A Nice, New Buick Aims For Middle Of The Road



Any time someone describes some portion of a car or a driving experience as being "nice," I want to either A) throttle them or B) run as fast and as far as I can from that vehicle. "Nice" is among the most insidious words in the English language – at best it's vague, and at worst, it conveys the exact opposite of its literal meaning. Yet it seems to be used with damnable frequency when it comes to verbally illustrating vehicles. "It looks really nice," or "These seats feel nice," or, heaven forefend, "It's got a nice ride," are all windy signifiers of absolutely nothing resembling a concrete opinion. "Nice" is the adjectival equivalent of meekly smiling and nodding your head.

Of course, I'm as guilty as the next person of having thrown English's least powerful descriptor around. There's even a chance that, rant aside, you'll catch me making nice in reviews to come. That's fine, but you should know that when you stumble upon such usage, past or future, that you've found a sentence in which I'm simply applying a bare minimum of effort to the task.

Right, let's talk about the newly updated 2014 Buick LaCrosse.
For better or for worse, Buick is a brand with a history of products that engender the use of the word "nice," with some frequency. On one hand, that's not the worst thing in the world; comfortable-riding, ably powered and generally well-kitted-out sedans like this new LaCrosse certainly don't do much to offend driver sensibilities. On the other hand, I struggle to find anything really superlative about it. Even within the nebulous sub-luxury, super-mainstream set that Buick competes in with Volvo, Acura, Lincoln and kinda/sorta Volkswagen and Chrysler, it's hard to pick just where the LaCrosse clearly excels.

2014 Buick LaCrosse side view2014 Buick LaCrosse front view2014 Buick LaCrosse rear view

Considering that the updates to the LaCrosse for the 2014 model year consist mostly of in-cabin refinements and appearance upgrades to the exterior, it's fair to say that Buick would like shoppers to focus first on looks and interior comfort. I haven't met a lot of modern Buick owners who rave about tuning potential or autocross times, so that's probably right on.

Buick would like shoppers to focus first on looks and interior comfort.

In terms of exterior appearances, Buick has done a solid job adding visual excitement to the LaCrosse without doing major surgery. The front three-quarters view of the LaCrosse should give you all the information you need to decide if the sedan is fetching or not; designers have doubled down on a larger, shinier grille that dominates the car's face. Headlights have grown in size to match the now-more-gaping chrome grille, too, and are bestowed with a downward rake that adds just a touch of menace. The car in our image gallery wears a set of 19-inch chrome alloy wheels that are one-up from the standard 18-inch rollers on V6-equipped cars, and one-below the 20-inchers that dominate the visage of the all-boxes-ticked front-wheel-drive LaCrosse. (All-wheel-drive cars can only fit 19-inch wheels.) On the backside, you'll find more chrome than on the outgoing model – a strip of the stuff runs the length of the rump now – and a light cluster-enlargement that matches the new headlights in front.

In short: If you liked the looks of the existing LaCrosse, but thought it lacked for chrome, this 2014 joint may just push you over the edge.

2014 Buick LaCrosse grille2014 Buick LaCrosse headlight2014 Buick LaCrosse wheel2014 Buick LaCrosse taillights

The helpful Buick team seemed excited to point out how many fewer buttons this LaCrosse has.

Bigger changes have been wrought inside the cabin of the car, where the helpful Buick team seemed excited to point out how many fewer buttons this LaCrosse has versus the 2013 car. And it is true that if you compare this photo with this one, you'll note almost immediately that the new car has streamlined physical buttons for both radio and climate controls. I'm sort of a button-agnostic, but I'll accept, for the sake of argument, that this is a positive development. Conversely, you'll also note that the button count on the steering wheel has jumped pretty dramatically, new versus old. The LaCrosse now offers an eight-inch digital display in the center of the instrument panel, and the available features for this display must be navigated via those cross-shaped rocker switches on either side of the wheel. Wait, are buttons on the wheel okay then?

I can't tell you if manipulating buttons on the steering wheel is harder or easier, or more or less distracting than fiddling with them on the center stack. I can say that calling either system "intuitive" based on a gut-level reaction to a test-drive is unscientific bullpucky. My full report, for now, is that I had no problem turning the radio on or off, or cranking up the AC on a hot day.

2014 Buick LaCrosse interior2014 Buick LaCrosse front seats2014 Buick LaCrosse rear seats

Buick will now sell you an "Ultra Luxury" interior package for $2,495.

The newly sleek LaCrosse cabin certainly presents a pretty substantial upgrade over the outgoing car. That center stack is dominated by a highly customizable IntelliLink touchscreen infotainment system, which I found a lot more pleasing to use and navigate than the display in the instrument cluster. Matte-chrome accents and a legitimately tasteful use of wood help to ornament a wall-to-wall soft-touch-and-leather cabin. Buick will now sell you an "Ultra Luxury" interior package as well, which includes a striking combination of deep red leather and black accents, as well as a suede-effect headliner. The top-line cabin also includes higher-grade leather on the seating surfaces, and runs $2,495. Considering that the standard leather interior feels pretty well stitched-together, I'd say the ultra-lux digs are probably overkill for the target LaCrosse customer, unless he or she is really looking for a way to splurge.

Perhaps overly satisfied with the environment they have wrought inside the '14 LaCrosse, company engineers have done their damnedest to insulate the driver from surrounding environment. On the positive side of the ledger, this means that in-cabin quiet is remarkable, and that it takes some of the worst frost-heaved back roads to upset the placid and steady ride quality on offer. I sampled both front-drive and all-wheel-drive LaCrosse flavors, and found each to be about equal in terms of straight-line stability and suspension performance over bad surfaces. I will add, however, that my sunny, dry and pretty undynamic drive route didn't offer up a lot of information about how well it grips and communicates during hard cornering situations. I'll guess that the AWD car has more stickum in a fast left-hander when you push it, but the fact of the matter is you'll never care to. In the snow, ice and rain, however, the all-wheels-driven system is doubtless the superior arrangement.

2014 Buick LaCrosse steering wheel controls2014 Buick LaCrosse gauges2014 Buick LaCrosse infotainment system2014 Buick LaCrosse shifter

Both engines are "standard" with Buick saying its customers should have a penalty free choice between performance or fuel economy.

The 3.6-liter V6 engine, now with 303 horsepower and 264 pound-feet of torque (that's up one horse from last year), offers plenty of power to move the 4,000-pound sedan smartly along. The larger of a two-engine lineup, with the 2.4-liter four-cylinder eAssist hybrid, the V6 doesn't add any cost to a buyer's bottom line. Both engines are "standard," with Buick saying its customers should have a penalty-free choice between performance or fuel economy.

The V6 car is quick enough, and if you floor the throttle, you'll even catch a hint of an exhaust note before the six-speed automatic transmission shifts up, but even its moderate thrust doesn't make the LaCrosse an exciting car to drive quickly. After pushing the puissant-yet-nose-heavy LaCrosse over a few of my pet test roads, I quickly settled into more of a sightseeing pace. The sedan isn't too soft or ponderous to drive hard, but the transmission logic seems programmed for maximum fuel economy, the steering is direct in action but devoid of feel, and I got roughly zero feedback about chassis movement via the seat of my pants, which simply sank deeper into the soft-yet-unbolstered leather chairs as the day wore on.

I was sadly unable to get a turn behind the wheel of the eAssist four-cylinder car, but my guess is that that milder powertrain is actually better matched to the laidback character of this LaCrosse in general. And, considering that the hybrid's fuel economy is substantially better than the thirsty V6 – 25 miles per gallon in the city and 36 on the highway for the eAssist car, versus 18/28 for the V6 – that powertrain adds a lot of credence to the kind of "sensible luxury" ethos the LaCrosse exudes.

2014 Buick LaCrosse engine

If ever there were a "nice" sedan to drive, this is it. Seriously though, thrown into contrast with the excellently differentiated products that will soon share the Buick showroom – Regal, Verano and Encore all build compelling cases in their respective niches – LaCrosse seems less competitive in its corner of the market.

Its most sensible competitive set comes from fully featured, mainstream large sedans.

Buick calls out cars like the Acura TL and the Lexus ES350 as being core competitors of the LaCrosse. And the Buick does fair pretty well against those two, as it's larger than the TL and a better value in terms of equipment than the Lexus, while being competitively priced with both. (Of course, the TL is a far more rewarding dynamic thing than the Buick, the Lexus has scads more brand prestige, and both are far better values when costs-to-own and depreciation are figured in...) But I actually think that the most sensible competitive set comes from fully featured, mainstream large sedans.

The Hyundai Azera, Toyota Avalon and General Motors' own Chevrolet Impala are all fresh faces in the big sedan world. All three offer roughly competitive V6 power, with the Toyota and the Hyundai winning the mpg-per-liter-of-displacement war pretty handily versus the GM products. The alternative trio is also in the same size and weight class as the LaCrosse, which is important in this segment that really seems to value elbowroom. But, of course, the Hyundai, Chevy and Toyota are all considerably cheaper than the Buick, with top-trim models asking about as much as a base model LaCrosse.

2014 Buick LaCrosse rear 3/4 view

The wide world has already spoken about the LaCrosse.

You can make similar arguments to the detriment of luxury brands versus mainstream brands everywhere you look, so what's my point? Typically, when you opt into an Audi, BMW or even a Volvo, you also believe you're buying into a brand that says something ineffable but positive about you as the driver. "This man is smart," or "This woman is attractive," or something along those lines. A subtle message is also sent by Buick-branded products to the wide world, but unfortunately the cultural value associated with the Tri-Shield badge is a lot less positive than it is with most luxury marques. The company's image is moving in the right direction, but it's going to take time to burn off the still significant stockpile of blue-hair jokes.

But who cares what I think. The wide world has already spoken about the LaCrosse; Buick has sold some 500,000 units of the thing since its re-introduction in 2009, and 57K in the US in 2012 alone. And it's true that just a few years ago, this was a needle-moving car for Buick, and a good one in that automotive landscape. But times have changed, and they don't seem particularly favorable to this LaCrosse refresh, despite the good track record Buick has compiled to date. It's an open question if this nice new sedan can keep up that pace.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 102 Comments
      mikeybyte1
      • 2 Years Ago
      Not bad for a mid-cycle refresh. To stay competitive they need to put the car on a diet as well as open up that greenhouse, which is very narrow. It is a sharp looking car and I am sure many will like it for the tomb like quiet ride it offers. Given that Chevy just came out with the Impala on the same platform I wonder how long this refresh will need to stay in place until a full redesign comes out. I agree with other posts that people are going to Buick as a step up from the mainstream attempts at luxury such as Avalon or Azera. Buick keeps edging closer and closer to that tweener near-lux car line it is trying to be.
      Mark
      • 1 Year Ago
      Why I chose the 2014 Buick LaCrosse: Superior performance compared to anything in it's class. Unprecedented combination of luxury and performance. Ultra quiet, roomy much quicker acceleration at highway speed to overtake vehicles when needed than Dodge or Ford, much quieter and luxurious than Toyota Avalon. Far superior vehicle
      Bill
      • 2 Years Ago
      The chrome wheels, back end and overall shape reminds me of the Equus... It may be the lighting but the plastic surrounding the center stack looks out of place.
      dukeisduke
      • 2 Years Ago
      I generally like the styling, but I can't tell much difference between the 2013 and 2014 model, besides a bigger grille. I did think the last LaCrosse was better-looking than the last ES.
        • 2 Years Ago
        @dukeisduke
        [blocked]
          ngiotta
          • 2 Years Ago
          The rear of the car looks much better. The rest is quite boring and the fender vents do nothing but break up what would otherwise be a pleasing side profile. On top of that, the interior is lackluster for something that is supposed to be competing in the luxury market. The dash on this car (like a lot of other GM models) is just way too cheap looking. The seating and door panels look nice though.
      daiggerm
      • 1 Year Ago
      So did they just pry those tail-lights off of a Hyundai Equus or...?
      • 2 Years Ago
      [blocked]
        • 2 Years Ago
        [blocked]
        hgeorgech
        • 2 Years Ago
        Laser continues to drive and adore his '86 Yugo
          • 2 Years Ago
          @hgeorgech
          [blocked]
          • 2 Years Ago
          @hgeorgech
          [blocked]
      SYJ
      • 2 Years Ago
      worthless review. Reviewer doesn't like Buicks or doesn't feel they have the brand equity of vaunted brands like Volvo and Acura so he shows no love for the car. He also apparently has no clue how much modern cars cost. He says that you can get top trim levels of competing full size cars for the same price as a base Lacrosse. First of all the top trim levels of cars like the 300, Avalon, Impala, etc. are in the mid to upper $30k range and all of those cars cost more than $42k fully loaded. They are barely cheaper than the Lacrosse and none of them are as nice inside. Its a waste of time for any reviewer to try and project his personal sense of brand value on others. We don't care. In his mind a Volvo, Acura (or any other import brand) is automatically worth a premium vs a Buick so he doesn't see the point in a $35k+ lacrosse. Others don't agree. Buick outsells Acura which indicates that more Americans prefer to put their entry level luxury money down on a lowly Buick than an Acura.
        • 2 Years Ago
        @SYJ
        Sorry in advance for not just addressing all of this in my earlier reply to you. (Seems like this LaCrosse review got you pretty worked up, sir!) So, personal values. I would never claim to not have bias, favorites, and strong feelings about cars and brands. I love cars, and I think that strong feelings, positive and negative, are par for the course. With that said, I can assure you that I really like some Buicks in the current lineup. Hell, even in this article I call three of them – Regal, Verano, and Encore – “compelling” cars. In particular I think that the non-turbo Verano is a standout product in an expanding niche. Unfortunately, those cars don’t do a lot to make this LaCrosse refresh any more competitive vs. the cars that play in the same market space. It also doesn’t stop the LaCrosse from being thousands of dollars more than cars that are as good, from Chevy, Hyundai, and Toyota. Also, just to put this out there, I would hardly refer to Acura and Volvo as “vaunted” brands. As for actual measured brand value, rather than personal opinion, I don’t know there’s a lot of data out there that I’ve seen just based on auto companies. A lot of the global brand ranking metrics include car companies, but smaller players like Buick, Acura, Lincoln, etc. don’t make the cut at all. We ran this piece a while back, which showed the only six car brands made the top 100, globally. Hardly scientific, but Motor Trend’s forums have a thread asking readers to rank all luxury brands on sale in the US, from top to bottom. With quite a few responses (I’m just browsing) Buick doesn’t fare particularly well, and established lux marques are almost always at the top. Food for thought, at any rate. -Seyth
          SYJ
          • 2 Years Ago
          Syeth: You said a lot but ignore the obvious- Buick outsells Volvo and Acura. Even though it doesnt directly compete with Audi and Infiniti, it outsells them as well. Brand studies aside, people are voting with their wallets. The fact that in 2013 you think Acura sits far above Buick in terms of reputation and product execution shows you are jaded, biased or both. As I said, in YOUR mind Buick can't hold a candle to a "great" brand like acura, but others in the media and the buying public beg to differ.
          NightFlight
          • 2 Years Ago
          @ SYJ "You said a lot but ignore the obvious- Buick outsells Volvo and Acura. Even though it doesnt directly compete with Audi and Infiniti, it outsells them as well. Brand studies aside, people are voting with their wallets." Buick has a far, FAR higher fleet ratio than any of the brands mentioned above with Acura close to 1%. So not all of those "customers" are voting with their wallets. Let me know how vehicles with a high fleet ratios residuals hold up. Don't forget that Buick also has historically high amounts of rebates and discounts. Your fanboy is starting to show.
          • 2 Years Ago
          MT link: http://forums.motortrend.com/70/9044675/the-general-forum/rank-all-luxury-car-brands-by-modern-prestige-perc/index.html
      Rochester
      • 2 Years Ago
      Cheap, unattractive and gaudy chrome wheels. Yep, that's a Buick.
      Black Dynamite
      • 2 Years Ago
      With the Toyota Avalon taking most of it's sales, and the new Chevy Impala impressing the media, is it too little, too late for LaCrosse?
        SYJ
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Black Dynamite
        no. You just worry about the avalon. Buick is not a volume brand like Chevy- the lacrosse will never rival the Impala in sales. Plus the base engine on the Impala is a 2.5L and the base Impala comes with far less kit than the base Lacrosse- hence the much lower price.
        car-a-holic
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Black Dynamite
        is that what your bosses scripted for you to type???
      INCREDIBLE BOB
      • 2 Years Ago
      Comparable to having Elton John review Korean hookers. The writer just does not like American-ish cars, but GM nearly committed suicide trying to make Japanese and German cars. This person understands the purpose of a Buick less than GWB understood Iraqis. However, somewhere in there, we sort of get that this is a good car for its intended audience.
      kontroll
      • 2 Years Ago
      well definitely better looking than the lexus ES or whatever with its cleft lip front
      • 2 Years Ago
      [blocked]
        Rochester
        • 2 Years Ago
        All of your posts have this identical, middle-school nonsense. You need a new schtick. Or you could just write like a normal person. That works, too.
        • 2 Years Ago
        [blocked]
    • Load More Comments