• Mar 7, 2013
Not including the women and men who built it, the 2014 Chevrolet SS has only been seen in person by a piddling number of people – fewer humans than would fill the gymnasium at a high school volleyball game. Not including the men and women who built it, no one has driven it. Even so, it is already saddled with two controversies: the way it looks and the way it shifts.

First to that shifting. Did we love the last Americanized Holden, the awesomely sportsome Pontiac G8 GXP, and its six-speed manual? Of course. Do we wish the SS came with a six-speed manual? Of course. But we'd like a toboggan to come with a manual transmission. We'd put a manual transmission on a weasel if we could because we're just wired that way; if it moves, it should come with a stick and a clutch. Or at least the option.

Let's climb down off the ledge, though. We haven't driven the SS and we have no idea how good (or not) the automatic is. And the Hobson's Choice in transmissions when it comes to sport sedans like the BMW M5, Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG and Jaguar XFR-S and, oh yeah, cars-that-really-should-have-manuals like the Nissan GT-R and Porsche 918 and every single Lamborghini and Ferrari, for instance, hasn't stopped us from enjoying what is clearly the gruesome, dual-clutched demise of Western automotive civilization. Because in spite of our ululations at the dying of the six-speed light, we understand.

All we're saying is sure, we're disappointed, but let's drive it first – then we'll find out if this is something more than a philosophical tragedy. When we asked what were the chances of a manual we were thrown the bones of "it's a possibility down the line," and that's all we need to go to Optimism Level: Lloyd.

To that other, bigger controversy: the way it looks – it seems many of you were expecting more, or at least more different. However, as far back as 2009 it was acknowledged that the VF Holden Commodore would be an overhaul of the VE series, and mainly under the skin at that. There was neither the money nor the business case to create a brand new car. If there is an issue with the looks of the SS, it's our opinion that we might have discovered 90 percent of the cure in the sedan's trunk.
Ever since it became clear that Pontiac had a permanent dinner date with Hades, people began suggesting – strongly – that General Motors keep the G8 coming but as a Chevrolet. Now that it's here – true, five years has passed – there's a vocal group saying, "Well, that's not exactly what we meant." Here is the 2009 Pontiac G8 GXP:



A 2012 Holden Commodore SSV – essentially still the VE Commodore first introduced in 2006 and upon which the G8 was based:



And the 2014 Chevrolet SS:



It's clear that designers also incorporated details from the Holden Special Vehicles GTS into the new 2014 Commodore SS and Chevrolet SS:



Looks are subjective and we're not trying to change anyone's minds, but there is your evolution. Make of it what you will. What do we think? It's certainly subtle, and we do think the rear end has too much Malibu, but we're fine with the looks. It wasn't the design that surprised us, though, it was the way we couldn't tell if the exterior of the SS is really a junkie for chrome or if it's merely the silver hue of the reveal car that's playing tricks on us. Before any more sinister judgment, we'd like to spend some personal time with a sedan in a dark color. Even with that, though, we think those chrome-plated door handles need to go. Aspirational mid-sizers and pickup trucks get shiny handles; once you've made it, you're supposed to be beyond those kinds of shiny flourishes. We would not complain if Chevrolet added a chrome delete to the two other options on the SS purchase sheet – sunroof and color.




It was when lead engineer for the SS, Dave Leone, showed us the full-sized spare in the trunk that we thought "This could get a lot better." Instead of a chromed 19-incher there was an alloy wheel in flat black. Evidence would also indicate a very different personality for the car when in another car: this Commodore SSV – without shiny handles – looks the business.



There will be plenty of time to resolve that issue. It is under that bright skin where the deepest allure of the SS is said to reside. The G8 GXP was momentous because it was a blistering drive that could fit five people. With five years of engineering progress, the drive part of the SS equation should be as safe as betting on the sunrise.

We don't have all of the numbers yet, but the ones we do have at least point the way to goodness. Lead engineer Leone said the VF Commodore has lost almost 95 pounds (43 kilograms) compared to the VE, the lightening a part of General Motors' Efficient Fundamentals initiative. Beyond the aluminum hood and decklid, other parts made of the lighter-than-steel material include items like the instrument panel structure and lower control arms. "You make a car lighter and it does everything better," he said. Hear, hear.

Losing weight on those upper panels has lowered the center of gravity and there's a near 50/50 weight distribution. The staggered 19-inch wheels (the rear track is wider than the front) ride on – and will be sold on – Bridgestone Potenzas, the front tires being the same spec as those on the Ferrari California, the rear tires the same as those specced on the Aston Martin DB9. Put it all together and Leone says the SS can achieve a maximum lateral acceleration of 0.9 Gs. This definitely nothing like last rear-drive performance sedan Chevrolet made: the late-nineties Impala SS.



We were told the handling of the Commodore and the SS are "very close" – the exact phrase we got regarding the SS was "It's tuned for the Chevrolet brand," made no more clear with "It's dynamic but relaxed as an everyday driver." The buyoff rides for its handling were done in the US, but since "the Chevrolet brand" includes the Spark on one end and the Corvette ZR1 on the other, we'll wait for seat time to figure out what that means for a halo sedan. And it might not make a difference to the Aussies in the crowd, but Leone also said the Commodore will have "a little less power" than the square 415 horsepower and pound-feet of torque that we'll enjoy.

Where does it fit? Without a price we'll wait to see which crowd Chevrolet wants to attack, but when you're talking about full-sized hi-po rear-wheel drive performance sedans you're pretty much talking about the SRT versions of Chrysler and Dodge sedans and a couple of Germans – and now that the Mercedes-Benz E63 AMG has gone 4Matic, perhaps that's just one German. The Taurus SHO is all-wheel drive and we omitted the Cadillac CTS-V because we were told more than once about the SS, "It's not a CTS-V."

The Charger SRT starts at $45,990, the 300 SRT at $49,990 (after $995 destination charges on both) and both sedans output a square 470 hp and lb-ft; 55 hp and lb-ft more than the SS. Leone said the SS is "about 315 pounds lighter than the Dodge" – the Charger SRT coming in at 4,365 pounds – the SS is still being quoted as having a 0-60 mile per hour time of "about five seconds," the SRT options have both broken into the low-to-mid four-second mark. The 400-hp BMW 550i takes five seconds to get to 60 mph and starts above $62,000, the 560-hp BMW M5 posts the same sprint times, but it starts on the far side of $90,000. A discussion of cross-shopping would be purely theoretical, but Leone's take was, "For BMW buyers, this might be a better place to spend their money."




Chevrolet is perhaps most proud of what the SS driver will experience in everyday use of the car, calling it "the perfect mix of refinement, sophistication and technology." The cross-stitched, cut-and-sew materials on the instrument panel are properly padded. There's a seven-inch touchscreen displays a MyLink system that just won a Best of CES award in the car category at this year's Consumer Electronics Show, and a full-color heads up display. The advanced park system, showing up for the first time on any Chevrolet, will parallel and reverse park at the push of a button. The rear cross traffic alert monitors oncoming vehicles up to 66 feet on either side of the SS. The front sport seats are supportive everywhere and still comfortable, and we had plenty of room in back with the front seats set to our driving position. The illuminated readouts inside the HVAC dials look properly luxurious. Said Leone of the technology and materials refinement in the SS, "We never had that kind of sophistication before."



We agree, and after one short evening of being able to crawl around in it, we found nothing inside to complain about. We hope to say the same about the entire car after we drive it.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 313 Comments
      NTex07
      • 1 Year Ago
      I'm going to guess that Leone meant .9 g unless this also comes with an anti-g-suit.
      Rochester
      • 1 Year Ago
      So much wasted opportunity. So much Chevy.
      jcbeckman
      • 1 Year Ago
      The auto trans on my G8 is the worst part of the car. It's terrible (no GXP available when I bought my GT). The car is a great drive marred only by the awful tranny. So not offering a manual means I'll just hang onto the Pontiac. It's getting up there in milage (I've taken it cross-country several times - a great cross-country cruiser). The new gizmos in the interior sound nice, but I'm not buying another GM automatic.
      Merk
      • 1 Year Ago
      /What I find so amazing is how passionate the readers of auto-blog are about Chevy and the resurrection of the SS. What's also clear from the comments is the overwhelming negative/disappointment remarks about the styling, the Chevy bow tie, chrome accents and lack of manual transmission. Maybe Mark Reus can tweak this "4 door Halo Car". Not my words, his, prior to shipping it to the States........This audience wants to be WOWED so badly and are disappointed instead.
        Teleny411
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Merk
        It's a shame too. The bones are there with this car... It's just a few tweaks/modifications away from being a home run.
      Bavarian818
      • 1 Year Ago
      A "Philosophical tragedy" - Are you serious???!!!... What a blatantly biased story... Trust me when I say I am a complete fan of the European car culture... However, I am really pulling for the "Big 3", and this is a HUGE step in the right direction for we everyday normal Americans with average incomes!!!! I am already a fan of the SS, a "Philosophical Triumph!!!"
        INCREDIBLE BOB
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Bavarian818
        It's only a triumph if it sells, or pulls enough interest in Chevy to push out more Malibus
      Kahz
      • 1 Year Ago
      Not a fan of the design
      Dreez28
      • 1 Year Ago
      I think people expecting this car to be an aggressive racer have the wrong idea. This will be an excellent dad car. Family friendly, comfortable, reliable, safe, and in no way shape or form the talk of the nieghborhood. Fast, but not stupid fast. Sporty, but not rough. Good looking, but not really a head turner. To me, this is as Euro inspired in the design department as anything I\'ve seen from Chevrolet lately. I would like it to be more young adult, sporty, agressive as well, because that is what I want in a car. But I probably can\'t afford this car anyway, so it\'s not really meant for me. Like I said, Dads car, and I think it will do best as that kind of car. If you wan\'t something sportier with a manual, get a Camaro.
        Ron
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Dreez28
        I am a middle aged Dad, and I find this thing boring to look at, and would not even dream of buying it without a manual or DCT transmission option, nor would I buy it if rides like a old caddy. The suspension needs to be more Corvette/BMW than 1980'scaddy. The exterior styling is more "great great grandpa's buick" than it is middle aged dad.... So I disagree, this is more "Grandpa" than it is "Dad"
        Matt
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Dreez28
        "4 door Corvette" "high performance sedan" "halo model" All GM's words. A dad car would be none of those; a Taurus, an Impala, etc would be a dad car.
        Ron
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Dreez28
        Also I disagree with the "Get a Camaro" line, Camaro's are hideous inside and out, and they are certified land barges; if the Camaro is your sporty benchmark, then we have very different definitions of what sporty is.
      JonathanBond
      • 1 Year Ago
      I like the Pontiac G8 better. This doesn't have a wow factor. And what's up with the Price? I'd rather get an SRT8 Charger for that price. I hope Chevy can back these claims up. I'm not too impressed right now
      Greg
      • 1 Year Ago
      Ford should bring over the Australian Falcon to go head to head with this car.
        Zoom
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Greg
        Head to head in what? Long number of days sitting on dealers lots?
      Stomp and steer
      • 1 Year Ago
      Face it this is for a MATURE client. Not the kids who need all the crap on it to look like some boy racers car. I don't think they had you kids in mind when the were designing this car.
      ragtopdodge
      • 1 Year Ago
      A lot of bellyaching going on here. Sure, it's a rehashed G8/Commodore, but it's better than the current Impala! If they can keep this car fully loaded for less than $40k, they got a winner. No manual? Neither does the SHO or SRT cars. Very very few people buy a four-door sports sedan with a manual. Of course, that would be my only choice and would have to get a used CTS-V to fit the bill. Sure it's not groundbreaking in design, but it's not offensive either. The chrome is to class it up and not be too boy racer I guess. Folks 45-65 will be buying this car, so that's what they want.
        Nick B
        • 1 Year Ago
        @ragtopdodge
        The SRT Challenger doesnt come in a 6 speed? Thats news to me.......
        Ron
        • 1 Year Ago
        @ragtopdodge
        as a member of your "target age", I say bullshit. The car is boring, looks like a 90's throw back; it is 40k and no current tech, no LCD gauges, no color HUD, no modern infotainment system, no integrated performance gauges, no DCT, no manual transmission... It is a miss on just about every level. At 40k, there are lots of better options.
          Michael Lofties
          • 1 Year Ago
          @Ron
          Ron, you do realize that pretty much majority of what you just said this car does not have it actually has. Maybe you should do your research before you go making assumptions? #ImJustSaying
          Daniel D
          • 1 Year Ago
          @Ron
          Wow Ron. Why not just say I have an opinion and I have no intention of clouding it with the facts.
      Anthony Evelyn
      • 1 Year Ago
      For those who are pissed about the C7 Corvette... well here is your 4 door power sedan. Seriously the only problem i have with this new Chevy "SS" is the name. I still think they should have called it Chevelle. The styling? Well its on the conservative side and it has grown on me. Cant wait to see final specs and power numbers.
    • Load More Comments