It's expected that Mercedes, like any automaker, aspires to be number one. But we've found a case where being at the top of the list is unlikely to be something of which Daimler is going to boast. That's because we're talking about the automaker most likely to cheat the European fuel economy tests.
According to Transport And Environment, Mercedes is simply the worst when it comes to finding every little way to manipulate the tests, which then produce "official fuel economy figures in the labs that cannot be replicated in the real world." Of course, T&E itself calls the test "obsolete," so it seems like there's enough blame to be spread around for the 31-percent gap (on average) between real-world fuel economy and what the automakers claim their cars get on the open road. That costs a typical driver in Europe an extra 500 euros ($620) per year in fuel costs they wouldn't have had to pay if the advertised numbers were accurate.
How do automakers cheat? Well, they start with "specially prepared prototype vehicles" and then pay the testing services to get the results optimized. T&E claims that "modern engine management systems are even able to detect when a test is being carried out to deliver better fuel-efficiency results – a technique known as 'cycle beating' that was first used to cheat tests for air pollution." The automakers also use tricks like applying tape to cracks around doors and overinflating tires. We've asked Mercedes for a comment on all of this, but have yet to get a response.
Thankfully, future numbers could be more realistic. The World Light Vehicle Test Procedure (WLTP) should be in place by 2017, if all of the EU countries agree. Of course, says T&E, the automakers are pushing to have the implementation delayed to 2022. You can read more below.
Mercedes ranks No 1 in Europe's list of fuel economy cheaters – report
Submitted on November 5, 2014 - 17:23
If your new Mercedes car swallows 40% more fuel than the brochure promised, it's not due to your heavy-footed driving. Rather it's because Mercedes are the current leaders at manipulating the way vehicles are tested, producing official fuel economy figures in the labs that cannot be replicated in the real world.
That's the findings of Transport & Environment's (T&E) 2014 Mind the Gap report, which analyses real-world fuel consumption by motorists that highlights the abuses by carmakers of the current tests and the failure of EU regulators to close loopholes.
On average, across all car brands, the gap between real-world fuel consumption and carmakers' claims has widened from 8% in 2001 to a staggering 31% in 2013 for private motorists; the gap for company car drivers averages a whopping 43%. The additional fuel burned compared to official test results costs a typical driver €500 a year.
Half of the official fuel efficiency gains made since EU laws were adopted in 2008 are hot air. For Opel/Vauxhall cars, made by General Motors, less than 20% of the measured improvement in the past five years has actually been delivered on the road.
The obsolete test is unrepresentative of modern cars and driving styles and is full of loopholes that carmakers exploit to produce better test results [1]. Carmakers produce specially prepared prototype vehicles for the test and pay testing services that help to optimise the results. Modern engine management systems are even able to detect when a test is being carried out to deliver better fuel-efficiency results – a technique known as 'cycle beating' that was first used to cheat tests for air pollution.
A new, more realistic and robust global test, the WLTP [2], is scheduled to be introduced in 2017, but EU countries are dithering in confirming the date – under pressure from carmakers that want to be able to keep exploiting the loopholes in the current test rules until at least 2022.
Greg Archer, T&E clean vehicles manager, said: "The gap between real-world fuel economy and distorted official test results has become a chasm. The current test has been utterly discredited by carmakers manipulating official test results. Unless Europe introduces the new global test in 2017 as planned, carmakers will continue to cheat laws designed to improve fuel efficiency and emissions reductions. The cost will be borne by drivers who will pay an additional €5,600 for fuel over the lifetime of the car compared to the official test result."
The growing gap between test and real-world performance is also damaging EU growth and climate goals. T&E forecasts that without the new test the average gap will grow to more than 50% by 2020. The cumulative additional cost of fuel that motorists will be required to buy as a result of test manipulation will amount to nearly a trillion euros in 2030. This is oil the EU must import, much of it from Russia, damaging balance of payments and lowering growth as money flows out of the EU economy. The cumulative additional CO₂ emissions are estimated to be about 1.5 billion tonnes, increasing the risk of dangerous climate change.
US authorities have been far more effective in identifying carmakers unfairly distorting tests. Hyundai and Ford have been required to reimburse customers for incorrect fuel economy figures while Mercedes and BMW-Mini have also been recently caught and are awaiting sanctions to be imposed. Checks on production cars by the independent US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have identified the anomalies, unlike the totally ineffective system in Europe.
"The US has shown how to provide accurate consumer information and limit the abuse of official tests by carmakers through effective market surveillance by an independent regulator. In contrast, the EU system allows carmakers to pay testing authorities to test prototypes in their own laboratories using an obsolete test. The results are distorted fuel economy figures, more climate-changing emissions and air pollution. If the new European Commission doesn't strengthen the system of car testing, the only place cars will be less polluting is in the laboratory," Greg Archer concluded.
Cars are responsible for 15% of Europe's total CO2 emissions and are the single largest source of emissions in the transport sector. The EU's first obligatory rules on carbon emissions require car manufacturers to limit their average car to a maximum of 130 grams of CO2 per km by 2015, and 95g by 2021.
Notes to editors:
[1] According to the 2013 edition of Mind the Gap! there are about 20 ways carmakers 'creatively reinterpret' test procedures to produce better fuel consumption and CO2 emissions figures (CO2 emissions are directly linked to fuel burned). Among the techniques used are:
taping over cracks around doors and grilles;
overinflating the tyres;
adjusting the wheel alignment and brakes;
using special super-lubricants;
minimising the weight of the vehicle;
testing at altitude, at unrealistically high temperatures and on super-slick test tracks.
[2] Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure
Submitted on November 5, 2014 - 17:23
If your new Mercedes car swallows 40% more fuel than the brochure promised, it's not due to your heavy-footed driving. Rather it's because Mercedes are the current leaders at manipulating the way vehicles are tested, producing official fuel economy figures in the labs that cannot be replicated in the real world.
That's the findings of Transport & Environment's (T&E) 2014 Mind the Gap report, which analyses real-world fuel consumption by motorists that highlights the abuses by carmakers of the current tests and the failure of EU regulators to close loopholes.
On average, across all car brands, the gap between real-world fuel consumption and carmakers' claims has widened from 8% in 2001 to a staggering 31% in 2013 for private motorists; the gap for company car drivers averages a whopping 43%. The additional fuel burned compared to official test results costs a typical driver €500 a year.
Half of the official fuel efficiency gains made since EU laws were adopted in 2008 are hot air. For Opel/Vauxhall cars, made by General Motors, less than 20% of the measured improvement in the past five years has actually been delivered on the road.
The obsolete test is unrepresentative of modern cars and driving styles and is full of loopholes that carmakers exploit to produce better test results [1]. Carmakers produce specially prepared prototype vehicles for the test and pay testing services that help to optimise the results. Modern engine management systems are even able to detect when a test is being carried out to deliver better fuel-efficiency results – a technique known as 'cycle beating' that was first used to cheat tests for air pollution.
A new, more realistic and robust global test, the WLTP [2], is scheduled to be introduced in 2017, but EU countries are dithering in confirming the date – under pressure from carmakers that want to be able to keep exploiting the loopholes in the current test rules until at least 2022.
Greg Archer, T&E clean vehicles manager, said: "The gap between real-world fuel economy and distorted official test results has become a chasm. The current test has been utterly discredited by carmakers manipulating official test results. Unless Europe introduces the new global test in 2017 as planned, carmakers will continue to cheat laws designed to improve fuel efficiency and emissions reductions. The cost will be borne by drivers who will pay an additional €5,600 for fuel over the lifetime of the car compared to the official test result."
The growing gap between test and real-world performance is also damaging EU growth and climate goals. T&E forecasts that without the new test the average gap will grow to more than 50% by 2020. The cumulative additional cost of fuel that motorists will be required to buy as a result of test manipulation will amount to nearly a trillion euros in 2030. This is oil the EU must import, much of it from Russia, damaging balance of payments and lowering growth as money flows out of the EU economy. The cumulative additional CO₂ emissions are estimated to be about 1.5 billion tonnes, increasing the risk of dangerous climate change.
US authorities have been far more effective in identifying carmakers unfairly distorting tests. Hyundai and Ford have been required to reimburse customers for incorrect fuel economy figures while Mercedes and BMW-Mini have also been recently caught and are awaiting sanctions to be imposed. Checks on production cars by the independent US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have identified the anomalies, unlike the totally ineffective system in Europe.
"The US has shown how to provide accurate consumer information and limit the abuse of official tests by carmakers through effective market surveillance by an independent regulator. In contrast, the EU system allows carmakers to pay testing authorities to test prototypes in their own laboratories using an obsolete test. The results are distorted fuel economy figures, more climate-changing emissions and air pollution. If the new European Commission doesn't strengthen the system of car testing, the only place cars will be less polluting is in the laboratory," Greg Archer concluded.
Cars are responsible for 15% of Europe's total CO2 emissions and are the single largest source of emissions in the transport sector. The EU's first obligatory rules on carbon emissions require car manufacturers to limit their average car to a maximum of 130 grams of CO2 per km by 2015, and 95g by 2021.
Notes to editors:
[1] According to the 2013 edition of Mind the Gap! there are about 20 ways carmakers 'creatively reinterpret' test procedures to produce better fuel consumption and CO2 emissions figures (CO2 emissions are directly linked to fuel burned). Among the techniques used are:
taping over cracks around doors and grilles;
overinflating the tyres;
adjusting the wheel alignment and brakes;
using special super-lubricants;
minimising the weight of the vehicle;
testing at altitude, at unrealistically high temperatures and on super-slick test tracks.
[2] Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Procedure
Sign in to post
Please sign in to leave a comment.
Continue