Vital Stats

Engine:
Turbo 2.0L I4
Power:
256 HP / 243 LB-FT
Transmission:
6-Speed Manual
0-60 Time:
5.6 Seconds
Drivetrain:
All-Wheel Drive
Curb Weight:
3,325 LBS
Seating:
2+3
Cargo:
14.8 CU-FT
MPG:
19 City / 27 HWY
Boiled Down, But Still Delectable



It is nearly impossible to avoid reminiscing about the 1983 Volkswagen GTI while driving the 2012 Volkswagen Golf R. As you may recall, "the original hot hatch" arrived on our shores seemingly eons ago with a naturally aspirated 1.8-liter four spitting out just 90 horsepower. While hardly brawny, even in an era of wheezy outputs (the 1983 Mustang GT 5.0 generated just 175 horsepower), its low curb weight of 2,100 pounds and a base price of $7,995 made the range-topping Rabbit not only light, tossable and reasonably quick, but very affordable.

Fast forward nearly three decades to the 2012 Volkswagen Golf R, a direct descendant of that first-generation GTI. Thoroughly modernized, and riding on a sixth-generation chassis, the new two- or four-door range-topping Golf boasts a bit more displacement and gobs more horsepower. But that is not all today's hot hatch has gained. With innovation and refinement come mass and cost – both of which have risen dramatically over the past three decades.

After falling head-over-heels for the 2012 Golf R after our first drive of the Euro-spec model in Switzerland last spring, it was time to put one in our garage for a longer run on domestic soil. With an eager and open mind, we welcomed the Golf R into our lives for a week. While we didn't have a chance to toss it around a closed racing circuit, we did put in several hundred miles on the highway, wrung it out on Mulholland and frolicked in wet Southern California mountain snow. In the process, we not only learned plenty about Volkswagen's hot hatch, but we met several other Golf R drivers who were more than willing to talk to us about their own experiences.
2012 Volkswagen Golf R side view2012 Volkswagen Golf R front view2012 Volkswagen Golf R rear view

Buyers in the United States have to make a few concessions. Unlike the Euro-spec Golf R, configured with to-die-for sport bucket seats, electronically adjustable suspension, Volkswagen's DSG dual-clutch automatic gearbox and a choice of tires, the U.S.-spec Golf R arrives with standard GTI-issue front seats, fixed sport dampers, a six-speed manual gearbox and all-season rubber. There is also a slight power change, as the U.S.-spec model loses a bit of horsepower and torque in the translation.

But focusing on what we don't get is the wrong approach, as the U.S.-spec Golf R is still one talented package.

Under the hood is Volkswagen's turbocharged 2.0-liter four-cylinder (EA113), tuned to develop 256 horsepower and 243 pound-feet of torque. Specially modified for use in the R, the direct-injected engine with a belt-driven camshaft features a reinforced iron cylinder block, stronger connecting rods and a Borg-Warner K04 turbocharger pumping out 17 psi of boost (while the displacement is the same, the standard GTI is actually fitted with a different four-cylinder engine: VW's EA888 with a chain-driven camshaft).

2012 Volkswagen Golf R

As mentioned, the standard gearbox on our shores is a close-ratio, short-throw six-speed manual transmission with magnesium selector housing. Power is sent to all four wheels through Volkswagen's 4Motion all-wheel drive, a Haldex-based system that uses clutch packs to vary torque sent to the rear wheels based on available traction – 100 percent of the torque is sent to the front wheels when grip is good, but up to 100 percent of the torque can be directed to the rear wheels when slippage is noted.

The Golf R's fixed dampers are uniquely calibrated and stiffer than those fitted to the GTI. The brakes are also upgraded, with 13.6-inch ventilated discs up front and 12.2-inch ventilated discs in the rear. Single-piston sliding calipers are standard on all corners. Wheels are 18-inch alloys, wearing all-season 225/40R18 rubber as standard equipment (the wheel and tire size are the same as the GTI).

Other enhancements to the Golf R over its GTI counterpart are mostly cosmetic. In addition to unique bodywork, upgrades include a slew of "R" badging, a sporty flat-bottom steering wheel, blue needles on the instruments, aluminum pedals, aluminum trim and an "R" shifter.

2012 Volkswagen Golf R headlight2012 Volkswagen Golf R wheel2012 Volkswagen Golf R taillight2012 Volkswagen Golf R tailpipes

The two-door base price of $33,990 includes dual-zone climate control, bi-xenon headlights, leather upholstery and full power accessories. The four-door starts at $36,090, but it includes all of the aforementioned equipment plus a power tilt/sliding sunroof, keyless entry/ignition, Dynaudio premium sound and Volkswagen's RNS 315 touchscreen navigation system. Equip the two-door like the four-door and it starts at $35,490. The only options in the States are dealer-installed accessories such as floor mats or a first aid kit.

Our first domestic taste of the 2012 Golf R involved driving it from the Bay Area to the Los Angeles Basin, a long trip of about 400 miles down California's Interstate 5. The monotonous strip of speed-enforced concrete was hardly the R's natural habitat. While we liked the sport seats, the stiffly sprung suspension shook our sodas to a froth and encouraged us to take rest breaks every hour or so. The engine, tuned for performance, delivered about 26 miles per gallon overall according to the onboard computer. At first glance, that number seemed a bit low for a late-model direct-injected 2.0-liter – the 2012 GTI is rated 21 city/31 highway – but it aligned well when compared against the EPA's official estimates of 19 city and 27 highway. For once, the slower traffic-choked freeways of Los Angeles couldn't come soon enough.

2012 Volkswagen Golf R interior2012 Volkswagen Golf R front seats2012 Volkswagen Golf R shifter2012 Volkswagen Golf R sill plate

If road trips are its failing, then carving canyons are the Golf R's success. An hour of blasting around corners in second and third gear, while thick on turbocharged boost, left us smiling and giddy. It is easy to drive fast and very predictable at the limit. Unlike many high-performance vehicles that are tuned to feel light and agile, the Golf R drives with a heavier and more deliberate step – much like a BMW 3 Series. Yet regardless of its all-wheel-drive configuration, the nose-heavy Volkswagen still exhibits front-wheel-drive mannerisms. In fact, driven at moderate speeds, the Golf R behaves much like the overweight GTI that it is.

The less constraining suburbs allowed the Golf R's true personality to emerge. Zipping around town was joyful. We applauded the slick manual gearbox and praised all-wheel drive as it completely eliminated the GTI's Achilles heel – front-wheel-drive burnouts. After a bit of annoying turbo lag, the boosted inline-four comes to life with a determined vengeance. It's a solid powerplant, one that we enjoyed in the Audi TTS, yet burdened with the additional mass of the Golf R – Volkswagen uses steel where Audi utilizes more costly aluminum – gearing is short, maybe too short, and a couple shifts are required before the 60-mph benchmark is hit. This likely explains its rather lackluster performance numbers. While Volkswagen doesn't release acceleration figures, those who test for numbers are finding the R accelerates to 60 mph in about 5.8 seconds.

Out of curiosity, we chased one of Southern California's winter storms into the mountains above Ojai. The rain that drenched the Los Angeles basin at sea level had fallen as wet snow at 5,000 feet of elevation. Ignoring the 'Chains Required' signs, we confidently soldiered into the Los Padres National Forest with the turbocharged, all-wheel-drive Golf R.

if(typeof AOLVP_cfg==='undefined')AOLVP_cfg=[];AOLVP_cfg.push({id:'AOLVP_us_1630387463001','codever':0.1,'autoload':false,'autoplay':false,'playerid':'61371447001','videoid':'1630387463001','stillurl':'http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/05/shortcutvw-golf-r.jpg','publisherid':1612833736,'width':628,'height':354,'videotitle':'Autoblog Short Cuts: 2012 Volkswagen Golf R','bgcolor':''});

The all-season tires we cursed the day before had now become our allies, as their full-depth tread and cross-cut sipes bit and held the snow with impressive tenacity. With temperatures hovering at freezing, and two inches of white stuff covering the road, Volkswagen's AWD system was at home. From the driver's seat, it was difficult to tell when the front tires were losing grip and power was being transferred rearward.

Determined to challenge the all-wheel-drive system further, we found a large unpaved turnout where a couple inches of fresh snow hid a very slippery layer of mud and dirt. It was the opportune time to reenact our childhood rally car dreams and powerslide the Volkswagen around, kicking up rooster tails of sticky ice-encrusted mud. It didn't even come close to getting stuck. In fact, the Golf R's only demerit seemed to be its low ground clearance. While we didn't realize it at the time, our childish antics had packed both front wheels with enough muddy ice to throw the 18-inch alloys off balance – a messy situation that sidelined us for fifteen minutes of cleaning during on our trek back down the mountain.

2012 Volkswagen Golf R brake caliper2012 Volkswagen Golf R badge2012 Volkswagen Golf R badge

Golf R owners are a passionate bunch, and we crossed paths with several during our time with the VW. It gave us the opportunity to ask them a few questions for some frank feedback.

According to its press release, Volkswagen believes that the BMW 128i, Mini Cooper S JCW, Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution and Subaru Impreza WRX STI are the Golf R's main competitors. We ran that question by some of the owners to see what they considered before buying the Golf R. Heather Hoyt, upgrading from a late-model GTI (and former owner of a 2008 WRX STI) considered an Evo, but it was lacking the hatchback she needed. "The only one I seriously considered was another WRX STI because it was the only other car that met all of my criteria: I need four doors (kids), I need a hatchback (bikes), I need it to go fast (I unfortunately support local law enforcement), and I need AWD (burnouts suck)," noted Heather. Kalen Maxwell owned a 2008 BMW 135i and a 2010 VW GTI before taking delivery of his Golf R. He considers it "the best driver's car that can be had for under $40,000." Jason Kehrli, who came out of a 1998 BMW 323is, was drawn in by the R's standard AWD. "I wasn't quite sold on the GTI because of my concern with how satisfied a FWD car would keep me as a driver. I also wanted something special, something that not everyone had," Jason told us.

2012 Volkswagen Golf R rear 3/4 view

Unlike most of its aforementioned competitors, we never felt like the Golf R was only about performance – it is, after all, only mid-pack when compared to its adversaries. Instead, it is a well-balanced package that stands out in its segment. The owners seemed to agree. "I loved my GTI as it had just the right amount of cool features," said Heather. "The only things I didn't like were that it was front-wheel drive, and it was a little slow. The Golf R addressed both of those issues and kept all the interesting features, even adding some new ones." Kalen also appreciated the performance, but was ultimately sold by the upscale cabin. "I love that the interior has quality, purpose and style – it outclasses anything with this level of performance in this price range," he explained. "What I like most about the Golf R is that it feels special. It doesn't look or feel like every other car out there, especially in the hot hatch segment," added Jason.

Of course, even current Golf R owners had a wish list of things they would like changed. Both Kalen and Jason shared our complaints about the lousy location of the AUX audio port (it gets in the way of shifting the manual gearbox) and we heard gripes about the short gear ratios and slight turbo lag. The most vocal was Heather, who said it was "mind boggling" that summer rubber was not an option. She also wished that "there was more of a nod to the Golf R's predecessor, the R32... such as the blue-painted calipers." We agree.

Yes, it is a frustrating shame that we don't get the racing seats, additional horsepower and transmission choices here in the States, but none of those omissions altered our feelings about the Golf R. In the big picture, this range-topping sporty hatchback is nothing but a thrill to drive. Look past its small performance deficiencies, swallow the discomforting sticker price and write the fat check. You will thank us later.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 437 Comments
      DJ Noble @ Norden
      • 2 Years Ago
      As much as the 2.0T helps the R's driving dynamics over the R32, I prefer the growl of the old 3.2L VR6!
        AcidTonic
        • 2 Years Ago
        @DJ Noble @ Norden
        You like how it's hard to mod too since it lacks FI?
          David Donovan
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          Reading > you. With every new post of yours everybody just gets to see how stupid you really are.
          David Donovan
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          The 3.2 VR6 isn't hard to mod. The mod's won't net you the same power increase as an FI car though
          AcidTonic
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          Really? So I could do like I did on my Evo Ix and get 70whp for $350? Bought the car already with full exhaust (would have been $550) Paid $50 for a used manual boost controller. $120 for a tactrix cable. $30 for Evoscan logging software. tuned it myself. Went from 290 at the motor to 302 at the wheels. Cheapest car to mod I've ever found. So you're saying a non-turbo V6 takes just as well to mods? Yeah right!
          AcidTonic
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          In case you don't understand motor vs wheel horsepower. A stock Evo dynos about 230whp. That's a 70whp gain to hit 300 wheel.
          AcidTonic
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          It's actually well known that forced induction cars are cheaper to mod than naturally aspirated cars.... Not sure how that shows that I'm dumb.... but whatever :)
          DJ Noble @ Norden
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          I'm just commenting on the sound. I'm familiar with modding turbo engines - my GTI has about 300hp. Doesn't change the fact that the VR6 sounds intoxicating!
          David Donovan
          • 2 Years Ago
          @AcidTonic
          "It's actually well known that forced induction cars are cheaper to mod than naturally aspirated cars.... Not sure how that shows that I'm dumb.... but whatever :)" http://gifsforum.com/images/gif/nevermind/grand/nevermind-eccbc87e4b5ce2fe28308fd9f2a7baf3-214.gif
      dohc73
      • 2 Years Ago
      Lame-ass video. As usual.
      Evan
      • 2 Years Ago
      I think it's a nice overall package... aesthetically, I like the simplified interior color scheme (vs. GTI). But why don't we get the boss LED taillights like the Euro version?? As for the hefty weight--I think there's virtue in waiting for the MQB platform Mk7. And here's hoping that update has greater stylistic appeal.
        Dayv
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Evan
        From what I've heard, the LED tails don't pass DOT regulations.
        foxtrot685
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Evan
        The LED tail lights are probably "too expensive" to bring over so to cost cut, we get the standard bulb version. Honestly, I'm a little shocked that HID's are standard, i thought for sure those would be in some sort of package in the US version.
      John
      • 2 Years Ago
      To all those bashing this car for being overpriced and suggesting that an STI/EVO will destroy this for comparable money, you're technically right. However, the interior refinement you dismiss is exactly the reason why I am attracted to this car. I have looked at EVOs/STIs extensively and, frankly, cant live with that interior long term. I appreciate that I'm sacrificing the marginal performance increase for the marginal interior quality increase in considering the GOLF R, but to me, who will probably never utilize the marginal performance increase offered by the STI/EVO, but will certainly notice the marginal increase in interior quality offered by the Golf R, that's a very welcome compromise. This car appeals to a different demographic; a slightly older, more mature car buyer who still wants a bit of performance edge but doesn't want to completely sacrifice creature comforts to get it. At the end of the day I think we all need to appreciate that, whatever automotive value proposition appeals to you, it's nice to have choices...
      Saracen
      • 2 Years Ago
      Both are intriguing...but I'll reserve my opinion until I *gasp* test drive them. Wow, what an idea!
        Dayv
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Saracen
        You've gone mad with reasonableness!
      The Steve
      • 2 Years Ago
      "While we liked the sport seats, the stiffly sprung suspension shook our sodas to a froth and encouraged us to take rest breaks every hour or so." So now I wonder how it compares to my '06 STI in terms of ride quality. I would've figured that the STI would be worse.
        Dayv
        • 2 Years Ago
        @The Steve
        It doesn't seem *that* stiff to me.
      RL to RL
      • 2 Years Ago
      Don't think this is one of the new DI engine from VW that has the port injectors to clean the chamber and minimize carbon build up. The owners would be overjoyed by this :D
      Once upon a 77
      • 2 Years Ago
      Love the R, no doubt about it. Complete BS though, with the premium price that it commands above the GTI the least they could do is give the States the race bucket seats. And who wouldn't mind some summer rubber
        FoxJ30
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Once upon a 77
        I'm betting the race buckets don't have side airbags, which are now required in the US... Ah yes, summer rubber. feels almost like wearing nothing at all. Wait... wrong topic.
        Dayv
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Once upon a 77
        The race bucket seats are an *option* in the EU, and one that add about $5000 to the price while sacrificing a huge amount of comfort in the name of track precision.
      tiedyeonthehiway
      • 2 Years Ago
      John Wrote: "This car appeals to a different demographic; a slightly older, more mature car buyer who still wants a bit of performance edge but doesn't want to completely sacrifice creature comforts to get it." That's probably why it appeals more to me than the WRX/STI/EVO. Having crossed over in to the 40 year old demographic, the boy racer styling of the above mentioned cars no long appeals to myself. I want a sporty daily driver, that's comfortable, refined, AWD (for the snowbelt in which I live), and I have an afinity for "smallish" imports. Except for the price, this is the car I can see myself parking in my garage. The car that comes closest to matching this new VW *may* be the 2.0L turbo AWD Fusion -- which is a lot less $$$. So that might be a car I have to look into... Especially if it comes with a slick shifting 6spd and if its not just a FWD car that can send power to rears when the fronts slip.
      NightFlight
      • 2 Years Ago
      Crackpipe. The letter of today kids, is the letter R. R stands for Ridiculous. Let's do a quick review: - ALL SEASON TIRES on a performance model, with no summer option (!!!). That's unforgivable. - No Recaros - Brake based e-Diff, no mechanical LSD - A slightly inferior AWD system - No DSG option for those who want it (I wouldn't) - Light on power and torque for a performance model - Heavy as a pig - Doesn't look that great - ~$37,000 for a Golf Nope, I think this will suffer the same fate as the R32 being a ridiculously overpriced, under performing lot rock. If you NEED AWD, you'd be stupid not to look at a WRX and pocket the savings. Sure, the interior is nicer on the R, but it isn't $10,000 nicer, and the vehicle is slower to boot.
        Shiftright
        • 2 Years Ago
        @NightFlight
        Agreed. As nice as it is, it's a Golf...
        NightFlight
        • 2 Years Ago
        @NightFlight
        I'd like to add that I just learned you can't even defeat the traction control. All season tires, brake based e-diff, and non-defeatable traction control on a PERFORMANCE model? You've got to be kidding me. That's a barrel full of laughs right there.
        Dayv
        • 2 Years Ago
        @NightFlight
        The one thing I'll agree with you on is that I'd prefer a proper mechanical LSD. And once again, the Recaros are an uncomfortable $5000 option where they're available. People need to drop it with the Recaros.
      Nordcross
      • 2 Years Ago
      No way I'm dropping almost 37k on this 4 banger Dodge Omni/Horizon looking ride when I could spend the same amount and get a wicked trick Mustang GT for less!!!! F that!!!!!!
        Justin Campanale
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Nordcross
        Why would anyone ever want a refined German hatchback which can seat 4 confortably, do well in snow or rain, embarass just about any 270> hp hot hatch out there, and to top it off, has great build quality and interior quality when they can have a cheap coupe with a fricking rear beam axle, no space, and a cheap plastic interior? s///
        jtav2002
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Nordcross
        Meh, depends where you live. For me and the weather where I'm at, I could daily drive the R, whereas with a Mustang as much as I like them, it could only be a secondary car for me. Plus for many having extra doors and the hatch make it more practical.
          Christopher
          • 2 Years Ago
          @jtav2002
          Really dude, you'd spend 37 large for, and I quote "this 4 banger Dodge Omni/Horizon looking ride"?!...Really?! Do this then. Buy the Mustang and a beater. Thats how I roll. Oh, and the Focus ST goes for about 12 grand less if you gotta do the hot hatch thing...Looks better too.
      Kabayo
      • 2 Years Ago
      Overweight, overpriced, unreliable. No thanks.
        Justin Campanale
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Kabayo
        Overweight: lighter than the WRX which it competes with. Overpriced: Better performance than all of its competitors, better equipped, more refined, better interior, need I go on? Sure, it is priced steeply, but it is worth the extra csh. Nice things cost money. Unrealiable:
          Vincent Pham
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Justin Campanale
          That's funny... top gear hosts picked subaru and mazda being most reliable brands at the top of their head...
          NightFlight
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Justin Campanale
          Justin, this is outperformed by both the STI and the Evo by a WIDE margin. Where are you getting your stats from?
          Justin Campanale
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Justin Campanale
          By competitors, I meant the WRX and MS3. By Car and Driver's Lightning Lap, the STI outperforms the Golf by a grand total of .2 seconds. Keep in mind that a comparibly equipped STi can go over $40k. . WRX is 3.16..6 compared to Golf's 3.14.. MS3? 3.16.2. Need I go on?
        turbomonkey2k
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Kabayo
        A Golf that's heavier than a Corvette. Go figure.
        Andy
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Kabayo
        What info can you use to prove that it's unreliable?
          BTCC
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Andy
          ANY survey or report from most any country.
          QCRamAir
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Andy
          @Andy: Uhh, this thing known as "history" proves these cars are notoriously unreliable. Sure, you'll have your lucky few pipe in and say "My VW has been the most reliable car I've ever owned!" Out of millions of cars, there are bound to be a few "oddballs"; in VW's case, reliable cars. Just like a manufacturer that's made millions of reliable cars also has a few that were utter lemons.
          Justin Campanale
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Andy
          @QCRamAir Actually, it's the complete opposite. German cars require you to be in touch with maintainance scheduling. Put off one thing, or do a half-ass job on it, and you're in trouble. Follow your dealer's suggested maintainance schedule, and you will have a pleasant experience. Most people in Europe maintain their cars well. That is why in Europe, VW and German cars are considered reliable. In the US, a lot more people don't take care of their cars properly. VWs still don't break down as much as they are percieved to, but the ones which go bad are heard the loudest.
    • Load More Comments