Vital Stats

Engine:
3.5L V6
Power:
273 HP / 251 LB-FT
Transmission:
6-Speed Auto
Drivetrain:
All-Wheel Drive
Curb Weight:
3,852 LBS (max)
Seating:
2+3
Cargo:
26.1 / 76.9 CU-FT
MPG:
19 City / 27 HWY
Bucking The Downsizing Trend For All The Right Reasons



Sometimes in life, you hit the nail right on the head, sink a hole-in-one or strike a perfect bullseye. It happens in all walks of life – from the original Star Wars trilogy to the Apple iPod. It even happens from time to time in the automotive realm. Take, for instance, the 1965 Ford Mustang or the original Acura Legend.

Other times, we're not so lucky. Like the ill-begotten Star Wars prequel trilogy, the automotive world has played host to a long line of underwhelming encores. The Mustang II comes to mind, and so does the Acura RL.

Of course, every so often, automakers release a car to market that's just isn't quite fully baked, like the ill-timed and poorly received Edsel from Ford. Though not nearly as obvious, the first-generation Acura RDX falls into this unfortunate camp.

Originally marketed to the upwardly mobile male Gen-X population – a guy Acura named Jason back in 2006 – it turns out that well-to-do, tech-savvy men aren't actually all that interested in an entry-level premium crossover from Honda's luxury division. And that's why, for 2013, the Acura RDX is being re-aimed at the heart of the market: namely, baby boomers and young couples – defined by Acura as DINKS – "Dual-Income, No Kids" – who prefer quiet, comfortable and composed to quick, nimble and raucous.
2013 Acura RDX side view2013 Acura RDX front view2013 Acura RDX rear view

The transformation of the Acura RDX begins with its exterior. In place of the pug-nosed look of the original – made necessary in part by the inclusion of an intercooler and its assorted plumbing – is a more refined, upscale appearance. There's still no mistaking the RDX for anything but an Acura, due primarily to the large metallic fascia up front and the crisply angular styling down its flanks and hind quarters. A faux spoiler of sorts is formed by the shape of the D-pillar and the top of the liftback, lending an air of sportiness missing in much of this segment.

Growing an inch or so in every direction, the 2013 Acura RDX's cabin is endowed with more space for passengers and cargo. At 103.5 cubic feet of total volume, the RDX offers more room than any of its closest competitors, who are, as defined by Acura, the Audi Q5, BMW X3, Cadillac SRX and Mercedes-Benz GLK. We'd add the Lexus RX 350 to that list, and it also has less overall room inside.

One notable change to the RDX formula is a redesigned cargo opening. At 48.8 inches, it's a full 6.5 inches wider than before, and without any odd contours or shapes, it's much easier to load large and bulky items into the rear cargo area where there's 26.1 cubic feet of storage with the second row up, and 76.9 cubic feet with it stowed.

2013 Acura RDX rear cargo area2013 Acura RDX rear cargo area2013 Acura RDX rear cargo area2013 Acura RDX folded rear seats

Acura has redesigned the interior of the new RDX to feel more open and spacious, utilizing deep cutouts in the dash in front of both the driver and passenger. The ploy works; after sitting in a previous-gen RDX for a few minutes, it is clear that the new model offers an overall impression of airiness that its predecessor lacked. Acura has also designed in a lot of cubby space in the new RDX, including spaces up front to store phones and electronics near their associated auxiliary and USB inputs ahead of the shifter and in the center console.

Acura has loaded a lot of technology into the 2013 RDX, too, including keyless entry and push-button start, Pandora internet radio (with pause and skip buttons) and Bluetooth connectivity that can display SMS text messages via the in-dash display. Also new is a so-called Multiview rear camera system that offers three distinct viewing modes – wide view, normal view and top view – each of which gives a useful look at what's lurking behind the car's rear bumper. Wide view in particular is a nice touch, offering a 180-degree field of view.

Opt for the Technology Package and you'll get a hooded eight-inch screen in the center of the dash with VGA resolution. A 60-gigabyte hard drive is used to store map data, leaving 15 gigs free for media storage. Buyers who opt for this package will also get an upgraded 410-watt ELS surround sound audio system and a power liftgate.

2013 Acura RDX interior2013 Acura RDX gauges2013 Acura RDX instrument panel2013 Acura RDX rear seats

Just as notable, however, are the technologies that the RDX is missing. For instance, there's no blind-spot warning system, no adaptive cruise control, no parking assist, no lane-departure warning and no rain-sensing windshield wipers, though there is a provision to turn the headlights on when the wipers are activated. Some buyers won't care about high-tech features such as these, but in many cases, they come as standard equipment or are optional on comparable models from competitors.

It's also worth noting that there's only one engine available: a 3.5-liter V6 with 273 horsepower and 251 pound-feet of torque in lieu of the last RDX's turbocharged four-cylinder. While enthusiasts (ourselves included) may initially bemoan the absence of Honda's high-output turbo mill, after piloting the RDX, we can safely say the V6 route was their best course of action. Not only is acceleration to 60 miles per hour kept the same (timed just under seven seconds, according to Acura), but the six is smoother, quieter and more refined than the engine it replaces.

Gone, too, is the Super-Handling All-Wheel-Drive system that received so much positive fanfare in the original RDX. All-wheel drive is still available, but it's a much more plebeian on-demand system that can send as much as 50 percent of the engine's torque to the rear wheels. Sure, it works as intended, but it's not very exciting, and it doesn't assert itself when driving like the SH-AWD technology did. We miss it, but Acura contends that its new system is lighter and less expensive, leading to increased fuel economy and a more attractive price point. Plus, it will still help the RDX through inclement weather in snowy climes.

2013 Acura RDX engine

Also helping save fuel is Acura's Variable Cylinder Management, which is capable of operating the 3.5-liter engine on three, four or all six of its cylinders. Even when the driver is paying rapt attention, there's no discernible change in engine feel or sound from inside the cabin, but, with estimated ratings of 20 city, 28 highway and 23 combined (19/27/22 with all-wheel drive), this tech pays big dividends when it comes time to fill up. Those figures are two mpg higher in the city and five mpg higher on the highway than the last RDX with two less cylinders, and they put the RDX at the top of its class in fuel mileage. Unfortunately, despite the loss of forced induction, Acura still recommends premium fuel.

Driven back-to-back, the 2013 RDX is quieter and smoother in operation than the model it replaces, though there's definitely less torque when accelerating from a standstill. We checked the spec sheet to verify our feeling behind the wheel, and sure enough, the old engine offered up 260 lb-ft of torque at 4,500 rpm – that's nine more torques at 500 fewer rpm than the new V6. Once moving, however, there is abundant passing power. We don't think any of its target buyers are going to miss the rush of turbocharged torque provided by the old 240-hp 2.3-liter four.

For 2013, Acura has finally fitted the RDX with a six-speed automatic transmission, replacing the aging five-speed of its predecessor. The first five ratios of the new transmission are lower than before, while the sixth gear is 16-percent higher than the top gear of the old unit. This keeps the engine spinning at a lower speed on the highway while keeping it in its higher-rpm powerband everywhere else.

2013 Acura RDX headlight2013 Acura RDX grille2013 Acura RDX wheel2013 Acura RDX taillight

RDX buyers will also appreciate the 2013 model's newfound smooth ride. While the suspension remains MacPherson struts up front with multi-link trailing arms at the rear, Acura has employed new Amplitude Reactive Dampers that offer a more compliant ride (the main damper spring is 15 percent softer) while lessening body roll in the corners. The trick shocks use twin valves and integrated rebound springs to keep up and down movement in check. Plus, they attach to a stiffer body structure using new mounts that improve ride and handling. Eighteen-inch alloy wheels are fitted with 235/60 Michelin Primacy MXM4 tires, making for a track that's 1.3 inches wider up front and .8 inches wider at the rear.

We definitely noticed the improved ride of the 2013 RDX, but were unimpressed with the feel of its electronic power steering. Despite the fact that Acura has included a more rigid steering shaft to cut down on unwanted vibration, the variable-speed steering setup feels much less natural than the old model's hydraulic system. Acura's engineers lessened the force required to turn the wheel at low speeds, but all we noticed was that finding and locking in on straight ahead required much more thought, and we never quite came to grips with how much effort it took on the wheel to execute a change of direction. Add it all up and what you're left with is a smooth operator that doesn't beg to be hustled like the last RDX.

2013 Acura RDX rear 3/4 view

Considering the added refinement and the increase in size and additional standard equipment, Acura has managed to keep pricing mostly in check for 2013. Base price is $34,320 plus $885 in destination charges, and an RDX outfitted with the Technology Package begins at $38,020, while all-wheel drive adds $1,400. For the record, these prices are about $1,400 more than the 2012 RDX, but it's still several thousand dollars less than competitors such as the BMW X3 and Audi Q5.

Judging by the new demographic Acura is aiming at, the brand has managed to craft exactly the machine they decided their customers wanted. When you consider that the sales leader of the segment is the Lexus RX, it's easy to understand why Acura chose to soften the edge of its entry-level crossover. It's not going to light many fires in the hearts of driving enthusiasts, but it's not supposed to anymore. As a somewhat lower-cost alternative to its European rivals, the 2013 Acura RDX ought to make plenty of sense to the sizable segment at which it's directed.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 158 Comments
      EB110Americana
      • 2 Years Ago
      I think the biggest number of RDX sales conquests will come from the MDX. Unless you need the additional cargo room or more than 5 seats, today's eco-conscious buyer will go for the RDX. This thing even looks like the MDX now. That's not necessarily a bad thing: that the RDX is in the sort of sweet-spot for crossover size...unless you happen to be looking for justification for the MDX's existence. The next generation MDX will have to be much more opulent (read: expensive) and roomy to put some breathing room in between the two. Oh, and Acura, don't fool yourselves, the buyers of these things are all toting around 1-2 kids in the back. They're not wealthy dual income, jet setting couples with nothing to spend their money on. They're middle-aged, middle class, small families with a little extra to spend on something nice to park a car seat in.
      Brett
      • 2 Years Ago
      Good move on their part softening it up. I don't know too many gearheads who would plunk down their fun-car cash on a crossover anyway. I'd never buy the RDX (unless the wife really wanted it), but I wouldn't have bought the first-generation either.
      Dyson Lu
      • 2 Years Ago
      Effective and proven understated design. Not everyone is fond of new exciting and bold designs that get old and lame after 3 years.
      shah
      • 2 Years Ago
      i think this is alot better then older rdx. liked the v6 moter with vcm tech very smart.
      BTCC
      • 2 Years Ago
      Ive seen a couple of these already, and it looks so much better than the older RDX.
      • 2 Years Ago
      [blocked]
        • 2 Years Ago
        [blocked]
          • 2 Years Ago
          [blocked]
          NightFlight
          • 2 Years Ago
          Whatever you say invisiblog, ____|____, rantmaster, or whoever you are today.
          Justin Campanale
          • 2 Years Ago
          I have absolutely NO relation whatsoever to NF. Just because we both call you out on being such a dumba$$ troll doesn't mean that we're the same person.
          • 2 Years Ago
          [blocked]
        Legione13
        • 2 Years Ago
        Autoblog readers will realize that this is a product that screams "compromise." They bloated it, and then cut an important feature (SH-AWD) to trim the weight and the price tag back down. Now it's saddled with an inferior AWD system, and as a result, is less sharp than its predecessor. That said, if Autoblog readers don't like this vehicle, I don't blame them.
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Legione13
          [blocked]
        chickenflauta
        • 2 Years Ago
        Nah, Mary. I'm far older than 16, but I think I get this vehicle. It's yet another perfect example of how Acura has completely lost its ability to articulate what it stands for as a brand and develop products that speak to them. One generation its about a sporty guys vehicle, the next it's DINKS, what? Where's the consistency? Acura made an uncompelling dud in the original RDX that handled well but looked a mess and didn't connect with the target buyers in the first iteration, so now they're trying to play catch-up with Lexus. But in re-positioning the vehicle, they've actually aligned themselves quite nicely with a segment that's already well established with lots of great players from automakers that consumers generally connect with more. I'm not sure why an Acura-fied RX350 would ever be more appealing than the Lexus or its German competition to the consumers they claim to be targeting. But let us all know how your test drive goes.
      kesando
      • 2 Years Ago
      Another Yawnmobile from Honda/Acura
      Master Austin
      • 2 Years Ago
      This would have been a competitive choice 5 years ago....
      PatrickH
      • 2 Years Ago
      Way to be a follower instead of a leader Acura. Business as usual for them these days...
        • 2 Years Ago
        @PatrickH
        [blocked]
          • 2 Years Ago
          [blocked]
          NightFlight
          • 2 Years Ago
          Acura introduced it? Ummm, wrong silly Honda fanboy. Even Lexus had them beat by a couple of years with the RX.
          NightFlight
          • 2 Years Ago
          If you are going to troll, at least try and do a good job. Also, I am not Justin.
          chickenflauta
          • 2 Years Ago
          Acura introduced the first luxury crossover? That's laughable. The 1st gen Lexus RX was the first hugely successful vehicle in this segment. It was around even before "crossover" was a term used to describe these vehicles. At that time, Acura was still selling rebadged Isuzu Troopers. Please.
        AP1_S2K
        • 2 Years Ago
        @PatrickH
        I think the people at Acura are a sleep at the wheel in cruise control (set to 25 in a 65mph).
      Smooth
      • 2 Years Ago
      Acura seems to have gotten the new RDX right, something I'm not so sure about with the new ILX but hopefully it is. The new RDX is more refined than the one it replaces and is aimed at a broader market, and for good reason. The previous one was really a niche type vehicle within its class with the specs it had and this one is much more mainstream. I like what they've done to it and from reading different reviews on it, it seems the general consensus is that Acura has got the right formula. Everything about it just seems more premium and less "boy racer" for lack of better terminology. Acura says they want to do "smart luxury" with value for the money and they seem to be on the right path with this new RDX. Let's hope this RDX is a sign that Honda is getting their mojo back. So far this and the new CR-V show promise for Honda's future. Good job!!
        Karl T
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Smooth
        Everything about the new RDX says '20-something soccer mom whose husband doesn't want to be seen driving an RX".
        graphikzking
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Smooth
        While I don't like the changes, I can see why Honda made them to appeal to mass market. I don't agree that it looks more refined. I think the old one looked sport/luxury. This one looks cheap to me on the outside. Looks like a mixture between a Suzuki, Mazda, Honda mashup. None of them evoke a premium image in my mind. It's funny how Ford can put a Turbo 4 in their Explorer and get 20 city and 29highway. Yet Honda couldn't muster better than 23hwy? 1 extra gear can't make up 5mpg. Honda has to admit for once that Ford has better 4 cylinder engines. 10 years ago I would have never thought that was possible. Honda had 4cylinders making more than Mustang V6. Honda - if you want to be niche (Insight / CRZ) then be niche and focus on your strengths (not sure what they are anymore and sadly, I don't think you have a clue either). If you want to be mass market - figure out your hybrid system and start putting it into your 2/4 door accords and watch them fly off the shelves at 40mpg. This is DEFINITELY a budget RX350. I'd pick the lexus over this car every day of the week if they are within $1000 of each other.
      Justin Campanale
      • 2 Years Ago
      Great job, Acura! You have managed to successfully take out everything that made the RDX fun (SH-AWD, turbo 4) and turn it into an Acura RX350.
        Greg
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Justin Campanale
        That's the type of customer who wants to buy this this type of vehicle.
      Nick
      • 2 Years Ago
      Saw this is person today for the first time. It is absolutely gorgeous. I was completely surprised to see how all the lines blend so well. It's sharp, crisp and agile looking. Anyone calling this ugly need to get their eyes checked. I'm sick of the brand stereotyping where anything that comes out of Honda or Acura is automatically labeled ugly. Acura did a great job designing this car. Deal with it.
        futuramautoblog
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Nick
        Im sorry... but if you think this thing is gorgeous, you really do need your eyes checked...
    • Load More Comments