• Mar 26, 2009
2009 Mazda6 s Grand Touring – Click above for high-res image gallery

With a tagline like "Zoom Zoom", Mazda has given itself the mandate that every one of its vehicles must be fun to drive. While that standard is more easily met with dedicated sports cars like the RX-8 and MX-5, infusing the essence of Mazda's marketing pitch into CUVs, economy cars and family sedans is easier advertised than done. Mazda runs the risk of damaging its message if each iteration of the CX-7, CX-9, Mazda3, Mazda5 and Mazda6 doesn't measure up.

And so the 2009 Mazda6 arrives with a new design, more room and more power as the brand's all-new offering in the hotly contested mid-size sedan segment. Being a Mazda, the new 6 will be compared just as much to the sedan it replaces as to competitors from Honda, Toyota, Nissan, Ford and Chevrolet. The prior version was the driver's choice among this field of vanilla four-doors, and the 2009 model must scream Mazda's mantra just as loudly while appealing to more customers. Does it accomplish this without diluting the company's "Zoom Zoom" message? Follow the jump to find out.



All photos Copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.

For 2009, the Mazda6 comes in SV, Sport, Touring and Grand Touring trim levels with two available engines. The base mill available in all trims is a 2.5-liter four-cylinder producing 170 hp at 6,000 rpm and 167 lb-ft of torque at 4,000 rpm, while a big 3.7-liter V6 making 272 hp at 6,250 rpm and 269 lb-ft of torque at 4,250 rpm is available in every trim except the base SV. The starting price for a 2009 Mazda6 i SV is just $19,220 including destination charges, while our range-topping s Grand Touring V6 starts at $28,260 and finishes at $32,790 with the optional nav system ($2,000) and Moonroof & Bose Package ($1,760). Surprisingly, the base MSRP of a 2009 Mazda6 i SV is $590 less than the least expensive 2008 model, though our top-shelf tester starts $1,315 higher than last year's.



Just as its price has expanded in both directions, the Mazda6 has grown in every measurable exterior and interior dimension except for rear headroom, which remains the same at 37 inches. The Mazda6 is now one of the largest mid-size sedans on the market, slotting just below the Honda Accord in size, which itself is now classified as a Large Car by the EPA. Those larger dimensions are wrapped in new curves that do things we haven't seen before in this segment.

Dimensions: 2009 Mazda6 vs. 2008 Mazda6

2009 Model
2008 Model
Difference
Length 193.7 inches
186.8 inches +6.9 inches
Width 72.4 inches
70.1 inches +2.3 inches
Height 57.9 inches
56.7 inches
+1.2 inches
Wheelbase 109.8 inches
105.3 inches
+4.5 inches
Curb Weight 3,547 lbs.
3,378 lbs.
+169 lbs.
Headroom F
39 inches
38 inches
+1 inch
Headroom R
37 inches
37 inches Same
Legroom F
42.5 inches
42.3 inches +0.2 inches
Legroom R
38 inches
36.5 inches
+1.5 inches
Trunk Volume
16.6 cubic feet
15.2 cubic feet
+1.4 cubic feet

Take the front fenders, which jut far out from the hood that angles in as they travel down to the leading point of a shield-shaped grille. Those fenders should look familiar – the RX-8 has been wearing them for years. They've been grafted onto other Mazdas like the CX-7, CX-9 and Mazda5 to create an expressive brand identity across the lineup. It's a look that is most at home on the 6 sedan, with its low and wide front clip suspended between 18-inch alloy wheels like an F1 car for the family.



Cat-like headlights with Xenon projector lamps are placed on the forward facing side of the front fenders while a long, thin intake connects a pair of fog lamps at the outer edges of the front end. With a big Mazda badge front and center, the face of the new 6 looks both familiar and more beautiful than before. We suspect it will win Best Dressed compliments from most buyers, especially in the Onyx Black color of our tester which looked like an Armani tux rendered in sheetmetal.



Around back, the Mazda6 is more conventionally shaped, but the designers' avoidance of straight lines continues with a rounded rear trunk lid and tail-lamps shaped to echo the front headlights. The dual exhausts at the bottom of the rear apron spew hydrocarbons through a pair of faux tips embedded in the bumper, a somewhat disturbing trend we've noticed on many new cars that make their dirtier bits appear prettier than they actually are.



While the Mazda6 looks better from any angle than most mid-size sedans, its profile reveals a few wrinkles. Seen from the side, the sedan's larger size cannot be hidden behind sinewy curves and organic shapes. Though its wheelbase has grown by 4.5 inches, the overall length of the Mazda6 now stretches 193.7 inches – a full 6.9 inches longer than before – which means its front and rear overhangs are that much more noticeable. The benefit is a larger trunk that can swallow an extra 1.4 cubic feet of stuff and an engine bay large enough for Ford's 3.7-liter V6. The downside is that while the car's substantially larger dimensions are subdued by its exterior design, the added size and heft can be felt from behind the wheel.



Whereas the exterior is the very definition of designing outside the lines, the interior of the 6 holds no surprises. Though the dash design is all-new, it's similar in most respects to the prior model and again divided in half by a line that sits at the top of your knees. You won't find wood trim here, but the 6 does sport a high-end accent material that looks like smooth piano black lacquer at first, only to reveal a wavy bluish-silver thread element upon closer inspection. It's a good compromise between the organic feel of wood and industrial presentation of aluminum or carbon fiber, and since it's unique, no one can say it looks like faux-anything.



All the controls fall readily to hand and are easy to use, including the three HVAC knobs that sit below the navigation screen, offering a well-oiled, expensive feel when manipulated. Below those, you'll find a chintzier pair of heated seat switches and the car's optional push-button start, though there still remains an ungainly plastic panel covering the hole where the standard ignition would have been on the steering column.

The DVD-based navigation system was unremarkable, which is to say it gets you to Point B no better or worse than the competition. The seven-inch touchscreen also interfaces with the Bose ten-speaker, 333-watt surround sound system. Six CDs can be inserted behind the screen, and it also tilts up a few degrees to reduce glare on sunny days. The large tach and speedo are also easy-to-read and jump out with orange-on-blue backlighting.



There is a small LCD screen that sits atop the center console, but it attempts to convey more information than its real estate can comfortably handle. About the size of a ruler, this display can show the time, inside temperature setting for both zones, fan setting, air flow and audio source information. It also acts as trip computer and show miles per gallon, average mpg, range and average speed. Some of this info can also be displayed on the nav screen, which makes the smaller display seem unnecessarily cluttered and somewhat redundant on higher-spec models.



We do give the new 6 high marks for comfortable seats befitting such a big car, with plenty of thigh support from the long lower cushions up front and loads of legroom in back. The front seats, however, did feature less side bolstering than we expected from a Mazda – they seemed better suited for long haul comfort than holding you steady during a decreasing-radius bend.

So far, we've chronicled everything new about the Mazda6 that doesn't have to do with "Zoom Zoom", so the question remains whether those changes have interfered with what made the last model special. There is one obvious casualty. Mazda canceled the high-performance Mazdaspeed6 model for the last generation's final 2008 model year, and it has not returned. With its lightweight yet extremely potent 2.3-liter, turbocharged, direct-inject four-cylinder producing 270 hp and 280 lb-ft coupled to a torque-splitting all-wheel-drive system, the Mazdaspeed6 had no true peers in the family friendly sports sedan segment.



The new 6 offers a larger V6 producing slightly more horsepower (272) and marginally less torque (269) in a vehicle that weighs about 169 pounds more. All-wheel drive is also off the menu for 2009, which means there's no new 6 that comes close to what the Mazdaspeed6 offered in terms of performance and handling. All is not lost, however, as Mazda engineers have ensured that what remains is still among the sportiest four-door family sedans on the market.

In lieu of all-wheel drive, Mazda asks that you place your faith in its Dynamic Stability Control and Traction Control System. These two electronic nannies should help keep the 6 pointed in your intended direction and aid forward movement on slippery surfaces. While there is no replacement for the grip of all-wheel drive when carving corners, DSC and TCS provide similar levels of sure-footedness during normal driving. However, the DSC is defeatable for those who wish to experience the full force of this front-wheel drive sedan's understeering potential.



That big V6 does provide enough grunt to move the 6 without fuss. S models mate it to a six-speed automatic transmission with manual controls on the shifter – no paddles. Lesser i models get a five-speed auto. Unfortunately, there is no Sport mode for the transmission, which means shifting to manual control gets you gear changes that take just as long as when the computer is in control. The engine already has the extra weight of a larger car working against it, so it's a shame that the transmission doesn't help out by offering a mode with a more aggressive shift pattern. Instead, it generally tries to parse out the engine's power as efficiently as possible, which results in EPA estimated mileage numbers of 17 city and 25 highway. Those aren't bad figures for such a big engine in a large car, but without the payoff of more engaging performance, buyers may gravitate more towards the 2.5-liter four-cylinder that, paired to the five-speed auto, returns 21 city and 30 highway miles per gallon.



What does save the 6's sporting credentials is its suspension. Independent at all four corners with high-mount double wishbones and stabilizer bars front and back, the coil springs and dampers are tuned for a firm ride that returns flat, stable handling when attacking twisties. Grip is prodigious with big 18-inch aluminum alloy wheels wearing P235/45 all-season tires that are intimidated by neither crumbling streets or curvy roads. The speed-sensing power-assisted rack-and-pinion steering, for its part, is excellent, offering just enough resistance at speed to feel the fight between the road and those big radials, only to faithfully dial back up the assistance when you're inching along looking for a parking spot.

For a family sedan, the 6 is remarkably taut and even nimble, certainly more so than most of its competition that compromise in this respect. The tradeoff is a degree of stiffness to which some spouses might protest, but others may not notice this in the face of the car's other attributes. And there's the rub. The 2009 Mazda6 offers more of what most people want in a four-door family sedan, namely interior space. It can haul four people more comfortably than before and accommodate more of their stuff. As such, it should be more appealing to the mainstream that passed on the previous version.



Has Mazda signed a deal with the Devil to sell more units, though? Has sacrificing some of this car's sporty character doomed it to be just one more Toyota Camry competitor? Not quite. Mazda's exterior designers have guaranteed that will never happen. Still, much of the Mazda6 that we loved from before has been gobbled up by a bigger body, and the powerful V6 makes acceleration effortless rather than exhilarating. For the moment, it's enough that we have to amend Mazda's tagline where it applies to the new 6. We're lopping off a "Zoom" from "Zoom Zoom". That still leaves one, which is still more "Zoom" than the other cars in this class.



All photos Copyright ©2009 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 67 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      Far more interesting than the Camry and Accord.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I think some of the Zoom-Zoom sparkle of the previous generation has been lost in the upsizing and in another effort to try to grab Accord/Camry/Altima buyers.

      I have seen the car in person and its attractive, but I am not sure the oversized front fenders work that well on the car. The interior looks nice but some of the materials are a bit thin when you tap them.

      I prefer the rest of world Mazda6, which didn't get upsized and is a better looking car.

      Just like the Honda Accord, turning into a full-size Crown Vic isn't always a good thing.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Sucks that we are not getting the hatch and the wagon, those are sweet.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I rented the hatch once and loved it. A truly unique and enjoyable vehicle.

        This review seems to miss the MazdaSpeed6 because of AWD, smaller size and more zoom zoom. I guess you still have one more model year of the Subaru Legacy GT (spec B if you want) that still delivers on those criteria.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Does anyone else see RSX?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Speaking of the MS6, that does strike up an interesting point: Is Mazda gonna make a new MS6? Haven't heard anything in quite a while.

      Nevertheless, this, particularily in V-6 form, is a strong competitor. Autoblog, let's see the 6s GT against the new Fusion Sport V-6 and Camry SE V-6.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Just once I want to read a review that starts "this year the model is 6" shorter than last year and 169 lbs lighter."

      The bigger-every-year trend marches on, and the excuse of adding more safety gear is long gone.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I thought I just read that Mazda was focusing on weight reduction as an alternative to the fat-ass hybrid movement. I guess they are just catering to the general N.A. fat-ass market lmao...

        I like to hear a company sticking to their guns. I've never owned a Mazda but I have always felt like they have been the ones really holding up the smaller passenger car side of things for the 'ol Blue Oval... (ie: euro Focus/3, Modeo/6/Fusion - I know these cars don't interchange but hopefully you get my drift...)
      • 5 Years Ago
      for those getting a V6, the mileage is poor, relative to its foreign competitors (not going to compare it to a potentially bankrupt company). Mazda mpg is 17/25 (272 hp), Camry's is 19/28 (268hp), and Accord's is 19/29 (271hp). What is sadder is that Toyota's has used the same engine for 4 model years now, and Honda's used theirs for 2 model years, and Mazda just came out with this. I'm disappointed.
        • 5 Years Ago
        A lot of that has to do with gearing. In Edmunds's test versus the Accord and Altima, the Mazda 6 got to 60 1 second faster than the Accord and .5 seconds faster than the Altima despite being the heaviest vehicle. In actual testing the Mazda 6 also had the best fuel economy, though I don't think they were controlling for fuel economy tests. Personal opinion is +/- 10% differences in EPA fuel economy doesn't always translate into real world differences.
        • 5 Years Ago
        The 3.7 mileage could be better with the Ford transmission instead of the Aisin 6 speed auto. (while keeping acceleration unchanged)
      Alex
      • 3 Years Ago
      Hopfully Mazda will revitalize the 6 with their new Skyactiv engines and gearboxes, and bump the power and milage figures to make the 6 more competitve with new entries like the redesigned Kia Optima (which has best in class gasoline power and mileage).
      • 5 Years Ago
      "the Mazdaspeed6 had no true peers in the family friendly sports sedan segment."

      Subaru Legacy GT ('05+)? Or is that not large and comfortable enough to be a "peer"?
        • 5 Years Ago
        Oh, yeah, and I forgot. The Volvo S40 and Mitsubishi Carisma.

        I find it hilarious you think that this couldn't happen outside of GM.
        • 5 Years Ago
        The Legacy GT gets no love. But I think you're right, it's a bit small and too niche to be considered a legit player. However if I was shopping for the Speed 6, I'd cross shop it.
        • 5 Years Ago
        @ LS7 -What? How would 2 cars from 2 different manufacturers be the same? Just because Ford has a controlling interest in both companies?

        This isn't GM.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Wasn't the Volvo S60 essentially the same vehicle as the Mazdaspeed6 with different sheet metal?

        I would suspect this kind of vehicle just isn't in huge demand. All the vehicles come and go quickly and don't sell when even when they are available.
        • 5 Years Ago
        josh:
        The VW Routan doesn't exist in your world? How about the Acura SLX? The VW Sharan? Which of these do you think GM is most to blame for?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Everything about the new 6 feels cheaper than the old 6. The same with the new 3.

      When I sat in the new cars at the auto show I noticed that the interiors felt a lot cheaper than the previous car's. My dad has a 2005 Mazda 6 grand touring wagon. Although the car looks a bit dated now, overall it seems to be a far better car than the new one.

      That is the disturbing trend I have noticed. New generations seem to be giving you a bot more room and more powerfull engines but the body metal seems to be thinner and the interiors using cheaper materials. Overall the cars just feel cheap instead of well built.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I agree with ASEVEN - I don't kno what these guys are talking about. Even compared to the old 6, my first gen 3 is light years ahead in terms of quality and feel. Even my aunt admits that. Sure the 6 is almost like driving a sports car but it was pure plastic inside. The new 6 feels Audi.
        • 5 Years Ago
        You're delusional. After spending time in the old 6 when my Mazda was in for service, the new 6 was a desperately needed breath of fresh air. EVERYTHING feels more expensive. The door pocket on the old 6 was so flimsy I thought I could snap it off with minimal effort. The plastics also felt very grimy after just 20,000mi's. The backseat space was very small for a family sedan and it was bland looking inside. The new 6 is such a leap forward you never would even think the two we're made from the same company. I never was a fan of the old 6's lean attitude.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Thank-you for finally reviewing the V6 model. This is the first meaningful article I've seen on the V6. If I had to read one more article about the 4-cylinder 6 I was going to kill someone.

      Mazda obviously had people like me in mind when they redesigned this car. With a 1-year old to haul around now I need something big enough to hold all of the stuff that goes with a 3-person nuclear family, will allow me to relatively easily get a child in and out of his car seat, has some room should the family expand further, but has some semblance of sport to it. This seems to be almost the only car in the family-sedan market that fits the bill.

      The serious players in this segment are large vehicles that can do all/most of the needs people like myself have. The old 6 was too small, same thing with the current Legacy. If you have older children either might work, but toss an infant and/or convertible car seat in the mix and neither has the room. If they were my only options I would be better served to keep my Contour SVT. If not for the 6 or the Accord I might have no other choice but to go with an CUV for a large vehicle.
        • 5 Years Ago
        There's always the Pontiac G8. Its extremely roomy and its RWD, which is worth its weight in gold for handling.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I give it a thumbs up. Were I in the market for a midsize sedan, this is probably the one I'd buy. Sure it's big and not as sporty as most of us would like, but it's more what people want. I can't fault them for trying to make money. Plus, it's not like you buy a FWD midsize sedan because you need a sports car.
    • Load More Comments