
Click above for high-res gallery of the Infiniti EX35
Infiniti first showed the world its new EX35 as a concept at last year's New York Auto Show and then put it on sale in fall essentially unchanged. Although the Acura RDX has been described as a sports car in CUV clothes, it's based on a fundamentally front-wheel-drive architecture. If Honda had instead taken the S2000 roadster, stretched it and jacked it up a bit, they would have come up with something more akin to the EX35. In fact, that's almost exactly what Nissan did.
The EX35 is based on the platform of the G35 sedan/G37 coupe and, of course, the fun loving 350Z. If you want a crossover with sports car genes, it would be hard to find something more suitable. Of course, wearing a badge from the Infiniti side of the family tree means getting a handsomely tailored suit and all the latest high-tech gizmos to go along with the go-fast hardware. It also means a few sacrifices to ultimate utility, but we'll get to that after the jump.
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
click any image to enlarge

One look at the EX35 and it's obvious that it shares the current Infiniti family DNA. From the gently curving contours over the wheel arches to the shape of the greenhouse, the look is that of a highly paid athlete coming out of the locker room after the game in a Saville Row suit. However, the sports car genes are most immediately apparent in the profile.

Most crossovers today are derived from front-wheel-drive platforms with transverse-mounted powertrains, and that's reflected in their relatively short hoods. Even the north-south inline six-powered BMW X3 and X5 share these proportions providing a somewhat more utilitarian look. Not so this Infiniti. The passenger compartment has been pushed well back giving the classic long hood sports car proportions, even with its taller-than-Z-car stance. It's an interesting look for this type of vehicle. Even compared to its big brother the FX, the proportions are amplified with a seemingly longer distance between the trailing edge of the wheel well and the leading edge of the door.
Pushing the wheels forward allowing for a front mid-engine layout helps the rear-drive EX achieve a weight distribution of 52/48, the same as the RDX. The all-wheel-drive version shifts that to 55/45. The sporting proportions, however, unfortunately sacrifice rear cabin space. Even though the Infiniti is two inches longer with an extra six inches of wheel base, it has nine inches less rear leg room than the Acura RDX. The back seat is definitely on the tight side. The Acura also has a 12 cubic foot advantage in cargo space behind the second row. Even in the front row, the EX has a decidedly snug cockpit-like layout. There's not a lot of stretch out room here. Where the Infiniti interior shines is the quality of the materials. The EX35 has the look and feel of a luxury car with its "wheat" colored leather and swaths of dark maple on the door panels and center console. Just below the navigation controls is the typical elliptical Infiniti analog clock. The layout of the EX center stack and controls means that pretty much everything falls readily to hand.
Among the array of buttons just below the navigation screen is one labeled Camera. This is part of the $1,950 technology package. Like so many vehicles today, the EX has a tailgate mounted rear view camera to show you what's immediately behind the car. However, shifting the EX into reverse brings up a display on the nav screen with two views, the one behind and another showing what's on the right side of the car. This is part of the Around View Monitor. Several cars with rear cameras overlay guide lines on the image to aid backing into a parking space. The EX takes that one step further with additional guide lines that indicate where the vehicle will actually go based on the steering input.In total, the EX has four outward facing cameras: one on the tailgate, one on the bottom of each side mirror and a fourth looking ahead through the windshield. Pressing that camera button when the vehicle is stationary brings up an overhead view of the car and the view all around the car from the cameras. Once you start moving, the camera view switches off. The cameras come back into play above 40 mph for the lane departure warning and prevention systems.

When the warning and prevention systems are switched on, the cameras look for the edge of the road or the lane markers. If the car starts to drift toward the edge of the lane, a warning beep goes off. If the prevention system is on, when the car reaches the edge of the lane the stability control applies a little bit of brake torque to the opposite side wheel, gently nudging the car back toward the center of the lane. It's actually kind of a spooky feeling when it happens. It's not abrupt and it's easily over-ridden if you actually wanted to pull off the road or change lanes. The system won't save a drunk driver weaving around, but someone who is momentarily distracted and drifting over will be assisted.
Another element of the technology package is the adaptive cruise control. A sensor in the bottom of the grille emblem detects the distance to the vehicle ahead and automatically maintains a safe distance. If the vehicle you're following slows down, the Infiniti's brakes apply reducing your speed. When things clear up, the EX automatically returns to the set speed.
Restoring that speed falls to perhaps the most important element of the EX, the engine. Here is where the EX holds its biggest advantage over the Acura. Like its lower slung siblings, the EX is propelled by Nissan's sweetheart VQ V6. As the model nomenclature implies, this one displaces 3.5L and puts out 297hp and 253lb-ft of torque. As in every other application, this free-revving six cylinder is a wonderful example of the breed. Squeezing the accelerator brings instant lag free response from the engine room.
The EX has a firm, sports sedan ride, but it doesn't beat you up. The bitterly cold winter weather that descended on us while the EX was here didn't allow for much back road thrashing, but we did get to exercise the traction control and stability control systems. The latter in particular was very well behaved, keeping the EX pointed where the steering wheel input intended without out any drama. The big question that arises from driving the EX35 is what exactly is the point? Ideally this thing would have the same ride height as the G35 and be badged G35 Touring or something similar. The EX is most certainly not an off-road vehicle and the extra ride height doesn't really add any useful functionality. With it's attractive and sporting but snug-fitting interior, the EX doesn't add much utility to CUV equation.
Perhaps it's more of a marketing driven move in a world where American drivers remain enamored with looking down upon their fellow travelers. Lexus offered something similar to this with the wagon/hatch version of the first generation IS, and it wasn't a huge sales success. In that case, the EX35 offers much of the character of the sedan and coupe with a hint of the higher riding FX. For those that prefer the balance skewed a little more toward utility while retaining the sport, the FX offers another alternative though is also down on utility compared to some of its large CUV competitors. The EX35 starts at just over $31,000 in base RWD form with the AWD Journey model we tested coming in at over $45,000, so buyers will have to consider if good looks, trick technology and a sweet powertrain are worth sacrificing some practicality.

Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Franz @ Feb 20th 2008 12:16PM
It's one of the better looking soft-roaders out there, but to me I really don't see the point of it. It's just a softer FX basically, but it's not a bad looking piece at all.
Two numbers really jumped out at me from the article though: 9 inches less rear legroom and 12 cu. ft. less room in the back than an Acura RDX,... it seems like a really snug fit under all that swoopy sheet metal.
That said, I like how it looks. and I suppose the article summed it up best: "...buyers will have to consider if good looks, trick technology and a sweet powertrain are worth sacrificing some practicality..." I dunno... Infiniti does great interiors, practical gadgets and that VQ V6 is pure magic. I guess for me it's a definite "maybe".
Chase @ Feb 21st 2008 9:42AM
I recently saw and sat in an EX in a showroom. The first thing I noticed was how small this car is compared to how it looks in pictures. You'll notice right away that its more the size of a hatchback than anything else, just with a bit more ride hight than a hatchback.
However, once you get inside, the likeness to a hatchback stops. The most noticeable difference to me after the apparent lack of room was that the floor was raised about three inches in addition to the suspension increase. It means that you feel higher up, but you also have a lot less head room (I'm 6'4", so I notice these things).
Actually, on the topic of hatch backs, I find it silly that all of the "CUVs" out there are nothing more than glorified hatchbacks with taller suspension (that no one has a use for), much worse fuel efficiency, and at considerably greater cost. My first priority in buying my GTI wasn't its utility, yet its cargo area is about the same size as you-name-the-small-suv. Now granted, its hard to find a four-door hatchback with AWD, so that's a valid reason to shop CUV, but its still very amazing how most car-buyers base their purchases on perception as opposed to reality.
mckoder @ Apr 8th 2008 11:53AM
What is the point of this vehicle? The point is that when you are riding high you are safer in case of a side impact. Safety is one of the reasons for buying SUVs isn't? There is more rollover risk, but lower risk of injury in case of a collision.
Ligor @ Feb 20th 2008 12:19PM
I think they did good, btu should have just brought us a G35 wagon with AWD standard
for what it is, i'd take it before the RDX or X3 for the engine alone
but, where are the roof rails? I'm thinking those tat will opt for this car do some skiing and no rails means no sale considering the tight interior
Fooman @ Feb 20th 2008 4:43PM
the X3 or RDX for the engine alone...
You know the VQ engine has been a Wards ten best engine for over 10 years (at least since 1995?) While the m54 in the b30 and b25 trim that the x3 has only made the list as the m54b30 in 2001-2003.
Of course the rdx has 2.4 liter turbo 4... and hits 60 in just under 7 seconds... Well you do the math on what this engine feels like.. I will tell you it rhymes with bog...
You want more room and less power but the same amount of gizmos get the rdx. If you want something with a Roundel and will end up not liking get the x3. Trust me I have driven all of them. I am a BMW guy but the x3 is ridiculous for the price.
Aetius @ Feb 20th 2008 12:22PM
It's marketing driven for sure. Just like that new Toyota. They're calling it a 'Crossover Utility Sedan'. It makes no sense but they can't use the word 'wagon', I guess.
psarhjinian @ Feb 20th 2008 1:06PM
Because calling it a wagon subjects it to the more stringent CAFE car standards. A crossover is subject to CAFE light truck and is thusly allowed worse mileage.
CAFE encourages poor mileage. Heh.
This is why I like CARB's approach better. Its standards are purely quantitative: either you emit a certain level, or you don't. CAFE has exemptions for certain types of vehicles and places no emphasis on emissions. A car could emit pure Sarin and be ok under CAFE, as long as it didn't use much gasoline in doing so.
Tim @ Feb 20th 2008 12:25PM
I love Infiniti's. But did the passenger airbag blow up in anybody's face? (http://goodcarbadcar.blogspot.com/2008/02/nissaninfiniti-recall.html)
Cly @ Feb 20th 2008 12:25PM
The UV should really be dropped from this car. We went shopping for a utility vehicle and it's not what we expected when we test drove the thing.
1. ZERO rear leg room.
2. You can't even fit your golfing gears in the trunk without folding the rear seats.
3. The ground clearance is barely more than a G35/G37 sedan.
This is a freaking G35/G37 wagon. The media/journalist should stop being so blindly fool by Infiniti. There is zero utility/practicality in this car. I was sorely disappointed when I saw it in person.
Dave T. @ Feb 20th 2008 12:33PM
yeah my problem with the EX was the back cargo area too. It really is useless. My dog can't even fit in the back and she's pretty small for a boxer.
Ligor @ Feb 20th 2008 12:35PM
to your point if they did a real G35 wagon the floor would have been so much lower it would have had a lot more space than the raised up by 5inch EX,
but, if you wanted to upgrade from a 4-door sedan (mainly the G35) this would give you a bit more room and still that great engine
Paul H. @ Feb 20th 2008 3:15PM
i agree. call it what it is. a G37 wagon.
Driver X @ Feb 20th 2008 12:31PM
Try putting diluted glass cleaner (50% water and 50% glass cleaner) on a soft rag and wipe the radio face and instrument panel lense. Nissan/Infiniti has a long history of these items becoming cloudy for life after a gentle cleaning. I would like to know if this quality issue has been addressed. I'm not talking about using harsh chemicals. My GMC truck has never had a problem being cleaned in this manner but I have an I35 with the radio face ruined. I sold Nissan for 13 years and Nissan denied this problem existed. I spared my Maxima's but after cleaning the console in my I35 I forgot and wiped the face of the radio. The face of the radio is now cloudy and cannot be repaired without replacing the radio.
indymcsc @ Feb 20th 2008 12:31PM
I really like the styling, but it seems to have a strong appeal to woman. I don't really see many men driving this.
The interior is REALLY small on the inside. Essentially, think of this as a 2+2 coupe. With it being so small I'm not so sure it's going to sell very well.
Ligor @ Feb 20th 2008 12:38PM
i've done that with my G35 for the past 4 years and I don't have that issue.
I use straight up Windex, then at the end I run a damp cloth (w/water only) over everything
but I do notice that my clear headlight cover is fogged up a bit
MikeW @ Feb 20th 2008 12:46PM
The Acura RDX (just compare the rear suspension to the honda civic) is 57/43 weight distribution.
A rear drive EX is 53/47 (rounded up), and depending on amenities an 'awd' is 54/46 to 55/45 (rounded up)
Yup, G35 wagon.
tbss_in_the_D @ Feb 20th 2008 12:57PM
I sat in one last Friday at the Chicago Auto Show. I love the interior and the look of it. The only real issue was the lack of room in the back seat. I am 6' and my wife could not fit in behind me without my knees bent to much. Other than that I loved it and think it would be fun to drive.
DKB_SATX @ Feb 20th 2008 1:19PM
Somewhere in the conversion from sedan to fake SUV they lost 6.2 inches of rear legroom?? (per autos.msn.com) That's not what I think of as SUV or wagon room... the G37 Coupe with its joke of a back seat has 1.3 inches MORE rear legroom than an EX35.
bruno @ Feb 20th 2008 2:18PM
It seems so sleek that there couldn't be much utlity to it. I'm not sure I get the point, other than a higher seating position and slightly more room than a sedan with a trunk.
Maybe it hides its size well?
Does anyone know of a SUV/SAV/crossover that actually combines good handling/braking with at least a moderate degree of storage and space? The BMW X5 is too expensive, as is the X3 (for what you get). I've driven the latter and loved the performance, but it really isn't much bigger than our 3 series sedan, and the cost/weight isn't worth the added benefits.
The lower cost small/medium SUVs seem to be tuned very soft (RAV4, Hyundai Santa Fe, etc)
Right now the GM quadruplets(Acadia, Outlook, etc) seem to hold the most promise, though they are over-large for my needs. But if they get the advertised mpg they're acceptable.
DKB_SATX @ Feb 20th 2008 3:56PM
Why do you want an SUV/SAV/CUV/abomination anyway? If what you want is good handling and decent cargo capacity, there's the 3series and 5series wagons and the A4 Avant. A few years ago I'd have said the Subar Legacy GT Wagon, but they've dropped that in favor of the Outback with all the handling compromises you mentioned... though if you like the X5/X3 handling well enough, the tall/tippy thing in the Outback might not bugh you too much.