The 2015 Ford Mustang is one of the most anticipated cars of the year, despite the fact that production hasn't yet begun. What's a pony car fan to do? It turns out that Ford already has pricing and options information about the vehicle in its dealer ordering system. A few enterprising folks have snapped some pictures from it and have posted them online. You might not be able to drive your car yet, but you can at least see what it might cost.

At the moment, Ford appears to be splitting the Mustang into five models – 3.7-liter V6, 2.3-liter EcoBoost, GT with the 5.0-liter V8, 50th Anniversary and SVT. There are 10 available paint colors, 2 of which require an extra outlay. Triple Yellow is $495, and Ruby Red Tint is $395. Regardless of model, navigation goes for $795, and reverse parking assist is $295.

For both the EcoBoost and GT, the six-speed automatic tacks an extra $1,195 to the sticker, and adaptive cruise control is the same price. The GT also has a limited-slip 3.55 rear end for $395 and a GT Performance package for $2,495. Recaro leather seats add an extra $1,595. For the EcoBoost, there's something called EcoBoost Performance package for $1,995. The system doesn't say what the packages include.

The info here also fits exactly with what we know about the Mustang 50th Anniversary Edition from the New York Auto Show. The package comes in Kona Blue or Wimbledon White with a special leather interior. According to this data, it adds $1,595 to the cost of a Mustang GT.

A user at the Mustang 6G forums also has images from the ordering system, and they include some info on the SVT model. While there are no prices, options include a track package, tech package and available Alcantara or leather seats.

Note, the pricing and options listed here could still change. That said, it's still fun to check them out. Information on colors and body styles can be downloaded as a PDF from The Mustang Source forum, and the rest can be viewed at Mustang 6G. Happy building.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 54 Comments
      evanee80
      • 8 Months Ago
      Everyone is all a-twitter about what could be in the EcoBoost performance package. I'll bet a nickel that it's about the same as what's in the 2014 V-6 Performance Package: Strut tower brace Larger sway bars, front/rear "Unique" front springs "Unique" front and rear calipers with "performance friction pads" 19" wheels with summer-only tires Limited-slip axle What's to think the I-4 package would be much different? BTW, they both cost $1.995.
        Jon Bowen
        • 8 Months Ago
        @evanee80
        The gt performance package will likely be the same as the gt performance package is now, not the v6. brembo brakes, special wheels and summer tires, and stability control along with a torsen differential and some extra coolers. ecoboost will be the same thing, we've already seen the wheels and tires and brembo brakes
      Sonmi-451
      • 7 Months Ago
      Can't wait to drive one! This is the best Mustang yet and while I like the outgoing one it is time to move the Stang to the next level. And for those that say the 2015 is not a true pony car with the addition of the IRS that is just hooey. Then what would you say about Camaro and Challenger both designed with IRS from the beginning.
      Ryth
      • 8 Months Ago
      Do we know the base price of the v6 , v4 Eco and GT?
        Matt Mossberg
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Ryth
        Afaik no prices yet. The turbo will sit between the v6 and gt amd my guess is msrp will be very close to current prices. I'll be test driving a v6 with and without the performance pack as I cannot afford the gt. I originally thought this car and the gti mk7 (my other new car choice) would be out sooner this year because I'm in need of a car, but it has gotten me to save up more. It will be interesting to see how much I like the v6 over the current gen gt which after the new stang comes out, will be even more of a bargain to get a low mile '11/'12.
          Ryth
          • 8 Months Ago
          @Matt Mossberg
          Just curious on why you would pick the V-6 over the eco-boost if the eco-boost has more horsepower and gets get better gas mileage. If it's price then that makes sense but you'd make it up in gas costs
      Matt
      • 8 Months Ago
      I would have never considered a Mustang, but the turbo 2.3L with a manual transmission, Recaros, an LSD, and xenons is an awfully compelling alternative to a M235i, for what, $15k less? Wonder how the steering/shifter feel is compared to the BMW though.
        carguy1701
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Matt
        The Getrag MT82 is slightly notchy from what I've read. Ford says they've fixed it, but I still wouldn't trust it (if Land Rover Defender drivers were complaining about it...).
        Ryth
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Matt
        Yep. I was looking at a S5 from Audi and am seriously considering a Mustang. No Quattro but for the price difference I mean it's huge.
        oRenj9
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Matt
        The M235i runs a quarter mile in 13.0, which is pretty close to the GT. It's pretty obvious that the 3.0L turbo engine is very much underrated and produces closer to 360HP. We're also not sure that the the 2.3L Mustang is going to be 30k either. It's very possible that it could approach 35k with the PP.
        mbmorrow4
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Matt
        Well Matt, The only way to find out will be a test drive. Sounds like fun.
      Jay
      • 8 Months Ago
      My god, the interior of that is a horrible mess!
        Chris
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Jay
        You people crying about interiors... You're quick to criticize, but never have any solutions. Personally, I think it looks classy inside, and is unique and suits the car well. You must want it to look more like everything else.
          Chris
          • 8 Months Ago
          @Chris
          I'd love to know who the mouth breathers are that voted this down, but don't because they were too big of cowards to leave a response. I'm guessing they have below average automotive IQs and would hate this car regardless.
          Chris
          • 8 Months Ago
          @Chris
          It makes sense because positive comments on this car are generally voted up, but occasionally I'll come back and find a slew of down votes instead.
        kingrat001
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Jay
        My only complaint is that I hate the center of the steering wheel. Other than that, my only complaints on the new Mustang are I don't find the front or rear ends very attractive.
      Jesus!
      • 8 Months Ago
      Wimbledon White? Are you serious? Performance White sounds so much better.
        RetrogradE
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Jesus!
        I thought you, of all people, would prefer "Nazarene Linen White." Or maybe, "Post-baptismal Dove White."
        SirUno
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Jesus!
        There's a specific reason for that.
      Brodz
      • 8 Months Ago
      I hate ford for killing the Falcon and leaving Australia, but this mustang is seriously good looking. The interior is dated though.
        Chris
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Brodz
        Again. You people with the interiors. What would you have done differently? And "dated"? That's quite possibly the most overused word on this site and calls for further explanation. Listening to people call something dated on this site is like listening to Beavis and Butthead say something sucks.
          Moreno636
          • 8 Months Ago
          @Chris
          How about a steering wheel that doesnt look like it should be on a tractor. A nice leather wrapped flat bottomed wheel would be a massive improvement. Other than that its not that bad.
          Jesus!
          • 8 Months Ago
          @Chris
          I dunno "proper" and "wagon" are up there among the most overused as well...
      mikemaj82
      • 8 Months Ago
      Where is the option to Americanize the front end?
        Krzysztof
        • 7 Months Ago
        @mikemaj82
        If you know anything about Mustangs, you will know that they are pretty much the most customizable cars ever made. I have no doubt that a few weeks after the 2015 is officialy released, aftermarket performance parts and body kits will rain from the sky (don't believe me? Go on americanmuscle.com).
        Krzysztof
        • 7 Months Ago
        @mikemaj82
        If you know anything about Mustangs, you will know that they are pretty much the most customizable cars ever made. I have no doubt that a few weeks after the 2015 is officialy released, aftermarket performance parts and body kits will rain from the sky (don't believe me? Go on americanmuscle.com).
      Bassracerx
      • 8 Months Ago
      that is so bullcrap that the freaking LSD is OPTIONAL on the GT 430 horsepower i want to know what the percentage of GTs are without the LSD after the car is out for a year. I would be very interested in the ecoboost mustang with all of the performance goodies none of the luxury goodies if it is under 30k (hopefully 28k or less) then that would make a very compelling coupe daily. only thing i would change would be sticky tires and 3 inch turbo back exhaust to give it that deep burble.
        Ammo_1
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Bassracerx
        Not sure what you are complaining about. The 2014 can be ordered with an optional 3.55 LSD too. The stock unit is a 3.31 LSD. You don't have to pay $395 for an LSD, you pay if you want the shorter gear ratio. The 2015 should be the same.
        Dean Hammond
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Bassracerx
        you may be jumping to conclusions...FYI, dealers do NOT have the 2015 ordering guides yet, so exactly what this is I have no idea...current GTs come standard with LSD, i see no reason the 2015s with big HP numbers wont either...so take what you conclude from this "leak" with a little scepticism......
      Sgt Beavis
      • 8 Months Ago
      That EcoBoost pack had better have a lot of other goodies. It just isn't worth two grand for a four banger turbo. I'll be curious to see how the price compares to the GT's V8
      Gorgenapper
      • 8 Months Ago
      Dear Ford: - GT with the 5.0 V8 - 6 speed MT - GT Performance Package (assuming it has the mechanical limited slip) - Tech Package (or whatever gives me blind spot monitoring and cross traffic alert) - Recaros (possibly) - Ingot Silver or Oxford White (much as I'd like the Deep Impact Blue, it'll be hell to maintain)
        ChrisH
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Gorgenapper
        if the white is not metallic stay far far away from it. I had a 2013 Mustang, worst paint I have seen on a car in twenty years. The rear and nose are not metal as is on most cars but that should not matter to paint quality, yet with the Mustang the tail of my car began to yellow noticeably. The nose was just fine. Ford's excuse was of course different materials, odd that a while Miata and white G35 I had owned previously never had these paint issues. Top it off with poor fit and finish, by no means as bad as the Camaro I comparison shopped at the time, and I would not recommend buying it unless you just want to toss your money away
        carguy1701
        • 8 Months Ago
        @Gorgenapper
        "much as I'd like the Deep Impact Blue, it'll be hell to maintain" Huh?
          Gorgenapper
          • 8 Months Ago
          @carguy1701
          Deep Impact Blue is a color offered on the Mustang. Same color as the car sold at Barrett-Jackson. Unfortunately it is a deep blue, as the same suggests, and deep / dark colors are the worst to keep clean and scratch / swirl free. I have a black car and I hate how hard it is to maintain as far as cleaning and appearance goes. @jtav2002 why? I saw a white Mazdaspeed 3 yesterday, the owner washed it and wiped it down - no visible dirt, scratches or swirls. If I did the same on my black car, it would be swirl city afterwards.
          carguy1701
          • 8 Months Ago
          @carguy1701
          Gorgenapper: Ah. I've never had a blue car so I wasn't aware (both of my cars have been silver).
          jtav2002
          • 8 Months Ago
          @carguy1701
          I'd rather deal with blue than white myself. Had a white car one time. Never again.
          carguy1701
          • 8 Months Ago
          @carguy1701
          Gorgenapper: Ah. I've never had a blue car so I wasn't aware (both of my cars have been silver). I'd still take the risk. Lovely color (best blue they've had since Sonic Blue).
          carguy1701
          • 8 Months Ago
          @carguy1701
          Gorgenapper: Ah. I've never had a blue car so I wasn't aware (both of my cars have been silver). I'd still take the risk. Lovely color (best blue they've had since Sonic Blue).
          carguy1701
          • 8 Months Ago
          @carguy1701
          Gorgenapper: Ah. I've never had a blue car so I wasn't aware (both of my cars have been silver). I'd still take the risk. Lovely color (best blue they've had since Sonic Blue).
      Joe Carter
      • 8 Months Ago
      3.55s are "performance" worthy? What is this world coming to?!
    • Load More Comments