Review: 2009 Ural T sidecar motorcycle isn't as retro as it looks

2009 Ural T sidecar motorcycle – Click above for high-res image gallery
Despite its obvious link to Thirties-era wartime motorcycles from BMW, the 2009 Ural T sidecar motorcycle can't really be described as "retro." Instead, the three-wheeled machines rolling out of Ural's factory in Russia really are a direct link to the past – a bygone era of motorcycling that's sure to intrigue some and disinterest others. Which camp you belong to depends largely on your expectations for a bike. Many motorcyclists relish the opportunity to zip away from stoplights with telepathic ease, weave through dense urban traffic and slide knees from apex to apex. If those are your intentions, the Ural is most certainly not your mount. If, however, your motorcycling passions tend to favor leisurely strolls through the countryside and you'd like to share the experience with your significant other, we suggest clicking past the jump to read about our time with Ural's latest sidecar motorcycle.
Photos Copyright ©2009 Jeremy Korzeniewski/Weblogs, Inc.
If you've never driven a motorcycle with a sidecar (otherwise known as a 'hack' or an 'outfit'), you're in for a major surprise when piloting the Ural. Since the sidecar's wheel isn't powered, the entire bike lists to the right when accelerating and to the left while braking. Thankfully, it didn't take long to get used to the odd motions and sensations, and by the end of our second day behind the bars, we were completely at ease with the see-sawing, eventually using it to our advantage around the streets of Seattle. Long, sweeping, uphill left-handers with a passenger in the hack proved to be the only occasion when the sidecar's effects were truly tiring to cope with, but beyond that, the Ural tracked confidently, delivering a measured amount of feedback that was both confidence inspiring and relaxing.

In the past, Ural offered some sidecars with powered wheels working through a differential. While this arrangement allowed the bikes to traverse nearly any terrain with nary a concern and reportedly did away with the constant adjustments required to keep the machine pointed in a straight line, the system wasn't exactly bulletproof and has been nixed as an option. A lockable two-wheel drive system is currently available on the Ural Patrol and camouflaged Gear-Up model and is reportedly quite stout. Although our bike lacked a powered sidecar wheel, we were quite content without it in the urban setting that Ural considers the new T's perfect environment.
Interestingly, Ural chose to name its new lower-cost sidecar after the classic Model T from Ford. Just as that automobile was intended to provide transportation for the masses, Ural hopes the T's reduced price point can introduce sidecar motorcycling to a new generation of riders. Plus, the factory is keen to recycle Henry Ford's classic quip, "You can have it in any color you'd like, so long as it's black." As such, the Ural is only available with a matte black powdercoat that should prove extremely durable, although we were less than convinced about the mandatory maroon pinstriping. However, there's no denying the bike's presence strikes a chord with passers-by. Hence the so-called "Ural Delay Factor."




It's nearly impossible to go anywhere without playing 20 Questions about the 2009 Ural T. "What year is that?" "Did you restore it yourself?" Or, the most frequently asked question when rolling to a stop: "What is that thing?" We had trouble convincing many of our interrogators that the Ural was a brand new motorcycle and that anyone with visions of sidecar motorcycling can order one right from their nearest dealer. Our advice for riders in a hurry: Carry pre-assembled pamphlets or feign a lack of English skills.
It's easy to send the sidecar's wheel northward in tight right-hand bends.
Once underway, other than the aforementioned right-to-left weight transfer, the biggest sense that you're riding something completely different comes when it's time to take a turn. Frequent motorcycle riders will need a quick mental reboot to clear any memories of countersteering as it will undoubtedly send you off in the wrong direction. Instead, turning right requires a firm push on the left grip and plenty of body-english if there's no extra weight in the sidecar. As you can see from our accompanying photo gallery, it's rather easy – not to mention extremely entertaining – to send the sidecar's wheel northward in tight right-hand bends. Turning left requires an equally hefty push on the right handgrip, and we've been told it's entirely possible to pivot the whole operation on that sidecar wheel if the rider doesn't shift his buttocks to the left rear in fast corners. As you can imagine, we happily assumed the position.


Once right- and left-hand turns have successfully been negotiated, it's time to practice the art of shifting. Changing gears on the Ural's four-speed gearbox (plus reverse) requires a hefty stomp on the heel-toe shifter. We also strongly advise patience when releasing the clutch, especially if there's a passenger mounted in the sidecar. Reach down to the right of the gearbox and you'll find a handy lever that allows the rider to engage reverse as long as the machine is in first or second gear. We also found the lever to be an ideal way to force the somewhat recalcitrant shifter into neutral. The entire process of rolling through the gears mustn't be hurried, which lends itself well to a casual pace.
Riding the Ural is an adventure, even more so than most other two-wheelers.
That's not to say the Ural T isn't capable of highway speeds. We had no problem keeping up with traffic, even with a passenger and luggage aboard. Top speed is somewhere past 70 mph, but we found the sweet spot to be somewhere between 55 and 65 mph. According to Ural, the bike's 750cc air-cooled horizontally-opposed Boxer engine, which is shared with every bike across Ural's lineup, makes 40 horsepower. We don't doubt that figure and found most of its tractor-like power to be accessible very low in the rev-range, though there's certainly no need to lug the engine when putting around. We'd love to be more specific about RPMs, but the lack of a tachometer makes it impossible to know exactly how fast the twin-cylinder mill is spinning. In any case, we found it easy to judge our shifting patterns based on the sound of the engine, and suffice it to say, there's plenty of noise coming from under the rider, though it's never an alarming amount.


Perhaps the most modern aspect to the Ural riding experience is the front brake. That Brembo full floating disc proved more than capable of hauling the 700-plus pound bike (along with rider and passenger) down from speed with ease. We dabbed at the rear brake lever (which actuates drums on both the bike's rear wheel and the sidecar wheel) from time to time just to be sure everything was working properly and sometimes used it when idling on uneven surfaces, but it's not essential to slow the machine.

In reality, riding the Ural is an adventure, even more so than most other two-wheelers. Specifications don't seem to matter nearly as much on a machine such as this (as opposed to the typical sportbike from Japan Inc.). Horsepower, torque, suspension and braking bits – on a Ural, all that just translates to 'go', 'stop' and 'turn'. We found it rather cathartic but could certainly understand why it wouldn't suit everyone. If you fancy yourself as a Ural rider, we think you'll find plenty to like in the new T, especially with its low base price of just $9,999.
Photos Copyright ©2009 Jeremy Korzeniewski/Weblogs, Inc.


![Gran Turismo 5 demo coming to PSN on Dec 17, GT Academy returns [w/VIDEO]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/370z-gt-academy_143x85.jpg)






Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
TestTest 12:03PM (7/15/2009)
Nice background of Seattle. Seattle Love!
Reply
James 2:50PM (7/15/2009)
At first glance, I thought it was the Bat Cycle... ;p
But seriously, I'd prefer them old skool bikes...either this BMW R71 "Cossack"-ed Urals or the Royal Enfields.
Stuart 4:11PM (7/15/2009)
Since when has Autoblog had writers in the Seattle area? I would totally want to meet up with you guys when you're testing something like this!
Plus you've gotta love Alki for photo ops... :)
Jeremy Korzeniewski 5:01PM (7/15/2009)
Stuart, we went to Seattle to test the bike. And yes -- Alki beach was great!
Jeremy
Freak Mojo 12:17PM (7/15/2009)
I like this a lot. I'd love it to be a tad more mechanically modernized, but you really can't argue with the character or price.
Reply
Shawn 12:26PM (7/15/2009)
Can the side car come off easily?
Reply
Shawn 12:27PM (7/15/2009)
I mean without major cutting/welding? I know it's not meant to be taken off and put back on like a convertible hardtop.
Jeremy Korzeniewski 12:33PM (7/15/2009)
Shawn, Urals with a single driven wheel (ie not the Patrol or Sahara), the sidecar can be removed with a series of bolts. No cutting or welding required.
If you wanted to do that, though, you should consider getting one without the leading-link front forks, which are specifically designed for sidecar riding.
Jeremy
Shawn 12:53PM (7/15/2009)
Thanks Jeremy,
I've wanted a Ural or a Dnepr motorcycle since I was 10-11 years old. I'd love a new one (parts are easier to get) without a side car!
Shawn
cdwrx 12:46PM (7/15/2009)
I like motorcycles, but I have no idea why someone would choose this over something like a second gen Miata. It seems like the worst part of a motorcycle (lack of safety) and the worst part of a car (size.)
Reply
Epyx 12:56PM (7/15/2009)
Weird comment comparing a Miata to a motorcycle but here is one potential reason.
The typical hipster doofus would look totally out of place in a Miata while this bike fits the image well. Remember the typically, hipster ONLY cares about image. They have to look the part of the sagged tight jeans, Ramones t-shirt, and chucks.
Also, you can not in any way compare a bike to a car. One does not usually replace the other.
cdwrx 1:45PM (7/15/2009)
Let's compare; two passengers, no top, no knee dragging, $10k. It would seem I can compare the two.
Hipsters are into cafes, not sidecars. Best I can tell, these are for old timers.
paul34 1:51PM (7/15/2009)
Naa. I can totally see hipsters riding in this thing while listening to The Shins.
Epyx 1:56PM (7/15/2009)
I see your point - a bike is not really a bike anymore when you add the side car. I still dont think the Miata is an appropriate comparison though given the "image" part. Well maybe a thrashed Miata, brush painted drab green with political stickers all over it.
And you cant see some Hipster ridding this with his ugly Darla girlfriend in the sidecar? Seems too perfect, and its flat black. Hipsters cream over flat black.
cdwrx 1:58PM (7/15/2009)
Haha, The Shins yeah I guess it does have Garden State written all over it.
galant14b 2:01PM (7/15/2009)
@cdwrx: I'm 25 and love Ural's (and the sort of related Dnepr). Hopefully I don't count as an "old timer" yet ;)
cdwrx 2:09PM (7/15/2009)
galant, two questions; 1) do you like The Shins? and 2) would you settle for "old soul?"
For the record I like The Shins
Epyx 12:56PM (7/15/2009)
$10K seems like too much for what you are getting. To each is own I suppose. The hipster, art school crowd should love everything but the price.
I really like the looks but it seems to be a turd by every objective measure. Sure, I understand you dont compare it to a sport bike - that would be asinine. But one should compare it to sub 10K cruisers - to which this thing is outclassed by EVERY OTHER BIKE on the market. It may have some looks but the rest is crap. That is fine if you value the looks over any substance. This bike is made for people to look cool, end of story. That is fine but, lets be honest.
Why would anyone want this over a Triumph Bonneville with a aftermarket sidecar?
Also, you guys review a motorcycle and admit that you dont know how to properly brake?
Reply
Jeremy Korzeniewski 1:18PM (7/15/2009)
Epyx -
Also, you guys review a motorcycle and admit that you dont know how to properly brake?
Have you ever ridden a Ural?
Epyx 1:30PM (7/15/2009)
The proper way to brake a motorcycle is to apply both the front ans rear brake. The front brake provides around 70% of the stopping power while the back take up the rest. A rider should use both brakes ridding in order to properly slow and stop the bike.
All bike will stop by only using the front brake but it is not the most efficient or safest. Your entry states that you only dabbled with the rear brake to make sure it worked, this makes it sound like it was not utilized correctly.
If you a claiming you rode the bike as intended (not using the back brake), then this bike is severely lacking in safety. Locking the front brake is extremely dangerous. I have not ridden a Ural but basic riding skills and physics tell me you wrote about an unsafe practice as if it was the proper way to operate a bike.