Teased! 2010 Ford Mustang detail shots

Click above for a high-res gallery of the 2010 Ford Mustang teasers
We've gotten our hands on five new pics of the 2010 Ford Mustang GT and, although the tweaks are subtle and the images obscured, these shots give us a few hints about what to expect when the new 'Stang arrives at this year's Los Angeles Auto Show.
The teaser above shows a more steeply raked hood accompanied by a new headlamp and bumper design, while the profile shot of the convertible previews a slight upkick in the beltline aft of the B-pillar. The Ford GT badge has undergone a slight revision, along with the new five-spoke wheels and a new steering wheel fitted with tweaked buttons for the cruise control.
We're only a couple months away from the 2010 Mustang's official unveiling, but more teasers and spy shots are inevitably on the way. Thanks to Brad for the heads-up.
Gallery: 2010 Ford Mustang Teased
[Source: 2010Mustang]
More 2010 Ford Mustang spy shots













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
Travis 1:25PM (9/10/2008)
what's with the Jay Leno chin?
Reply
Torrent 1:43PM (9/10/2008)
+1. That's a huge underbite.
Gregor 1:51PM (9/10/2008)
I happen to like the severe under-bite. It gives it a little bit of a brutish, cro-magnon look.
s13hybrid 2:05PM (9/10/2008)
+1
The Cromagnum comment had me laughing. I wonder if Geico will have good rates for this car.
rpowers 7:21PM (9/10/2008)
Cromagnum sounds like styling Dodge would use on cars.
BOB 9:30PM (9/10/2008)
YOU WILL ONLY SEE THAT VIEW WHILE ON YOUR HANDS AND KNEES ADMIRING THE CAR
Torrent 12:09AM (9/12/2008)
Although, I must admit- I do like it. And I'm a Camaro Guy.... OMG. Am I going to the dark side?
Matt 1:27PM (9/10/2008)
What's with the stubby speedometer needles? I thought Ford was going to get rid of those?
Reply
Shipey 1:28PM (9/10/2008)
Looks as though they smoothed everything out... like the basic shape is the same, but they ran it through a rock tumbler. (Remember those?!) I like it, especially the added shape in the flanks.
Reply
jackson liu 1:31PM (9/10/2008)
so far so good
Reply
TKE 1:34PM (9/10/2008)
These are detail shots indeed and don't seem to reveal any sort of wholesale changes. But, it bodes well for a little more aggression, something that wouldn't hurt in light of the Challenger and Camaro.
Reply
Stumpy 1:33PM (9/10/2008)
I hope the suspension and massive weight were dealt with, otherwise, don't think the out side looks like more than just a small refresh.
Reply
Nellydesign 3:02PM (9/10/2008)
Considering it weighs less than the Challenger and Camaro I think it'll do OK.
Jimbo 1:36PM (9/10/2008)
I love how they had one photo dedicated to the cruise control buttons. A common complaint on InsideLine on their long term Edge was the lack of a "Cancel" button for the cruise control. Looks like they'll still be complaining on the revised Mustang.
Reply
elpepe 2:25PM (9/10/2008)
all cars HAVE a cancel button for the cruise conrol... it's called a brake.
Jimbo 3:12PM (9/10/2008)
I don't disagree with you. Just pointing out comments made by journalists from another popular site.
Derek 8:06PM (9/10/2008)
People are saying that FORD is basing the side of the new Mustang on the "camaro...blah blah blah..."
FORD BASED THE SIDE OF THE MUSTANG 2010 ON THIER OWN CONCEPTS!!1
People just make this stuff up so that they can feel better abou themselves. And help the Camaro.
The styling cues from the Mustang 2010 that FORD didn't use....Chevy took em and added them to the Camaro.
And FORD didn't use them for a reason.
Face it everbody: Camaro's gonna lose. Mustang is gonna win.
Reply
Farmboy 11:28AM (9/11/2008)
I've always thought the current 'stang was inspired by the 67/68 style. From what little we've seen of the changes, it looks like they've been looking hard at the 69.
I'm hoping that in a few years they'll be up to the 71. I enjoyed the heck out of my Mach 1.
mykul 1:46PM (9/10/2008)
Let's hope it loses that live axle...WHAT!?
Reply
catgirlshyla 1:49PM (9/10/2008)
Wow, they redesigned NOTHING!!!!
ugh, *insert complaint of Mustang Articles on Autoblog*.
Reply