Review: 2009 Mercury Mariner Hybrid [w/VIDEO]
2009 Mariner Hybrid – Click above for high-res image gallery
Ford took pride in being the first automaker on the planet to offer a hybrid utility vehicle when it introduced the first battery-assisted Ford Escape in mid-2004. The Escape hybrid has had mixed success over the past few years, but with gas prices hitting $4 per gallon, the Blue Oval is selling every unit it can produce. For the 2008 model year, one in eight Escape sales are hybrids, which is impressive when you consider that it averages $30,000 per vehicle. In 2006, the Escape was joined by the lower volume Mariner Hybrid, giving Ford two entries in the hybrid soft-roader market, and a green model to sell at Lincoln-Mercury dealerships.
The Escape got a thorough makeover on the outside for 2008, but most of the mechanicals remain a carryover from the previous generation. For 2009, Ford finished the job on the Escape and its sheet metal sibling from Mercury and the hybrid models followed suit. The changes include a new engine that provides more power and improved efficiency, some cosmetic tweaks, and several technological upgrades. Ford is betting that the changes will improve their footing in the green scene, so we took a loaded Mercury Mariner hybrid into the Autoblog Garage to see if the fuel-sipping CUV could win us over.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Mercury Mariner Hybrid
All photos Copyright ©2008 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
Our loaded Light Ice Blue tester came equipped with leather seats, moon roof, Travel Link navigation, and a rearview camera, bring the grand total of the luxo-hybrid to a husky $33,000. But according to Mercury, buyers will be able to achieve over 30 mpg in mixed driving without having to sacrifice ride quality, refinement or aesthetics, something that's sure to please both soccer moms and the Sierra Club.
The Mariner Hybrid's new powertrain is a 2.5L four-cylinder running on the Atkinson cycle, which is mated to the same CVT as the last-generation model. The new mill is essentially a bored-out version of the outgoing 2.3L, though Ford added variable intake timing to improve power and refinement. The new engine is much smoother and more powerful than the previous powerplant, though fuel economy doesn't suffer as a result. The Mariner Hybrid keeps the holdover 330-volt Nickel Metal Hydride battery pack, though the energy-capturing electric brake system is new, recharging the battery pack, and unlike the outgoing model, it allows for stability and traction control.
The tinkering didn't end with the powertrain, either. Ford also added high-strength steel to the A-pillar, frame rails and cross members, which stiffens the Mariner's structure while providing a more comfortable ride around town. Several software enhancements were added to better-optimize efficiency and to make the shift from engine-power to battery-power and back smoother than before.
All those improvements translated well out on Michigan roads, as the 2009 Mariner Hybrid was much more refined than its 2008 predecessor. The new Mariner Hybrid is quieter, the engine turn-off isn't noticable and drivers can now go up to 40 mph without having to revert to petrol-power. In heavy traffic, we were so excited that we weren't using any fuel that we hardly noticed that our day was wasting away in a sea of metal and CO2, and it's nice to go through a fast food drive-through without contributing to global warming. If hybrids could only help us burn calories, we'd all want one.
Whether the engine was on or off, we were impressed with the newly solidified drive characteristics. While the 2008 model looked the part of an all-new CUV, it sometimes felt floaty and cheap on the road, but the 2009 model has better balance and all-around improved composure on the road. The 41 psi low rolling resistance tires didn't feel harsh on bumpy roads, which is a notable improvement over the jarring ride of its battery-assisted predecessor.
While our one week in hybrid land was generally problem free, we did experience about a day and a half when the battery didn't take over for us at all. While it pitched in with assistance at all speeds, it didn't shutter the engine at stops, and it didn't take over at low speeds. The battery never went below 50-percet utilization at any point, but after about 75 miles, everything went back to normal.
Over the course of our drive, we managed a combined 32 mpg in mixed driving (photo above was taken before we reset fuel economy info) which includes roughly a 50/50 mix of highway and city driving on our daily commute. While that tally is far shy of the 43 mpg we achieved with the Prius last year, it's far better than what we've gotten with most non-hybrid compacts we've sampled in the past, and it was substantially better than the 26 mpg we got with the Saturn Vue hybrid. Even when we did have to fuel up, the cap-less fuel system made the task a little easier.
On the inside, the Mariner had plenty of interesting features that should help make the daily drive more palatable. To begin with, Ford's new Travel Link navigation system is incredible. You can check sports scores, weather, gas station information, and movie theater times with minimum navigation. The GPS system works well for directions and maps, and the system comes with a ten-gigabyte hard drive for storing your favorite music. Fuel-conscious drivers can also keep tabs on fuel economy and battery charge by clicking on the info button. We spent most of our week staring at the efficiency display (when it was safe), which made us keenly aware of what our right foot was doing, causing fuel economy improved in turn.
Ford also does a solid job of keeping the driver comfortable with leather seating surfaces with good lateral support, a thick, comfortable leather-wrapped steering wheel, and a cushy resting place for our right arm. The gauge cluster is well lit and easy to read, and there is a meter on the RPM gauge to show when you're driving under battery power.
Our tester also came with a large moon roof that disappointingly didn't open up very far. The size of the opening doesn't justify the added cost and weight to the vehicle, and it doesn't bring in much fresh air. Storage space behind the second row is less than spectacular, and folding the back row completely flat into the floor requires that removal of the headrests. That's problematic because of the amount of effort it takes to get them off, but more importantly, there are a lot of people that will remove the head rests and forget to replace them when they put the seats back into the upright position.
After one week in the Autoblog Garage, we're confident that the 2009 Mercury Mariner Hybrid is a more competent, more refined, and more powerful vehicle than the model it replaced. It easily achieves the fuel economy most of us would kill for, and it looks good doing it. The only thing that would give many of us pause is the $33,000 price tag, but with gas prices on a seemingly unstoppable upwards trajectory, 32 mpg accompanied by plenty of amenities doesn't seem like a bad deal. And in the world of econ-conscious commuters, you could do a lot worse than the Mariner Hybrid.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Mercury Mariner Hybrid
All photos Copyright ©2008 Chris Shunk / Weblogs, Inc.
Autoblog review of the 2009 Mercury Mariner Hybrid
























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
doug 8:07PM (6/25/2008)
Too bad Ford makes so few that you almost have a better chance of getting one of those Honda Claritys than a Mariner Hybrid.
...and a loaded Altima Hybrid costs $33k also, so the price isn't totall out of line.
Reply
TJ 11:55AM (6/26/2008)
From the article: "and it's nice to go through a fast food drive-through without contributing to global warming"
Didn't you get the memo? Since the world has been cooling for 10 years now, the Goracle changed it to 'climate change'
jg 12:00PM (6/26/2008)
It was always climate change and the world is certainly not cooling.
Weather and climate are not the same.
nhthinker 2:21PM (8/03/2008)
A little work and you could get lucky like I did:
Timeline:
June 2009 - Decided time to replace 10 year old Astro getting 15 mpg in 80% city driving 15000/yr- convinced hybrid was most likely best way to go.
mid-July 2009 - Decided Escape/Mariner/Camry/Altima were worth looking at more.
Local dealers said Escapes and Mariners were on 16 weeks order to delivery dates - no hybrids available to test drive.
July 20th - found dealer with 2008 Mariner available for test drive
July 28th - test drove and liked it! Dealer indicated he had a 2009 coming in "one to two weeks" that had the options I was looking for.
July 29th Morning- Visited Toyota Dealer to check out Camrys- I found out I my head hits the roof of Camrys with sunroof - Toyota does not sell high end Camry Hybrids without sunroofs.
July 29th Afternoon- After checking other dealers, by 1pm, I called back and put a deposit on the Mariner.
July 29th Evening - Dealer calls back and says the shipment with the Mariner just arrived.
August 1st - Driving my brand new 2009 Mercury Hybrid for MSRP (no additional markup).
2009 Escapes and Mariners are the only 2009 vehicles currently listed as qualifying for income tax rebates:
http://www.irs.gov/newsroom/article/0,,id=185050,00.html
----
I do not expect anyone else to be as successful as me, but here are the keys to potential success:
1) Call every Ford/Mercury dealer within 100 miles- more likely to have luck with a dealer that keeps one to test drive.
2) Call them again - then give up, place your order and maybe you will get a Christmas present.
empowah 8:11PM (6/25/2008)
Awesome vehicle. ESP, SYNC, and a revised chassis and interior address all my complaints with the 2008 model.
I wonder if EPA fuel economy ratings change for 2009. The '08 FWD already gets better city mpg than the Camry Hybrid.
Reply
SPG 8:48PM (6/25/2008)
Hardly somthing for one who loves to drive as an only car. I however, would be happy to have a Mariner Hybrid as an A-B car and a winter car.
It looks pretty good, drives well (from what I am told), and is not foolishly expensive.
Reply
Aprime 9:06PM (6/25/2008)
Your logic makes no economical sense whatsoever.
Aprime 1:10AM (6/26/2008)
Wait, disregard that I totally read his comment wrong.
DesiAuto 8:53PM (6/25/2008)
This and new escpae has a very very good interior...better than Japanese counterparts.
exterior is somewhat bland.
Overall I like this mariner/escape (never ever liked it for past model years).
Ford should sell quite a few of these...
---
BTW, I have officially changed my position on FLEX after seeing it in wild (actually target parking lot). I think it will do much better than most think ... FLEX LIMITED is sharp looking vehicle. If I had money I would certainly consider buying it.
Reply
Thedevil 9:02PM (6/25/2008)
Wonder how much they'll have to pay Toyota per vehicle sold?
Reply
Bryan 9:08PM (6/25/2008)
Good question. Since we all know its using Toyota's old hybrid technology. Wonder how long till we get a rav4 hybrid.
PJ 9:31PM (6/25/2008)
Incorrect. Toyota and Ford developed their systems independently; Ford's was second, and they found that their tech may have been in conflict with patents already held by Toyota. They negotiated a patent-sharing accord in 2004.
Both companies have publicly stated that Ford received no technical assistance from Toyota in developing the hybrid Escape's powertrain.
Austin 9:44PM (6/25/2008)
Not much because ford will introduce their new battery late this year in the Fusion/milan which will go in the Escape/mariner/tribute. ford will have an unlimited supply on these, not like now where toyota blocks them. The battery will be from California with the same company that they are researching plug-in hybrids.
MTU 5.0 10:00PM (6/25/2008)
Good job setting the record straight PJ!
MGBYG 11:25AM (6/26/2008)
Too bad it is still based on the OLD Mazda 626 stampings...would be nice to update this puppy with the '09 Mazda6 chassis and keep the prices low.
Marc-O 9:03PM (6/25/2008)
"Regenative" ? Heh... :P
Seems like a decent vehicle !
Reply
Paul P. 9:08PM (6/25/2008)
I had a 2002 Mazda Tribute (same as the Escape/Mariner) and it was a pretty good little suv. It's only downfalls were the poor gas mileage, poor interior, and the gearing (too much of a jump from 1st to 2nd). I've seen the new ones and it seems like they fixed all my major concerns. The interior is excellent, it has a six speed auto, and they have the hybrid (for gas savings) and the updated 3.0L V6 (which is more powerful while still better on gas).
All in all, if I was looking for a solid little suv it would definitely be on my list.
Reply
lithdoc 9:17PM (6/25/2008)
Although I am a GM fanboy, I can't help not to say that recent Ford designs are getting better and better. 32mpg is great for a car of this size. Ford's interiors are also really nice and high quality. I only wish Mercury had greater brand recognition and would finally see its sales pick up. Why not to make Mercury an all hybrid brand? Or maybe, a euro-import? Anyway, I think Mullaly is doing a great job at Ford, which now seems to be in far greater shape than GM. I really believe Ford is in the middle of what is one of the greatest corporate turn-arounds of the 21st century.
Reply
Gregg 9:06AM (6/26/2008)
Mercury is dead meat. Lots of people have great ideas how to improve/help Mercury, but it is slated for the ashcan of history. The lack of any new models (other than straightforward Ford clones), no concepts on the board, and no supplier orders after 2012 all say it is toast. Ford is pulling in and killing Mercury softly.
Justin 9:50PM (6/25/2008)
Pretty good for an suv but lets see this same drivetrain in a fusion. Too bad they never made a wagon version.
Reply