Review: 2008 Chevy HHR SS
2008 Chevy HHR SS – Click above for high-res image gallery
Our first experience with the Chevy HHR was back in 2006 when we rented one in Los Angeles while covering the 2006 L.A. Auto Show. Being a fleet vehicle, our HHR rental failed to impress with its raspy, underpowered Ecotec four-cylinder and cheap interior materials. The HHR does, however, have a way about itself. Its retro-inspired design is just plain good looking, better than the PT Cruiser to which this vehicle is most often compared (they were both designed by Brian Nesibtt, GM's current Executive Director of its European design center), and its outward attractiveness shows even on bare bones rental units like the one we abused in L.A.
The 2008 Chevy HHR SS would seem to be the HHR we always wanted, with more power, an upgraded interior, aggressive tweaks to the exterior and the same two-box shape and clever cargo solutions that make the base model popular. But with the market for new car sales in the U.S. as soft as it is, should Chevy be spending its time making a high-horsepower, better handling SS version of a vehicle like the HHR? Read on to find out if their effort was worth it.
Gallery: Review: 2008 Chevy HHR SS
All photos Copyright ©2008 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.
The HHR's retro design is probably not for everyone, but it's a hit with us. It applies specific cues from the 1949 Chevy Suburban to a smaller, tidier package and adds just enough modernity to avoid being a caricature of the past. The General Motors Performance Division (GMPD) didn't just slap a spoiler and some big wheels on a base model to make the HHR SS, but gave the high-performance model a completely new front fascia with a split grille, big lower air intake framing the turbocharged engine's intercooler and a subtle chin spoiler.
Part of what makes the HHR's retro design so nostalgic are its chunky fenders that used to be all the rage some 60 years ago, and here they look right at home shrouding a set of large 18-inch aluminum wheels wearing Michelin all-seasons. There's also a spoiler perched atop the rear hatch and a new rear apron through which a single, larger exhaust tip exits. Finally, there are special "SS Turbocharged" badges heralding the vehicle's motive force on each front door and the rear liftgate.
Our HRR SS tester was coated in a rich shade of Blue Flash Metallic paint, and thanks to body-colored mirrors, side sills and super chunky pillars, there's a lot of surface area to show off the color. While those wide pillars may look fun from the outside, but they also create some big blind spots from the driver's seat. Staring through the short and rather upright windshield can also be frustrating as traffic lights disappear from view long before you reach the white line. This is the price one pays for a cool design.
The interior of the HHR SS is made from the same hard, textured plastic as our rental vehicle was two years ago, but Chevy has added a few extra touches of differentiation. The most obvious is the turbo boost gauge mounted on the A-pillar. Some might think it's cool, but we found it looked aftermarket and was superfluous. The seats are also performance spec with wide cushions and deep bolsters that are both extremely comfortable and grippy. The upholstery is a combination of black woven nylon and gray "suede" Ultralux inserts that make the new thrones look like the most expensive items inside the vehicle.
The rest inside is standard GM parts bin components that are shared with a number of the automaker's other vehicles. While the HVAC controls and stereo are easy to use, we're getting tired of seeing them in almost every Chevy, Saturn, Pontiac, Buick and GMC vehicle we test. The instrument panel, meanwhile, feels like one continuous piece of thin, hard plastic, and the door panels flex in and out from the pressure of your leg pressing against them.
The leather-covered steering wheel with redundant controls for the upgraded stereo (iPod jack included, thank you) and cruise control is swollen in the right places, though could be a bit smaller. There's also some "chrome" trim on the gauge dials, door handles, vents and floor shifter that add a sparkle from the sun to break up the acreage of black.
Rear-seat occupants are treated to the same visual and tactile aesthetic as front-seat passengers and take their places on a 60-40 split folding bench seat. Head and legroom are adequate regardless of where you sit, unless you're the fifth person who's stuck riding center in the second row. There's no third row of seats in the HHR, which is fine. We wouldn't trade this vehicle's excellent ability to swallow stuff for a couple of extra cramped seats.
The second row of seats folds completely flat in the HHR and are also backed with plastic flooring. When down, you've got a cavernous cargo hold with a completely flat and level floor that's finished in durable plastic instead of stainable carpet. There are two smaller storage nooks with closeable lids built into the floor and a larger one at the rear hatch. Configurable in a number of ways with nets, straps and different shelving configurations, the cargo carrying and organizing ability of the HHR are some of its best selling points.
It's finally time to turn the darn thing on, and anyone who's twisted the key of a Pontiac Solstice GXP, Saturn Sky Redline or Chevy Cobalt SS Turbo will instantly recognize the sound of GM's 2.0L turbocharged, direct-inject Ecotec four-cylinder. A jewel of the General's engine lineup, this little mill puts out a stout 260 horsepower and 260 pound-feet of torque... when paired with the available five-speed Getrag manual transmission in the HHR SS. As you can see, our tester was equipped with GM's 4T45 four-speed automatic, with which the 2.0L turbo is dialed back to 235 hp for what we presume is a good reason other than giving us a giant buzz kill.
Even being 25 horsepower down, this HHR SS can still haul aSS. Even though it's a cliché, the HHR SS really does feel like its powered by a V6 rather than a tiny 2.0L four-cylinder. Since the slushbox has only four forward gears, however, it relies too much on the engine's strength to makes its tall gears feel short. We can only imagine what the five-speed manual feels like when you engage it in the motor's sweet spot, as the automatic gives you just a taste. Since there's no manual shift option or paddle shifters, you're completely at the mercy of the four-speed automatic, which, like most GM gearboxes lately, seems more interested in short shifting for fuel economy than maximizing the engine's output. The upside to a stingy automatic is impressive fuel economy, with the HHR SS scoring an EPA estimate of 19 city and 28 highway mpg. We drove the HHR SS all over creation during its week with us, and because much of that was long-distance driving on the freeway, the trip computer reported that we averaged an incredible 27 mpg. We would've stayed ecstatic after our first refueling, but a sticker on the fuel filler door reminded us that only premium fuel gets poured down this engine's gullet.
We honestly weren't thinking of gas prices while driving the HHR SS, though. That's because our mouths were left agape at how this vehicle handles. GM has become increasingly good at suspension tuning, somehow finding that perfect balance between sporty handling and a comfortable ride that exists around 7/10ths of a vehicle's full potential. That's about the limit of safe performance driving on public roads, and the HHR SS handles like a sports car up to that point before giving way to the understeer, torque steer and body roll you would expect. The top 3/10ths of the performance scale have been sacrificed, however, for a ride that's eminently livable on a day-to-day basis and downright comfy on long drives.
If you can believe it, the HHR SS's FE5 sport suspension was actually tuned on the famed Nurburgring in Germany where it posted a record lap time for its class of 8:43.52. While the vehicle's basic suspension components were never meant to tackle the Green Hell, performance-spec components like a 23mm stabilizer bar up front and 24mm bar in the rear, gas-charged twin-tube struts and unique electric power steering system prove that this is no SS wannabe.
We still haven't answered our original question: Should GM have bothered making an HHR SS? Retail and rental customers alike would've appreciated some extra monies applied to the tall wagon's interior, and wouldn't an HHR Hybrid (even a mild hybrid) make a lot of sense right now? Perhaps, but the HHR SS is anomaly the likes of which we'll encounter less and less of going forward. Stiffer CAFÉ and emissions standards will squeeze out development dollars for high-performance models, especially oddball ones like the HHR SS.
The 2008 Chevy HHR SS has a base price of $24,560 $22,375 (sorry, misread the sticker), while our tester was loaded up to $24,560 (not including destination charges) with options like the four-speed automatic transmission ($1,000), side airbags all around ($395), an upgraded stereo system ($295), the Blue Flash Metallic paint job ($295) and XM Satellite Radio ($200). Its pool of potential buyers will be limited to those cross shopping vehicles like the Dodge Caliber SRT4 and MazdaSpeed3. The market for these vehicles isn't large and probably won't grow in the near term, but we don't think Chevy wasted its time developing the HHR SS. Aside from some a sub-par interior, it offers high performance and a level of practicality that aren't often found in the same vehicle at the same time. The HHR SS is much more than its rental fleet relatives would have you think, and for that it deserves a place in the lineup.
Gallery: Review: 2008 Chevy HHR SS
All photos Copyright ©2008 John Neff / Weblogs, Inc.






























Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
Allan 12:13PM (6/02/2008)
I feel like I have a totally opposite opinion of the thing. I can't stand it's looks and think that it's just absurd that they'd make something this lame into an SS.
Then again, I'm not in the market for one and wouldn't consider it with or without the SS. I'm sure the people that would actually buy one will like it... and good for them.
Reply
kanoswrx 12:17PM (6/02/2008)
Biggest waste of time and money on GM's part :( Really should focus on better looking, better economic cars. This thing just should be taken out back and shot and forgotten :)
Reply
geo.stewart 2:10PM (6/02/2008)
the biggest waste in not being able to fit the SS grille in a non-SS vehicle without replacing the front clip!
waiownsyou 12:16PM (6/02/2008)
I know beauty is in the beholder's eye, but come on, Autoblog. Get a new set of eyes. This car is like mobile eye terrorism.
Reply
John Neff 12:41PM (6/02/2008)
I totally disagree, it's basically a wagon shape and I love the fenders and hood. Sure it's a retro design, but it's more interesting than something like the Mazda5 that's just a big wedge. It's a unique design that stands out, just like the PT Cruiser, but I think it's more useful than the PT.
geo.stewart 1:02PM (6/02/2008)
I love mine. totally blacked out fall07 edition. i WOULD appreciate a better interior and a 5-sp auto but otherwise, more distinctive, roomier, and better appointed than similarly priced xB or mazda3. and the PT cruiser handles like a rowboat in the perfect storm.
as for the SS, yes VERY small demographic that would pick this over a MS3, mainly to get the extra space. not sure it was worth it from hevy's perspective
rodan32 1:17PM (6/02/2008)
So how is it that I like the styling but would never be caught dead owning one? It's not a bad look, but it's exactly wrong for the segment. It's like when I found out the PT Cruiser was really a Neon.
Maybe it's the size of the thing; it's got that Suburban style on an econo car. Anyway, it draws way too much attention to itself.
epilonious 1:35PM (6/02/2008)
John: The appropriate Mazda comparison for this car would be a Mazdaspeed3... which has 5 seats in front of a hatch door... a direct inject turbo four cylinder... and will probably be considered "nicer looking" by about 95% of the car-driving populace if not "retro".
Comparing the HHR SS to a mazda5 is like comparing the PT Cruiser to a Kia Rondo. While not completely separate classes... they are going for completely different markets
Xcountryflyer 2:29PM (6/02/2008)
I actually don't mind the HHR, but the SS one is a bit overdone. With the PT Cruiser gone this is only game in town. Glad that GM is paying some attention to it. The PT Cruiser languished and died when it really didn't have to. It had more potential than the nasty Caliber. The HHR is practical, but I'd rather have MS3.
Zodiac 12:29PM (6/02/2008)
It really baffles me how and why Chevy throws around its "SS" line in its vehicle categories. Obviously Chevy isn't the only automaker guilty of whoring out its "racing/power division" *cough* Dodge *cough*, but to even consider slapping on SS tags on a HHR is beyond ridiculous.
Reply
Yar 12:59PM (6/02/2008)
So a class lap-record on the 'Ring isn't worthy of an SS badge?
Miguel 1:39PM (6/02/2008)
Dodge whores its performance marque? The SRT division is one of the only things Chryslerbus has going for it. Say what you will about the SRT-4 being FWD, the Caliber is an underrated beast. Autoblog's own review of the car in question (click: http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/29/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-dodge-caliber-srt-4/) calls it "worth taking a look at" with knocks for the obligatory crappy Chrysler interior and external styling that works for guys with 'roid rage and little else. Meanwhile, it is a "decent corner carver" that has "strong acceleration out of" those corners and "brakes that offer great velocity retardation". Also, the SRT team explained (http://www.autoblog.com/2007/11/29/autoblog-qanda-erich-heuschele-from-srt-answers-why-the-caliber-s/) why they kept it FWD (hint: FWD=lighter car).
Or maybe you were referring to the Charger SRT-8? Except, no, that's not possible, because the Charger SRT-8 is a fantastic performance sedan. Oh, I know! The Viper SRT-10! Uhh...
Granted: there is no need for SRT tuning on a Jeep GC or a Chrylser 300C, especially since the Charger SRT-8 is the exact same car and someone shopping factory-tuned performance vehicles isn't going to cross-shop what passes for luxury from Chrysler. But performance trucks are normal (F-150 Lightning, Silverado SS), so there's no logical complaint against the Ram SRT-10, and SRT's work on cars is probably the best in-house tuning by a volume manufacturer.
montoym 9:36PM (6/02/2008)
Was it also ridicuous for Chevy to slap an SS badge on the old El Camino's?
I will admit that Chevy languished in recent years and placed the SS badge on too many unworthy models, Malibu SS and Malibu Maxx SS come to mind. But, they have stated that for the future, SS badges will be reserved for models truly deserving of the nameplate and they have been following that so far. The Cobalt SS and this HHR SS are very competitive to their respective peers and showcase the SS bage for Chevy very well. I hope to see that continue.
TBlueMax 12:25PM (6/02/2008)
The HHR SS seems to strike a good balance between practicality/utility, economy, and performance. While some folks may find the styling not to their liking, the HHR SS provides a practical package that can gently rock the 'ring for somewhere in the mid-$20Ks... not bad, not bad at all.
As for the styling, love it or hate it, you'd never mistake it for a vehicle of european or asian origin and there's something to be said for standing out in a crowd.
Reply
Rboyett 12:37PM (6/02/2008)
You screwed up on this review by getting the automatic. Several reviewers (from other sites) have stated that the HHR SS is a totally different animal when equipped with the 5 speed manual...
My wife has an 07 HHR and I think its fine for a grocery getter. I just can't stand the window switches mounted between the gear selector and the dash. It looks like the HHR SS has corrected that by putting those switches on the door where they belonged in the first place.
All that said, I do agree that GMs money would have been better spent on upgrading the interior materials. The overall design is ok (except the afore mentioned window switches) but like many older GM products it is failed by cheap looking materials...
Reply
John Neff 12:39PM (6/02/2008)
I get what they give me, I certainly didn't request the automatic.
Noe 12:35PM (6/02/2008)
i saw one and red and it looked hot! but still would perfer a mazdaspeed 3 for my graduation present.
Reply
Ugh 12:39PM (6/02/2008)
Chevy PT Cruiser, made in Mexico.
Reply
Chris 12:44PM (6/02/2008)
They have the audacity to charge $1,000 for a four speed automatic?
wow
Reply
Scott 12:45PM (6/02/2008)
"The leather-covered steering wheel with redundant controls for the upgraded stereo (iPod jack included, thank you)"
I wish everybody would STOP referring to this as an "iPod jack", which implies you can control your iPod, which you can not. It's an "auxiliary input jack", and can be used for any stereo audio device using a 1/8" stereo connector.
Reply