
Click image for photo gallery
We recently spent a week with Saturn's latest addition to the stable, the Aura Green Line, which afforded us the opportunity to size it up relative to its Aura XR sibling that we tested last year. The Aura XR was impressive, with attractive styling, some real pop underhood courtesy of the 3.6L V6, and a nicely-rounded, comfortable driving experience. A lot of he same basic good stuff carries forward to the Aura Green Line. Autoblog's Aura Hybrid also looked pretty sharp and comported itself well overall. Follow the jump for a brief rundown of some of our observations of the Green Line compared to the XR, and keep an eye on AutoblogGreen in the coming days, as our colleague, Sam Abuelsamid, will be posting a complete full-length review of the car.
The Aura Green Line combines the the same mild hybrid system and 2.4L Ecotec engine used in the Vue Green Line that we reviewed last year. Good for 164 horsepower, it's paired with a 4-speed auto (the paddle-shifted six-speed would be nice here, General) and moves the Aura around ably. When warranted, the car gets an electric boost to help out with acceleration. It's no match for the XR's 3.6L V6, which is smoother, quieter, and much more powerful, but that said, the Green Line powertrain lets the car perform well both locally and on the interstate. The little green "eco" light appears quite readily and will remain illuminated as long as you keep your right foot light on the throttle. It becomes a bit of a game while driving to see how long you can keep it going, and unlike the '07 Vue Green Line, the Aura GL has an info center display in the gauge cluster that shows you both instant and average fuel economy. This means you can really keep tabs on how you're doing, and see a number to correspond with the light on the instrument panel.
The EPA rates the Aura Green Line at 28/35 city/highway, and over the week, we averaged right around 25 mpg -- just like we did with the Vue Green Line. The lowish number is probably attributable to yours truly's hellish 30-mile-each-way commute in mostly stop-and-go traffic. While it really puts the stop/start system to work, it otherwise doesn't play up to the Aura's strength as an economical highway cruiser. That trait that became apparent when I used the car as my transportation to and from the Greenwich Concours last weekend. In contrast to my weekday commute, the 60-mile round trip each weekend day was a breeze, and over the two days, the car's average fuel economy increased pretty quickly.
Our tester was equipped with the Preferred Package, which adds a power driver's seat, wheel-mounted radio controls, and heated electric outside mirrors. The cloth seating surfaces are fairly generic-looking, but the seats themselves are very comfortable and supportive. Parents who'd like a leather seating option (it's easier to keep clean) are out of luck: hides aren't available in the Aura Green Line -- a surprising omission, if you ask us. We also have to say that we found the light gray interior color to be on the boring side -- this is a matter of personal taste, of course, but it just didn't jibe well with the car's attractive Berry Red exterior, in our opinion. The available tan fabric and trim is far more complimentary, and is what we'd choose if we were buying. 
A passenger commented on the car's backseat legroom and noted that the dugouts in the front seatbacks really make a difference in this respect. Trunk space remains ample, but some is sacrificed to make room for the car's battery pack. One thing we mentioned when reviewing the XR is that the center storage bin's lid and latches felt exceptionally flimsy, and we expressed concern over their ability to survive daily use. After driving the Aura Green Line, we can affirm that the bin's lid really is an egregious piece of crap. The latch on this particular tester had become off-kilter and didn't work properly. It's this kind of thing that detracts from what is otherwise a perfectly good car that we genuinely like. Fix it.
You'll find other hybrid sedans that top the Aura Green Line in terms of available equipment and fuel economy (think Altima and Camry), but the Saturn wins big in the window sticker competition, checking in at just $23,070 as tested. Throw in the $1300 federal tax credit it's eligible for, and once again, you have a very appealing value package in a car wearing the square Green Line badge.Stay tuned for much more on the Aura Green Line from AutoblogGreen.
UPDATE: The full In the AutoblogGreen Garage review has now been posted.




All photos Copyright ©2007 Alex Núñez / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Adam @ Jun 8th 2007 1:37PM
I am curious, but doesn't city driving generally work better for a hybrid? Then it can take advantage of the regenerative braking.
Also, I am glad GM is making an effort, but doesn't a standard Camry V6 put out similar milage numbers?
Again, I apluade the effort, but is seems more like a half hearted effort to get to the market to cash in on the hybrid popularity contest. Seems like a "Me too!" effort. Hopefully, the Volt will be a truely inovative car.
Alex Nunez @ Jun 8th 2007 1:45PM
Adam,
Keep in mind that the light hybrid system GM uses in the Green Line cars cannot run in an EV-only mode, which is what makes other hybrids really excel in certain local/city situations.
ruggels @ Jun 8th 2007 1:45PM
City driving generally works much better for FULL hybrids, which this car is not (it's the same reason the hybrid civic returns greater highway mpg). This car is also cheaper as a result so you give and take a little.
.. though for $23,000 you'll be able to buy the new jetta tdi in a bit with better economy and more power... though i digress... i'm not one to knock gm for finally getting 'serious' about green, and this is perhaps the finest sedan they offer below the cadi level right now (aura in general) so props to them for releasing it. I just wish it achieved better average mpg then my Jetta 2.0T being driven in Sport for an entire tank :(.
Adam @ Jun 8th 2007 1:47PM
OK, I just checked and I am wrong.
EPA numbers:
Camry I4 (auto) is 24/33 and 24/34 (man)
V6 is 22/31
Hybrind is 40/38
Still with the observed number by the author, that is still pretty low for a hybrid.
So how does this system differf rom the Toyota that gets higher milage in the city?
ruggels @ Jun 8th 2007 2:36PM
"So how does this system differf rom the Toyota that gets higher milage in the city?"
As a few of us have already articulated in response to your previous question, toyota uses a full hybrid system to deliver better fuel economy, it's also more costly.
Viv @ Jun 8th 2007 1:40PM
Great interior and superb bang for the buck. Can't beat that.
Bill @ Jun 8th 2007 1:43PM
It doesn't give you great milage because its a MILD hybrid or whatever that is. Its amazing how Toyota Ford and others give you a full hybrid but GM only wants to go the MILD route. Like their Silverado and now Aura. Whats the point? Either dont do it or go all the way.
Alex Nunez @ Jun 8th 2007 1:49PM
Bill,
That's what the GM 2 Mode system's going to do. "Real" hybrid power's coming, first on Tahoe/Yukon, then on Vue (with a plug-in following sometime after that).
One has to assume that GM will use it on other passenger cars over time.
tbyron @ Jun 8th 2007 3:09PM
Why get so hung up over the semantics of mild v full hybrids? Application of these sorts of technologies and efficiency strategies each have their place, with different levels of cost and effectiveness. For $23,000, this car gets pretty great gas mileage for a car of this size. Sure, a Jetta TDI gets better mileage for the same price; but, it is a smaller car. The more comparably sized Passat TDI costs a lot more.
When BMW rolls out a bunch their start/stop technologies, why is that nobody whines about mild hybrid and about them not going all the way?
John @ Jun 8th 2007 1:46PM
That interior doesn't look good at all. I remember it was looking better before with all the wood and leather on the top model. I feel bad for the people buy the base Aura as the interior will probably be dark and plasticky.
Alex Nunez @ Jun 8th 2007 1:50PM
Like I said, the tan interior's a lot better looking, even with just the cloth. (If I'm not mistaken, the tan gets the woodgrain accents, too).
Viv @ Jun 8th 2007 2:34PM
Much better to look at than what japan is trotting out these days. They seem to operate on the belief that people will buy their cars no matter what.
John R @ Jun 8th 2007 3:12PM
Hey Viv isn't there a playerhaters ball you should be attending?
The Saturn's interior is nice, but you can't say, "they seem to operate on the belief that people will buy their cars no matter what."
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=109710
hate, hate, hate, hate, hate...
bmoredlj @ Jun 8th 2007 1:46PM
I appreciate the effort...rather than waiting two more years (or whatever) for the full two-mode hybrid, Saturn opted to bring SOME kind of hybrid as soon as possible. It's more of a teensy preview of things to come than a copycat. That said, I'd prefer an Aura diesel option to a complex hybrid system. It IS an Opel...and a European car without a diesel option is like a Chihuahua without the shivers.
Alex Nunez @ Jun 8th 2007 1:53PM
bmoredlj,
It's not an Opel. Ues, it uses Opel design cues, but this is not the same car that Europe has. The next-gen Vectra/Aura will be the same thing, though. This is built on the line next to the Malibu, which is basically its mechanical twin. new Malibu's going to get the green Line powertrain, too.
Rick Lyon @ Jun 8th 2007 1:53PM
I just can't look a this car and not wonder about the waiting for a flood AWD SUV sized gaps above the tires. s this an offroader? Screwed up a perfectly good euro design.
ConsipacistThot @ Jun 8th 2007 2:17PM
'Screwed up a perfectly good euro design.'
'Screw up' and 'Euro' is a given. This whole carbon, green and warming stuff is the scam of scams. Now carbon taxes? Friggin liberals
LaughingTooHard @ Jun 8th 2007 2:55PM
Just a silly question but can't they detune the 2.4 ECOtec a bit to get better milage? If you don't have 174bhp then you can can't use 174bhp right? If GM put the 2.0 liter ECOtec wouldn't that give up some ooomph! for a few MPG? Seems obvious to me, when I bury the pedal on my 240+bhp Impala I get 19mpg when I tool around at 1/3 throttle I get 30mpg. Anyone want to enlighten me as to why they can't do this at the factory. If you are buying a car for the economy, why not make it economic by 20% less power? I know I wouldn't miss the ponies if they were never there.
dan @ Jun 8th 2007 3:18PM
Why would anyone want that? You already have the option of keeping your foot out of it. Electronically neutering the top end will just make passing and merging needlessly difficult.
MikeW @ Jun 8th 2007 2:58PM
Does 'I' stand for intermediate? Starting in 2nd and excluding 4th?
Come on 6t40.