Hyundai considering RWD, car-based pickup
Could it be true? Mike Levine at Pickuptruck.com thinks so and has quotes from Hyundai to back it up. The speculation is that the South Korean automaker may levereage the BH platform on which its upcoming Genesis luxury sedan is based to produce a new rear-wheel-drive pickup. Up until this point, we were aware that in addition to the BH-based Genesis, Hyundai was also planning a long-wheelbase version of the luxury sedan, a version badged as a Kia, and a rear-wheel-drive coupe. Adding a rear-wheel-drive pickup to the mix would help Hyundai get even more mileage out of the platform, so to speak.
Of course, being based on a unibody platform, the Hyundai pickup would be more like Honda's midsize Ridgeline than Toyota's new Tundra, the latter of which was designed to compete against Ford, Chevy, Dodge and Nissan in the full-size truck segment. Hyundai's pickup would likely share the same advantages that the Ridgeline now enjoys: under bed storage, a decent ride, sharper handling, and potentially higher fuel economy than a traditional pickup. Unlike the Ridgeline, however, it would be rear-wheel drive rather than all-wheel drive and feature Hyundai's new "Tau" 4.6L V8 rather than a V6. Thus, the Hyundai pickup would likely be a more capable hauler than the Ridgeline, which is saddled with a low 5,000-lb. towing capacity, less than half of some traditional pickups. Plus, Hyundai has confirmed that the Tau can go larger than 4.6L if it's used in a truck, which means it would produce considerably more than the 300 horsepower that's being planned for the Genesis.
[Source: Pickuptruck.com, illustration by Mark Stehrenberger used with permission]
And get this: Hyundai may also be planning a unibody compact pickup powered by a four-cylinder engine driving the front wheels. We've been saying for quite some time that the compact pickup market is becoming more ripe by the day, and it's only a matter of time before an automaker realizes that there's a demand for small, fuel-efficient pickups with more refinement than the aged Ford Ranger.
With all of this news, we think it's safe to say Hyundai is a full-line automaker in the making.
Get a WordPress.com Blog
_opt_thumbnail.jpg)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
fordguy 10:03AM (2/02/2008)
I saw this new Hyundai pickup near the Fountain Valley, California design center for Hyundai over a year ago, very thinly cloaked with "car bra's". It was being driven by a white coated tech, and even tho the front had a mask, you could easily see the "H" outlined on the front grill. About the same size as the 1st generation Tundra, read the rest at Edmunds.com. At the time Hyundai denied it, but Kia was showing the same thing...the Mojave concept pickup at east coast car shows in 2004!
Reply
Bob-omb 10:47PM (5/04/2007)
I can't say I'm crazy about the idea of the big honkin' unibody pickup, but the compact one's not a bad idea. The only competitive product in the segment is the Tacoma, so maybe Hyundai could win some sales there from people who want something lighter duty.
Reply
Brian W 11:05PM (5/04/2007)
Why is it that every time Hyundai THINKS about a future model, it becomes a major press release. It's like concepts at the auto show, half won't ever be built and the ones that do won't be anything like the concept.
Reply
Kwesi 11:11PM (5/04/2007)
Mitsubishi Should bring a version of their super award winning L200/triton, which beats the ranger in every regard in every country the two are sold, btw #1. i like the new hyundai, and i always fight for the underdog. This bh platform seems to be the entire essence of hyundai for the next cople of years, and i see it posing prommisng results. Its not clear to me the point of hyundia and kia just yet, because i was assuming the hyundais was to become a lexus fighter, while kia went were hyundia is now, but i see little to no demarkation in products, and i am thinking this merger may go a little further. Cant wait to see how this turns out for Hyundai and the entire industry
Reply
jgp 11:49PM (5/04/2007)
Car-based pickups work best when it's clearly just a car with a bed. That's why I like the El Camino, Holden & Ford Utes, Subaru Baja (and the classic BRAT/Brumby), etc.
But I hate how Honda is trying to market the Ridgeline as a truck. They've styled it with proportions that make it look like it's a truck and not just a car with a bed, which killed any appeal the Ridgeline might have had.
If Hyundai's smart, they'll just chop the top half off the back of the Genesis and not try to proportion it like a truck.
Reply
TriShield 12:25AM (5/05/2007)
I agree, cars that can tow, haul and retain the desirable qualities of a car are superior to gigantic, V6-only trucks like the Ridgeline. Nearly every review of the Ridgeline I've read has noted V8-like fuel consumption. What's the point then? Why not just get a Tundra or another real truck?
I think with fuel prices going up and the mass exodus from SUVs there's a market for cars like the Australian Utes in the US. People who love cars but want to run to Lowe's every once in awhile or haul something in the back. All without the stinging fuel bills and driving dynamics penalty.
GM can't sell the upcoming Ute SS here soon enough.
Reply
Neal M 1:22AM (5/05/2007)
Here's why the BH-platform C-U-T would be a great idea: low development costs. They already have the platform. They already have the engines. They really just need to design a chassis to ride the platform, make some model mixes, and do some advertisement--that's all it would take.
More importantly, having this kind of vehicle would position Hyundai head to head with Honda, even more so than as of today. This is exactly what Hyundai wants. They want you to compare (objectively nonetheless) Hyundais with Hondas. Why? It's because they are VERY CONFIDENT that they will come out on top. Why? They have VERY COMPETENT products.
So does Honda? Yes. Honda, however, doesn't have good prices, and to some people that "Honda magic" seems like "expensive plastic." Hondas are appliances, for better or worse. Hyundais have personality. I guess you could say the same for Honda...but it would be the personality of a tripping ASIMO (over Hyundai's cleverly placed leg).
Reply
Alexis 3:34AM (5/05/2007)
Build it and they will come...
Just as long as it has a cargo bay longer than the damn baja!
A waterproof lockbox built under the floor of the bed bed would be essential-for laptops and stuff like that.
Reply
BOB 3:54AM (5/05/2007)
.............................
the EL KOREA-MINO!!!!
If GM can't get it together, I guess the idea is fair game. Maybe Lutz plans to show the 2014 El Camino as a concept, while GM fiddles around trying to decide what country to make it in.
Reply
Rob 4:04AM (5/05/2007)
Bob, I don't make fun of the cars with automatic transmissions and big v8s, just the people that buy them. The car can't help it if most casual drivers like a slushbox.
Reply
Brian 2:13PM (5/05/2007)
Brian W, when will you drop your biased and insecure tradition of bad-mouthing every Hyundai article. Are you a Japanese or Big 3 fan boy who cries everytime someone buys a Hyundai? I bet you've never even driven a recetn Hyundai. Get a life, Hyundai deserves better given their efforts to please the consumer.
Reply
stevezilla 6:15PM (5/10/2007)
make the front end a little less ugly, and I'll buy one. Kinda makes me wonder why Honda doesn't make something like this. Drop in a torquey hybrid V6 and I'll be all over a Hyundaimino. Yeah, i said it.
Reply
far jr 7:00PM (5/05/2007)
I would rather see a return to fuel efficient compact trucks rather than car based trucks. The Ridgeline certainly is not a booming success. Curent compact/midsize trucks have very little price and fuel economy benefits over full sized trucks.
Reply
A&W 8:42PM (5/05/2007)
DCX could make a nice car based truck out of the Magnum/300. And get it to the market faster than Hyundai.
Reply
jgp 10:20PM (5/05/2007)
#12 - Yeah, I miss the days of the tiny compact pickup. I miss the classic Datsun Pickup, Chevy S-10, etc. Now, everything's gone to midsize trucks. I hate midsize trucks; not light enough to be a compact truck, not large enough to be a fullsize truck. The worst of both worlds.
Reply
Bryan 4:31AM (5/06/2007)
JPG old as it may be, the Ranger is there. It's not a bad truck at all. Just old. I think Hyundai is wasting their time. If Honda makes one and it doesnt sell very well, what makes them think people are going to shell out for a Hyundai truck? Hyundai sales were down this month, and they aren't exactly close to the top. They should focus on the lackluster cars they already have and leave trucks--in any form--to Ford, GM, and Chrysler.
Reply
Bob 10:54AM (5/06/2007)
if the car will look like this, i dont mind to buy one, it looks ok.. but about the engine, sorry im with kyoto..
http://mininova.wordpress.com/
Reply
dan 1:01PM (5/06/2007)
#12/14, besides the Ranger the Colorado/Canyon is also small, it just isn't any good. The regular cab Tacoma isn't too big either.
The spec inflation wars have been much worse to the light duty fullsize truck, which is now extinct. They've all gained 1000lbs, 10K towing capacity, 350hp, and 12mpg - in other words, medium duty trucks with soft rear springs for a nice ride and no bed payload capacity. Stupid before, and with $3.50 gas stupid and unaffordable.
Reply
Barney 6:44PM (5/06/2007)
RE:12. I would rather see a return to fuel efficient compact trucks rather than car based trucks.
I agree but some trucks are close to being cars to appeal to those who don't need them. A car/truck is better suited to those who don't "use" a truck but loose out without "Macho" appeal. Small pickups came with four cylinders and eventually V6s as an option. Now four cylinders have more power then the v6s did,but hard to find and none available in the 4X4.
Reply
Mike Homeniuk 8:39AM (5/08/2007)
...and if the illustration's any indication, it'll be a heck of a lot more attractive than the Ridgeline as well....
Reply