Filed under: Detroit Auto Show, Sedans/Saloons, Chevrolet, GM
Detroit Auto Show: Chevrolet's Malibu gets a makeover

click on above image to view our updated gallery of the Malibu with an additional 29 live shots
We didn't think Ed Peper required corrective action nearly as badly as the Malibu, but "Fashion Police" star Bobbie Thomas was on hand this morning to give Chevrolet's general manager a fashion makeover in a quick skit that showed that, if nothing else, Peper is one hell of a good sport.
Kidding aside, Peper introduced the 2008 Malibu, a sedan that GM claims will lead the Chevrolet brand's effort to regain competitiveness in the passenger car market. In person, the pre-production interior is excellent, and we're quite anxious to see the production hardware. GM's official photography made the front fascia appear to be a bit bulky, but the shape looks much better in real life, and the exterior in general shows an attention to detail that we're just not used to seeing from the General's mainstream vehicles. Overall, we'd say that the design and styling will be a strong asset when battling it out in the hyper-competitive midsize sedan market.
Under the hood, you'll no longer find any pushrods, as the Ecotec four-banger is standard, while the "High Feature" DOHC 3.6L V6 provides additional motivation. A new six-speed auto is available with both engines, which is the first time such a trans has been paired with a four-cylinder in this segment.
Click on our updated high-resolution gallery to see more of the Malibu's official introduction. We've also included the official press release after the jump, as well as video released by GM of the Malibu being driven through the country.
For our comprehensive listing of everything from Detroit, click here.
VIDEO:
PRESS RELEASE:
2008 CHEVROLET
Performance comes from a family of powerful dual-overhead cam four- and six-cylinder engines, including a 2.4L Ecotec DOHC four-cylinder engine and a 3.6L DOHC V-6 with variable valve timing. A six-speed automatic transmission is standard with the V-6 and is offered with the 2.4L four-cylinder – a segment first.
Here's a look at
Driving experience
The rear suspension also features a direct-acting stabilizer bar, as well as monotube or twin-tube shock absorbers, depending on the model. The front and rear suspension systems are tuned for each powertrain combination, delivering tailored driving characteristics for all models. Hydraulic ride bushings and body control damping measures enhance the connected-to-the-road driving feel while supporting a comfortable ride.
GM's StabiliTrak electronic stability control system is standard on LT and LTZ models. It uses sophisticated vehicle sensors tied to the anti-lock braking system to help the driver maintain control during certain maneuvers. The new panic brake assistance feature provides full braking power when a panic-braking event is detected. This can reduce the braking distance, providing more control in helping to avoid a crash.
Steering response is precise and immediate, thanks to tuned steering systems designed for each model.
A family of 16-, 17- and 18-inch wheels is offered with
The suspension systems are mounted to a robust chassis and integrated body structure that features a safety cage design and strategic placement of high-strength steel for outstanding structural integrity. The strong chassis and body structure enable more precise mounting of the suspension systems, a design trait that enabled engineers to focus on finer degrees of suspension tuning. A safety cage construction built into the
Powertrain
The 2.4L Ecotec DOHC four-cylinder engine is rated at 164 horsepower (122 kW)* and delivers an estimated 31 mpg in highway driving, which is projected to be as good as or better than the segment's current sales leader. It also is good enough to join the exclusive ranks of vehicles rated at 30 mpg or more – a club that will be tougher to join in 2008 because of revised EPA mileage test standards. GM has more "members" in the 30-mpg club than any other manufacturer.
The 2.4L Ecotec DOHC will be offered with all trim levels. LS and LT models are backed by a Hydra-Matic four-speed automatic transmission. Malibu LTZ models with the 2.4L engine are equipped with a new Hydra-Matic 6T40 six-speed automatic – the only four-cylinder/six-speed automatic combination in the segment.
The available 3.6L V-6 VVT is a sophisticated, all-aluminum DOHC engine that uses variable valve technology to produce 252 horsepower (188 kW)** while delivering an estimated 26 mpg in highway driving. It is mated with a Hydra-Matic 6T70 six-speed automatic transmission.
The Malibu's six-speed transmissions enable a strong balance between performance and fuel efficiency, with the six forward gears offering optimized performance at all rpm levels, as well as reduced rpm at highway cruising speeds. Lower rpm can enhance fuel economy and reduce cabin noise. The six-speed transmissions also feature Driver Shift Control (DSC), which enables the driver to shift manually with steering wheel-mounted controls.
All
Quiet, thoughtful environment
The interior's attention to detail complements the quieting features, with an ergonomic design using materials that convey quality and value, including a cast skin material on the instrument panel. For the first time, the
Ambient lighting in areas such as the overhead console and door-pull pockets enhances the
OnStar
All 2008
*Pending SAE certification.
**SAE certified. A new voluntary power and torque certification procedure developed by the SAE Engine Test Code committee was approved March 31, 2005. This procedure (J2723) ensures fair, accurate ratings for horsepower and torque by allowing manufacturers to certify their engines through third-party witness testing. GM was the first auto manufacturer to begin using the procedure and expects to use it for all newly rated engines in the future.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
sk 10:34AM (1/09/2007)
Now compare that to the Dodge Avenger. The Malibu looks like its 10-15 years ahead of the Avenger.
Reply
Piter 10:37AM (1/09/2007)
The photos coming from Autoblog are great. Keep up the good work.
Reply
Kev 10:39AM (1/09/2007)
the rear light treatment is awful. it looks like a mashup between the old impala and mitsu diamante...
Reply
Jeremy 10:39AM (1/09/2007)
Absolutely beautiful. Great lines, awesome powertrain, excellent attention to detail, and best of all...BUILT IN AMERICA!!
Reply
laserwizard 10:39AM (1/09/2007)
Yawn! This car is already in an Acura dealership (and is due to be replaced in a year). Once again, GM is behind the styling curve instead of leading it. While this is certainly better than the current model, let's not get carried away with praise. This model is four years TOO late to be significant. Being better than the prior model is not good enough, Mr. Putz. You have to be BETTER THAN THE COMPETITION now and this isn't.
Reply
J.C. 10:40AM (1/09/2007)
I agree with #1. The Avenger looks like the new K-Car in comparison of exterior styling. It is great that this car is clearly built on the same platform as the Saturn Aura...The Car of the Year! I can't wait for the GM haters to post about this car without seeing it in person and slamming it for GM's long ago mistakes it has cleaned up years ago.
Reply
Phil 10:40AM (1/09/2007)
Looks like it will be a hit
Reply
Phil 10:41AM (1/09/2007)
And Jeremy, speaking of detail...there are Chevy Bowties in the headlights and taillights
Reply
3rdgear=heaven 10:44AM (1/09/2007)
It'll look great in my MS3's rearview mirror. All kidding aside, though, I think the General has done well here.
Reply
robino 10:45AM (1/09/2007)
Looks like another nail in the coffin.
Reply
DarkKnight67 10:49AM (1/09/2007)
And here's lazerwizard with another justifiable comment ...
Reply
djSyndrome 10:53AM (1/09/2007)
Infiniti called. They want their taillights back.
Reply
Be Oh Be 10:57AM (1/09/2007)
This is a very nice looking car. And it's good to see that GM is finally starting to wake up and put the good engines in their regular, mainstream sedans. This will be a true contender against the Camry and Accord (if the price is right, which it should be).
It *is* actually quite amazing how many people on here totally bash the hell out of GM products, even if they don't know anything about them or haven't driven them or seen them in person. C'mon, we're all supposed to be (mature) car enthusiasts, right? Lets start really looking at this stuff objectively, and not just bashing for the sake of it being trendy or funny. Most of the serious, objective people that frequent sites like this probably skip right over the flaming comments that some of the more childish people write on here (yes you, "laserwizard" - and the many like you). Perhaps this looks similar to an Acura TL, but I know for sure that this car won't have a $36,000 sticker price.
It's good to be critical, we all have our opinions, but it's fairly obvious those who just dislike GM for the sake of disliking them.
At the end of the day, there really isn't much difference in any of these new cars - Toyota, GM, Ford, Hyundai, or whomever. They're all pretty good (when you compare them to cars from 20 or 30 years ago).
Reply
che culattone 11:04AM (1/09/2007)
it's better than the current malibu....but really, is that saying a lot? i was hoping for something much better styling-wise
Reply
laserwizard 11:05AM (1/09/2007)
Damn that interior is awful looking in that color combination. Feces brown and battleship grey - barf! Also the instrument cluster is awful - hate that central speedo look with two smaller gauges next to it. The more I see of this car the less I like it. Poor quality joints on the dashboard with so many pieces - this is not a well constructed model. The same problem was on the CTS with awful joints, too much useless faux aluminum trim and too many pieces making it up. GM has a long way to go on interiors making what they design look like it isn't made in China.
Reply
Robert O 11:12AM (1/09/2007)
Finally, a design worthy of the Malibu name. Looks like Chevy is finding its groove. Though I must confess to being confused about that two-toned interior - at least in the choice of tones.
Reply
dude 11:12AM (1/09/2007)
I find it funny how the same people that said the Camry is ugly say how great this car looks! Put two photos next to each other and they look nearly the same: the bubble nose, the angled headlights, the same exact lines from the side, etc.
Also, I think there needs to be a rule here that from now on if you say that Car X looks ugly then you need to say what car in the same class looks good so that people can get an idea of what you consider a good looking car in that class.
Reply
carguy 11:19AM (1/09/2007)
It certainly looks better than the current Camry and Accord but its too early to judge if it will be competitive. If all the details make it into production, the fit and finish are acceptable and it drives as well as the Saturn Aura, then GM will have a competitive product.
Maybe they should have given it a new name as the mere association with recent Malibu models may depress its resale value.
Reply
Sheth 11:25AM (1/09/2007)
Th car looks good. Laserwizard and others cant be taken seriously. This car is right on time in terms of styling, those saying its 4 years to late must not be familar with the Accord, Camry or Sonata. Or the Altima for that matter. The Altima looks almost the same as it did when it was new in 2001. Talk about being a dated design.
You cant respect people that criticize the styling of this car but think mainstram Japanese sedans are on the cutting edge of design.
Reply
American Cars suck 11:28AM (1/09/2007)
Not a bad looking car. Question is will the wheels stay on?
Reply