Vital Stats

3.7L V6
273 HP / 270 LB-FT
6-Speed Automatic
All-Wheel Drive
Curb Weight:
4,552 LBS
17.2 / 100.7 CU-FT
16 City / 22 HWY
As Tested Price:
After spending some time roaming the Hill Country of central Texas with Mazda's new Mazda6 and CX-5 with the 2.5-liter Skyactiv engine, I got a round with the redesigned CX-9 back in Michigan. The three-row Mazda crossover comes to court in the 2013 model year with the same 3.7-liter V6 engine that we've sampled before (still making 273 horsepower and 250 pound-feet of torque), though the nose that wraps it has been updated with the same "Kodo" design language that marks out the CX-5 and friends.

I had quite recently spent time in our long-term Nissan Pathfinder, so I felt better equipped than usual to suss out the potential high and low points of Mazda's family-facing CUV.

Driving Notes
  • A combination of a responsive throttle pedal and a surprisingly lively exhaust note made the CX-9 feel immediately sportier than the CVT'd Pathfinder I had just stepped out of. The Mazda's six-speed automatic transmission was surprisingly willing to drop gears and pile on the revs when I put my foot to the floor for a pass on the highway, and I actually never really felt prodded to use the manual mode as a result. Don't get me wrong, the CX-9 isn't "fast" in an objective sense, but it definitely feels adequately powerful for a largish 4,500-pound crossover. (Those seeking real speed with three rows would still prefer the Ford Explorer Sport or Dodge Durango in V8 trim, I'd wager.)
  • True to form for Mazda, the CX-9 feels a shade sprightlier in terms of handling than does the bulk of its competitive set. Sitting in the drivers seat for the first time, I was actually a little shocked at how small in diameter the steering wheel is. Better yet, the front end of the large vehicle moves promptly when guided by this sporty wheel, turning in with a quickness that belies the long wheelbase, and offering a shade more road feedback than is typical of this class. I'm not sure how many buyers really care about a kind of "athletic" steering feel when selecting their next kid-wagon, but the Mazda would seem to be the top-of-class here.
  • Overall fit and finish of our CX-9 Grand Touring-spec interior felt nice – I particularly liked the kind of micro-suede door inserts – if a little bit simple. There's still more hard-plastic surfacing in the CX-9 than I'd gotten used to in our long-term Nissan, and far fewer enticing pieces of technology. Mazda is offering a new-for-2013, 5.8-inch display with which to negotiate the navigation and media controls, but the interface simply serves to make the CX-9 feel slightly less out of date than it would with the older setup. And the Mazda didn't have the near-luxury feeling that the plusher, gizmo-laden Pathfinder does.
  • There was more interruption from wind and tire noise in the CX-9 than in other similarly sized crossovers and SUVs I've been in lately, too. Just a shade louder, mind you, but there was enough wind noise at 70 miles per hour on the highway that I was forced to notice that I didn't like Mazda's stereo as much as I had the Pathfinder's. (Maybe because the Pathfinder's quieter cabin provided a better sound stage?)
  • While the third-row seating of the CX-9 is clearly not made for six-foot, five-inch guys like me, I did have a seat in the second row to see how it measured up. Beyond feeling a tiny bit lacking in headroom, I found the three-seat-wide second row a place that I wouldn't have a problem camping out in over goodly distances. My legs and knees had space to move around, and the seat bottoms weren't overly short or too stiff. In other words: Your tweenage kids should fit just fine.
  • My conclusion about the CX-9 in today's market is a little mixed. I feel as though most shoppers in this segment are going to want more content, a cushier ride or more interior volume than Mazda is offering us. On the other hand, I don't think that I've tested a three-row crossover that's quite so fun to drive as this one. That strikes me as a core competency that's not super valuable for the segment, though it might be more of a niche (driver-focused family haulers) than I understand.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 2 Years Ago
      They need to get rid of the Old inefficient Ford Engine it is using and put something refreshed.
      • 2 Years Ago
      Sorry, I like the new Mazda's but this is getting abit long in the tooth despite the new front end. For almost $40k I would expect something a bit more up to date than this... I think Mazda should have just made a longer wheelbase CX-5 or something.
      • 2 Years Ago
      Strange, this is the first "Kodo" styled Mazda I'm not a fan of. I really do think that the original CX-9 when it first came out was far better looking and more fluidic, this seems a bit over-styled if anything. Nice to hear that this is still a great driving SUV, always have been a fan of Mazda
      • 2 Years Ago
      The only thing that kept my mother from trading her Lexus RX in for one was fuel economy. She loved the plush upscale feel of the car. It's a shame they don't have a Skyactive V6 out yet.
      • 2 Years Ago
      I like the exterior, but was put off when I finally climbed inside of one. Lots of hard, cheap feeling surfaces.
      • 2 Years Ago
      Mazda is the only high volume that makes sure every car is fun to drive and provides feedback, now that BMW stopped caring. It's a shame Mazda is so underrated.
        • 2 Years Ago
        Agreed. I've owned several over the years (Protege5, Mazdaspeed6, currently a Mazdaspeed3). We leased an 08 CX-9 and had it for 3 years. I miss it as much as any other car I've owned - It was such a pleasure to drive!
        Gernn Blanston
        • 2 Years Ago
        No better word than "underrated" for the Mazda5. Love that car. I don't even object when people snicker that's it a minivan. A mini-minivan is what it is, and it drives better and holds more junk than a small SUV. The girlfriend is okay with it too, so let 'em hate.
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Gernn Blanston
          I'll second that on the Mazda5
      Avinash Machado
      • 2 Years Ago
      Mazda is like the old Honda. Fun to drive cars at affordable prices.
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Avinash Machado
        I couldn't agree with you more. I am a long time honda fan who now has two Mazdas and just one Honda in the driveway.
      • 2 Years Ago
      Why would anyone consider the new Santa Fe when you could buy this beauty. Plus, the inside doesn't look like a preschool playground unlike the Hyundai.
        • 2 Years Ago
        Because the CX-9 is smaller inside. Why are you so bent out of shape about Hyundai?
      • 2 Years Ago
      • 2 Years Ago
      It was perfectly nice before. I donno why they changed it's face to a dog face. I look at it, I see a sad dog.
        • 2 Years Ago
        You don't know why? As if you never noticed that ALL manufacturers try to keep a consistent design theme through their entire line of vehicles?
          • 2 Years Ago
          CX-5 is great, new 6 is great. But this CX-9 is actually using new design theme on old shape >_> It's turn out to be weird.
      • 2 Years Ago
      These crossovers are getting really pricey.
        • 2 Years Ago
        The as-tested price is for a top-of-the-line model. The CX-9 starts under $30k. The Grand Touring AWD model (top spec) starts at $36k, so this tested model has $3k in options on top of that.
        • 2 Years Ago
        I'm in the market for this car myself. I've been able to negotiate the 2-wheel drive, Touring version (includes leather seats) for around $28,500. For a car that's this fun to drive and with leather seats, that's a great price for a new car in this segment.
        • 2 Years Ago
        39k is average or slightly above at worst. Consider you can buy a Ford Focus for nearly 30k, and the CX-9 is light years nicer.
      • 2 Years Ago
      I drove a 2012 CX-9 a couple months back when we moved. It was alright for a crossover, but I didn't like how high I was.
    • Load More Comments