2013 Ford Focus ST vs 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST vs 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST vs 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST vs 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI 2013 Ford Focus ST 2012 Volkswagen GTI
Can The Blue Oval Bad Boy Dethrone The Hot Hatch King?



About three years ago to the day, fellow Senior Editor Seyth Miersma and I – during our respective tenures as editors at Winding Road – met on a cold, wet autumn morning to put the then-new sixth-generation Volkswagen GTI up against a slew of hot hatches for a comparison test cover story. Miersma and I share a love for this type of car, simply because they're affordable little runabouts that don't skimp on functionality while being hysterically fun to toss about. Actually, you'd be hard pressed to find a single member of the automotive media that doesn't hold at least one of these little rascals close to their heart.

If you want to dethrone the king, you have to beat the GTI at the very game it created.

The hot hatch hierarchy has long been capped with the GTI as king, and for good reason. Of all the vehicles offered in the segment, it has perhaps the best blend of the many facets we love about these cars, and it's the one that we'd absolutely open our wallets for year after year, generation after generation. So when a new kid comes to town, it doesn't completely matter how it stacks up against other competitors in the segment – if you want to dethrone the king, you have to beat the GTI at the very game it created.

Enter the 2013 Ford Focus ST, a car that Ford says will run circles around every other hot hatch available in the United States. The Blue Oval is out for blood with this one, and for good reason. After our first experience with the car overseas, we must admit, it's damn good.

So on yet another cold autumn morning, I found myself sitting behind the wheel of the brand-new Focus ST, following Miersma in the GTI out to the same roads we've flogged hot hatches down in the past. History indeed has a way of repeating itself, but with the potent little Ford now in its class, does the GTI still hold onto its crown?
2013 Ford Focus ST specs

There's a reason why we're keeping this a head-to-head comparison. The next logical competitor for the Focus ST is the bonkers Mazdaspeed3 – there's the old family tie there, anyway – and cars like the Subaru WRX and Mitsubishi Lancer Ralliart do fight in the same class, albeit with all-wheel drive. But we wanted to keep this simple, and since every new hot hatch gets compared directly to the GTI, we figured this should just be a straight-up two-car battle. No sense in complicating things with other cars.

The Focus ST is an all-new entry for the 2013 model year, powered by a 2.0-liter EcoBoost inline four-cylinder engine that sends an impressive 252 horsepower and 270 pound-feet of torque to the front wheels. Those rollers themselves measure 18 inches at all four corners and are wrapped in sticky P235/40R18 Goodyear Eagle F1 tires. Our Tangerine Scream tester came packed with options like the automaker's love/hate MyFord Touch infotainment system, dual-zone climate control and the fabulous swallow-you-whole grippy Recaro seats. All in, this relatively loaded Focus ST stickered for $28,170 including destination – a full $3,405 more than the GTI you see beside it.

2012 Volkswagen GTI specs

When we first parked the two cars next to each other, the bold, aggressive lines of the Focus ST only reminded us how much we appreciate the clean, conservative styling of the GTI. The Ford absolutely screams "boy racer" from every angle, though truth be told, this paint job doesn't help. It may be the Focus ST's show color, but it's the least appealing to our eyes. Regardless of hue, we found the Ford's design to be over-styled in many ways – most notably, there are a couple of extra character lines on the sides that don't really seem necessary and the sill extensions could stand to be smoothed out. "The body kit added on to the already complex shape of the Focus panels doesn't work for me," says Miersma. Still, when it comes to getting the point across that this isn't your normal Focus, the ST has enthusiastic charm in abundance. It is indeed both fast and furious, and looks the part even when standing still.

In this spec, the Focus ST weighs in at 3,223 pounds – 189 more pounds than the 3,034 of the Volkswagen. A lot of that comes down to the fact that the Focus is simply a larger car in every dimension. It rides on a 2.8-inch longer wheelbase (104.3 versus 101.5), is 5.8 inches longer overall (171.7 vs. 165.9), is 1.8 inches wider (71.8 vs. 70.0) and stands just over half an inch taller (58.4 vs. 57.8). Because of the added width, the front and rear tracks of the Focus are slightly wider than the Volkswagen, as well – 0.8 inches wider at the front, 0.7 at the back. Despite those numbers, the Ford just plain looks bigger from all angles, though that's largely thanks to the fact that our test Focus has four doors while the GTI only has two.

2013 Ford Focus ST front view2013 Ford Focus ST rear view2012 Volkswagen GTI front view2012 Volkswagen GTI rear view

Fitting two extra doors to the GTI adds 79 pounds to the curb weight (and $600 to the car's bottom line).

And here, we must address another caveat to this test. We fully understand that the more appropriate comparison would have been to use a four-door GTI since the Focus ST is only available with that many doors, but we were unable to source one. The more important thing to compare here concerns performance, and if we wanted a VW equipped with a manual transmission, we had to get a two-door. (The Focus ST is only available with a manual.) Even so, fitting two extra doors to the GTI adds 79 pounds to the curb weight (and $600 to the car's bottom line). Yes, it looks a little funky for the photos, but trust us, we were glad to have the stick in the VW for judging these two cars on the road. You'll read about that in a minute.

Now that that's cleared up, let's discuss the Volkswagen, all $24,765 of it. You heard right – it's a GTI that stickers under $25k. That's a seriously attractive price point for this car, though it lacks a lot of the features and functions found in the Ford. Namely, the GTI doesn't have any sort of navigation or infotainment and doesn't feature dual-zone climate control, though it does come standard with heated seats – something our Focus ST wasn't equipped with. But don't let this price fool you – top out a GTI and you'll be forking over $32,490, while a fully stocked Focus ST comes in at $30,335 (both prices include $795 for destination).

2013 Ford Focus ST headlight2013 Ford Focus ST wheel2013 Ford Focus ST taillight2013 Ford Focus ST headlight2013 Ford Focus ST wheel2013 Ford Focus ST taillight

We adore the Ford's Recaro seats, but they aren't quite as accommodating as the VW's.

Unlike the Focus ST, we can't be anything but in love with the GTI's appearance – it really just looks like a Golf fitted with larger wheels (18-inch Detroit alloys wrapped in P225/40R18 Pirelli PZero Nero tires here). The Volkswagen has a refreshingly clean shape with simple lines that don't make it look overly aggressive or faddish. It's probably the biggest sleeper in the entire class, and its design won't be off-putting in any situation. Even your mom will think it's handsome.

Same goes for the interior – once again, we find the Ford to be a bit over-styled. Miersma's notes completely lined up with mine, the tall Dutchman citing "textures, colors, patterns and lighting that all overload the senses." We adore the Ford's Recaro seats for keeping us firmly planted while tossing the car about, but they aren't quite as accommodating to our well-fed bodies as the chairs in the Volkswagen. There's just a lot going on, though neither of us would call the Ford's cabin anything less than well-appointed and comfortable. It all just feels a bit overwhelming (and perhaps a bit cramped).

2013 Ford Focus ST interior2013 Ford Focus ST interior2013 Ford Focus ST front seats2012 Volkswagen GTI2012 Volkswagen GTI interior2012 Volkswagen GTI front seats

Volkswagen absolutely wins the helm wars here – its thick, flat-bottomed wheel is a joy to spin.

There's no need to bore you readers yet again with our dissection of the MyFord Touch infotainment system – just know that it's the exact same unit found in every other Blue Oval product. There is a complimentary five-way controller on the left side of the steering wheel to manage functions found in the gauge cluster, with a matching five-way setup on the right side to control audio functions. The rest of the steering wheel is packed with buttons for voice controls and cruise control, and despite the fact that the Focus ST wheel feels nice in our hands, it's all a bit cluttered. Volkswagen absolutely wins the helm wars here – its thick, flat-bottomed wheel is a joy to spin – and while we enjoyed the lack of any redundant control buttons attached to it, it's easy to grow tired of reaching over to the center stack to deal with audio requests (#firstworldproblems).

After being disappointed with interior fittings in VWs like the Jetta, it's so refreshing to be back in the GTI. Every touchable surface feels really high quality, and we simply adore the plaid cloth seats fitted to this test car – they're comfortable, supportive, and come on, they look awesome. And with the standard bun-warmers, we don't know why anyone would opt for the leather on higher trim levels. Call the tartan treatment gimmicky if you will (we call it "historically correct," not to mention "super rad"), but the pattern ads some pizazz to what can be an otherwise sober interior. And besides, if you don't like a bit of fun in your compact, you shouldn't be buying a hot hatch in the first place.

2013 Ford Focus ST gauges2013 Ford Focus ST navigation system2013 Ford Focus ST climate controls2012 Volkswagen GTI gauges2012 Volkswagen GTI audio controls2012 Volkswagen GTI climate controls

Behind the front cabin, the Focus ST and GTI are both extremely functional, but Volkswagen has yet again done a better job here. Both cars offer plenty of legroom and headroom for rear seat occupants, the VW offering slightly more of each, even in this two-door configuration. Back seat riders are treated to 38.5 inches of headroom in the GTI (37.9 in the Ford) and 35.5 inches of legroom (the Focus has 33.2). For hauling, both cars offer 60/40 folding rear benches, but the Volkswagen's legitimately fold flat while the seats in the Focus just sort of topple over and require you to remove the headrests. Because of that, the GTI, even with its smaller size, narrowly takes the cake on cargo capacity. You can fit 46 cubic feet of stuff into the back of the VW while the larger Ford can only hold 44.8.

The GTI is seriously underpowered compared to the Focus ST.

From the parking lot point of view, Miersma and I were absolutely smitten with the GTI and hands-down preferred it to the Ford. But would that translate to the road?

First and foremost, despite its 189-pound weight advantage, the GTI is seriously underpowered compared to the Focus ST. Nestled under its Candy White hood is Volkswagen's 2.0-liter turbo-four, good for 200 hp and 207 lb-ft of torque. That's a full 52 hp and 63 lb-ft shy of what's being made in the Focus ST, and in fact, the GTI is one of the least-powerful hot hatches of its size.

2013 Ford Focus ST rear seats2013 Ford Focus ST rear cargo area2012 Volkswagen GTI rear seats2012 Volkswagen GTI rear cargo area

"This EcoBoost powertrain feels downright epic... closer to the brutal throttle response of the equally bonkers Mazdaspeed3."

We lined up the two out on some of our favorite back roads just northwest of Ann Arbor, Michigan – perhaps the only good driving roads in the entire lower half of the Mitten State, and roads that Miersma and I know like the backs of our hands. Firing up the engines, the Ford came to life with an impressive rumble, while the GTI just, well, turned on – no drama here. Our first run had the GTI pacing the Ford, and here, the Focus had absolutely no problem keeping up through every corner and on every straight stretch of road. Off the line, Ford estimates a 5.9-second 0-60 time while Volkswagen says the GTI will take nearly a full second longer to reach that same speed.

"This EcoBoost powertrain feels downright epic – far closer to the brutal, what-the-hell-did-I-just-step-on throttle response of the equally bonkers Mazdaspeed3 than that of other hot hatches," Miersma notes. "The downside to all of that power and torque is some bad behavior from the front tires under hard acceleration."

2013 Ford Focus ST engine2013 Ford Focus ST engine detail2012 Volkswagen GTI engine2012 Volkswagen GTI engine detail

The Ford's more impressive exhaust note provided pure aural delight.

Ford has employed a seriously good active front differential in the Focus ST, but there's still a wallop of torque steer in first and second gears. It's all fairly manageable – you don't feel like you're going to careen off into a ditch like you would under full-throttle applications in a Mazdaspeed3 – but you absolutely must have your wits about you. Running through the gears, the Ford's more impressive exhaust note provided pure aural delight, being pleasantly audible when you were hard on the throttle and diminishing to a dull roar while cruising. It's a perfect balance of sound and made us wish the GTI would open up its vocal chords a bit, though let it be known that the Ford's throaty noise is manipulated to be more audible at higher revs. The louder note presents itself all of a sudden around 3,000 rpm, and we don't mind it one bit.

All of that impressive front-end tuning completely came into, uh, focus when we hit our first sharp, 90-degree left-hand turn. Not only is the steering so absolutely direct with go-kart-like turn-in, the car is nearly free of awful understeer characteristics. "You might find more plowing behavior when driving on a race track, but Ford has this thing locked in for on-road performance," notes Seyth. It's really impressive and was perhaps the biggest surprise (and delight) about pushing the Focus through turns. This car is just oh-so rewarding to fling around. It's hard to completely remove both torque steer and understeer from front-wheel-drive cars with this much turbocharged grunt. Pigs may not yet fly, but at least this one can turn.

2013 Ford Focus ST driving2013 Ford Focus ST driving2012 Volkswagen GTI driving2012 Volkswagen GTI driving

The meatier, more engaging setup of the Focus ST only amplifies just how weak the Volkswagen is.

In the GTI, on the other hand, things weren't nearly as good. This little guy dove nose-first into every corner with the front tires struggling to keep things glued to the road (the Ford's grippier rubber indeed helps here), but even more disheartening is how light and carefree the Volkswagen's steering felt in these situations. This steering setup may be nicely tuned to filter out many of southeast Michigan's harsh road impacts, but we wished it were a lot more communicative during these back-to-back runs down some decidedly smooth ribbons of tarmac.

That same sort of eager-to-please but highly underwhelming dynamic could be found in other areas of the GTI driving experience, namely in its throttle response, clutch feel and gearbox. Seyth noted this on our drive out to the good test roads before even sitting inside the Focus ST, and the fact is, the meatier, more engaging setup of the Focus ST only amplifies just how weak the Volkswagen is. The clutch in the GTI is seriously light, as are the gearbox throws. That's fine and dandy for traffic jams and slumming through city streets, but on these roads – or on a track – it's hardly ideal. The same can be said about the brakes – the stoppers on both cars are plenty adequate, but the Ford's more responsive pedal feel and its tendency to stay better balanced under hard braking make it the outright better performer during slow-downs.

2013 Ford Focus ST steering wheel2013 Ford Focus ST shifter2012 Volkswagen GTI steering wheel2012 Volkswagen GTI shifter

The placement of the six-speed shifter in the Focus ST is a bit weird.

Once again, kudos goes to the Focus ST. Its clutch offers a near-perfect balance of weight and feedback and the gearbox offers precise, short throws. That said, the placement of the six-speed shifter in the Focus ST is a bit weird for quick steering-wheel-to-shifter movements, the whole thing feeling like it's maybe an inch too far to the right. The GTI is better in this ergonomic regard, but again, the Ford's is more engaging to use.

When it came time to line the GTI behind the Focus ST for a run down our test course, it became immediately clear just how much quicker and more composed the ST is. With the Ford rocketing ahead, it was a truly tough time trying to keep up in the Volkswagen. In order to keep the GTI's throttle on full notice, the engine needed to ideally spin above 3,500 rpm and in one gear lower than the Focus ST. Because of this, you're doing a lot more clutch-and-shifter work on involving roads with lots of varying-speed turns. For the majority of our route's difficult sections, we could leave the Focus ST in third or even fourth gears, while the GTI had to run back and forth between gears two, three and four to always have its power on tap. The VW 2.0T mill was a total honey to play with, but it felt completely outgunned by the Ford.

2013 Ford Focus ST driving2012 Volkswagen GTI driving

Picking a winner here was a total no-brainer.

That same thing can be said about every other part of the GTI driving experience – it simply feels a couple notches below the Ford on the total performance and involvement scale. We'd love to get these two out on a track for ultimate testing, but there isn't a doubt in our minds that the Focus would continue to wipe the floor with the Volkswagen dynamically.

All that in mind, it'll come as little surprise that picking a winner here was a total no-brainer – the Focus ST absolutely outperforms the GTI. In terms of form and function, the Volkswagen is the sort of car that you could more easily get away with for everyday life – its lower levels of engagement, better interior and more refined styling indeed proved to be better for the sort of non-enthusiastic settings that we were faced with during the entirety of our week-long loans with the two cars. But when it came time to pick the better hot hatch, the Focus ST took our votes without a single doubt. The GTI just couldn't keep up – literally.

2013 Ford Focus ST vs 2012 Volkswagen GTI

We mustn't discount the fact that the GTI is getting on in age – the seventh-generation car is right around the corner, previewed by a concept that bowed at the Paris Motor Show in September. And it's hard to say exactly how its performance credentials will be amped up in the coming years. But right now, we can no longer call the GTI the king of the hot hatches – Ford's European-bred offering simply stomps all over this car in the dynamics department, and while we like the overall packaging and refinement of the GTI a lot more (it's the one many Autoblog staffers would rather live with day in and day out), the Focus ST still wins. Period.

So at least until that new GTI hits the streets, there's a new king sitting atop the hierarchy of giddy little hot hatches. And when that new car launches, I'll be with Miersma for yet another round of turbocharged tomfoolery to see if the Focus ST can hold onto its new crown.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 328 Comments
      Darkwingedduck
      • 2 Years Ago
      golf R would be compared to the focus RS, not the ST.
      Angelo Russo
      • 2 Years Ago
      I have a 2012 Focus Titanium 5-door. Contrary to the article the rear seat of the Focus does fold flat. The rear seat bottom is forward hinged. You pull up on the back of the seat bottom and it moves upright down into the rear floor. The headrests do have to be removed but the seat does fold flat. I discovered the hinges by accident while vacuuming and figured this out. I suppose if i read that section of the owners manual it would have explained that.
      Downunder Dunce
      • 2 Years Ago
      Beauty is is in the eye of the beholder and 2 my eyes the Golf is starting to look old and tired. The Focus may not win any beauty competitions but at least it looks fresh. The Megane RS250/265 blows both away on the road and for looks
      Raymond
      • 2 Years Ago
      The Ford does not look boy racer you just have it in a loud color. I hate it when reviews give loose options like they are fact and worth including in the bible. I have driven both and the Ford blows the VW away in everyway and seems like a 21st century car unlike the VW that has the same basic interior from 10 years ago.
      Steve Sweetz
      • 2 Years Ago
      Hmm, I didn't know they were putting cheaper radios in new GTIs. I have a 2010 Mk6 and the standard unit then was a touch screen. No nav and no video playback so it's kind of wasted, but it does have an SD card slot and the touch screen makes it quicker and easier to navigate the folder tree. --- To echo some other posters, putting such a big focus (er, no pun intended) on performance is missing the mark to an extent. The point of the hot hatch is that it does everything. It's a bit sporty, but can haul 4 adults and some sizable cargo when it needs to, and it remains comfortable for a day-to-day commute. If all you want is performance, there are better options than both of these cars around the same price point. The modern GTI was never intended to be a performance king, it sets out merely to be sporty enough - and I believe it accomplishes that. I've never felt short of power or handling prowess on a public road, because I'm not ass that hoons on public roads, and I don't take my GTI to tracks or test courses. What's the day-to-day ride comfort like? What's the interior noise like when you're not looking to get an earful of engine note? How easy can you fit a recliner in the back? How appreciative is your ass of standard heated seats on a
        Haelphadreous
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Steve Sweetz
        I have a 2011, They changed it to packages, pretty much sunroof and upgraded stereo was the first tier up around 27.5K, that is how mine is equipped. There was no Focus ST on the list when I bought my car, only the regular Focus, I test drove a bunch of cars, the Regular Focus was my runner up, but I disliked the cramped feeling cluttered interior, I really liked the simple more open GTI interior better.
      dmclone
      • 2 Years Ago
      I've owned both a 2008 Mazdaspeed3 as well as a 2006 VW GTI with DSG. Looks were kind of a toss-up for me. The interior and overall build quality of the VW was a LOT better. The handling was similar but the MS3 was a lot rougher riding I liked the DSG in the GTI. The only negative I saw was a tendency to roll a few feet after you put it in park. Once I got use to it , it was not a big deal. The MS3 had a killer engine and pretty good shifter. The only modification I made to it was a cold air intake which made it sound killer. Even with 18's you had to hang on tight to the steering wheel. The MS3 had "summer only" tires and they were not kidding. 2 inches of snow and it wouldn't move an inch. Put on dedicated winter tires and it handled the winter like a dream. The car I'll remember and cherish most would be the MS3. The GTI reminded me a lot of the 2000 Civic Si I had. A great daily driver but just lacking in the power department. In the end, both great cars.
        Dayv
        • 2 Years Ago
        @dmclone
        "I liked the DSG in the GTI. The only negative I saw was a tendency to roll a few feet after you put it in park." I don't drive automatic often, but I thought it was proper to come to a complete stop *before* shifting into park.
          FoxJ30
          • 2 Years Ago
          @Dayv
          The pawls in the DSG are fairly widely spaced, so the car will roll if it's on an incline even after it's come to a complete stop. The only way to stop it is to use the parking brake.
      Agent55
      • 2 Years Ago
      'Hot hatches" that close in on $30k just don't make a lot of sense to me. Both of these cars (and their competitors) are plenty trick and fun to drive I'm sure, but for this kind of money I'd be looking at other options like a used RWD car, maybe a used M car or something equally superior to these choices. When I think modern hot hatch I'm thinking something more like the Fiesta ST which by all indications could/will be had for low-$20k's. That's the kind of price range this segment belongs in.
      Xedicon
      • 2 Years Ago
      Way too much talk about the Golf R. Here's why. Price! The Golf R is stupid expensive and costs at least 6 grand more than the ST! There's only a 305 dollar difference in the starting price of a Golf R and a Subaru STI (4 door). Do you really think comparing the ST to an STI is fair? Because that's what you're saying if you're crying about the Golf R.
        Carlos Cruz
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Xedicon
        Just like everyone is praising the styling and the fit & finish/ well thought out interior of the GTI when compared against the Focus ST. The STI's interior quality is disappointing. When compared with the Focus ST, the STI makes the ST's interior seem Audi/MB like. I'd compare the STI's quality to a Corolla almost. I like my 25k+ cars to feel like 25k+ cars, not an 16k car with an upgraded engine.
      AnalogJesse
      • 2 Years Ago
      I agree with most of what was said in the article, and it was a good read. You guys really need to relax with the adjectives, though. Using the most extreme adjective in every situation is a bit of a beating to read, and devalues the words after too many uses.
      Michał Pingwin
      • 2 Years Ago
      I had a 3 door GTI. Weird things always went wrong with it, but still not the worst thing I've ever owned. I wish Ford made a 3 door hatch version of the ST. Something about 5 doors just doesn't do it for me.
        NissanGTR
        • 2 Years Ago
        @Michał Pingwin
        It kind of looks like a sports van with 5 door
      johnwoji
      • 2 Years Ago
      While these two cars are no-doubt crossed-shopped, they really are for different buyers. The ST is more aggressive in all respects, and ... younger. Not good or bad, just a different demographic. The VW is a very sweet daily driver that can be a blast to haul around on a commute or errand. And for a long-trip chariot, no issues. The ST is a rewarding ride to blast around, but can easily handle the daily stuff. I would also suggest the mere mention of the color in the article is actually a big deal on the ST. It already has more surface excitement going on, so covering it in neon is only going to make that more prominent. It looks much better in black, and they should offer more subtle color options, including for the interior (a riot of lines and shapes). A nice approach might be Focus Electric trim (in and out - plus Recaros) with ST underpinnings! We're very lucky to have these little rockets!
      Shomare
      • 2 Years Ago
      I find it interesting that American reviews of the ST say its styling is over done and busy while European reviews describe it as rather bland. As an owner of a Ingot Silver ST I can attest that color is important if you want to avoid the boy racer look. Fantastic car that you can enjoy every day. Very practical and dosile until you put your toe into it and the. It's an entirely different car.
    • Load More Comments