• Apr 21st 2010 at 11:58AM
  • 48
2010 Nissan Versa SL – Click above for high-res image gallery

Small, affordable cars are like mushrooms. They quietly go about their business in the soggy bottom of the market, tolerated more than celebrated. Occasionally, the fungi mutates into a truffle, and so it is with this less-respected branch of autodom.

The Nissan Versa is no market newcomer. Introduced in 2007, it's trudged along unloved in the U.S. while faring better in markets outside the States as the Tiida. As with cuisine, some regional flavors are an acquired taste. The Versa hatchback has a decidedly "big in Europe" thing going on, with its distinctive shape and tall-hatch proportions. Taking into consideration Nissan's close relationship with Renault, the styling even seems Gallically influenced. We nabbed a pair of Versas, an S with six-speed manual and an SL with CVT, to see if Nissan's efforts are fetid or delicious. Make the jump to find out.



Photos by Steven J. Ewing / Copyright ©2010 Weblogs, Inc.

Styling is one of the main weapons automakers have when prices are low. The Versa five-door comes off a little bubble-ish with its high-arching roof, but it's a boon to occupants. There's a squared-off C-pillar in back that doesn't consume visibility, and its reverse-cut suggests some Renault influence, as does the nose. New up front for 2010 is a redesigned grille, set between lamps that continue the European-influenced theme.

There will inevitably be detractors, but the Versa isn't styled for shock value. It's not so much pretty as it avoids the overt weirdness that can creep in when prices are low and hardware is pedestrian. Even in the flashy Metallic Blue that our SL tester wore, the Versa is relatively nondescript; the latest in a line of inoffensively styled Japanese hatchy things. Blending in isn't necessarily bad, and if you want more expressiveness, Nissan offers the Cube on the same underpinnings.



The interior follows the same design ethos of not rocking the boat. No element is overwrought on the cleanly-styled dashboard. The expanse of nothing that faces the front seat passenger cries out for a little something, though. At least it makes it easy to peg the quality of interior plastics and fit and finish, which is pleasing to the eye, if not the touch. All cars in this price range carry similar looks-decent-feels-nasty interior materials, and knocking the Versa for such would be unfair. While it's not an Infiniti-grade interior, the colors and materials come off as well-chosen. The dashboard and door pulls give an anti-style message, but they don't feel unfinished. The charcoal cloth upholstery and tan tweed headliner feel more luxurious than you would expect, and the whole interior milieu somehow evokes Golfs of the past.

The Versa's upwardly-bowed roof keeps the headliner off hairdos and also adds to an airy atmosphere inside. There's storage cubbies aplenty, and the ergonomics are a delight. The radio sits high in the dashboard, right at hand. Nissan offers a bargain-priced navigation unit in the Versa, a surprisingly high-end touch in a car that's in the $15,000 range. The Suzuki SX-4 offers standard navigation, but the Versa's integrated option is a slicker implementation.



Three big knobs for the HVAC are simplicity itself, and they back up their easy use with a tight, non-sloppy feel. It may seem a small thing, but controls without slack add to a feeling of build quality, and the Versa's HVAC controls feel better than those in some luxury vehicles we've tried. High-G cornering will send your beverages flying from the shallow cupholders, though the door cubbies accommodate bottled drinks.

Ergonomic complaints are few, indicating that the Versa's interior is a solid effort, overall. Some gripes include the steering wheel cruise control buttons, which could use identifying dots to lessen the need to look down while underway, and It would be nice to have some padding under your elbows, especially on longer drives. The gauges, however, are clearly seen through the steering wheel and the seats are a comfortable surprise. Plastics are hard to the touch, for sure, but there's not a cheap sheen on surfaces.

The base Versa comes equipped with a 1.6-liter four-cylinder that hums out 107 horsepower. Both Versas we tried had the up-sized 1.8-liter, 122-horsepower engine. From the gutless performance of the larger engine, we can only surmise that the 1.6 is an engine for drivers accustomed to planning every move. It could be that we're used to explosive horsepower, but even with its short gearing, the Versa feels light on torque. Fortunately the engine doesn't mind revving, and it's just boomy, not rough.



Surprisingly, the 1.8-liter engine is better when teamed with Nissan's XTronic CVT instead of the six-speed manual transmission. Unfortunately, the XTronic is only available in the SL trim level, sticking bargain hunters with a four-speed conventional automatic if they want a shiftless Versa S or 1.6. Nissan does some of the best CVTs in the business, and even with a smallish four-pot, the Versa avoids the breathless-rubber-bandy experience common of small engines and gearless transmissions.

A six-speed manual also isn't common in this class of vehicle, and the great promise from such a ratio-spread is phenomenal fuel economy. Nissan went the other route, with smaller ratio gaps between gears. This approach probably lends performance to the 2,700 pound Versa S, though it's not a point-and-shoot driving experience. On the highway the engine spins around 3,000 RPM at sane speeds, adding more boom to the zoom, and stirring the transmission is video-gameish with a disconnected-yet-smooth shifter action.



The Versa is softly tuned, making it a comfortable rider. Despite that, the chassis doesn't flail around if you force it to rough-house. Make no mistake, there aren't any sporting intentions here. A beam axle is used out back, enhancing the rear load area at the expense of all-out handling. Steering points the car without doing much else, like communicating tire grip. Braking is likewise unexceptional in use. The pedal is pleasingly firm, and the Versa's disc/drum setup with ABS, electronic brake force distribution, and brake assist brings things to a halt. Simple and straightforward.

The Versa's mission is to soothe your nerves as you appliance around. There's a lag time between turning the steering wheel and the chassis responding, and the general impression is that the Versa is tuned to feel bigger than it is. It's at the big end of its class, and the EPA even classifies it as a mid-size car. It's tough to argue with the idea that the Versa could convincingly stand in for cars with larger footprints. There's plenty of space inside, a useful hatchback body style and it's rather comfortable. There's also far less wind noise in the Versa than in the Cube, and its styling is also more mainstream – a plus in many books.



Despite the promise of a six-speed transmission and relatively low curb weight for these times, fuel economy for us was a disappointing high-20s in mixed driving. City mileage with the 1.8-liter engine, however, is definitely better than traditional mid-size cars, and the spacious interior and hatchback brings near wagon-like usefulness to your driveway for far less than $20,000.

The Versa is large for its class, for sure, and it's filled with class-appropriate materials while driving more refined than you'd expect from its position in the Nissan pecking order. Our only question after sampling the Versa is: Why is there still a Sentra? In the inexpensive-not-cheap car realm, the Versa has a lot to offer, and its substitution of calm where others go frenetic will please potential buyers – and steal a few Sentra shoppers in the process.



Photos by Steven J. Ewing / Copyright ©2010 Weblogs, Inc.

Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own – we do not accept sponsored editorial.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 48 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      CVT = FAIL

      I looked at one of these a few months ago...the interior is right out of 1985 econobox. Saw the CVT and just walked away.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Only the SL hatchback has the CVT. All the other Versas come with either the manual transmission or 4-speed automatic.
      • 5 Years Ago
      This is apparently perspective from car ram-rod.

      Low end cars are 'tolerated more than celebrated'?
      Like the VW Bug you mean?

      Performance is not the ability to go fast.
      It is the ability to do whatever you do well.

      A cheap, capable small car is a high performance machine - if it is truly cheap and truly capable.
      Luke
      • 3 Years Ago
      True. Versa is a great little big car, with a powerful engine. Put on some sporty wider wheels on it and you'll take it to the track. I wouldn't be surprised if it'll get a cult following from the youth, once prices will come down for used models. Interior is great, spacious, very, very comfortable velvety materials. And true again: I was going for a Sentra when I saw Versa next to it in real life and that was it. In comparison, the Sentra is a ridiculously looking sedan, pretensiously larger but actually same size car.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Always thought the Versa was the best in its class....the Yaris is such a POS.
      • 5 Years Ago
      This wouldn't even be on my radar if I were in the market for such a vehicle.

      This would be my line-up:

      1. Ford Fiesta
      2. Honda Fit
      3. Hyundai Accent SE
      4. Mazda 2

      Everyone else I couldn't even care less about. The Versa is a terrible car, who cares if it is bigger. Check out Consumer Reports reliability data on the vehicle, pretty shocking for such a basic car. Be sure to see my story about my experience with the Versa on the first page of comments.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Those of you saying the interior is crap are high. I was just in a rental Versa, and the interior quality is absolutely the best you'll find for $15k. I also enjoyed the very roomy interior and outstanding visibility, which is something that is pretty much extinct in cars these days.

      For a bit more money, I prefer the styling (inside & out) of the Kia Soul, but that car is noticeably less roomy inside.
      • 5 Years Ago
      The Fiesta and Mazda2 look far better than the Versa.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Forget looks, I'm surprised Autoblog seems to be so positive on this car when the people I know who own a Versa only bought it because they were strapped for cash and pretty much hate their cars (and yes they probably should have just bought used cars if they cared about the cars being nicer vehicles but to be fair a low end versa is really really cheap).
        • 5 Years Ago
        I'm sure they are. I drove the Versa before buying my Fit, and the Fit just seemed like a much better car.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I drove a 1.6 Versa with the CVT within about two weeks of driving one of the Fiesta Movement cars last summer. The Versa lacked in every department excepting cargo capacity. Unless you are buying a small car as a hauler, the Versa is a competent but not competitive offering. The problem with making cars inoffensive, calm and bland is that by trying to not offend anyone's tastes, you appeal to no one's tastes.

      The Versa is a perennial also-ran because it offers no suprises, no bonuses, no exceeded expectations. It is a bland car with bland styling, expected economy, decent capacity and inoffensive handling. People will forgive shortcomings in any of the above categories for excellence in others, but no one aspires to a car which does not in some way engage them emotionally.
      • 5 Years Ago
      It may not look the nicest, but it probably has a lot more visibility and room than the Fiesta.
      • 5 Years Ago
      More is often less when it comes to engines. I am not sure about Versa, but in Mazda3 the 2.0 is by far the better engine. There many other examples of smaller displacement engines being much better (smoother, quieter, more flexible.)
        • 5 Years Ago
        Mazda3 also costs more.
      • 5 Years Ago
      If I am going to drive a small, underpowered car (and I might), it would need to get outstanding fuel economy (40 mpg or better). This doesn't.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I'm just saying, I'm not buying anything less. If they want to sell me a car, they will have to meet my standards. I have been postponing a purchase for several years now. If they don't offer what I want, I'll drive what I already have. I'm the boss here, not the car companies. I would buy a turbo diesel, but the nearest VW dealer is several hours away. I'm patient and critical.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Neither does anything else, unless it's a hybrid or a diesel.
      • 5 Years Ago
      My God are some of us spoiled or what? This is a fine car for the price. Especially if you go easy on options, or choose the lower trim level.
    • Load More Comments
    Share This Photo X