First Drive: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V

Click above for a high-res gallery of the 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
After decades of decay, Cadillac began a transformation in the waning years of the last century that would allow the brand to compete against modern luxury brands. Decrepit beasts like the late Eldorado and Seville were euthanized and, while the decision to switch mostly to alpha-numeric naming was dubious, Cadillac finally started creating cars that could compete directly with the best from Europe and Japan, and the first generation CTS was one of them.
In spite of this progress, the Germans still had something Cadillac lacked, namely AMG, M and RS models. So Cadillac devised the V-Series, the first of which was the 2004 CTS-V. Just as BMW does with the M3 and M5, Audi with the RS4 and RS6 and Mercedes with innumerable AMGs, the CTS-V had a bigger, more powerful engine; beefier brakes and tires; a suspension to match and an upgraded interior. This, however, is an arms race that has yet to subsie in spite of ever higher fuel prices. With BMW, Mercedes and Audi now offering even more powerful engines, Cadillac has stepped up to the plate with an all-new CTS-V and we had a chance to drive it at the even newer Monticello Motor Club in New York. With a new supercharged LSA engine closely related to the LS9 in the Corvette ZR1, the CTS-V makes some big promises. Read on after the jump to see if it delivers.
Gallery: First Drive: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
American automakers started trying to create what they called Euro-sedans way back in the mid-'80s. At the time, they thought a European sedan was nothing more than a de-chromed version of a regular sedan that was stiffly suspended with a little more tire. The result of this thinking was cars like the Chevy Celebrity EuroSport and Pontiac 6000 STE. Needless to say, none of these were competitive with Audi or BMW were offering. Cadillac didn't even try to compete at back then since it was still selling big Fleetwoods and De Villes. Fast forward two decades and GM has well and truly learned how to build cars that can attack the heart of the German sport sedan segment, as the regular 2008 CTS, which has drawn largely rave reviews since its debut last year, has demonstrated.

We got a close look at the CTS-V in June at the Milford Proving Ground and went for a ride in one so we already knew the car was fast. With 556 horsepower and 551 lb-ft of torque, how could it not be? But many past GM efforts performed well on the controlled surfaces of a proving ground environment but fell flat on their faces in the real world. So before we hit Monticello, we embarked on a 90-minute route from White Plains, NY that took us through a mix of urban stop-and-go, freeways, small towns and some twisty mountain roads.


The driving environment of the CTS-V is largely the same as the standard CTS, but with some upgraded trim like micro-fiber inserts in the seats and around steering wheel that feel rich to the touch and look great. The standard seats are based on those in the standard CTS, but unless you have an extra-wide girth, we recommend opting for the 14-way Recaros – you won't be sorry. The standard seats are reasonably supportive and comfortable, but the lower cushions are too short. The Recaros have adjustable thigh supports, as well as adjustable everything else.
The CTS-V does transmit more of the road surface to your back-side than the regular sedan. You will not mistake it for one of those floaty, '80s-era Fleetwoods. Nor is it anything like an early C4 vintage Z51 Corvette. The magnetic ride damping system does a great job of filtering out the unpleasantness while still letting you be aware of what's passing underneath. Similarly, the audible feedback of the tires and exhaust are louder than a base CTS but far less than a typical aftermarket exhaust system. It's a nice balance that lets you know you're driving a serious automobile with very serious sporting pretensions, but that it doesn't mind getting up and going to work each morning.


Visually, the CTS-V stands out in a crowd more than either its lesser siblings or its predecessor. The big mesh grille now has twice the open area of the previous V, a necessity to flow enough air for the up to seven heat exchangers. The CTS-V is also the first GM car to be equipped with an electric park brake. The base CTS has one of those old school foot operated jobs, but Cadillac engineers wanted more foot room for the manual transmission CTS-V.
The EPB leaves extra room for the dead pedal on which you can rest your left foot when not using the clutch. With 551 lb-ft of twisting force, the clutch needs a lot clamping force. Fortunately, the use of a dual plate clutch like the one in the ZR1 means that your left leg won't end up being twice the size of your right. The clutch effort is nicely weighted and the travel is well matched to the accelerator and brake.

Once we got to Monticello, there was a briefing from CTS-V lead performance integration engineer Chris Berube. Along with all the technical details about the engine, he gave us a warning about shift points. Showing us the power and torque curves, he noted that most engines reach a power peak somewhere below their maximum rpm. Even without looking at the tach, you can feel the loss of acceleration as you approach the red-line. Such is not the case with the LSA power-curve. It has no peak, rather it just ends at the red-line. If the valve-train and other components could withstand higher sustained speeds, it could make even more than its advertised 556 horsepower. Thus, it's very easy to hit the CTS-V's rev-limiter before you know what's happening. The speedometer and tach have red tracer LEDs that follow the needles as they arc around the dial, and as you approach red-line they start to flash.

This new Monticello track is absolutely astounding. It's a 4.1-mile, 22-turn natural terrain circuit designed by veteran road racer Brian Redman and track architect Bruce Hawkins. We'll tell you more about the Monticello Motor Club in a separate post later, but suffice it to say that this was a perfect locale for the debut of the CTS-V. It took some getting used to since none of us had seen the track before, especially since it's so long, and with 500 feet of elevation change, there are many different types of turns. It's challenging for drivers of any skill level, especially driving a monster like the CTS-V.
Like the team responsible for the ZR1, the CTS-V crew strove to build a car with immense performance that was at the same time very usable on both the street and track. A driver with less skill can thrash it without getting bitten back at every wrong move. For those with a higher degree of skill, the CTS-V offers a higher ceiling for exploring even greater limits. Switching the stability control system to Competitive mode raises all the thresholds before the system will intervene, which allows you to hang the tail out in a controlled drift before reeling it back in.

Switching the magnetic ride control from Touring to Sport will noticeably reduce body roll. Sport mode is probably a bit too harsh for use every day, unless you live somewhere with really smooth pavement. Ride quality wasn't an issue on the perfectly contoured pavement of the Monticello track and the stiffer damping allowed the car to respond to our inputs much quicker than in Touring mode.

With a mass nearly 900 lbs more than the ZR1 and considerably less Michelin rubber wrapped around its wheels, the CTS-V could never be expected to be as nimble as the two-seat Chevy. However, any car with this much power that can put it to the ground with no hint of wheel hop or axle tramp is clearly doing something right. Cadillac uses an asymmetric half-shaft setup that has different natural frequencies on each side of the rear axle, which prevents the two wheels from getting into a race condition. Combined with the traction control system that uses signals from the stability control to vector the torque and help turn-in, driving the CTS-V extremely fast comes naturally.

Production of the new CTS-V starts in October and Cadillac hasn't finalized pricing yet. We're told to expect a base price of about $60,000 with only a handful of options, but the only option you really need are those Recaro seats. That's more than $20,000 less than a BMW M5 or a Mercedes-Benz AMG E63 – and the Cadillac is faster than both. For those who crave the supercharged grunt of a ZR1 but regularly need space for more than one passenger, the 2009 CTS-V will get you shockingly close in a remarkably sophisticated package that's a bargain in this segment.
Gallery: First Drive: 2009 Cadillac CTS-V
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
Our travel and lodging for this media event was provided by the manufacturer.








Get a WordPress.com Blog




Reader Comments (Page 1 of 4)
why not the LS2LS7? 12:12PM (9/02/2008)
That's the weirdest use of "race condition" I've ever seen. Especially since on cars, racing is usually an enjoyable thing!
I personally think axle tramp is more akin to deadlock (dining philosophers) than a race condition.
Anyway, for those confused by the text cause you aren't computer geeks, just substitute "oscillation" for "race condition".
Reply
Torrent 12:12PM (9/02/2008)
60K is great. Considering it's basically a Cadillac ZR-1.
Reply
stevereportdotcom 12:55PM (9/02/2008)
Lets see what the resale value is in 5 years. Take a look on eBay what the value of the M5 is... The CTS-V won't even buy a new loaded Chevy Cruze in 5 years.
And yes, resale value is important because people who buy this won't be keeping this car forever. They'll want something new (new CTS-V in 2014).
60k a value? Just because the GM engineers shoe horned a 500+ HP engine into it? This doesn't make it a "value" car. Sell this thing for about 50k, and we'll talk.
Yar 1:44PM (9/02/2008)
The worst thing about the internet is people like you. You know nothing, you are the epitome of incompetence. First off, you think that GM just "shoehorned" a big motor into this car, you don't realize the level of engineering that went into this vehicle.
On top of that, you speak of resale value. How is that even a relevant topic? Do you honestly think that Cadillac is going to increase its resale value by selling inferior products? Are you suggesting that GM should just give up and never try to make anything good?
In the real world, people like you get laughed at and humiliated. Yet, on the Internet, you can simply slip away into complete anonymity.
Pitiful
Nellydesign 1:47PM (9/02/2008)
That dismissive attitude is the same one the big three had that let the Japanese take over the US market. Just because things HAVE been a certain way doesn't mean they will continue that way indefinitely. Big changes bring more big changes and the level of this Caddy compared to even the last gen CTS is off the charts. Why don't you go drive one and then make your snap judgements.
brian 3:35PM (9/02/2008)
@stevereport
RS4?
M3?
SOhp101 2:29PM (9/02/2008)
The resale value comment is irrelevant. Cadillac has made huge strides when first introducing the CTS and now the CTS-V, which will dramatically improve resale values.
I'm glad that Cadillac can finally say that they can compete with the German companies in terms of performance; before this we probably would have never dreamed of entertaining such a thought.
Empee 4:27PM (9/02/2008)
Harsh as it may sound to suggest that Steve is obsessed with maintaining superficial parity with the Joneses, I struggle to draw a more fitting conclusion about an individual who attacks the CTS-V's merit on the basis of resale value in a segment where the average consumer's income is several times over the MSRP of the vehicle. I'm not suggesting said individuals don't give a damn about it. But wouldn't someone with the potential to pay the car off over a shorter period or even immediately be less constrained than John Does who rely on a 60-month installment plan?
I'd hold onto this car if I could afford one. Considering Cadillac was a third-rate player all of a decade ago, this particular V would find a permanent place in my garage if I could afford it. Not only does it have the potential to become a storied (and valuable) chapter in Cadillac's legacy, our increasing environmental consciousness may place it among the zenith of a breed. . .
Torrent 2:21AM (9/03/2008)
Whoa. I come back to check on the comments, only to find a war against Steve...
Oh and Steve, you haven't blasted into the future and seen what happens to the CTS-V, so I suggest you:
1: Quit your whining and get into a CTS-V and drive it, without harping on GM's past and everything they did wrong instead of looking back at all the things they did right....
2: Wait and see the CTS-V in the market for a couple of years before making blind judgments.
Or...
3: Shut the hell up.
LoneWolf 12:14PM (9/02/2008)
Love this car. Looks awesome in black
Reply
KeatMP 1:23PM (9/02/2008)
I agree. Looks amazing in black.
dgduris 12:18PM (9/02/2008)
"...micro-fiber inserts..."
I have a raincoat made of micro-fiber (hotter than Hades, btw). I think that steering wheel is covered in micro-Suede...the 'merican version of Alcantara.
Never let your eyes or hands overlook BS from marketing types.
Reply
why not the LS2LS7? 12:37PM (9/02/2008)
American?
I assure you, we don't make any fabrics here in the US anymore. We don't make anything. We outsourced it all to China.
But more seriously, Microsuede is a trademark of Microfibres, Inc., like Alcantara is a trademark and Ultrasuede is a trademark. So they may be saying microfiber in order to get around the trademark, since they didn't buy it from Microfibres, Inc. It's the old "how do you say Walkman without saying Walkman" problem.
220v 1:45PM (9/02/2008)
I'm looking at the CTS-V option sheet [without pricing, of course] and option code N45 says "sueded rim." Given that the standard wheel has leather, and synthetics don't wear very well, I'm guessing that the wheel is real cow-hide suede.
Razor1973 12:19PM (9/02/2008)
I understand why reviewers stopped comparing the M3 to the S4 as the RS4 took the place of its sibling in these comparos, but when did we stop comparing the M3 and C-Class AMG to the CTS-V? No wonder there's a $20K gap.
Reply
Waltzon 12:29PM (9/02/2008)
Umm... since you could park the M3 or any of the A4 variants inside the CTS-V, the comparison is apropos. The CTS-V is a heavy-caliber sports sedan designed to compete both on driving prowess and capacity with the larger German offerings. Despite the fact that the price is relatively equivalent and there are similarities in function, you don't compare a Safari .45 with a .270 Weatherby Mag.
Sam Abuelsamid 12:39PM (9/02/2008)
Cadillac has always compared the CTS to the 3 and C-class based on price. From a size perspective it has always been closer to a 5-series. With the CTS-V they are for the first time comparing to the M5 because of the performance.
Razor1973 2:11PM (9/02/2008)
@Waltzon: So the CTS-V grows 0.1in from MY08 to MY09 (191.5 vs. 191.6) and it's already in a new category? The 2008 CTS-V was still being compared to the smaller Germans. And Sam Abuelsamid is right in that it's always been closer to the M5, E-Class AMG and S6/RS6, yet it was always compared to the M3, C-Class AMG and S4/RS4 instead.
geo.stewart 3:39PM (9/02/2008)
Just as the Koreans are doing, Cadillac has been doing with the CTS.
The CTS is PRICED like a 3-series, SIZED like a 5-series (within inches in all interior measurements).
That has always been the goal. nothing new. its always competed against both because well, Cadillac doesnt have a 3-series sized vehicle on this side of the pond.
Razor1973 3:58PM (9/02/2008)
@geo.stewart: I completely agree with this. But this has always been the case. Why/when did the status quo change with this new generation?