
Last December, President Bush signed a new energy bill into law that requires automakers to achieve a Corporate Average Fuel Economy standard of 35 mpg by 2020. This historic stiffening of CAFE standards set a lofty goal, but left plenty of time to get there and new standards of any kind won't begin until the 2011 model year. Today, which happens to be Earth Day, U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters laid out the first set of new CAFE rules that will be implemented for passenger vehicles and light trucks from 2011 through 2015.
The first step on the path to 35 mpg by 2020 will be increases of 4.5% in CAFE standards for passenger vehicles and light trucks over the five-year period spanning 2011 and 2015. This means that standards for passenger vehicles will rise from the current 27.5 mpg to 35.7 mpg by 2015, while light trucks will go from 23.5 mpg to 28.6 mpg. The NHTSA claims the new interim standards will save 55 billion gallons of gasoline and reduce carbon dioxide emissions by 521 million metric tons. They also claim that drivers will save $100 billion in fuel costs over the lifetime of vehicles that fall under the rule.
We decided to reach out to the Big 3 automakers in the U.S. to ask for a comment, and both Ford and Chrysler are keeping mum until they've had a chance to read over the new rules. General Motors, meanwhile, already released a statement reiterating what it said last December, which is that it will meet the new standards despite how tough they are.
Automakers are also able to earn credits when they happen to exceed the CAFE standards, and can either bank those for a time when they won't meet them or even sell the credits to other automakers at a cost below what the fine would be for not meeting the standards. We've heard rumors, for instance, that Honda's sitting on a healthy pile of credits.
Now that we have an actual CAFE target for the auto industry to hit in the near term, expect to see a flurry of activity from automakers. Lithium-ion plug-in hybrids, series hybrids, diesels and all-electric cars will likely be the new technologies that help the industry meet these new interim CAFE standards by 2015, and the first change set for 2011 is not far away at all.
[Source: NHTSA]
PRESS RELEASE
Secretary Peters Proposes 25 Percent Increase in Fuel Efficiency Standards Over 5 Years for Passenger Vehicles, Light Trucks
Fuel efficiency standards for both passenger vehicles and light trucks would increase by 4.5 percent per year over the five-year period ending in 2015 – a 25 percent total improvement that exceeds the 3.3 percent baseline proposed by Congress last year – under an ambitious new proposal announced today by U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary E. Peters.
"This proposal is historically ambitious, yet achievable," Secretary Peters said. "It will help us all breathe a little easier by reducing tailpipe emissions, cutting fuel consumption and making driving a little more affordable."
For passenger cars, the proposal would increase fuel economy from the current 27.5 miles per gallon to 35.7 miles per gallon by 2015. For light trucks, the proposal calls for increases from 23.5 miles per gallon in 2010 to 28.6 miles per gallon in 2015.
All told, the proposal will save nearly 55 billion gallons of fuel and a reduction in carbon dioxide emissions estimated at 521 million metric tons. The plan will save America's drivers over $100 billion in fuel costs over the lifetime of the vehicles covered by the rule, Secretary Peters said.
As required by Congress, the proposed rule allows for automakers to earn credits for exceeding Corporate Average Fuel Economy, or CAFE, standards. This will serve as an incentive for companies to exceed these goals while giving manufacturers flexibility to meet the standards without compromising their economic vitality. The goal is to save fuel, not endanger jobs, Secretary Peters said.
"Looking at the fuel-efficient technologies already available, it's easy to see a not-too-distant future when cars fueled by something other than gasoline will be readily available and affordable," Secretary Peters said. "Until that time, however, we will continue to do what we can, safely and efficiently, to improve gas mileage and help consumers spend less time and less money at the pump."
Over the last six years, the Administration has twice made changes to the nation's CAFE standards, including the first since 1975 to increase mileage requirements for light trucks. Last year, President Bush called for an energy plan that goes even further by requiring attribute-based fuel efficiency standards for passenger vehicles. A copy of the CAFE proposal can be found at www.nhtsa.gov.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
tifosiotaku @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:30PM
I might as well get a Challenger or Camaro before CAFE regulations kill the muscle car, then...
Jay Evans @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:38PM
Exactly the reason I bought a Mustang GT
Atomicbri @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:36PM
What always confuses me is why the car companies have to take all the burden. Has there been any attempt in Large cargo trucks industry to try and reduce their levels of consumption? You see soooo many huge big rigs on the road carting things from point A to B but are these compaies trying to reduce emissions and improve their fuel economy? I was just curious. Sucks that automakers have to take the brunt of all of this and not other industries that consume and pollute.
pacman @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:49PM
The Logistics Industry and Buses and other commercial gus guzlers are forced by the market to make corrections and improve fuel efficiancy. The industry is constantly looking at ways to save fuel. Regardless of fuel price (even if it was .50 per gallon) the logistics industry would like to spend less to increase profit. That is totally different than the consumer market when a SUV may cost a driver $800 bucks more a year to fill vs a car. The consumer market needs some proding to improve but the commercial side has the p/l to force change.
User @ Apr 22nd 2008 4:16PM
The Feds are just trying to help out the companies for the long run. Eventually the market would have lead to this direction and the Big 3, which aren't very ductile, would be left behind. This could be very good news for the Big 3 in the future when their product line is a-okay with the future market.
And big rigs are very efficient vehicles given the amount of weight they haul... Much, much, much more efficient than consumer vehicles. :)
tankd0g @ Apr 22nd 2008 4:41PM
The trucking industry is always trying to find ways to save fuel, as are some car buyers, this mandating car manufacturers into better fuel efficiency is a load of BS. It's not like we're going to suddenly reach the point where our cars are so efficent that the price of gas goes DOWN, this measure isn't for the good of the nation, the MPG my car gets is not what's driving the price of oil. Priuses aren't selling because the government mandated them into existance. They are selling to people who want that fuel efficiency at the expensive of performance. Those of use that don't are not suddenly going to trade our sports car for a SMART car just because the government said so.
Disgruntled Goat @ Apr 22nd 2008 9:01PM
There's plenty of market forces encouraging lower fuel costs but none encouraging decreased emissions. The trucking lobby spends a lot of money to keep the emissions requirements for passenger cars away from big rigs. That's why you see all these 18 wheelers spewing toxic black diesel exhaust strait into the atmosphere while diesel passenger cars are almost nonexistent because they can't meet regs.
RG @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:42PM
Ford and Chrysler stayed mum because they might not even be around in 2035. :-)
Rafael Illan @ Apr 22nd 2008 4:06PM
Chrysler i don know, but according to some financial analyst ford is doing better than GM.Sorry to burst your bubble champ.
Jon @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:43PM
What does this mean for car companies like Ferrari and Lamborghini? There is no way their cars will ever meet these rules.
The Other Bob @ Apr 22nd 2008 4:02PM
Either they do not apply to the companies becuase they sell so few cars or the companies just pay fines like BMW and Mercedes do.
pacman @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:49PM
so what, let em die or comply. My life does not change if Ferrari and Lamborgini exist as we know them. Maybe they start using electiric like Tesla? Who knows but who cares unless your an Arab prince, a pro-athlete, or Hedge Fund Manager.
almost Dr. G.. @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:55PM
pacman,
just because you cant or wont ever be able to doesnt mean others should suffer. entrepreneurs, lawyers, and doctors (!!!) among other professions also pull enough to purchase a $150k+ car.
Yar @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:45PM
Government Regulation...pff..
You wackos can't make me save gas if I don't want to. My threat still stands: If this isn't repealed before it goes into effect, I'm putting a carburetor on every car I own (and a really lumpy cam).
John Johnson @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:45PM
The first step on the path to 35 mpg by 2020 will be increases of 4.5% in CAFE standards for passenger vehicles and light trucks over the five-year period spanning 2011 and 2015. This means that standards for passenger vehicles will rise from the current 27.5 mpg to 35.7 mpg by 2015...
Math FTW?
Andrew @ Apr 22nd 2008 4:14PM
34.27 mpg by my math. Oh well its the Bush Administration, some numbers dissappear here and there, it happens.
benzaholic @ Apr 22nd 2008 6:18PM
'five year period spanning 2011 and 2015.' So start with 27.5 for 2010, add 4.5 % for each of the five years through 2015, and the math works.
EVan @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:47PM
From post...
"Now that we have an actual CAFE target for the auto industry to hit in the near term, expect to see a flurry of activity from automakers."
Right, 'cause I'm sure that record high gas prices have no effect on automakers' decisions about future product. (sarcasm) Wake up. These regulations are dumb, a waste of money, and most likely insubstantial.
Does it not seem like a coincidence to anyone else that policy makers and businesses seem to care about "Global Climate Change" at a time coincides with the most expensive fuel in the last century? The high cost of energy is the real motivator behind PHEV's, BEV's, hybrids, etc... Regulators know this and are just trying to score some style points with the American populace by attempting to take credit for something that's going to happen anyway.
Mr. Oak @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:48PM
Honda and GM might already at or close to this with many models anyway.
This may change the design direction for many car companies. A move to slipperyier shapes and taller OD gearing, as well as DI motors for all models.
GM for example get away with a 1.6 or 1.8 liter version of it's current 2.0L DI motor for the upcoming base Cobalt.
Zane @ Apr 22nd 2008 3:50PM
Wow.. this government douchebaggery is a complete farce! Buy and sell credits? This is not a game of monopoly, you scumbags.