2016 Jaguar XF First Drive [w/video]
Does Cool Britannia Finally Make Sense?
EngineSC 3.0L V6
Power380 HP / 332 LB-FT
0-60 Time5.1 Seconds
Top Speed155 MPH
Curb Weight3,770 LBS
MPG20 City / 30 HWY
As Tested Price$62,700 (est)
The first-generation XF made some hay for Jaguar, selling around 280,000 copies through 2014. But those annualized rates still represented a blip on the luxury midsize radar when viewed against the backdrop of the German Three's numbers. Part of that sales story has been down to the E-Classes and 5 Series of the world being consistently excellent, to be sure. But a lot of the blame can be found in Jaguar's historic weak spots. Grace and pace the brand had in spades, but consumer perception of quality and reliability just weren't there, pricing was typically near the top of the class, and the residual values of the cars were low (a combination of all three factors, most likely).
Of course, Jag would love to sell a few more cars. But this time, instead of simply building a great-looking, great-driving new XF (which is absolutely the case), the brand is doing some clever non-engineering-based things to put more big cats in more garages than ever before.
After flying all they way to Spain – Pamplona and the Navarra Circuit, by way of Barcelona and a Range Rover adventure you'll hear about soon – I would be remiss not to tell you how the new XF goes down the road. Some 150 kilometers (93 miles) of motorway and challenging b-roads lie between the city with that annual livestock problem and the 2.44-mile, FIA approved racecourse. A route that led me to understand that this XF, in my case the 380-horsepower XF S, has gained more than it has lost in the generational changeover.
The tradeoff of very good ride quality is worth the minute amount of roll.
The company is fully committed to aluminum for its midsizer, with the new car now using a body structure that's 75-percent built from the stuff. I'm told that means a body in white that weighs just over 600 pounds, and an overall weight savings of 11 percent. Body stiffness has been raised by 28 percent in the process. Those numbers seem impressive to me, but the proof of their worth was truly evident when stringing together Spanish corners on a climbing mountain road. The rigid body combines with quick, weighty steering to offer rapid changes of direction, and it's soon clear that car has more ability than public roads and my fear of international prisons can surpass. Plus, I know there's track time later in the day.
The XF uses a traditional double wishbone front suspension, with an integral link rear, as well as adaptive dampers. That setup is partly responsible for the keen turn-in I felt, but even in the sporting modes there's a bit of softness in the dampers. I really have push before I feel any of that squish in the underpinnings, and, honestly, the tradeoff of very good ride quality is worth the minute amount of roll.
Said ride quality is appreciated in this nicely done Jaguar cabin, too. There are more evocative colors and textures available than you see in the car I drove and photographed, but even in this staid palate I found the design well executed and the materials good to touch. I'm still not a fan of that rotary shift knob, but even I have to admit that its presentation in the center of a sizable, satin-finish wood slab is rather dramatic. High-traffic touchpoints – steering wheel, starter button, door handles, seat backs, etc. – feel as though they'll be pleasing drivers until the third-generation XJ debuts, at least. The one sour spot in the interior, Jaguar's painfully old infotainment system, is getting a replacement with the all-new InControl Touch Pro system, some time in the middle of model year 2016. If you're a low-end gadget user you might be fine with this old/base system, but the larger center screen, all new "virtual" instrument display, and better software (I hope), could very well be worth waiting for.
The larger center screen, all new "virtual" instrument display, and better software (I hope), could very well be worth waiting for.
On the other hand, I wouldn't bother waiting for the upcoming 2.0-liter turbodiesel engine. After driving the supercharged 3.0-liter V6 that will be available in S models at the start, I'm comfortable giving up the fuel economy. S-model V6s produce 380 horsepower and 332 pound-feet of torque, both more than adequate in making the XF feel quicker and faster than ever (well, at least without a V8 under the hood). Sixty miles per hour comes up in just over five seconds in the rear-drive car, and thrust feels readily available from any engine speed. As ever, Jag's eight-speed ZF automatic transmission is well tuned for sporty driving; I set the trans to Sport mode and mostly ignore the optional paddle shifters until I really feel like playing on switchback roads.
My biggest gripe with the powertrain, and probably with the car overall, is that it doesn't sound enough like a Jaguar should, to my way of hearing. Perhaps I've been spoiled by years of big, purring 5.0-liter V8 Jags, but under aggressive throttle this exhaust doesn't do much to get the pulse rate up. Even trackside at Navarra, I constantly thought my fellow drivers were executing cool-down laps, as they charged into view of the start-finish line. The V6 roar is more like a strident mewing, which is too bad considering this company's filthy rich aural history.
It doesn't sound enough like a Jaguar should.
I'm not going to go deep into my track time for a few reasons: I didn't have much of it, and all laps were taken in an all-wheel-drive car that I didn't test on the road. Broad takeaways are that Jag's AWD system quite clearly preserves the rear-bias that you'd expect, and that the willing chassis I found on the street isn't lost at track speeds. There were quite a few quick corners followed by powerful exits, and a handful of sliding rear ends, too. Expect more of a report on the all-wheel XFs when they roll into the Detroit test fleet (and hopefully with some Detroit snow).
Again, Jaguar has made an undeniably competent car to go to war with Audi and BMW and the gang. Frankly, I didn't expect less, though I'm happy that there's another joyful Jag in the world. But the potentially game-changing stuff I mentioned at the top has little to do with driving. Probably most important is a shift in pricing strategy, from top-of-market to heart-of-market. For XF, that means a price drop of more than $5,000 from the base car in 2015, to the base car in 2016. Admittedly, that's on the lower powered, 340-hp V6 that I didn't get to sample, but Jag's math does sneak under German MSRPs (and Cadillac). On top of that, the company is throwing five years and 60,000 miles worth of free scheduled maintenance, roadside assistance, and warranty that it calls best in class. Throw in good rankings in initial quality metrics for the last few years, and there is some hope that Jaguar might be able to stem its depreciation problem, and, in turn, lower all-important lease rates.
The choice between the ubiquitous German Q-ship and the stylish, lithe XF becomes a lot tougher.
I'm not going to sit here and tell you that XF leases will compete with 5 Series rates next year, but I can say that pieces are in place for the gap to shrink. If that happens, the choice between the ubiquitous German Q-ship and the stylish, lithe XF becomes a lot tougher. I know it would for me. Damn, did Jaguar just make lease rates cool, or have I just had too much Barolo?
Autoblog accepts vehicle loans from auto manufacturers with a tank of gas and sometimes insurance for the purpose of evaluation and editorial content. Like most of the auto news industry, we also sometimes accept travel, lodging and event access for vehicle drive and news coverage opportunities. Our opinions and criticism remain our own — we do not accept sponsored editorial.
Jaguar XF Information
- Most and least efficient car companies
- Fastest-depreciating cars in the United States
- Find and compare 2017 Models