• Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL
  • Image Credit: John Neff / AOL

Vital Stats

Engine:
Twin-Turbo 3.6L V6
Power:
410 HP / 369 LB-FT
Transmission:
8-Speed Auto
0-60 Time:
4.9 Seconds
Top Speed:
135 MPH (limited)
Drivetrain:
All-Wheel Drive
Curb Weight:
4,215 LBS
Seating:
2+3
Cargo:
18 CU-FT
MPG:
21 City / 30 HWY
Base Price:
$69,095
As Tested Price:
$71,015
Not long after bombing around the Milford Road Course in the new CTS Vsport, Cadillac invited me to try out its other new-for-2014 Vsport model: the XTS. And despite using the same twin-turbocharged 3.6-liter V6 from the CTS, the Vsport package takes on a whole new meaning here in Cadillac's softer flagship.

In the CTS, this trim perfectly bridges the gap between the standard models and the hardcore CTS-V, and is focused on being the best-driving version of the range without a standalone V badge. The XTS, however, has no proper V model, so the Vsport becomes the new range-topper for that line by default. But unlike the CTS Vsport, which uses rear-wheel-drive architecture and is focused on driving dynamics above all, the XTS is geared toward a much different customer.

The entire XTS experience is far more concerned with plush comfort than handling prowess, and while this Vsport model certainly ups the ante with more power and some mild suspension and steering tweaks, it's not exactly what we'd call a particularly engaging experience. But that doesn't mean it isn't good.

Driving Notes
  • Cadillac's new TTV6 engine is just as excellent in the XTS as it is in the CTS, though it's lost a bit of pep. In the XTS Vsport, total output is rated at 410 horsepower and 369 pound-feet of torque – decreases of 10 hp and 61 lb-ft versus the smaller, lighter CTS. Still, this engine represents gains of 105 hp and 105 lb-ft of twist compared to the standard XTS' naturally aspirated 3.6-liter engine, and this healthy bump in power is indeed welcomed.
  • Cadillac states that the all-wheel-drive, 4,215-pound XTS Vsport will run to 60 miles per hour in 4.9 seconds. (That's half a second quicker than a base Porsche Cayman, for reference.) And full-throttle acceleration run is accompanied by the deep growl of Cadillac's new twin-turbo motor – it's very much audible here in the XTS, much to my delight.
  • This added power makes the XTS Vsport an incredible highway cruiser, able to pass slow-moving semis with absolutely no drama, all while keeping true to the sedan's core values of being comfortable, quiet and solid on the road. I do the Detroit-to-Chicago run more times in a year than I can count, and the XTS Vsport would be an absolutely ideal pick for this sort of activity.
  • My afternoon in the XTS took me down some of my favorite local backroads – places I've tested countless cars before, and stretches of pavement that I know like the back of my hand. And while I think the XTS Vsport is generally a very nice luxury sedan, a sports car it absolutely is not. Even with the supposedly reworked suspension geometry, the car still floats around and rolls in corners, and the very much front-biased all-wheel-drive system still allows the front tires – Bridgestone Potenza P245/40R20s, for what it's worth – to wash out in enthusiastic cornering. Beyond that, torque steer presents itself when going hard on the throttle, again showing weakness of this AWD architecture. Steering feel is pretty poor, too, and though things are supposed to be better in Sport mode, all you get is added weight to the rack – no actual addition of linearity or direct involvement.
  • So it's not exactly a Vsport in terms of handling performance. Fine. This XTS is still far better to drive than the base model, with a slick-shifting eight-speed automatic transmission that's perfectly matched to the more potent engine. And even with the added power and torque, this XTS will still return 30 miles per gallon on the highway. Not bad at all.
  • Inside, it's the same XTS it always was, and that's fine by me. The seats are incredibly comfortable, the reconfigurable LCD display looks great, and the CUE system, while remaining frustrating and not incredibly intuitive to use, still offers a whole raft of technology and functionality right at your fingertips. The cockpit is very nicely appointed, wind noise and road noise are nearly nonexistent, and really, it's a fine place to pass the time.
  • Visually, the Vsport is set apart by its larger, 20-inch wheels, unique badging and a refreshed, good-looking front grille. That fascia treatment is a small touch, but one that works well and strikes me as a really thoughtful upgrade for this sporty-ish model.
  • Opting for the Vsport will set you back $69,095 – nearly $25,000 over the starting price of a base, front-wheel-drive XTS. Of course, you get a ton more in the way of standard equipment, as well as the awesome engine, but even fully decked out, this means dishing out over $70,000 for a fully optioned example like the one you see here.
  • That puts the XTS Vsport in a different competitive set – now playing with cars like a base Lexus LS or a loaded-up Hyundai Equus. And while those cars don't really offer any great shakes in terms of driver involvement, neither does this XTS.
  • So while this Vsport treatment isn't nearly as bonkers (or as good) as the CTS package, at only $5,000 more than a loaded XTS Platinum with the base engine, it's not a bad upgrade to have. This XTS is as comfortable and easy to drive as it ever was, and while the Vsport formula doesn't radically shake anything up, it's still a great addition to the range.


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 74 Comments
      CBJMNWLD
      • 1 Year Ago
      I have driven an XTS and its a perfect American luxury car. Designed for long trips, quiet, and smooth riding. With this passing power of the Vsport this will be a car to have. And being 6'4" I also like that its a roomy car for 4.
        normc32
        • 11 Hours Ago
        @CBJMNWLD

        For under $50,000 for the VSport after discounts, only Germans can keep in power output.

      austinmavd
      • 1 Year Ago
      Beautiful interior and I like styling - especially for its target audience. This car is going after the Lexus LS and a specific target audience. The 55+ crowd is important but a lot of manufacturers seem to ignore them.
      Ryan
      • 1 Year Ago
      To me the XTS presents a compelling alternative to... of all things the CTS V-sport. Granted, it is more of a cruiser, but it is larger interior and cargo wise and pricewise it is roughly the same, if not cheaper than the CTS V-sport which sports an MSRP of $69,995. This tells me that Cadillac may have been a little TOO aggressive with the CTS V-sport pricing.
      Quest
      • 1 Year Ago
      As previously posted: This car does not have an 8spd transmission; it has a 6spd transaxle that is related to the one Ford employs on the Taurus SHO and MKS EcoBoost. Seems quite a few don't believe it huh psml ;')) Well read it for yourself: http://www.cadillac.com/xts-luxury-sedan/features-specs/standard-optional-equipment.html All transverse Ecoboost use the 6f55 6spd transaxle which is related to GM 6T75 used in the XTS Vsport. Both of these transaxles trace their origins back to the original GM-Ford 6spd transxle development joint venture. Some more reading for those that don't know... http://www.sae.org/mags/aei/12435
        Quest
        • 1 Year Ago
        @Quest
        For those that can't navigate menus... pmsl ;')) freaking fanbois on this site http://www.cadillac.com/xts-luxury-sedan/features-specs/powertrain.html
      Cruising
      • 1 Year Ago
      I can't afford said car but does not mean I can't admire it. Looks great in white.
      Eta Carinae
      • 1 Year Ago
      The XTS for what it is a excellent car.......the RLX, lexus ES, and the Lincoln MKS are far less appealing then this car is.....the interior and exterior appointments such as the lighting handles gives this car a sense of class the others lack........and that TTV6 makes this car quite the sleeper...........my friends' dad just bought and said "now this is a cadillac" after hating GM for years........kudos caddy keep it up, cant wait for the flagship sedan.....and after reading reviews on the RR wraith.....a elmiraj production would give that car a run for is "old money" customers...
      wafflesnfalafel
      • 1 Year Ago
      Big, black Cadillac - I will eat your puny little Cayman for lunch! We have friends with a standard XTS. I was impressed - it's far less floaty than I would have expected and the interior is very nice - reminds me of an Infiniti on the inside. No, not for everybody - but when you need to get from LA to Vegas quickly with the golf bags and a couple suitcases this is hard to beat.
        normc32
        • 9 Hours Ago
        @wafflesnfalafel

        Throw summer tires on XTS VSport and motor trend figure times are right with WRX.

      Thunder938
      • 1 Year Ago
      Was not a fan of the XTS in photos before they were out, but they are very sharp IRL
      Spartan
      • 1 Year Ago
      I think they could have kept the DTS name, but I think that the new name was part of the strategy to increase the price. You could get into a DTS for a lot less money and say what you want, that was a damn good driving car and quite comfy. My neighbor has one and while he's 80 (I know), him and his wife love the car. The XTS is a good looking front driver, but it's pricey.
      cgold13702
      • 1 Year Ago
      looks like GM is seperating cadillac from buick by drasticlly raising its MSRP for the entire Cadillac line I saw that GM now wants 75000 for the new ELR GM riginally talked about an MSRP of $55000, then discussed $65000 but came in at $75000 plus. I had no choice but to disregard the new ELR As a cadillac owner I am sorry to see that GM does not want do demonstrate any sense of financial reality for their products.
      HenryF
      • 1 Year Ago
      Hi, Anyone have any insight as to whether the XTS will be getting cameras anytime soon (eg, 2015?). I love all the electronics (that's my hot buttons, admittedly), but lack of a camera seems a little odd in this day and age...
      Paul
      • 1 Year Ago
      I wonder why the new Caddy's don't photograph well? I've seen the ATS and XTS in person and they each look much better than they do when looking at them online. The ATS looks fantastic in person - in still photos it kind of looks like just a smaller outgoing CTS, but in person it really looks nothing like the CTS. In photos the XTS doesn't look right either, it looks good - but in person it's a beauty. I think some of it is the colors they choice for these test cars, it hides a lot of the lines you can easily see in person. Also the sizing doesn't come across well either in photos. The ATS was a good deal smaller in person than I assumed it to be, not a bad thing but not something I realized until seeing it and sitting in it (coming from a current CTS perspective). Anyways I'm still very much looking forward to seeing the new CTS in person, which looked fantastic when introduced but not quite as sharp in the reviews I've seen. I'm assuming I'm in for the same experience of, when seeing it in person, it being stunning.
    • Load More Comments