Autoline on Autoblog with John McElroy - 2010 Chevy Camaro Edition!
2010 CHEVY CAMARO: DRIVING IMPRESSIONS
I'm sure there are a lot of Autobloggers out there who know the specifications of the new Camaro far better than I do. But numbers on paper don't mean much until you experience them through the seat of your pants. So here are my driving impressions of the new Camaro, after spending the better part of a day with four different models, driving them hard over a variety of different roads.
First off, this is unmistakably a Camaro, yet one that looks fresh and modern. It's a powerfully built car that almost has a pugnacious appearance to it. Almost. But the size and proportions are well balanced, and it looks good from every angle. Follow the jump for more.
Come back Monday (3/23) at 12:00PM EST for Autoblog's own First Drive of the 2010 Chevy Camaro. We'll be working on it all weekend, so you won't want to miss it.
John McElroy is host of the TV program "Autoline Detroit" and daily web video "Autoline Daily". Every week he brings his unique insights as an auto industry insider to Autoblog readers.
Inside they kept it clean and simple. The belt line wraps around the entire interior in one unbroken line. The dashboard is big and expansive with all the instrument gauges clustered immediately in front of driver. The radio and HVAC controls are mounted in the center, lower part of the dash. This uncluttered look creates an impression of simplicity and solidity with no frivolous design cues to distract you from the job at hand: you're in this car to drive!

And the performance this car offers is awesome. Even the base 3.6-liter V6 will thrust you from 0-60 mph in about 6.5 seconds. That's better than the 1969 Camaro did with its base V8. Yet the new one (as you probably already know) is rated at 29 mpg on the highway. Go easy on the gas and you should be able to eke out a combined 24 mpg.
But if you're really after power, try one of the 6.2-liter V8s that come in this car. Talk about brute force. The LS3 version, with 426 hp and 420 lb-ft, will rocket to 60 mph in about 4.7 seconds and still deliver 25 mpg on the highway.
When you stomp on the 6.2-liter it sounds fantastic, everything a V8 should be. But at steady highway speeds in 6th gear, I found the exhaust note became a droning, low resonance boom. In fact, I found myself downshifting into 5th gear just to raise the pitch of the note and get rid of the boom. I suppose some people will actually like that boom, but not me. The V6, on the other hand, has a nice balance. Jump on it, and it growls like it means it. Cruise at highway speeds and you can barely hear it.
You can really fling this Camaro around. Stability control, ABS and traction control mean you will have a hard time getting in over your head unless you do something really stupid. But if you deliberately want to hang it all loose, you can always turn those controls off.

One reason the car handles so well is its independent rear suspension. It may add some weight to the car, but it sure pays off in the handling department. On bad, bumpy roads the car can feel like its bouncing all around, yet the wheels stay planted firmly on the ground, even when cornering hard, thanks to the IRS.
And when you need to come to a stop, you do it in a hurry. The standard brakes are good, the optional Brembo brakes are exeptional.
I like the Camaro a lot, with certain exceptions. For example, the steering wheel is a bit weird. It seems like they wanted to have a deep-dish look, to resemble the ones from the 1960s. It has a very thick rim that is shaped funny. If you grip it at 10 and 2 it feels comfortable. Otherwise it feels awkward to hold.
And despite the clean look of the instrument panel, I was surprised to see hard plastic on the dash, dash top and the top of the door trim panels. Even on the +$30,000 V8 versions it's all hard plastic. Fortunately, the places that you would normally touch are padded or covered in cloth, like the arm rests and the door trim panel next to your arm.
Pony cars are not meant to be family cars, and this is especially true of the new Camaro. There is next to no rear seat leg room. Plus, the trunk opening is inky-dinky. There's a fair amount of trunk room, but good luck trying to fit something through that opening.

There are two different 6-speed manual transmissions. One is made by Japanese company Aisin and comes with the V6. I found it kind of clunky and notchy to use. The other 6-speed is made by Mexican company Tremec and shifts very nicely with short throws that are precise and sure.
But it's difficult to heel-and-toe in the Camaro. I've been bitching at GM for decades that their sports and performance cars are not designed for enthusiasts who truly love to heel-and-toe, yet no one has ever been able to explain why this is so. Strangely, the GM truck group comes out with manuals that are easier too heel-and-toe with. Go figure.
But I quibble. This car is great to look at and an even better to drive. My guess is that Chevrolet has an opportunity to sell Camaros to people who would otherwise never be caught dead walking into a Chevy store.
Autoline Detroit
Airs every Sunday at 10:30AM on Detroit Public Television.
Autoline Detroit Podcast
Click here to subscribe in iTunes
Follow Autoline on Twitter for ongoing updates every day!
I'm sure there are a lot of Autobloggers out there who know the specifications of the new Camaro far better than I do. But numbers on paper don't mean much until you experience them through the seat of your pants. So here are my driving impressions of the new Camaro, after spending the better part of a day with four different models, driving them hard over a variety of different roads.First off, this is unmistakably a Camaro, yet one that looks fresh and modern. It's a powerfully built car that almost has a pugnacious appearance to it. Almost. But the size and proportions are well balanced, and it looks good from every angle. Follow the jump for more.
Come back Monday (3/23) at 12:00PM EST for Autoblog's own First Drive of the 2010 Chevy Camaro. We'll be working on it all weekend, so you won't want to miss it.
John McElroy is host of the TV program "Autoline Detroit" and daily web video "Autoline Daily". Every week he brings his unique insights as an auto industry insider to Autoblog readers.
Inside they kept it clean and simple. The belt line wraps around the entire interior in one unbroken line. The dashboard is big and expansive with all the instrument gauges clustered immediately in front of driver. The radio and HVAC controls are mounted in the center, lower part of the dash. This uncluttered look creates an impression of simplicity and solidity with no frivolous design cues to distract you from the job at hand: you're in this car to drive!

And the performance this car offers is awesome. Even the base 3.6-liter V6 will thrust you from 0-60 mph in about 6.5 seconds. That's better than the 1969 Camaro did with its base V8. Yet the new one (as you probably already know) is rated at 29 mpg on the highway. Go easy on the gas and you should be able to eke out a combined 24 mpg.
But if you're really after power, try one of the 6.2-liter V8s that come in this car. Talk about brute force. The LS3 version, with 426 hp and 420 lb-ft, will rocket to 60 mph in about 4.7 seconds and still deliver 25 mpg on the highway.
When you stomp on the 6.2-liter it sounds fantastic, everything a V8 should be. But at steady highway speeds in 6th gear, I found the exhaust note became a droning, low resonance boom. In fact, I found myself downshifting into 5th gear just to raise the pitch of the note and get rid of the boom. I suppose some people will actually like that boom, but not me. The V6, on the other hand, has a nice balance. Jump on it, and it growls like it means it. Cruise at highway speeds and you can barely hear it.
You can really fling this Camaro around. Stability control, ABS and traction control mean you will have a hard time getting in over your head unless you do something really stupid. But if you deliberately want to hang it all loose, you can always turn those controls off.

One reason the car handles so well is its independent rear suspension. It may add some weight to the car, but it sure pays off in the handling department. On bad, bumpy roads the car can feel like its bouncing all around, yet the wheels stay planted firmly on the ground, even when cornering hard, thanks to the IRS.
And when you need to come to a stop, you do it in a hurry. The standard brakes are good, the optional Brembo brakes are exeptional.
I like the Camaro a lot, with certain exceptions. For example, the steering wheel is a bit weird. It seems like they wanted to have a deep-dish look, to resemble the ones from the 1960s. It has a very thick rim that is shaped funny. If you grip it at 10 and 2 it feels comfortable. Otherwise it feels awkward to hold.
And despite the clean look of the instrument panel, I was surprised to see hard plastic on the dash, dash top and the top of the door trim panels. Even on the +$30,000 V8 versions it's all hard plastic. Fortunately, the places that you would normally touch are padded or covered in cloth, like the arm rests and the door trim panel next to your arm.
Pony cars are not meant to be family cars, and this is especially true of the new Camaro. There is next to no rear seat leg room. Plus, the trunk opening is inky-dinky. There's a fair amount of trunk room, but good luck trying to fit something through that opening.

There are two different 6-speed manual transmissions. One is made by Japanese company Aisin and comes with the V6. I found it kind of clunky and notchy to use. The other 6-speed is made by Mexican company Tremec and shifts very nicely with short throws that are precise and sure.
But it's difficult to heel-and-toe in the Camaro. I've been bitching at GM for decades that their sports and performance cars are not designed for enthusiasts who truly love to heel-and-toe, yet no one has ever been able to explain why this is so. Strangely, the GM truck group comes out with manuals that are easier too heel-and-toe with. Go figure.
But I quibble. This car is great to look at and an even better to drive. My guess is that Chevrolet has an opportunity to sell Camaros to people who would otherwise never be caught dead walking into a Chevy store.
###
Autoline Detroit
Airs every Sunday at 10:30AM on Detroit Public Television.
Autoline Detroit Podcast
Click here to subscribe in iTunes
Follow Autoline on Twitter for ongoing updates every day!












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
Chris 6:22PM (3/20/2009)
Good to hear that they truly did make an exeptional new Camaro, we have been waiting too long... Now get a voltec under it so I have the excuse to buy one.
29 is so last week :)
Reply
DavidB 6:23PM (3/20/2009)
Wow, just wow. I thought GM had learned how to make an interior after the new Malibu, the new Equinox, the Traverse. What the HECK happened in the design studio when they where doing the Camaro? Looks as bad as the G6 interior.
Reply
Vetmstr 6:25PM (3/20/2009)
LOL fortunatley you are just speaking for yourself. Interior is awesome for its uniqueness if nothing else.
Taglane 6:34PM (3/20/2009)
I love the Interior. It's not supposed to be advanced or even futuristic. The term is Neo- Retro, and it is faithful to the Camaros of old- while combining the refinement of new. It makes me feel like I'm actually in a Muscle car. You can't say that about the Challenger's same old, same old interior. The Mustang's is a nice, clean design, but I think the Mustang's interior approach is more like "functionality" instead of "Deja New" like the Camaro. It's is certainly unique. It may not be the highest quality, but if the interior is what people base their outlook on the car on, I'd assume Honda is more to one's liking.
jmo.
Nixapatfan 2:25PM (3/22/2009)
GM has learned a lot about this segment and that's exterior style and a low price matters more than a great interior. If interiors sold muscle cars the GTO would have been a runaway hit versus the Mustang.
They need to cut costs somewhere how many cars can you get with 300hp for less than $23k? Even Hyundai can't hit that price point.
jeffzekas 6:32PM (3/20/2009)
Note to GM: interiors ARE important. Case in point: my 1986 Celebrity reeked of cheapness, while my 1983 Toyota Corolla seemed well-made... mainly because the interior materials were of better quality in the Corolla than in the Celebrity (of course, having the paint peel off the Celebrity, while the dealer swore it was "normal", didn't help with my opinion of Chevy "quality").
Reply
Gary 7:42PM (3/20/2009)
A lot can change in 25 years. I'm surprised that there wasn't a Cimarron reference.
corey r 8:44AM (3/21/2009)
I know exactly what you mean. I just traded my 2007 Honda Accord for a brand new 2008 Chevrolet Silverado. It has 7k miles and rattles and creeks like a 10 year old vehicle. I typically pull for the domestics, but I am just completely disappointed at the quality of the interior of this truck. I will say in it's defense though....it will haul and haul fast.
Dondonel 6:34PM (3/20/2009)
I actually like the two tone interior. I agree that the grey interior is plain and kind of cheap looking, but the two tone seems competitive in this price bracket.
Reply
xtasi 6:45PM (3/20/2009)
GM nailed the exterior. It looks great. The interior reeks of 80's crap. The interior is where I spend most of the time. It needs to be good. The interior needs to be modern... not futuristic, but look like it was designed this millennium. Look at the Malibu interior. GM has good interior designers somewhere in the world, please start using them.
Reply
JohnAngelo 6:47PM (3/20/2009)
All in all, it looks very impressive!
If you aren't in line to get one at the dealership, it could be a few months!
And bring your checkbook!
Reply
Neil 6:52PM (3/20/2009)
Those reverse lights look lost...not part of the taillights, not near the license plate, just right in the middle of the bumper.
Reply
Taglane 7:01PM (3/20/2009)
If the lower rear was like this, then it would be all good.
http://i38.photobucket.com/albums/e103/jinxergt/jinxz28pro2.jpg
skine 7:17PM (3/20/2009)
beautiful rendering ..the back up lights should have been made like the rendering ...thats just perfect ...the ones on the production look like an afterthought ..."lets just put them here"
the exterior ..while at first i hated it ...then it grew on me ...i like it ..i just seems outdated already
the interior ..i love all for the exception of the radio and the HVAC controls ..why does it bulge out so far they should of just left them flush ...where would a navigation screen go or even an aftermarket head unit? ..i think the mustang interior is much more refined and light years ahead of this
glad to see the pony car wars are back though :)
Jeff 7:58PM (3/20/2009)
@skine: it seems outdated because it IS outdated. It's a big, heavy caricature of the Camaros of old, which is the same beef I have with the Mustang, Challenger and even the Mini for that matter. GM has a great platform to play with here. It would just be nice to be looking forward, rather than backwards. And why the hell is something so massive essentially relegated to being a two-seater, or a 2+2 at best?
Yes, the interior IS important. It's where you spend your time, and if it's not satisfying to look at or touch, well, that's a deal breaker. I have nothing at all against a minimalist IP-- I prefer it to the sea of buttons and screens we're getting these days-- but why does it have to look like this. The instrument panel is an awful expanse of plastic, even with the two-tone detailing, and it sounds from the article like GM is back on form vis a vis materials. Hard plastic dash, dash top and door panels??? If it didn't look and feel shoddy, at least it'll be crunching, creaking and rattling like the last- and previous-generation Camaros in no time. Is that what they mean by "heritage?"
I wanted to like this car. Scratch that; I wanted to love this car. I was raised on muscle cars, and I'm thankful it exists at all. They blew a great opportunity to build a modern, forward-thinking muscle car with intelligent packaging. No doubt, they'll sell a million of 'em.
Dan 1:32PM (3/22/2009)
Hey i just wanted to let everyone know that in all the pictures i have seen the interior looks cheep and ...well crappy BUT i have sat in a production model and it is NOTHING like the pictures. The stereo has red led lighting around all the knobs and the quad gauges by the shifter as well as the 2 large gauges are nothing but awesome. They look so great in person but terrible in pictures. Trust me when i say this is one car you have to sit in to understand.. when you're in it you feel at one with the Camaro and want to do nothing but DRIVE !
Reply
hokieman09 1:45PM (3/22/2009)
+1
I noticed the same thing when I sat in one.
Bigbuck17 7:28PM (3/20/2009)
The V-6 mustang isn't to bad then since it gets to 60 in 6.7 secs.I think the camaro v-6 can pull off a much better 0-60 time than that.
Reply
Nellydesign 7:24PM (3/21/2009)
Not with a couple hundred extra pounds...
And I do like this car. Don't get me wrong. But it seems like they just phoned it in on the design of the lower front and rear facias. The front is your standard "circle fog, rectangle grill, circle fog" and the rear is straight '05 GT500. Black diffuser with ribs and dual exhaust. Come on, it's been done!! A LOT!! By way of contrast I really like the diffuser on the new GT500. Much more interesting.
daking 3:10PM (3/21/2009)
3 points:1) I live in the Greater Toronto Area, in Canada for thoes who don't know and just saw one on the road yesterday in yellow. The front turned me off. I saw itin autos shows and in pictures but that grill nees to go. Likein general the front looks good but crate on the front just stands out.
2) I don't want GM to fail but this car will fail. I almost missed it when i saw it. Luckly it was a red light. We've seen this car so much that now its like meh.... I know we all want it to be a huge sucess but i dont think it will.
3) The interior is bad. Peoplemigth say its goodbecause they are fanboys or they want this car to do great things, but compred to its competitors, its the worst. Mustang- retro ouside, very modern inside. Challenger- retro outside, very modern inside. Camero- retro outside, retro inside. Not a good combo.
I know people will rag on me but just consider my opinion
Reply