Review: 2009 Lincoln MKS

2009 Lincoln MKS – Click above for high-res image gallery
The 2009 Lincoln MKS may be the marque's last chance at establishing a distinct image after two decades of struggling to find its identity. At one time Lincoln, like its counterparts at Cadillac, stood apart from lesser vehicles with unique styling, powertrains and features that clearly delineated its place in the automotive hierarchy. Not that Mark IVs, Vs and VIs were high-water marks in design, but at least when you saw one rolling down the road, you knew you were looking at a Lincoln.
But the Continentals of the '80s marked the onset of Lincoln's utterly forgettable image, and when Ford went on a buying binge in the late '80s with Jaguar, continuing through the '90s with Volvo, Aston Martin, and Land Rover, the waters began to be seriously muddied. The creation of the Premier Automotive Group, which bundled all the premium brands together, did nothing to help Lincoln's outlook, so Ford's in-house luxury brand needed a fresh start. With the dissolution of PAG, Peter Horbury and the team went back to the drawing board to define a look that would shout "Lincoln!" for years to come. Read on to find out if the MKS succeeds.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Lincoln MKS
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.
In the PAG years, Ford management didn't seem to have any idea of what they wanted Lincoln to be. Perhaps Lincoln's best shot at moving up the ranks was the LS, which actually came about from the desire to produce a new mid-sized Jaguar and have the American brand compete with lower end BMWs and Audis. But the non-descript styling and limited power (after all, it did have to stay a notch below Jaguar) meant it never really got the attention it deserved. When the life cycle of the LS expired, Lincoln was left without a clear successor. The Zephyr/MKZ didn't advance the styling bar, and it's Fusion-based architecture didn't fit the profile.

The 2009 MKS is one of those rare cars that actually improves upon its conceptual predecessor shown in 2006, and is the first production model to adopt the new cues that first appeared on last year's MKR concept. Unfortunately, most of the MKS was already locked in by the time the well received MKR was finished. The only significant design aspect to make it to production was the grille, but that may well be the most important element. For the first time in decades Lincoln has a face that stands out in a crowd and isn't an embarrassment.

The rest of the car is handsome and clean, if not spectacular. The belt-line rises towards the back and helps to hide its tall stance. As you're likely already aware, the MKS is derived from the same Volvo-based platform as the Taurus/Sable/Taurus X and Flex. At a distance it doesn't look large, but once you get up close you're struck by the MKS's height. The roof-line extends a full four inches taller than a Cadillac STS and 4.5 inches more than the Lexus ES350.
Like the Taurus, you sit tall in the MKS, which makes ingress and egress easy, but doesn't really enhance the idea of a sport sedan. The MKS' doors are cut down into the rocker panels and the skins wrap underneath, which makes stepping in and out easier. It doesn't seem like a big thing, but it does make a difference. Having the rocker panels covered should also keep them cleaner, meaning less chance of getting your pants dirty from road salt in the winter time.


In spite of the high seating position, the rising belt-line still leaves some of the "sitting in a bath tub" effect. If you like to drive around on nice days with the window rolled down, you won't feel comfortable resting your elbow on the window sill. However, the upright seating makes the MKS feel exceptionally roomy front and back. The seats are comfortable and supportive while offering all the adjustments you need, and when exterior temperatures deviate from optimal comfort levels, heated and cooled front seats keep your backside in cozy climes.
Last year, when Ford debuted the Sync system that included USB and line-in inputs with voice controls for auxiliary devices, it proved very popular. For 2009, Sync is being augmented with a new interface to the navigation system and Sirius Travel Link. Travel Link gets real time traffic data from the satellite radio system and can automatically re-route you to avoid backups. It also provides lots of information like sports scores, movie listings and guidance to the cheapest gas prices. Ford's voice control system is actually the most reliable and robust of any that we've tried so far. It recognizes commands the majority of the time and even accepts combinations of commands such as "Destination - POI." The new user interface is probably one of the easiest to navigate and makes BMW's iDrive look like a bad joke.

Overall, the interior design is clean and well laid out. The center stack is straightforward with audio and climate control buttons, including the heated and chilled front seats. The rear quarters are also thermally enhanced, but the occupants will have to rely on air flow to reduce temperatures. The nicely padded front center arm-rest is split down the middle and each side can be individually adjusted to suit the position of the occupant's elbow. One flaw we found with the center stack design is the section ahead of the shifter and below the climate controls which is emblazoned with "Lincoln" and would make an excellent storage compartment. However, the panel is fixed and our mobile phone was forced to reside in our pant pocket.
On the road, the behavior of the MKS belies its size, but the steering has no dead spots and the responses are reasonably precise. While the MKS and Flex are derived from the Taurus architecture, it's been heavily reworked, and to good effect. Changes were necessary to provide a decent ride with the 245/45R20 tire/wheel package. The short sidewalls alone wouldn't do much for on-road compliance, but the new suspension setup does a good job of allowing the wheels to soak up the battered and bruised pavement that comprises most of Michigan roads.

The 3.7L V6 is adequate for motivating the 4,127-pound sedan, but it probably won't set enthusiast hearts alight. The six-speed automatic is the same 6F50 unit used in other big Fords and co-developed with GM. Each company produced its own control software for the transmission and the team in Dearborn seems to have done a better job calibrating the shift smoothness. Ford applications consistently have seamless shifts at either full or part throttle, while the GM vehicles tend to be more jarring.
Most newer automatic transmission vehicles are saddled with a lackadaisical shift response when set in normal Drive mode, undoubtedly calibrated to optimize the EPA mileage numbers. Thankfully, popping the shift lever in Sport mode has a dramatic effect. Shifts are sharper, although still smooth, occurring at higher revs with downshifts occurring promptly with a stab of the go pedal. Tapping the shift lever to the right enables manual shifts that happen when you ask for them.


At just over $47,000 as tested, including the dual panel moon-roof, all-wheel-drive and the 20-inch wheel package, the MKS isn't cheap. However, it is competitive in price with some of the stalwarts of the luxury set and finally brings some style to the Lincoln line-up. On the off chance that you might have some 5.1 audio DVDs in your collection, you'll be glad that you opted for the THX-II certified surround audio system. Ford includes a sampler disk in the car that features Pink Floyd's Money and it sounded absolutely incredible.

Beginning in about April 2009, Lincoln will begin offering the 3.5L twin-turbo EcoBoost V6 in the MKS which should dramatically improve performance. Given the trajectory of gas prices right now, you may want to wait for a smaller four-cylinder EcoBoost engine to replace the V6s, although if you're spending near $50K on a luxury sedan, the 19 mpg we saw in mixed driving conditions may not bother you too much. For now, the MKS is a great start to the revive Lincoln and hopefully, it won't be long before we see models that incorporate all the elements that appeared on last year's MKR concept.
Gallery: Review: 2009 Lincoln MKS
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 5)
AkulaX1 12:48PM (7/07/2008)
It's sick but I would take CTS over it
Reply
Seoultrain 1:11PM (7/07/2008)
my thoughts exactly. Lincoln needed something above and beyond the competition. This car, while well-executed, is barely enough to be considered.
MasterCKO 1:25PM (7/07/2008)
definitely a huge improvement for Lincoln, but yeah, not up to CTS in terms of visual appeal.
I think the grill is fantastic (minus the air dam at the bottom, which is meh) and can really go places as a unifying design language for the brand. The rear is ok, but not great (definitely not as good as the front).
Best thing going for it: the interior. it looks phenomenal, and the new SYNC/info center update looks absolutely amazing. That Ford makes in-car tech that embarrasses BMW's is truly a feat.
Keat 1:56PM (7/07/2008)
Same here...It looks good, but nothin really special. I would take a CTS for sure.
Xcountryflyer 2:02PM (7/07/2008)
Far better than recent Lincolns, but a distant second behind the CTS. It is pleasant, but it screams chauffered vehicle and old people. I hope it sells decently enough for Ford, they certainly need it.
Randy 2:46PM (7/07/2008)
Folks,
I think this car competes with the DTS not the CTS! It's full sized not Mid.
The MKZ is the CTS competitor! Now on that note, the CTS outside is off the hook but the Lincoln's Interior (and I say this with conviction) is of the best I've ever seen!
baffledu2 3:26PM (7/07/2008)
MKS is not even meant to be a competitor to the CTS. Lincoln's MKZ is the competitor in that segment. How many CTSV models will Caddy sell compared to the base V6?
CTS has a certain grotesque appeal for those who have need of a vehicle that says "look at me" but the interior of either the MKZ or the new MKS are far superior while the exterior of either Lincoln has my vote as classically understated.
Xcountryflyer 4:43PM (7/07/2008)
And the price is way too high as others have mentioned. I would, for sure, buy something else for $47K.
User 3:38AM (7/09/2008)
... This thing is big?
It looks so small in its photos.
And $47,000?
Aw man... I feel like my excitement bubble popped for this car. I thought it was like CTS sized or smaller! I also thought it started at the low 30's.
Man... I would buy a 3 series over this (or an ES if I wanted luxury minus the performance.)
Darn! I thought this was Lincoln's comeback!
Torrent 12:24AM (7/12/2008)
Really. This car is a great start, but now all they need is a new Lincoln Lineup that can actually create competition, not follow 2 steps behind it.
ML 12:49PM (7/07/2008)
I can tell you right now if this design 'succeeds' and - as you put it - "shouts Lincoln" for years to come. No, it doesn't(!). The car is too dumpy and fat. The grille may be acceptable and may define the 'look' of Lincoln's future, but the rear of the car is not at all distictive. It could be - and more likely appears to be - Korean. Where is the immediately recognizable rear design of the current small Lincoln? The large horizontal tail-lights are attractive and shared with no other car on the market. But this new Lincoln can't be differentiated from any number of imports. This car's tail is not unique and even looks down-market, not a design worthy of a luxury car.
Reply
psu48187 12:56PM (7/07/2008)
If you insist. Cadillac's Art and Science theme has not incorporated a single theme from Cadillacs of yore, yet I didn't see many complaints about the departure there.
Anyhow I like the car, and this coming from someone that is 27. I've seen a few in person and it has a lot of presense, and it is nice to see Lincoln finally incorporate high tech features into one of their vehicles.
Richard 1:00PM (7/07/2008)
+1
Nick 1:04PM (7/07/2008)
agree the design is lacking. It doesn't look fresh - it looks like a design that is already due for a mid-cycle refresh / facelift. very soft lines, rather uninspiring. the grille is okay, but the rest of the car fails to impress...
PiCASSO 1:06PM (7/07/2008)
psu48187: I think that ML was refering to the Lincoln Zepher/MKZ and keeping a consistant theme up front and back. Cadillac has done that well with majority of their line-up, and I also agree that this MKS is fat and lumpy. Doesn't strike me as a flagship of a luxury division. Even the FWD Lexus ES350 looks better, and sleaker than this shortwheelbase looking turd.
2004m3driver 1:07PM (7/07/2008)
Agreed. It looks very generic and boring. Cadillac has much better design when it comes to luxury domestics.
ML 1:11PM (7/07/2008)
Wrong psu48187(!). Cadillac's CTS is derivative of most past Cadillacs in the details. The texture of the grille is very much 'Cadillac' and the tail-lights are very much a Cadillac look (vertical slits). GMs designers looked to the line's past and updated most of what made a Cadillac distinctive. Ford's designers took a pudgy, bloated body and styled a Lincoln to fit it. As a consequence, they produced a car that looks totally out of place sitting beside a CTS (or Infiniti or Lexus for that matter), and does not look like the 'top-of-the-line' Ford car.
Tourian 1:24PM (7/07/2008)
@psu48187
Cadillac's art and science theme incorporates large egg crate rilles and bold upright tailights, even the tailfin is making a comeback supposedly in the new SRX
jamie 1:29PM (7/07/2008)
psu48147
"Cadillac's Art and Science theme has not incorporated a single theme from Cadillacs of yore..."
I guess you didn't notice the verticle taillights, huh?
Anyway the MKS (Mary-Kate Salon) is about the poorest excuse for a Lincoln I ever saw. Talk about a train wreck.
I agree with Tool,
"I find it hard to believe that this is going to do anything to reinvigorate the Lincoln brand. It breaks no new ground, is overpriced and is largely derivative."
Yes it is overpriced. It would make a better Buick or Mercury for sure.
As a Lincoln though, it truly misses the Mark.
"We are not amused."
Colin Smith 12:53PM (7/07/2008)
I think the proportions, stance and architecture in general are very derivative. Rather than giving this car a real presence the designers have produced, I believe, a car that looks like pretty much everything else in its size range.
Perhaps in the flesh?
Reply