
Click above for a high-res gallery of the Subaru WRX
Last year when the 2008 Subaru Impreza debuted at the New York Auto Show, many fans of the road-going rally car were taken aback. The older, aggressively styled four-door sedan now had a decidedly pedestrian look to it. Worse still, the cool looking mini station wagon of the previous generation had been dumped in favor of an oddly proportioned five-door hatchback. We only got to see the base and WRX versions in New York and had to wait until the Tokyo Motor Show in the fall for the hard-core STI variant. When the STI did finally appear, it had shifted from the four-door to the hatch body style. Fortunately for Subie fans, the aggressive bulging fenders and super-sized rear spoiler remained from the previous car, although the proportions still look a might peculiar.
The countdown to the inevitable EVO-STI showdown had begun. Unfortunately, you won't be seeing that battle here just yet. We did, however, have the opportunity to review a new WRX and spend a few days with an STI model only a week apart. Since we'll soon publish a solo In the Autoblog Garage review of the STI, we want to focus here on the two rally-inspired Imprezas and how they compare in day to day use.
Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid, Alex Núñez / Weblogs, Inc.
click any image to enlarge


Nearly a year from its debut, the WRX hatch is actually kind of growing on us. We'd still rather have the old wagon, but this one doesn't make our eyes hurt anymore. While we didn't have the two cars at the same time, it's easy to see that the new WRX looks downright plain Jane compared to its big brother. The STi looks like it spends its days at the gym while the WRX appears more like a long distance runner, slimmer and trimmer. Where previously even the base WRX had fenders that bulged like a ProDrive special, the new model shares its side body panels with the standard Impreza.


Moving inside, one quickly wonders if perhaps some of those designers responsible for recent Chrysler interiors have gone to work for Subaru. As is so often the case, the layout and design is fine, but the materials would look at home inside a $12,000 Chevy Aveo. The problem is that a WRX starts at double the price, and the STi jumps off at $10,000 more than that. The plastics are hard and shiny in some places. At least the steering wheel is wrapped in leather and has a nice thick grip.
Both cars have the same seats, with the WRX getting fabric upholstery and STi leather and alcantera. Aside from the upholstery, from the drivers seat there isn't much to choose between the two models. There are some extra controls on the center console of the STi aft of the gear lever. These knobs provide some degree of driver control over the center differential and electronic throttle, which Alex will go into full detail about in his review, and we'll gloss over here.
The Driver Controlled Center Differential system lets the driver switch between modes that keep the center differential open or tightened up. The open mode allows for freer steering, especially around tight corners, while the Auto (+) setting is best reserved for slippery surfaces. The SI-DRIVE system lets the driver modify the responsiveness of the throttle to accelerator pedal inputs. The Sport Sharp mode provides more instantaneous throttle response while the Intelligent mode shaves off the edges and gives a milder, smoother response. The SI-DRIVE modifies the throttle response, but unfortunately does little for the problem of turbo lag. The STi, however, produces significantly more peak power than the WRX and can beat the lesser model handily in full bore acceleration. The STi will run 0-60 in 4.8-4.9 seconds ,while the WRX takes about a second longer. In day to day driving, however, that extra power isn't really very useful. Extracting it requires revving the engine in a manner likely to attract unwanted attention from ticket writers. Below about 4,000 rpm, the STi engine feels decidedly weak than its overt exterior suggests. Once the needles on the boost gauge and tach start to get active, so does the engine and the STi leaps forward.
By comparison, the power in the WRX comes on almost instantly. As soon as you tickle the right pedal and ease out the clutch, the WRX leaps off the line. Driving around in any gear, as long as you're not lugging the engine, the WRX just feels much stronger and more responsive. There's 226 lb-ft of torque at 2,800 rpm in the WRX, while the STi engine reaches its maximum of 290 lb-ft at a much higher 4,000rpm. Of course, at some point the STi will run away and hide from the WRX, just not in regular driving. That's the price you pay for the lower 8.2:1 compression ratio and higher 14.7 psi (vs 11.9 psi in the WRX) maximum boost pressure. Both cars have a similar engine note that's more or less unique in the automotive landscape. The mechanical sound of a Subaru boxer engine is unlike anything else except perhaps a Porsche engine with a comparable layout. Neither of these cars is quiet at any time when they are on the move. At highway speeds, there is plenty of wind and mechanical noise and neither model could be described as refined.
Driving around in both cars, another readily apparent difference is the suspension compliance. Neither car could be described as soft, but the STi definitely veers toward harshness. Michigan roads will test any car's ability to keep its rubber on the pavement, a skill that is necessary in order to provide cornering grip. The WRX ride is firm but doesn't beat you up, while the STi seems much better suited to the pavement you might find in places that don't experience 50 degree temperature cycles from one day to the next. One huge advantage of either Impreza is the rear-biased all-wheel-drive system, which, unlike a Dodge Caliber SRT-4, never has any issues with torque steer under hard acceleration.

When the weather turns nasty, like it did when we had each of these cars, the rally heritage of the all-wheel-drive system shows its true colors. Turning into a snowy corner and goosing the throttle swivels the back end of the car around nicely past the desired direction before the drive torque balance shifts toward the front axle to pull you through the corner. It all works smoothly and seamlessly and is great fun.
So is the STi worth $10,000 than a regular WRX? As always, it depends. If you can't live with the hatchback styling and want to choose the sedan, you are limited to the WRX. If you can live with the looks of the hatch, the decision gets a little more complicated. If you reside somewhere with smooth pavement (that is not Michigan) or you regularly spend weekends at the track and don't mind the high strung nature of the high-boost turbo engine, the STi will fill the bill. On the other hand, if you're in the market for a daily driver, the WRX is actually a lot more fun to drive at speeds won't cost you your driving privileges. It leaps off the line and the torque band feels broad and useful instead of peaky like the STi. Both cars have good grip and their advanced all-wheel-drive systems allow them to be utilized under all kinds of weather conditions. From the driver's seat, each car is rowdy and raucous, but the WRX gets my vote as a daily rally machine.

Photos Copyright ©2008 Sam Abuelsamid, Alex Núñez / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
Chris Vitale @ Mar 6th 2008 1:51PM
I think both cars looks great. Especially in those colors.
LoneWolf @ Mar 6th 2008 2:09PM
I can't understand the whole hype around hatchbacks - I want the sedans back!
Mallory @ Mar 6th 2008 7:53PM
Amen, this looks like a modern day interpretation of the AMC Pacer. Yuck.
fixitfixitstop @ Mar 7th 2008 10:02AM
Because hatchbacks, unlike sedans, are actually useful.
I will never buy a car with a trunk again, and I've hated every car I've ever owned which has one.
MikeW @ Mar 6th 2008 2:16PM
'One huge advantage of either Impreza is the rear-biased all-wheel-drive system'
The base Impreza is not 'rear biased'
It is actually front biased ever so slightly front biased because of the extra gear mesh & bearing drag, about 51/49.
sw @ Mar 6th 2008 5:25PM
That's only true of the automatics, the manual is 50/50
DRO3000 @ Mar 6th 2008 8:19PM
ACTUALLY THERE IS NO BIAS ITS 50/50 HENCE FULLY SYMMETRICAL ALL WHEEL DRIVE. ALTHOUGH IN SUBARU TURBO MODELS THEY TEND TO BE A LITTLE MORE REAR BIAS IN ACCELERATION BUT WHEN YOU HIT ROUGH /SLIPPERY CONDITIONS IT WILL GO BACK TO 50/50
Chase @ Mar 7th 2008 11:13AM
*SIGH*
Andrew @ Mar 6th 2008 2:34PM
Ditto. I much prefer the looks of the sedan. I do like hatches and appreciate the practicality. Some look great (Mazda3), but something about the proportions on the new Impreza is just not attractice to me. I think it's the loooong from overhang. It needs a trunk in back for visual balance. The STi looks good with it's wide fenders and other cues, but the WRX and standard Impreza 5-door look awkward.
Injected @ Mar 6th 2008 2:41PM
Practicality is application specific.
The hatch is for a better weight ballance. Note the short overhangs.
Gregg @ Mar 6th 2008 3:19PM
Short overhangs? The front is TOOO long, making the whole car look unbalanced. Why can't Subaru draw an attractive shape without a lot of quirks to it?
integradude @ Mar 6th 2008 2:39PM
sounds like subaru needs to bring the twin scroll turbo from japan over here [for the STI]
George @ Mar 6th 2008 2:54PM
IKD how great the lighting would have been, but the silver one should have been shot more into the woods. Ya know, give more of a rally feel....
Dan @ Mar 6th 2008 4:57PM
And the red one should have been shot in the dark, to spare our eyes.
ChazzMichaelMichaels @ Mar 6th 2008 2:56PM
I don't understand some of the reviews I've read about this car from the standpoint of having a completely different experience myself. I own a 2004 WRX, my roommate owns a 2007 STI that I've driven a few times, and I've driven both the 2008 WRX and STI. I would say that the STI has a decidedly better quality of ride than all of the others. I didn't feel a jarring sensation throughout my spine on the roughest roads in my area in the 08 STI, which I do feel in my 04 on a regular basis. I will agree on the tame pedal below the 4000 mark, but I was very impressed with the ride quality.
Feel free to read my thoughts/review and comment:
http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showpost.php?p=20498504&postcount=1
If you've driven it, please share your opinions.
ChazzMichaelMichaels @ Mar 6th 2008 3:00PM
Allow me to correct one statement about the pedal being tame. I thought it still felt powerful, but in contrast to prior model years of the STI, it feels more tame.
Ferg @ Mar 6th 2008 3:10PM
I agree about wanting a decent sedan, but the hatch looks pretty good in person.
danapark @ Mar 6th 2008 3:53PM
I own a 2002 hatch and it is extremely useful. Been waiting for an STI in a hatch but i sorta wish they wouldn't have changed the styling so much.
This article is useful for wrx owners because you normally just here the sti is faster so its better argument. This is a nice contrast. Is the standard wrx fast? Sure it is, in fact after four years of ownership it still makes me smile every day that I drive it. But more might be nice too.
danapark @ Mar 6th 2008 4:02PM
What really gets me excited is a diesel varient of the WRX and or STI. One problem with subaru's both turbo and non turbo (i've owned both types of impreza) is the gas mileage. Be nice to see around 30-40 on the highway but still be able to scoot when needs be. I'm waiting to here more.
Xcountryflyer @ Mar 6th 2008 4:07PM
It is still ugly and awkward--the passage of time does not change its bad design aesthetics. The gratuitious slab of fake chrome connecting the tail lights of the WRX is particularly garish and a big tell-tale sign that they were targeting the older Toyota crowd with the regular WRX. I hear the interior quality is acceptable, but it is better than the Lancer which I hear is really bad.