• May 2nd 2010 at 1:31PM
  • 22

Last week we told you about Hennessey's dyno test of the Ford Raptor with the new 6.2-liter V8, which yielded 326 horsepower and 343 pound-feet of torque at the rear wheels. That's a 19.5 percent drivetrain loss from the 411 hp and 434 lb-ft Ford tells us we can expect at the flywheel. We'd typically only post one SVT Raptor dyno post, but our friends over at Pickuptrucks.com also dynoed Ford's off-roading superstar, with substantially different results.

Mike Levine and company traveled to K&N Air Filters in Riverside, California to dyno the Raptor, and came away with totals of 344 hp and 361 lb-ft. at the wheel. That's 18 more ponies and pound-feet than the Hennessey dyno run; an increase of about six percent. Further, Pickuptrucks.com says it ran its tests on 87 octane, which reportedly lowers the 6.2's flywheel power numbers from 411 hp to 401 hp. K&N's dyno showed a drivetrain loss of about 16 percent.
While neither power number is likely to disappoint when behind the wheel, it's nice to know that Hennessey's power numbers look to be at the low end of the spectrum. Perhaps that means the 500 horsepower VelociRaptor is more like the 525 or 550 horsepower VelociRaptor. Head over to Pickuptrucks.com to check out the the comprehensive full review of the Ford SVT Raptor 6.2.




[Source: Pickuptrucks]


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 22 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      wow different dynos in different conditions in different places with different calibrations have different results. thanks for this amazing update.
      • 5 Years Ago
      It is funny because you are spamming your site when you don't even have a real domain name and self written content.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Nice!
      Is this article trying to imply that 411 bhp from 6.2 liters is something to be impressed about?
        • 5 Years Ago
        No, it isn't impressive.
        But that wasn't Ford's objective. They wanted something cheap, that is why there was a retrograde move to 2 valve per cylinder.
        They wanted something with better BSFC than the V10.
        • 5 Years Ago
        you're telling me your civic has more?
      • 5 Years Ago
      all dyno's vary, horsepower is nothing but a number that can be manipulated with correction factors.


      this post fails autoblog.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Probably because the first dyno was in 4th gear which is closer to 1:1 than the 3rd gear the k&n one was in, which isn't as accurate. They did the same thing with the new 5.0 mustang, skewing the numbers by not dynoing in the correct gear.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Hiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii All,
      The Ford really had presented s fabulous model of car i loved it.
      =========
      Susan
      BMW Cars
      • 5 Years Ago
      Hey Jack! Visit my site!

      dont_spam_autoblog_you_spammer.com
      • 5 Years Ago
      Love the Raptor - IMO the best-looking of all the F-xxx truck line.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Quit spamming the site.
      • 5 Years Ago
      ....POWER!!!!!
      • 5 Years Ago
      Just keep dynoing it and you can get any figure you want. There are so many correction factors that small changes in results don't mean anything. K&N's very existence owes itself largely to this fact. Do you really think that changing an air filter adds that much HP? You could take the filter off completely and not get as much increase as K&N claims.

      I'm not sure where the idea that the 6.2L doesn't make full power on regular gas came from. It's not fair to the manufacturers to spread this stuff.
        • 5 Years Ago
        As much as it pains me to side with K&N for anything, in the right (or wrong) conditions, an air filter can make a huge difference. I dyno tune GMs for a hobby, an factory turbo cars air filters are usually hugely restrictive.

        Changing from my stock air filter to an aftermarket one net me 2lb/min more airflow. That's quite nearly 20 whp
        • 5 Years Ago
        I have to agree with Nick on this one I've witnessed it to many times to call it a fluke a properly done cold air intake or ram air intake can net quite a few hp even on a N/A setup I've seen as high as 14whp gains and generally around 8-10whp throughout the range. On turbo cars the effect is even greater as they can take advantage of the cooler air that comes in aswell as the increased velocity. My friends MR2 turbo dyno'd at 185 stock with a tune ran to about 196 and with the intake and a ecu tune put it up to around 212 then on the final run (for now) with a boost increase is putting a healthy 245 whp. Thats on factory everything except the intake and ecu tweak.
      • 5 Years Ago
      THE TRUCKS CAN HAVE 1000 HP DOESN'T MATTER.THEY CAN'T PUT IT DOWN ON THE ROAD ..THE REAR IS TO LIGHT iVE BEAT 10 LIGHTING TRUCKS WITH A 320 HP FIREBIRD
        • 5 Years Ago
        Does your Firebird weigh 6,000 lbs?

        Were those Raptors using the 6.2 or 5.4?
        Was the rear differential locked? (if only using rear drive) Were they in 4x4 (otherwise)
        • 5 Years Ago
        This isn't a street truck, it's a dedicated off-roader. With four-wheel drive and some serious tires, this thing will put all its power down.

        And stop yelling. You look 'tarded.
    • Load More Comments
    Share This Photo X