This just keeps getting more interesting by the day. Back in 2002, Carroll Shelby partnered with Unique Performance to produce continuation Shelby 427 GT500 "Super Snake" models. Only one "Super Snake" was built in 1967, so each of these "new" cars, built on a vintage 60's Mustang platform with a registered Shelby VIN, was sure to be one hot collectible. Unique Performance would build 75 of these 575-hp monsters, each with a base price of $214,000. Investors, and speculators, quickly placed their deposits.
As the months went by, the cars weren't coming out of the Texas warehouse in a timely manner. Customers began to ask questions. As things often go from bad to worse, the relationship between Shelby and Unique Performance went down the drain and it wasn't long before the police came knocking on the door. Unique Performance was reportedly sitting on $7 million in deposits, yet customers weren't getting their muscle cars. Other companies, such as Foose Design, quickly severed their relationship just as the police moved in to confiscate 61 incomplete body shells.
Case closed? Not even close. Now we have word that Unique Performance utilized hard-core Texas prison inmates to help build the cars, and each of the hand-built Mustangs contained over 13 gallons of Bondo body filler. VIN numbers were illegally removed, and some parts of this re-built American classic were coming from Taiwan. If there ever were a hot demand for continuation "Super Snake" Shelbys, we're betting the secondary market for this particular model is drying up rather quickly. Thanks for the tip, Cameron!
[Source: 67MustangBlog]
New KITT Attack Mode revealed at Comic Con
London 2008: Honda OSM concept roadster says, "Cheerio!"
London 2008: Lotus unveils the Evora
2010 Chevy Camaro - Official Details and Images
2010 Chevy Camaro - LIVE from the reveal
First Drive: Maserati Quattroporte S in Europe
First Drive: 2008 MINI Cooper S JCW
In the Autoblog Garage:2009 Nissan GT-R
North American Exclusive First Drive: Alfa MiTo
First Drive: 2009 Kia Borrego
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
n!ck @ Feb 25th 2008 3:01PM
Non-bondable men + bondo = unique performance
Caz @ Feb 25th 2008 3:10PM
"Hahaha!" -Year One
ckm @ Feb 25th 2008 3:17PM
I'm quite sure that most SEMA show cars and other high-end hand made cars have LOTS of Bondo or equivalent. And so does any Ferrari made before about 1985. That's just the nature of handmade, hand hammered metal, particularly when it's done in a mass-production sort of way. And before bondo, it was lead....
Note that it IS possible to build custom cars without bondo, but very, very few people have the skill and it's usually not worth the time anyway. The notable exception to this is stuff made from carbon fiber or fiberglass, as it leads itself to precision without the need for hard to master skills.
There is also the problem of over-restored cars. Next time you go to an old car show, check out the panel gaps. Over-restored cars have Honda-like panel gaps (e.g. 1/8" or less), while original cars would have more like slightly more than 1/4". What's the difference? Sprayable Bondo (aka, SlickSand), a material that makes it trivial to get smooth surfaces (and close panel gaps) out of just about any surface and it used copiously by most high-end body shops. I've seen 1-3 gallons of the stuff used on hot rods....
Peter @ Feb 25th 2008 3:49PM
A little overly sensational there, don't ya think? I won't deny that the company comes off as crooked, but there are valid reasons for Taiwanese parts and lots of bondo. Looks like they put a skim layer on every surface imaginable on the cars.
Dustin @ Feb 25th 2008 9:44PM
18 ... gallons ... ?!?!
johnnytrailerpark @ Feb 25th 2008 4:08PM
I'm glad to see that I'm not the only one that thinks that Autoblog is being a bit screechy on this one. It seems to me that most builders use Bondo to get that ultra-smooth and tight finish. Also, it seems that Ultra Performance was just trying to make use of an idle resource pool and control costs at the same time. It's not unheard of to use prison "talent" to help companies cost-effectively make things such as limousines and such.
GTX141 @ Feb 25th 2008 4:39PM
I think you posters seem to miss the point that these cars are supposed to be "new".
What new car out there has Bondo, other than maybe the Tata?
ckm @ Feb 28th 2008 1:30AM
@GTX141 = Almost all new cars have some form of Bondo, usually in a sprayable form. It's a perfectly legitimate way of smoothing surfaces. And a lot of cars have parts that are glued on using epoxy, like minivan roofs....
67mustangblog @ Feb 25th 2008 4:40PM
Bondo or not, they used prison inmates to help build their cars. inmates with little or no experience. That'll do it for me. Still, excessive Bondo use is just silly. For some reason in the USA people love plastering it on like a wonder filler. Where as in other countries excessive use is frowned upon. Do the hard yards, don't cut corners.
BC @ Feb 25th 2008 10:17PM
You would be surprised at the number of custom builders and restorers using prison auto shops as subcontractors. The inmates gain skills and possibly job recommendations, the state recoups some of the cost of their keep, and the business gets below-market labor.
Benfolio @ Feb 25th 2008 5:53PM
It doesn't mention the skill level of the inmates. Maybe they were former body men, or recieved training while behind bars? They do have enough time to learn a skill or two while there.
Bill @ Feb 25th 2008 6:39PM
I would think the bondo would loosen when those Mustangs bodies began to shake as they usually do.
Tagg @ Feb 25th 2008 9:51PM
Wouldn't most the Bondo be sanded off anyway? Sure you may mix alot but most of it is sanded off to get the smooth finish. So it's not like they are leaving the shop with every ounce of Bondo mixed and applied.
montoym @ Feb 26th 2008 1:26AM
That being the case, they certainly should not need 13 gallons per vehicle. The only reason that much would be used is shoddy sheetmetal work/laziness.
Seems like just a ridiculous amount of Bondo to me, It has its uses, but it should be used sparingly as well, especially on a car like this.
ckm @ Feb 28th 2008 1:32AM
@montoym - sanding off most of the bondo is very typical when trying to get perfect surfaces. I was just going through this today where I would mix up a batch and most of it winds up on the floor. The more curvy the surface, the worse it is. Flat panels are also never flat from the factory.
RLQ @ Feb 26th 2008 3:21AM
Sucks for those who bought UP cars.
The Other Bob @ Feb 26th 2008 10:35AM
Using prison labor isn't a shock. I think Shelby himself used prison labor.
Interesting twist to "Made in the USA" huh?
Tagg @ Feb 26th 2008 11:21AM
The prison labor doesn't bother me depending on what tye of work they are doing. I think we should use more prison labor instead of letting them watch cable T.V., play rec league softball, and stew in their cells all day thinking soome pretty nasty thoughts. All of this on the U.S. taxpayers dollar.
Dave @ Feb 26th 2008 12:24PM
All this matters because I think the main point is that:
they did all this, and they NEVER delivered a finished flipping vehicle.
Aki @ Feb 26th 2008 1:34PM
The idiocy of these blog posts never cease to amaze me.
Yes, poor Unique Performance is being victimized by Autoblog. And those snooty rich people are asking to much when they expect quality labor and parts after spending $200,000. Get real. I've always wondered what dim bulbs lie behind the screen.