Mercedes may sue over Chinese SMART clone
If you took a quick look at the pic above, would you be able to tell which one is the Smart ForTwo from Mercedes-Benz and which is the Shuanghuan Noble? Mercedes is apparently concerned enough about that question that it may be filing a lawsuit over the issue. Automotive News is reporting that Benz may be working to block European sales of this Chinese microcar because of how similar it is to the Smart ForTwo (right).
The Shuanghuan Noble (left) is set to debut next month at the IAA in Frankfurt. While there's no doubt they are very similar, it should be noted that the Noble is a four seater and that it will sell for a paltry 7,000 euros in Germany, making it the cheapest car on that market there. The Managing Director of China Automobile Deutschland, Klaus Schlössl, said, "If I were the auto manufacturer I would not make such a big deal out of it. The cars are priced differently and are in a different class in terms of quality. There are many cars on the road today that look similar to each other," he added.
We suspect Mercedes sees it a little differently.
[Source: Automotive News, sub. req.]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
TriShield 4:38PM (8/21/2007)
Is this any different than allowing the Chinese to sell bootleg copies of our films, video games, electronics and other products in our markets?
Reply
Don 7:08PM (8/21/2007)
It's different when Mercedes is trying to gain inroads to the Chinese market to sell their own wares.
paul 4:38PM (8/21/2007)
Not to be racist here, but can't the Chinese do anything right? First the Brilliance crash test debacle, then the Lexus RX clone, now this?
Reply
Don 7:09PM (8/21/2007)
It's a developing market economy, Paul...one with over a billion people scrambling to form their own capitalist ventures. Things will be screwy for a while.
lamboman 11:26AM (1/06/2009)
I'm half Chinese. I still say, this is pathetic, and I really, really hope that these POS rip off companies get the crap sued out of them. As you said, they can't do anything right in this industry ATM...
Viv 4:42PM (8/21/2007)
Sorry to sound so harsh but don't the chinese have one creative bone or atleast some SHAME in them? If i was a company like that i would be ashamed to copy somebody so blatantly that i couldn't come up with anything original.
Reply
Trinitron 4:54PM (8/21/2007)
I want to see the crash test results.
Reply
ugg.tryptophan 8:19PM (8/21/2007)
it uses the passenger as airbag to save teh groceries!!!
111
P B 8:57PM (8/21/2007)
Step on an empty pop can. I'll wait...
.
.
.
Probably something like that.
Trinitron 4:58PM (8/21/2007)
The Chinese (Im asian so I guess I can say that) has ALWAYS been making fakes. I remember we could not afford the real Voltron so I got the cheap generics from china.
but yeah, its sad to see that they do not have an ounce of creativity in them and aren't even ashamed of it.
Reply
Roger 7:10PM (8/21/2007)
Some Chinese will copy as long as they can get away with it. But how is that different than folks in other countries? Here in America, we just have stricter laws and enforcement. I'm hoping someday soon, the Chinese manufacturers will get creative. Then they'll start taking down their own copyright infringers. Sadly, I think they'll own the USA by the time that happens, so none of that will really matter.
Arthur 12:19PM (8/22/2007)
In the PRC proper, creativity isn't valued a great deal. As Don pointed out, when you have 1 billion people scrambling to make it in a cutthroat capitalist market, with absolutely no IP protection whatsoever, things just won't look good. It's a simple problem of economics and law.
That said, I don't think the same things can be said of say, the Chinese folks working down here in Silicon Valley. =P
Big 2.5 6:36PM (8/21/2007)
The only way to beat such arrogant piracy is to bankrupt those who produces the rip-offs. I will be happy to see M-B receiving tangible compensation and banning this thing from sales anywhere, including China, something that may effectively drive the automaker out of business. Same for Brilliance and Chery - the way to keep those unsafe, low quality replicas off the road is to allow their creators invest 100s of millions into production and marketing just to see it's been killed by quality and safety regulations.
Reply
joe23521 5:04PM (8/21/2007)
These companies deserve to get their pants sued off them.
With that said, can we all try to use proper qualifiers when making comments like "Can't the Chinese do anything right?" or "Don't the Chinese have any creativity or shame?" in the future? For example, adding the word "automakers" after the word "Chinese" would sound so much more acceptable.
Reply
robotrock 5:22PM (8/21/2007)
Sure you could say Chinese Automakers, but what about the toy manufacturers? Livestock feed manufacturers? Toothpaste manufacturers for crying out loud...
joe23521 5:44PM (8/21/2007)
I hear ya. That's what I meant by using qualifiers. It's easy to get carried away with the current anti-China media storm and over look the fact that the Chinese are a smart and hardworking people. They're having their problems, but they will grow out of them sooner rather than later.
geo.stewart 6:26PM (8/21/2007)
theoretically, they have on their way out of it for decades. They have two major stumbling blocks at this point: 1) their government system and beliefs, 2) Size and the dont break it dont mess with it.
Nothing but the two prior items has kept China from moving at the same pace as Taiwan and S. Korea.
Japan's edge was that we rebuilt them, thus creating the monster that is. For example, We gave them more advanced steel mills than the US was using because there was no legacy system in place.
If you look around the landscape, no one profits more than a country that the US has beat in war. I feel like declaring war sometimes so that they will pay for my house, utilities, and finish my education abandoned oh so long ago.
JC3 5:10PM (8/21/2007)
Now metermaids have a choice.
Reply
Nick 5:20PM (8/21/2007)
Considering it doesn't have the Smart safety cell, it will be about 0.5% as safe as the actual ForTwo. Screw suing them, just stick one in a side-by-side NCAP crash test with the real deal and laugh as it disintegrates.
As far as the legal action, come on, the company is called "China Automobile Deutschland", could they make it any more blatantly obvious that they're simply ripping off the car?
I can't stand the Chinese automobile industry, it's pathetic to a new extreme. I can't recall any cars making any waves in safety circles unless they fail tragically (which they seem to do more often than not), and every single one of them is either HORRIBLY designed aesthetically, or the most derivative piece of crap ever built.
Fail harder China.
Reply
LCN 5:58PM (8/21/2007)
China Automobile Deutschland is a German (Munich to be exact) based importer, they did not design this car.