GM's FWD vs. RWD poll: and the winner is...
Posted Jan 24th 2006 12:00PM by Stuart Waterman
Filed under: Trends

All of the above. Or
more accurately, FWD, RWD and AWD. Jack Keebler, Director of GM's Advanced Concepts Group, is back on GM's FastLane
Blog with his take on the results of last week's informal survey of buyer preferences for future drivetrain
architecture.
His take on the FastLane readers' comments is that there is a "healthy market" for
"great-driving front-, rear-, and all-wheel drive cars and trucks." In other words, the right drivetrain for
the intended purpose of the vehicle. Judging by the Autoblog comments
here, I think we would all agree.
His closing comment should put a smile on a lot of readers' faces - he promises to develop "a line of
small, agile, rear-wheel-drive cars."
Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.
When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.
To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.
Please note that gratuitous links to your site are viewed as spam and may result in removed comments.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
SubaruWRC @ Jan 24th 2006 12:37PM
What GM needs is a small to medium displacement (2.0L-2.5L) turbocharged AWD (true AWD) platform to compete against Subaru, Mitsubishi, and Dodge (SRT4). There is a huge performance market that GM is missing out completely. Plus, getting into Rally, would add much needed credibility to GM's performance line and image (nobody cares about the Chevy Cobalt).
jrhmobile @ Jan 24th 2006 8:05PM
If only this would happen in the next 2-3 years. I personally maintain that the "real" reason Americans went to trucks in such a big way in the '80s and '90s was becuase automakers deserted RWD for FWD econoboxes, midsize and, eventually, luxury cars. And the development -- and success -- of plusher, more "sophisticated" trucks, minitrucks and SUVs was a stopgap that kept those buyers in the fold.
If GM could build a latter-day 2002/1600 sedan with two or four-door options (and an "active lifestyle vehicle/station wagon), they'd clean up.
garrett Levy @ Jan 25th 2006 3:15PM
I drive a Caddy CTS, and it's not a small car. It seats 5 as easily as the Chrysler 300. The Lincoln LS is even bigger. GM doesn't have to think small. They need to keep expanding the horizon until a big part of their lineup, even the bread and butter sedans are RWD!
Cut @ Jul 4th 2006 7:00PM
No bad )