Spend more for the cutting edge of luxury and style, and you could wind up taking a larger whack than most when it's time to trade in that sled. The National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) is reporting that premium luxury vehicles actually have the highest annual depreciation rate. The reason for the stone-dropping value is that luxury car buyers tend to want the latest and greatest. The preference for the next big thing leads to owners turning in their current cars faster than people who will drive a Taurus until its wheels fall off. Manufacturers also keep rolling out new versions of their top-tier cars to keep these customers coming back for more, which also takes a bite out of resale value since the next iteration is often right around the corner. Those cars that don't get refreshed as quickly end up with heavier incentives to maintain their sales volume in between refreshenings. In the end, it's a win-win for everybody. Automakers continue to move iron, early adopters beta test the products for the rest of us, and if you're willing to be a little bit behind the curve, you can pick up a three-year-old car for a small potatoes and still feel like you're living large. Topping the list of annual value-losers is Jaguar's XJ8, which drops 25 percent in just a year. Mercedes-Benz, Audi, Lexus and Volvo also make appearances in NADA's top ten list of dubious distinction. The luxury cars are kept company by such ignominious vehicles as the Suzuki Verona, Hyundai Accent and Kia Rio. Judging from those rankings, it looks like the top and bottom extremes lose their value the fastest. If you're in the market for a Joneses-pleasing marque, this is good news.
[Source: NADA via Winding Road, Photo by Sean Gallup/Getty]
PRESS RELEASE
Premium Luxury Vehicles Show Highest Annual Depreciation Rate According to NADA Market Report
Replacement levels and customer preference for latest models drive depreciation
McLEAN, Va. (March 3, 2008) – NADA Used Car Guide (NADA), the industry standard in used-vehicle valuation and information, reports the premium luxury vehicle segment experienced the highest annual depreciation rate among three-year-old models in 2007, due in large part to consumer preference for the latest new models and high replacement levels.
NADA Official Used Car Guide data, developed by NADA's editorial team and released today, shows premium luxury coupes and sedans held four of the top-10 spots for vehicle depreciation for the year, with a replacement rate of 43 percent on average.
"Luxury vehicle owners consistently demonstrate a strong preference for owning the latest new products in this segment," said Terrence W. Wynne, director of editorial and data services for NADA Used Car Guide. "The changing customer preferences and high manufacturer replacement rate effectively accelerates depreciation of these vehicles, deflating the resale performance of previous models and those competitive models late in their life cycle," he added.
According to the NADA report, the top-10 depreciating three-year old vehicle models in calendar year 2007 were:
Make Model Annual Depreciation
Jaguar XJ8 25%
Mercedes-Benz CL-Class 22%
Kia Rio 22%
Audi A8 21%
Lexus LS 21%
Suzuki Verona 21%
Volvo C70 20%
Hyundai Accent 20%
Audi A4 20%
Audi A6 20%
Wynne noted that the replacement rate directly impacts incentive spending in the luxury segment and compounds the pressure already present on the used-car market based on consumer change in design preference. He said that unreplaced models tend to have the heaviest incentives.












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
amdforever @ Mar 6th 2008 12:39PM
A big DUH moment right here.
John Johnson @ Mar 6th 2008 12:45PM
Hey, how about a
And I just bought a new '08 VW Rabbit last night - to hell with the Audi, my car rules :)
John Johnson @ Mar 6th 2008 12:46PM
^The blank up there is a < /i >
jjpg2000 @ Mar 6th 2008 12:45PM
Dan! You forgot to close your Italic!
Papi L-Gee @ Mar 6th 2008 12:47PM
As much as these luxury cars depreciate, somehow they still remain too expensive for most people. Guess that's part of what makes them luxury cars...
Oh, and can someone get that tag working please?
Farris @ Mar 6th 2008 12:48PM
Gah! Open italics AND misspelled acronym (NASA should be NADA)! No worries, I'm sure it'll be corrected soon...
Back on topic, though, does it really matter if luxury cars have the largest depreciation? Isn't the consumer base of luxury cars, by definition, the best equipped to deal with a loss of money?
John Johnson @ Mar 6th 2008 12:53PM
Kia Rio owners are LOOOOOAAADED.
:)
XJ @ Mar 6th 2008 1:36PM
As evidenced here, it's not just the high end market, but the very low end as well. After all, a $2,000 depriciation would sound decent on a Camry or Accord, but for a $10k car, it's a 20% hit.
zamafir @ Mar 6th 2008 1:02PM
Wait... so what we're hearing is the cars with the highest markups, most profit, are the ones with the greatest potential distance to fall? sweet jesus, I'm glad we have these PhDs calculating such complicated realities.
... has NADA reported on the color of the sky yet?
Alex @ Mar 6th 2008 1:05PM
This is the exact reason why i picked up a XJR on the thrift (relatively speaking). Its my Sunday car and i absolutely love it.
ckm @ Mar 6th 2008 1:24PM
Here, here. I did the same. I look at this list and see cars I would buy when they are a few years old.
Chris.
calc.exe @ Mar 6th 2008 1:09PM
Luxury brands cost more to maintain. They may be used car bargains, but you won't be able to afford a transmission repair.
That's why new BMWs come with pre-paid maintenance.
500 @ Mar 6th 2008 1:12PM
Funny, I've always heard that Mercedes had some of the highest resale values. A couple years ago when I was shopping for a car, Mercedes was at or near the top.
Ah, here's one article:
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/52236
(And yes, I know a lot can change in 2 years, but Mercedes has historically had a high resale value, at least as long as I can remember.)
Corey L @ Mar 6th 2008 1:27PM
Thanks for the financial tips, Captain Obvious!
Chopper Dave @ Mar 6th 2008 1:36PM
And this is great for people who buy these things used for roughly the price of a so-perceived "lesser" model (e.g., a one- or two-year old A4 for the price of a new or one-year old upper-line Jetta or Passat).
John @ Mar 6th 2008 1:37PM
This phenomenon is a great example of wealth re-distribution.
Nick @ Mar 6th 2008 2:09PM
No doubt. I can buy a 2003 Mercedes CL600 with a V12 twin turbo for under $40K with only around 50K miles. Of course, maintenance costs are high, but the car was around $140K new so I doubt you'd rack up the $100K in maintenance and repair costs. I'd also venture to guess that people shopping in that segment don't really care about a measly few tens of thousands in depreciation.
Jason @ Mar 6th 2008 2:13PM
Hmmm.... Audi A4 was recently listed on ALG Automotive Lease Guide as "the best" residual (resale) value over a 24-36 month period. This is part of the reason why you can lease an A4 for such a low monthly payment. A4's especially with manual command all the dough. A6's and A8's are weak on the used market. And as far as R8's they are selling on eBay for $20k over sticker. That is pretty good resale. Right?
http://spystyle.com
catgirlshyla @ Mar 6th 2008 2:17PM
So thats where the joke about Jaguar depreciating faster than a rock came from...
Oh well, guess I can still get a First-Gen Inifiniti Q45 for peanuts.
Alex @ Mar 6th 2008 3:36PM
rocks depreciate?