• Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL
  • Image Credit: Copyright 2014 Brandon Turkus / AOL


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
    Related Articles Related Articles

    Today, Ford wishes its first experience with non-hybrid continuously variable transmissions was far behind it. The Blue Oval was awash in complaints and a couple of class-action lawsuits over the CVTs used in its 2005-2007 Ford Freestyle, Five Hundred and Mercury Montego models, which were a manufactured in Batavia, Ohio as part of a joint venture with ZF. The company gave up on the CVT after just two years, but with fuel economy standards pressing automakers to conjure new tricks, Ford's global

    As the old saying goes, "There's no replacement for displacement." But these days, many automakers are launching powerful, downsized engines that offer similar or better power output than their predecessors, all while offering improvements in fuel economy and emissions. These days, we're seeing automakers replacing eight-cylinder engines with turbocharged sixes, and the naturally aspirated six-cylinder motors are being phased out in favor of potent turbo fours. But Ford has gone even smaller, of

    Ford's 1.0-liter EcoBoost is proving to be The Little Engine That Could, and it continues to acquit itself well, finding favor as one of the best powerplants in the world. To confirm it yet again, the tiny mill just won the International Engine of the Year award for the third year in a row, likewise also nabbing the title in the Sub 1.0-liter category.

    Okay, okay, okay, so I was just a smidge wrong. Those that read my review of the Ford Fiesta with the new 1.0-liter, EcoBoost engine will know that while I really enjoyed the torquey little three-cylinder, I was concerned that Ford's decision to force 1.0-liter owners into a manual transmission, steel wheels and one trim level might hurt sales of the new engine. I was also concerned that the promised 45-mile-per-gallon highway rating wouldn't be enough to tempt buyers into trying an engine that'

    Three's A Party

    I'll be honest; when Ford first unveiled its 3.5-liter EcoBoost V6, I was skeptical. Past attempts at building turbocharged American cars were almost universally awful, I reasoned, so why would Ford's latest effort be any different? This may seem foolish today, considering the success that the growing EcoBoost range has achieved – particularly the 2.0-liter and 1.6-liter mills. Yet I once again found myself questioning Ford.

    Share This Photo X