
click above for a high-res gallery of the 2008 Chevy Malibu LT
Once upon a time, General Motors' mid-sized models were the perennial top-selling passenger cars in America. Within my own lifetime, the Oldsmobile Cutlass topped the sales charts for years on end. But somewhere along the way, it all went pear-shaped for GM. Its cars went from being perpetual sales leaders into a perpetual sales decline. As GM's car sales tanked, the Toyota Camry and Honda Accord picked up the slack and are now considered the standard by which others in the class are measured.
The first signs of a real revival in the GM sedan lineup appeared in 2006 when the Saturn Aura debuted to decent reviews though somewhat lukewarm sales. Then, last January at the Detroit Auto Show, GM debuted two new production sedans, the Cadillac CTS and the car that just spent a week in the Autoblog Garage, the 2008 Chevrolet Malibu. The Malibu is here now, so let's find out what it's like to live with for a week.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

The Chevy Volt may represent the future of General Motors power-train technology, but before it can become a reality, GM needs a steady cash flow to fund development. That's the job of the Malibu. The last generation Malibu was bland with some slightly odd design details, while the one before that was just plain invisible. In this class, bland styling is not necessarily a bad thing as the Accord and Camry have clearly demonstrated over the past decade. However, the Japanese brands have backed up their innocuous looks with a reputation for impeccable build quality and levels of refinement that are considered well beyond their price point. That's something equivalent domestic models have been lacking until relatively recently.

When the latest edition of the Malibu debuted last year, it wore what is easily the best interpretation of Chevy's current corporate face with a large, horizontally-split grille. In addition to the bold-looking nose, virtually the whole car drew praise from onlookers at the 2007 Detroit Auto Show. The one possible weak spot was the back end that features taillights which still look like something of an after thought. The rest of the car is so good, however, that the back lights are easily forgotten. The car has handsome proportions with a long, sleek roof-line that draws some obvious inspiration from the Volkswagen Phaeton, among other cars.

The relative absence of surface detailing serves to point out how well Chevrolet got this basic look just right. The details that appear upon close inspection also show the thought that was put into the new Malibu. Even on this slightly above entry-level LT, nothing on the outside of the car looks cheap. The 225/50R17 tires and wheels aren't undersized, fill the wheel wells nicely and sit flush with the surrounding body. Those attractive five spoke wheels? They are actually plastic wheel covers on steel wheels. They may be less expensive than aluminum, but they sure don't look cheap. The turn signal repeaters on the front fenders also give a European touch. Even the little Chevy bow-tie molded into the rear signal lens is a subtle reminder that someone was paying attention.


My wife has never been a GM fan, but when she started seeing the Malibu in TV commercials, she couldn't believe it was a Chevrolet. For the first time in the 14 years we've been together, she actually wanted to check out a GM car. We think this type of reaction is happening all over the U.S. when people see the new Malibu for the first time.
The glass moon-roof on our test unit didn't get much use during the cold pre-Christmas weather around Ann Arbor, but when I tried it out, I noticed it opens up on the outside of the roof so that it doesn't detract from interior headroom. Upon opening the doors of the Malibu, it was immediately clear that this car is a huge step forward for GM mid-sized cars. Compared to the Dodge Avenger and Caliber SRT-4 that we've reviewed in recent months, the doors felt solid and closed with a tighter seal than even the new Accord. The cloth covered seats in the 1LT model weren't quite as good as those in the new Accord, but are still very comfortable and supportive.

The interior of the Malibu is a revelation for a mainstream domestic car. Even on this low-end model, the quality of the materials was excellent. The appearance and feel of the plastics was of a higher quality than either the Toyota Highlander Hybrid or Jeep Grand Cherokee we've driven in recent months, both of which were more than twice the cost of the Malibu. The steering wheel rim was thick and covered in a rubberized plastic that offered a good grip and feel. The 2LT and LTZ trim levels have a leather-wrapped wheel, but even this one felt better than the skinny leather wheel in the new Highlander.
One of the first things we looked for in the Malibu was the alignment of the trim on the door panels and dashboard. Every Saturn Aura we've looked at had a misalignment between the door and dash trim, a point we've made sure to mention to GM. A rep indicated that the company was aware of this issue and working to address it before Malibu production started. At least on this example, they succeeded. The interior has plenty of storage including wide pockets in the doors, a deep bin under the center armrest and a compartment in the center of the dash top. The backs of the front seats are also scooped out to provide extra legroom for rear seat passengers, and the back seat is nicely cushioned and comfortable. It folds down 60/40, but the thick padding prevents the seat back from folding completely flat. The latest Accord has grown quite a bit and the extra two inches of width it has over the Malibu can easily be felt in the back seat if you add a third passenger. The rear compartment of the Malibu is great for two passengers but a tight squeeze for a trio.
Another place where the Malibu has a distinct advantage over the latest Accord is interior sound levels. The Chevy is exceptionally quiet, especially for a car with a base price just shy of $20,000. Even the 2.4L EcoTec four-cylinder was well muted.

Other nice touches in the Malibu include pale green ambient lighting behind the door handles and next to the dome light switches. The lighting was just enough to allow occupants to find the handles in the dark without fumbling around. The trunk lid also has four bar link hinges that don't intrude on space the way the goose-necks do on the Accord. It's small touches like these that convey to the buyer that bean counters didn't build this car.
The aforementioned 2.4L EcoTec four-cylinder engine had plenty of power for moving the 3,400-pound Malibu, although the four-speed automatic transmission was partly to blame for the 21 mpg test average. Most of our time in the new Chevy was spent driving around town while Christmas shopping, which meant we logged a lower than normal percentage of highway miles during the week before Christmas. Mileage should be improved next spring when the four-speed will be supplanted by GM's new six-speed unit as the company ramps up production of the new transmission. The electrically-assisted steering was nicely weighted and provided decent feedback. The brake pedal feel was excellent and the four-corner disc brakes responded well to inputs while being easy to modulate. The Ann Arbor area got a fairly healthy mid-December dumping of snow, which provided good opportunities to test the traction and stability control. Thankfully, both systems worked smoothly and consistently, particularly the stability control. It just kept the car going where the steering wheel was pointed. The back end stayed put with the ESC warning light flashing quietly on occasion, but there was no additional feedback through the steering wheel or extra alarms. The suspension was well sprung and damped, absorbing bumps and frost heaves without ever feeling floaty or harsh.

Overall, the Malibu is easily the best mid-size car from General Motors in my lifetime and probably yours, and it's one of the best cars available in its class today. Even the entry level model doesn't look or feel like a Hertz or Avis special. The ebony interior is perhaps a bit too monochromatic, although those who have small kids with dirty hands might prefer it over the lighter two-tone gray interior treatment. The 1LT model GM provided us prices out at $22,230 including the sun-roof. Moving up to the 2LT model starting at $23,135 nets you a leather-covered steering wheel and shifter, seat warmers, aluminum wheels and other standard amenities. With all that equipment, the 2LT Malibu is a real bargain and a truly viable competitor to the Camry and Accord.
All photos Copyright ©2007 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.













Reader Comments (Page 1 of 7)
3seriesisking @ Dec 31st 2007 12:43PM
I like the new Malibu. I really think that if I were in the market for a mid-size family car the Malibu, maybe not the LT, would be my choice over the Accord or Camry. Good work GM.
amastadon @ Dec 31st 2007 12:49PM
I agree. Couldn't say it better.
The Friendly Grizzly @ Dec 31st 2007 12:51PM
I haven't even seen one on the streets yet, but so far, all the reviews are good. I had an Impala on rental 2 weeks ago. A sheer delight to drive, EXCELLENT fuel economy (easily broke 30 average with about 15% town and 85% highway).
10 years ago, I never dreamed I would say this, but after my experience with my Chevy truck and the various Chevy rental cars I have had, i can say now that for value, it is darn hard to beat a Chevy.
mike @ Dec 31st 2007 12:56PM
if were in the market for a family car, i would recommend you purchase an 08 Toyota Avalon XL for the money instead of the new Malibu. The 3.5L V6 268hp in the Avalon gets the same fuel efficiency as the ecotec 4 in the Malibu. Autoblog averaged 21mpg, i average 22mpg in my Limited Avalon in the city in NYC. PLus you get much more power and better acceleration in the Avalon. Avalon's a sleeper. 0-60mph takes only 6 seconds and 6.1 seconds for the BMW 328i according to Car and Driver. Avalon is also faster through the 1/4 mile than the 328, the I4 & V6 Malibu, the noisy I4 and V6 Accord. Go for the Avy!
Adam @ Dec 31st 2007 1:04PM
2008 Toyota Avalon XL? You're talking two different price points, man. You could maybe compare an Impala SS to an Avalon, but you should compare the Malibu to the Camry.
3seriesisking @ Dec 31st 2007 1:04PM
Thanks Mike. What kind of price are we talking on the Avalon in the Limited trim package?
meshies @ Dec 31st 2007 1:06PM
Avalon is too expensive and doesnt come close to the Malibu in the looks department. Try again.
jordan @ Dec 31st 2007 1:09PM
@mike
I think people looking at a Malibu are most likely not in the market for an Avalon.
Avalon: $27k-$34k
Malibu: $20k-$27k
That's, what, a 35% price increase? If you're going to stay in the same price segment, compare it to the Camry, which I think it easily outshines.
sheth @ Dec 31st 2007 1:11PM
the avalon is ugly and doesnt get the same mileage as malibu I4 model. Its rated at 19/29 vs 22/30 for Malibu. Furthermore the Malibu is cheaper and handles better. The two cars arent even in the same class.
3seriesisking @ Dec 31st 2007 1:13PM
I thought the Avalon was in a different price bracket. A limited will run you around $35,000.
Russell @ Dec 31st 2007 1:35PM
@mike
I feel sory for you, the money you paid for your Avy could have gotten you a really nice car like CTS.
Yea gooo CTS...
caddy dave @ Dec 31st 2007 1:46PM
Avalon? Surely you're joking. I'd rather drive a Checker Marathon. It has more style.
Louis Duran @ Dec 31st 2007 2:12PM
Mike, the Avalon doesn't really compete on price with the Malibu LT1/LT2. Although the base prices on the Avalon XL is close to the Malibu LTZ the prices quickly go up on the Avalon. Compare a similarly equipped Avalon XLS with the LTZ and it is at least $5K more.
Tim Dennison @ Dec 31st 2007 2:18PM
Chose it over a Camry or Accord? Perhaps if it's a lease or buy with your money, not mine. Why? Because as it's an unknown quantity, depreciation is bound to be high very, especially with a 4-speed slush box.
why not the LS2LS7? @ Dec 31st 2007 2:53PM
The Avalon gets great gas mileage for the power and car size. But it doesn't match this Malibu. You can't just compare mpg between two different people in two different situations, that's why we have standardized tests.
Also, the Avalon is far more expensive and far larger than the Malibu. They just don't compete with each other.
It'll be interesting when the 6-speed I4 Malibu comes around. It should be a lot better on performance and mpg and really make the low-end Malibu a very competitive car.
iSpec @ Dec 31st 2007 1:00PM
Proof GM can equal or beat the imports. I make this after reading many comparo's done with consumers as test drivers. Most rate the Malibu above the Camry and equal to the Accord. If GM continues to build vehicles like this, they can recapture some of the market they have lost but it's gonna take some time.
Juvenille @ Dec 31st 2007 2:39PM
Sounds like some ricer fanboy doesn't like GM.
sheth @ Dec 31st 2007 1:01PM
as usual we have the media saying this the first GM car in decades that is up to par. Apparently the Impala, first gen CTS, Aura, STS, Olds Intrigue, Arora, etc. dont count now that we are in 2007. Even the last gen Malibu had as much refinement as the Asian competition even if it was a little frumpy looking and lacked big time V6 power. Although no one wants to admit it GM has been turning out solidly engineered cars for a few years now, its just the packages and powertrains are more attractive than ever before. The Malibu is a more stylish evolution of the last car but the basics of the two cars are still the same.
jordan @ Dec 31st 2007 1:19PM
I'm not sure I'd put the Impala in that list. I got one as a rental (V6), and I felt like I was driving a taxi. No offense to taxi drivers, as I've never actually driven a taxi, but that's just the feeling I got.
I think Olds was just too little too late. Their last generation of cars were awesome, in my opinion (I'm 25 now, btw), but they were already in the rumor mill to be on the chopping block when they came out.
Bling Bling Boy @ Dec 31st 2007 1:46PM
I agree...In the past several years,GM has been consistently turning out vehicles with quality that either equal or surpasses the competitors..(The designs were just a little boring)...We have just received a fleet of Malibu(s) with the ecotec engines .As a fleet manager, I get to drive any car compact - full size car in the rental fleet ..And I must tell you, this Malibu is a competent performer..While it's underpinnings are shared with the Saturn Aura, GM did a great job with Chevy's execution of this platform ...I can't wait to drive the LTZ V6 version.