Opinion – No replacement for displacement

This has been on my mind since last week’s Tuner

Get Autoblog in your Google feed

This has been on my mind since last week’s Tuner
Tuesday report on the 9.77/137mph Mitsu Evo. I asked myself what the old adage “No replacement for displacement”
really means to people like me. It means more than speed; there’s a whole philosophy behind it.

First let me say I respect and relate to anyone who takes the time to read, understand and work on cars, whether
their passion is a ?32 Ford, ?69 Judge or a ?04 Evo. We are all a part of this culture and working on the same mission
– to get better performance and looks out of our vehicles. But I feel that I need to better express the ?displacement?
argument with the advancement of mega-horsepower from small engines.

As I said, this isn?t just about speed. With the right resources, I could get a bathtub to pull some pretty
impressive times down the quarter-mile. There is more to it and the system seems to work via the senses.

Sound. I grew up around engines displacing 400, 305, 350, 327. Some of these engines
were pre-catalytic converter. The sound that I personally equate positively with what I want my car to emulate was bred
there. MB AMG?s turn my head when they go by; they have the classic V8 sound. While smaller displacement Italians have
a sound all their own, something I call techno-muscle. The smaller cylinder engines, like the Evos and STIs, while I am
in awe of the power they possess, leave me feeling empty when one takes off. And for the life of me I can?t figure out
why anyone would want their car to sound like a motorcycle, but that will be answered in the last sense.

Sight. There?s nothing like a nice clean engine bay filled to the hilt with cubic inches, not
plumbing. Chrome, maybe some carbon-fiber and eight spark plug wires. Also, the large coupes and sedans that usually
house V-8 are more attractive to me than small cars, the Camaro, GTO, Mustang, 300c, etc.

Touch. Maybe this should be labeled more like ?feel?. While a 600 lbs/ft Evo is more an exception
to the rule, smaller engines usually top torque numbers with the horsepower, while I prefer it the other way around.
Torque plants you in the seat. There?s nothing like having a car that could pull a house off its foundation. Also in
the ?feel? category is the rumble that shakes the car while at idle, not only should I hear the car, but I need to feel
that it?s alive (the exact opposite of what most lux makes are looking for).

Smell. This one was a little harder to come up with. I can only equate to
older classic cars; the smell of fuel in the jets of the carburetor, starter fluid to get her going and a low
restriction exhaust. That?s a cacophony of garage smells that many modern cars can?t give you (maybe too many of these
fumes have gone to my head).

Taste. Well, not literary, though I find a spatter of a good synthetic five-weight goes good with a
side of road grime. It all comes down to a matter of taste. I can appreciate any type of automobile, but only certain
types make it to my garage and it seems that I will always favor rear-wheel drive based V8s as my everyday driver and
with the popularity of V-8 powered rear-wheel drive American cars again, it seems like a great time to be alive for
guys like me. I don?t feel like I was born twenty years too early any more.