• Jul 1, 2009
2009 Audi A6 3.0T – Click above for high-res image gallery

In 1982, Audi introduced its redesigned 5000 to the world and unwittingly influenced the shape of sedans to come. The 5000's smooth flanks, disk wheels and flush-mounted side glass were replicated by a generation of cars over the next two-and-a-half decades, and when its successor debuted in 1994, the A6 grew some curves while retaining Audi's patented blend of staid Germanic modernity.

The 2009 Audi A6 isn't nearly as revolutionary. It sits atop the same C6 platform we've known since 2005, and last year, the automaker gave its upper mid-sizer a mild makeover consisting of new front and rear fascias, light clusters and a few interior tweaks. Maybe that's why Audi thought it need to commission actor Jason Statham to star in a multi-million dollar Super Bowl advert to boost the A6's image. Well, that and to highlight the automaker's all-new supercharged 3.0-liter TFSI V6 – the same engine due to be fitted to several new Audis, including the 2010 Audi S4. How does the restyled A6 fair during a week of testing? And more importantly, is this new blown V6 a suitable replacement for Audi's 4.2-liter V8? Find out after the jump.



Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

The basic profile of the A6 dates back a decade, with its curving greenhouse drawing heavily on the original TT coupe. The current generation stretches the glass longitudinally and, like other contemporary Audis, the A6 has a tornado line (designer speak) just below the sheetmetal's shoulders to connect the outermost corners of the front and rear light assemblies.



Those light clusters were the main focus of last year's refresh, although their shape remains rectangular, lacking some of the sculptural elements found in the new A4, A5 and Q5. Other modern Audi design cues have been adopted on the refreshed A6, including the RS4-esque intakes below the headlamps, along with taillights that extend towards the center of the trunk lid, pinching off at the license plate pocket.

Inside, our A6 tester had a two-tone, brown and black leather finish which drew mixed reviews from passengers. While the leather and dash materials are top-notch and soft to the touch, the color combination left some people cold. The two-tone interior does an admirable job of breaking up the vast blackness found in most modern Audis, but those who prefer a monochrome look can choose to coat the A6's interior in black, gray or beige. As for the rest of the A6 interior, it's standard Audi: no great breakthroughs, but fit, finish and materials are excellent and ergonomics are similarly good.



As with all German luxury marques, Audi has incorporated a control knob on the center console to allow users to navigate through the myriad of features and functions available through the automaker's infotainment and climate control system. Unfortunately, the updated A6 makes due with the second generation Multi Media Interface (MMI), while the new Q5 and refreshed Q7 get the third-gen system. For its part, the second iteration of MMI is still heads-and-shoulders better than most incarnations of BMW's iDrive, but it still has some annoying quirks.

The system's most notable niggle is how you spin the knob to scroll through the menus. Contrary to the majority of wart-operated devices, the Audi system places the scroll bar to the left of the menu list, and while it may seem intuitive to turn the MMI knob clockwise to scroll down, instead, it takes you up. We'll admit it's a minor annoyance that fades away after a few days, but for a system this complex it's yet another learning curve we could do without. In fact, given the flexibility and configurability of other aspects of MMI, we'd like to see a user setting where we could flip-flop the scrolling, much as many video games will allow the user to invert the axises on their controllers.



Across The Pond, the A6 and its ilk are considered "executive" vehicles, often used to ferry management-types to the board room and golf course. As a result, the A6 has an expansive 15.9 cu-ft trunk and a commodious back seat able to coddle two passengers in comfort. While Audi cites the A6's capacity at five, the sedan's rear confines are contoured to maximize the comfort of two passengers, so if your shuttling more than four people around for more than a short jaunt, it's best to take two cars.

For 2009, the existing normally aspirated 3.2-liter V6 and 4.2-liter V8 engines carry over and are joined by the new supercharged 3.0-liter V6. Until now, Audi has used the TFSI designation for turbocharged and direct injected gasoline engines. For marketing reasons, officials chose not to change that appellation for this all-new supercharged mill – presumably the Four Ringed brand didn't want to create confusion among consumers by calling this the 3.0S, lest people confuse the model for a sportier S-Line trim. Nevertheless, a few letters don't compromise the engine's effectiveness.



Nestled between the cylinder banks is a belt-driven compressor huffing enough air through the manifold to deliver 300 peak horsepower and 310 lb-ft of torque between 2,500 and 4,850 rpm. In the A6, the engine was developed to deliver instant, seamless acceleration at freeway speeds. And it does. Flawlessly. The belt driven blower means turbo lag is nonexistent and with this much grunt available at the flick of an ankle, it could easily replace the V8 before long. Although the engine – shared by the 333 hp 2010 Audi S4 – has been slightly detuned, the 4,123-pound A6 gets to 60 mph in just under six seconds and you'll never be struggling to merge onto the highway or make a pass on a two-lane road.

Also updated for 2009 is Audi's all-wheel drive setup, and like the versions employed on the new A4 and A5, the reworked Quattro system features a 40/60 front-to-rear torque split. Approaching the limits of grip, the A6 offers a more balanced feel, eliminating much of the understeer traditionally associated with 50/50 AWD platforms. Power is transferred via a six-speed Tiptronic automatic transmission that allows the shift lever to be pushed to the right for manual gear selection. However, unlike more explicitly sporting models, the A6 3.0T doesn't offer steering wheel-mounted paddle shifters, something we expect to be rectified in the future.



The A6's clear métier is to cruise the Autobahn at elevated speeds in surefooted comfort, and while we didn't have the opportunity to play with the A6 in inclement weather, past Quattros have always done an outstanding job of maintaining a stable trajectory no matter the conditions. As A6s (and 5000s before them) have done for the past quarter-century, the slick aerodynamic shape results in admirably low levels of wind noise, making this Audi a very relaxing place to cover long distances. The suspension also does an excellent job of soaking up the expansion joints, frost heaves and potholes that typify Northern roads without ever feeling floaty or out-of-sorts.

Since Audi isn't offering its excellent 3.0-liter V6 TDI in the A6 for American consumers, the sedan's fuel economy is only so-so, although not bad for its performance level. We saw just over 21 mpg during our test and the EPA rates the A6 3.0T at 18 mpg in town and 26 mpg on the open road.



The normally aspirated front-wheel drive A6 starts at $45,100, while the 3.0T jumps to $51,600. With its navigation system, our Premium Plus model carried a sticker of $54,200 – several thousand more than its Japanese competitors, but right in line with its German counterparts from BMW and Mercedes.

Like its compatriots, the A6 is available in wagon trim (Avant in Audi/Euro parlance) and for 2009, the new supercharged V6 is the only powerplant available. To our eyes, the wagon has better proportions than the sedan and offers even more utility thanks to its cavernous rear compartment and its retention of Quattro all-wheel drive. If we were making the payments, we'd opt for the wagon, with the wonderful engine making the deal that much sweeter.



Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.


2009 Audi A6 3.0T Premium Plus
Performance Brakes/Tires/Wheels
Engine Supercharged 3.0-liter V6 Front Brakes 12.6-inch ventilated discs (ABS)
Configuration/Valvetrain DOHC, 4 valves per cylinder Rear Brakes 11.9-inch solid discs
Max Horsepower @ RPM 300 hp @ 5,100 RPM Wheels (front) 18-inches
Max Torque @ RPM 310 lb-ft @ 2,500 to 4,850 RPM Wheels (rear) 18-inches
Drive Type All-wheel drive (40/60 split f/r) Tires (front) 245/40 R18 All Season
Transmission Six-speed Tiptronic automatic Tires (rear) 245/40 R18 All Season
Fuel Injection Direct Injection
Compression Ratio 10.5:1 Exterior Dimensions
Recommended Fuel 91 octane Length 193.5 inches
Fuel Capacity 21.1 gallons Width 79.2 inches
EPA Fuel Economy (city/hwy) 18/26 mpg Height 57.4 inches
0-60 mph time (MFR est.) 5.9 seconds Wheelbase 111.9 inches
Top Speed 130 mph (electronically limited) Curb Weight 4,123 pounds
Suspension/Steering Interior Dimensions
Front Four link, with anti-roll bar Maximum Seating 5
Rear Trapezoidal-link Luggage Capacity 15.9 cu-ft
Steering Speed sensitive Rack-and-pinion Head Room (Front/Rear) 38.7 / 37.8 inches
Turns Lock-to-Lock 2.74 Shoulder Room (Front/Rear) 57.1 / 55.9 inches
Turning Circle (feet) 39 Leg Room (Front/Rear) 41.3 / 36.9 inches


I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 28 Comments
      • 5 Years Ago
      It certainly is a very very nice car, but next to the current A4 the A6 looks really dated. I've always been more of a fan of the A6 than the A4 in terms of exterior design, but the current A4 just looks too good.

      Of course I could afford neither and drive a Skoda Fabia instead, but hey. At least I all the parts in my Skoda have VW/Audi logos on them :D.
      • 5 Years Ago
      The 40/60 is a marketing canard.
      Audi Quattro has always been rear biased, well ever since they used the torsen center differential.
      With a 3:1 tbr, you have 25:75 while cornering (until you spin up the inner rear tire), with the new torsen3 center differential you have 15:85, again until you spin up the rear tire.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Audi quattro, Torsen since 1987 right?
        http://www.autozine.org/Classiccar/html/Audi/Quattro.html
        The fact that the new nominal torque split is slightly rear biased is irrelevant due to how the torsen differential works.
        Yes the torsen1&2 have 50/50 split, but can shuffle anywhere from 75/25, 67/33 f/r, so in straight line driving, the power follows the weight distribution [Audi typical 60/40]
        A torsen3 40/60 +/-25 also follows weight distribution. The torque sensitivity fights against the inherent planetary split.
        When you are really driving the quattro, you will light up the inner rear tire, then the center differential locks and changes the rear biased torque distribution back to one that mimics traction-heavy front biased weight distribution. Everything goes out the window if you lift the tire off the ground.
        But when you are driving at say 5/10ths, if you can notice the improvement from 25/75 to 15/85 then kudos to you.
        Realistically the biggest gain is the improved weight distribution 60/40=1.5; 55/45=1.222
        • 5 Years Ago
        MikeW:
        A Torsen T-1, as Audi used for most of those years, is not biased either direction. If you're nailing a Quattro from those years, the first thing you get is plow understeer, not lighting up either rear tire. This is because the front tires overload from having to steer and accelerate.

        Even the race-prep A6s Audi used to run in Speed GT exhibited this.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Totally unrelated, but I get this weird feeling that the driver's seat is watching me in that first picture. Like a burning laser in the back of my head.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Testing 1 2 3...Autoblog 4.0
      • 5 Years Ago
      The Jaguar XF looks far more exciting than this.
      • 5 Years Ago
      it still looks really nice and its got that touch of class, looking forward to the all new one in 2011. hopefully only minor changes on the outside.
      • 5 Years Ago
      The quibble about the scroll wheel going up instead of down is really silly as EVERY current Audi operates the radio dial in the same manner. So, it's an Audi thing. My 06 does the same thing. There is no learning curve. You turn it, realize which way it's going as you are turning it and voila! you know which way to turn it from now on.

      I can do without the brown two-tone however. I'd rather all black.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Hard to see why anyone would choose this over an SHO Taurus. The Taurus has a nicer interior and more power.

      How was the A6's braking? I've heard complaints about that in the past.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Ford VS Audi.. It would be really tough for me to compare those 2. But I see how you can compare them based on specs.

        The AWD System.. I don't think a person in this class really cares about "FULL Time AWD" versus Front/AWD.

        Are these cars going to be used for rally/autocross? I would hope not. They both need to loose a considerable amount in order to pull that off.

        I'm not a huge fan of Audi, but the name and interior quality in the past have to heavily favor Audi. Focus, Fusion(2009 and prior), Explorer, 500, Escape interiors aren't appealing at all to me.

        I hate the Square hard plastic look in the center! I love the new Taurus engine though and would def choose over the Audi engine in this case.

        I still can't figure out why audi wouldn't turbo the engine?? They turbo their 4's (GTI, Jetta, Passat, CC, Taureg, A4, etc) and their 8's (Bugatti) but not the 6's???

        Why not be consistant?
      • 5 Years Ago
      Man, that exterior styling is incredibly bland.
        • 5 Years Ago
        I've seen this new A6 on the road already and it's a very clean, smooth looking car. I think it looks far better than the basic 5 series. The exterior sheet metal in this pic is diminished by the tiny and not really attractive wheels. This car must have 19s to look the part. I've seen a few of these upgraded with the Audi factory 19" wheels and it is really a hot looking ride. I'd take one.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I agree the exterior design is bland, but this car has been around for some time now. I reckon the next all-new A6 will be bigger than the current model, following all new Audi's of late.

      The engine seems excellent.

      If I had the cash and wanted a decent German car I'd always opt for Audi - they exude quality.

      M.
      • 5 Years Ago
      Good review, kind of dry, but than again, the A6 3.0T is perhaps one of the most sedate and cold cars Audi's currently selling, so the review shouldn’t be glaringly exciting :).
        • 5 Years Ago
        @ rick

        I don't know if the rear legroom on the B8 A4 is as big as the last gen A6, but i can tell you for a fact that the B8 A4 has lots more legroom than the B7. We had a B7 A4, that we upgraded to a B8, and when I sit in the back seat behind my brother, I still have plenty of legroom, enough to be comfprtable for long rides, and a lot more room than in the B7 (both my brother and I are 6'1'').
        • 5 Years Ago
        My A6 is two gens old. But no, it doesn't have the back seat legroom of the 2000 A6, I don't know where the extra length goes. More bumpers? Longer hood for the longer engines (the A6 4.2 my year had a longer nose than the regular models). But it's FAR more room then a 2000 A4. Those were really cramped. Just go take a peek in one in a parking lot, there's plenty of room as long as the seat isn't nearly all the way back.

        I think you may find the new one has the same rear legroom as your B7 A4.
        • 5 Years Ago
        The current A4 is the same size as my 2000 A6 except in width. It's probably a hair lighter, but not more than 150 lbs.
        • 5 Years Ago
        Yup, the growth in size of the A4 makes this almost moot. Audi really needs a new design for this car. And potentially a lighter chassis for better performance. I played with it at an autoX event and was not impressed.*

        *disclaimer, I'm not a huge fan of massive cars unless they're either a) more lithe then you'd expect (the a6 is not) or b) a lot quicker than you'd expect (the a6 is not). The last fun big car i drove was the 545i when it first came out all bangleized. Biblically entertaining, especially compared to the 328i I stepped out of :)
        • 5 Years Ago
        Yup, it's a big car, about as big as i'd personally get with a daily.
        • 5 Years Ago
        the design is stale and non existent in my eye, sort of liek a Lexus in that respect

        the Avant is definitely the better choise, and I'd jsut as much save $20k and get the new Taurus SHO. it's not liek this deserves the $50-60k sticker price

        shoot the new A4 is almost just as big as the A6 so one can opt for the A4 and save $20k

        in this class the Audi sit about 4th or 5th for me - considering the CTS/STS/M35-45/5-series all would earn my money before I even bothered to look at the A6
      • 5 Years Ago
      Love the interior, and yeah I'd go for the Avant too if I was in the market.
    • Load More Comments