• 96
2010 Chevy Equinox – Click above for high-res image gallery

The Chevrolet Equinox has never really been a loser in the compact crossover segment, but it has also never really been a leader, either. It was always just kind of "okay," with milquetoast styling, so-so performance and reasonable roominess, but never anything really attention grabbing. Coming just a week after General Motors filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, Chevrolet General Manager Ed Peper officially introduced the all-new 2010 Chevy Equinox as the first product of the "New General Motors," and it's clear that the company hopes their new baby is able to grab a much larger share of this burgeoning segment.

Among other things, the Equinox gets all new powertrains, including an available four-cylinder engine for the first time. Both the four and the new 3.0-liter V6 have direct fuel injection and are paired up with six-speed automatic transmissions. In fact, everything about the Equinox is new. Apparently the only major component carried over from the old model is the sunroof module. Everything else has been reworked or replaced. We had the opportunity to spend some seat time with both the four-cylinder and V6 models with front- and all-wheel drive. Find out if the Equinox finally has what it takes to be more than just competitive after the jump.

Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

Chevrolet calls the Equinox a compact crossover, but when you look at its dimensions, this CUV is in many respects more mid-size than compact. At 187.8 inches long, it out-spans the Ford Escape by 13 inches and the Toyota RAV4 by six inches. It's even two inches longer than a Ford Edge. Chevy's rationale for calling this a compact is the 72.5 inch width, which is 0.5 inches less than the RAV4 and two inches less than the Edge. So it's really a "tweener" of sorts. However you define it, though, the Equinox is especially roomy relative to competitors.

As soon as you lay eyes on the new Equinox, it's clear that the design team put in a serious amount of effort this time. The dowdy looks of the previous generation have been replaced by a bold modern look that's more muscular and better proportioned. Like all other recent Chevrolets, this one starts with a dual port grille that is flanked by a pair of handsome jeweled headlamp clusters. The combination of a rising character line along the flanks, aggressive wheel well flares and a higher beltline combine to visually lower the new model – even though it's actually four inches taller.

The Equinox also gains Chevy's current design DNA on the inside, with a dual cockpit instrument panel layout similar to the Malibu and Traverse. The new look is a huge improvement over the old model, both aesthetically and functionally. Like several other recent GM vehicles, the dashboard flows into the door panels with a look that provides some continuity. Some of the past iterations of this, notably the Saturn Aura, had an issue with vertical alignment of the door panels and dashboard. We've brought up this problem with GM officials on several previous occasions and they have apparently taken it to heart. None of the four Equinoxes we drove had any such alignment issues.

In fact, Mo Wazir, Vehicle Line Director for GM's compact crossovers, explained that the engineering team addressed this from a root cause approach when developing the new Equinox. They examined why the parts were misaligned and found that it was related to tightening the two sides of the dashboard separately. The assembly process has been changed to ensure that the dashboard is more consistently installed. In fact, all the fits in the Equinox testers we sampled were better than before. That's not to say the interior is perfect, however.

The same Ingersoll, Ontario assembly plant that built the previous Equinox began building so-called salable units about two months ago. These early production units are generally kept within GM for its captured test fleet, where engineers and managers drive the cars to look for last minute production problems. The examples that we drove were from this early build batch and the first units destined for customers are being built this week. The most prominent issue that we noted was a color disharmony on the dashboard. All four of the vehicles we drove had the two-tone interior scheme consisting of either black/brown or black/light gray.

The brown was the issue. The plastic panels covering the passenger side airbag and around the instrument cluster on the driver's side had a slightly different shade than the two mating pieces on either side of the center console. According to Wazir, the center stack panels come from a different supplier than the other parts. GM is already aware of the problem and working to resolve it. The gray version also had a slight mismatch, but it was far less noticeable. The only other gripe we had with the interior is the silver plastic cover on the center stack and the vent surrounds. GM opted to put a glossy clear coat finish on these parts that we feel makes them look cheap. We would prefer the richer look of a matte or satin finish for these parts – GM has also heard this complaint from others and is considering a change here as well. Wazir explained that the clear coat finish gives the part better durability and resistance to scratches, but while it may be functional, we still don't like it.

Otherwise, the interior is very good. The controls are well-placed and easy to use, with plenty of storage compartments. Models that don't have the optional navigation system get a storage bin above the radio like the one in the Malibu and all models get a bin ahead of the shifter as well as the deep compartment in the center console. That bin is large enough to accommodate a 15-inch laptop computer. It also has auxiliary audio and USB ports that support MP3 players or just thumb-drives with songs on them.

The front seats use a common seat frame developed by GM that is employed on a variety of platforms including the Epsilon II Opel Insignia, Buick LaCrosse and other models. The seats have excellent cushioning which provides decent lateral support and excellent comfort. In this case, one of the advantages of using a common frame is that the lower cushion is longer than found on many cars, thus providing decent thigh support – of our most common complaints. In the back, GM has retained the sliding rear seat that can move fore-aft a total of eight inches. When pushed back, the 112-inch wheelbase allows for positively luxurious legroom. If more cargo room is needed, sliding the seat forward provides extra space for gear or luggage.

How about those fancy new DI engines? They are very good indeed – especially the four-cylinder. This is the first four-cylinder ever offered in the Equinox and it runs smoothly and quietly with no noticeable ticking from the direct fuel injectors. Both the four- and six-cylinder engines at 182 hp and 264 hp respectively make about the same amount of power as the 3.4-liter and 3.6-liter V6 engines used in 2009 models. Unfortunately, the smaller displacement and lack of boosting mean that both engines lack in torque compared to the old engines. The four pot generates 172 lb-ft at 4,900 rpm while the old 3.4-liter V6 produced 210 at 3,800 rpm. Similarly, the previous model's 3.6-liter V6 that produced 250 lb-ft at 2,500 rpm easily trounces the 3.0-liter's 222 lb-ft at a lofty 5,100 rpm. Frankly, we would have preferred that GM go down the turbocharging path with even less displacement for the resulting fatter torque curve. Of course, that would have added cost, which GM was obviously trying to avoid.

Nonetheless, the four-cylinder will still likely be more than sufficient for the majority of drivers who don't need any significant towing capacity. The four can drag along an extra 1,500 pounds, while the V6 can pull 3,500 pounds. The four-cylinder Equinox is no speed demon (neither is the V6 for that matter), but it has enough acceleration that you'll never worry about merging onto freeways or making a pass with a reasonable amount of room. Both six-speed automatic transmissions have been re-calibrated and have much improved shift quality compared to previous versions, especially the larger unit used with the V6.

One new feature of the four-cylinder model is an ECO button located ahead of the shifter. Currently, it just makes adjustments to the shift map and torque converter lock-up points to help enhance fuel efficiency. It's claimed to improve mileage by about 1 mpg overall. Future iterations will likely add control over the electronic throttle response and cruise control, as well. During our drive time in the front-wheel-drive four-cylinder Equinox, we averaged a respectable 26 mpg – not bad for a 3,800-pound non-hybrid CUV.

The aerodynamic work done on the Equinox pays dividends for fuel economy and for NVH. Driving in the Equinox was a remarkably subdued experience. The plastic A-pillar covers on the old model are gone and the windshield is now virtually flush with the surrounding pillars. The result is a drastic reduction in wind noise. Combined with the more rigid body shell (which includes a one-piece body side stamping and acoustic laminated side glass), the Equinox delivers a pleasantly quiet interior.

The Equinox's strut front and multi-link rear suspensions are also well tuned to provide an excellent balance of ride and handling, especially on the base 17-inch wheel and tire package. Front-wheel drive models can have optional 18s, which are standard with all-wheel drive and 19s are optional on AWD versions. Switching to the larger, heavier wheels makes a noticeable difference to ride quality, with small road imperfections being much more likely to pass through to occupants. Another factor that detracts from handling is the all-wheel drive. The extra couple hundred pounds of hardware seem to make it feel much less nimble than the FWD variant, but the system ought to pay dividends when the weather turns sour..

Four-cylinder models get an electric power steering system while the V6s stick with a tried-and-true hydraulic setup. The difference comes down to cost and fuel efficiency. The EPAS is more expensive but draws less power and since GM was trying to max out mileage numbers for the four, it received EPAS. Eventually, as costs come down, EPAS will be offered across the board. Both systems felt about the same at the steering wheel, with comparable levels of effort that were just about ideal. Neither system provide huge amounts of cornering force feedback, although the hydraulic system felt slightly better.

GM is pricing the new Equinox very aggressively and greatly reducing the number of buildable combinations. Most items are now packaged in four trim levels and, including colors, there are now about 1,200 different combinations that the plant can build compared to over 10,000 previously. The base LS model starts at just $23,185 with the four-cylinder engine and front-wheel drive. That's $1,825 less than a 2009 Equinox LS. A maxed out LTZ with every possible option including the V6, all-wheel drive, sunroof and navigation will only be about $35,000. Both four-cylinder and V6 engines and front- or all-wheel drive can be selected at any trim level.

The new Equinox is scheduled to arrive at dealers in the next few weeks. It deserves a look.

Photos Copyright ©2009 Sam Abuelsamid / Weblogs, Inc.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 6 Years Ago
      How is this 'new GM' if it was developed entirely by old GM?
        • 6 Years Ago
        Autoblog is probably going by the timing of its introduction. At least that's how I perceived them to be doing.
        But at any rate, I would agree with you on your question though.
        • 6 Years Ago
        No one (including GM!) even knows what the "New GM" even means. At least Chrysler knows that the "New Chrysler" means "Fiat".
        • 6 Years Ago
        What do you want "New GM" to be? It takes on average 4 years to develop a new car. They are keeping Chevrolet and this was a product they developed to replace an existing product. You can't snap your fingers and expect everything to change overnight. Old GM had figured out design long before they went bankrupt. The real issue GM had was the too many brands/models, as well as excessive labor and health care costs. They did a great job on this vehicle as I have seen several driving around and on dealers lots. It has good presence as well as a feeling of quality in the assembly. The fuel economy is also rated highest in the class...
        • 6 Years Ago
        I think "new GM" includes the word "government" in it somewhere. (Overplayed, yes, but never seems to get old. :))
      • 6 Years Ago
      I like it, but have to nick pick something which is toooo common with the domestics..They always use one white for reverse and one red taillight for stop and turn signals..Theres no originality in taillight designs anymore. Is it really that expensive to add like a 3rd amber turn signal?
        • 6 Years Ago
        Level: "I like it, but have to nick pick something which is toooo common with the domestics... Is it really that expensive to add like a 3rd amber turn signal?"

        I tend to agree that amber lights are often better --- not always, it really depends on the design --- but it's not fair to target the domestics here; a lot of automakers do this. I don't think a single Acura has amber lights; not sure about Honda. I think people associate the all-red look as more upscale and cleaner.
        • 6 Years Ago
        It doesn't necessarily have to be Amber tail light at the end, It could be clear with an amber bulb or even a separate 3rd red turn signal dedicated incorporated into the tail light, if you really hate the amber color but not even that is what I am saying.

        I.E cars top of my head are the Mercury Mariner and GMC Arcadia.



        The tailights where design to house dedicated turn signals and at the end both ending up having where the turn signal would go it being capped off...instead theres the empty spots in the taillights where you would normally find the dedicated turn signal but cop out from putting them on to save a few dollars which to me is a prime example of how cheap can you be???? seriously 2 sockets and 2 bulbs
        • 6 Years Ago
        "Is it really that expensive to add like a 3rd amber turn signal?"

        Even the new Honda Accord doesn't have an rear amber turn signal.

        • 6 Years Ago
        Agreed on the lack of amber turn signals in the back. And missing side flashers too (either on the mirror or below it.) That's my biggest pet peeve with most American cars. I won't buy one that's missing these two safety features.
        • 6 Years Ago
        They like to use the addition of an amber turn signal light as one way to show how the vehicle has been updated in its third or fourth year. Sometimes they even get bold and introduce it in the vehicle's second year!
        • 6 Years Ago
        @ Dude:

        Amber rear signal lenses are there for safety, not fashion. If you’ve ever followed a vehicle (typically domestic) with the brake lights and turn signals on the same circuit, it takes longer to recognize a driver’s intention when he/she is signaling for a turn and applying the brakes at the same time. That second or so can be critical when the need to make an evasive maneuver arises. This is why virtually all Asian and European vehicles have the turn signals in a different segment of the lamp housing and why they are usually amber instead of red. This is the law in most other areas besides North America, and I think it reflects poorly on a car maker when they’re too cheap to spend a couple of bucks extra to engineer the turn signals into a dedicated segment of the rear lamps.

        There have been dozens of posters on Autoblog that let the shape of a radiator grille nix a number of good vehicles from their consideration (Mazda 3 or Acura anyone?). Well, I’m the same way about amber rear turn signals. If a vehicle doesn’t have ‘em, it’s off my shopping list!
      • 6 Years Ago
      So why has it become acceptable for car companies, especially US car companies to do such a poor job matching paint color from bumpers to body. It started with Silver now it is prevelant in most colors.
        • 6 Years Ago
        You have a valid point. The fact that your question was low-ranked is strange. CLynch. I think the post is infested with GM employees.
      • 6 Years Ago
      26 Miles Per Gallon out of the four is better than my 2.4l four 06 Sonata's 23-23.5 MPG mixed. And I baby that thing like there's no gas left. :(
        • 6 Years Ago
        He does have about 600 fewer pounds to drag around on narrower tires, and a roof that pushes 6" less air out of the way.

        Color me skeptical that those compact car like mileage numbers will show up in the real world, electric steering or not. Tuning for the EPA treadmill test receives a lot more engineering attention now than it did in 2004-2005 when Hyundai was designing his Sonata.
        • 6 Years Ago
        I also have a smaller engine in a car that's RATED for 31 MPG highway. The 2010 Equinox is rated for 22 City/32 Highway/26 Combined - and 26 Combined is what it got.

        Me? I drive 95% highway. I drive about 2 miles on a road doing 35 MPH on cruise the whole way, then pull onto a highway that does 60 MPH cruise for 5 miles, then that leads (at a constant speed) to another highway that does 65-68 MPH cruise for 5-6 miles, followed by pulling onto a highway (at a constant speed) that does 45-50 MPH cruise until I pull into work. AKA all my miles are cruise/highway miles with very little stopping, if any.

        But thanks for the ignorant comments! Congrats?
        • 6 Years Ago
        Do you have direct injection, electric power steering, 6 speed automatic, ECO mode, tall gearing?
        Think not.
      • 6 Years Ago
      That interior is absolutely beautiful. Wow.
        • 6 Years Ago
        I wouldn't call it "beautiful," but it's three steps in the right direction for Chevrolet.
      • 6 Years Ago
      Brand new vehicle within single week! Have the engineers of The New GM sold their sould to the devil? :)
      • 6 Years Ago
      Actually looks pretty nice. Good fuel consumption numbers as well. I remember when the 20mpg city the original Marrano achieved was considered great. 26 combined is really impressive for this class of vehicle. My Nissan Sentra does not do much better and is obviously not nearly as large.
        • 6 Years Ago
        • 6 Years Ago
        Agreed. I read that 26mpg figure and was quite surprised. Sounds like the 30mpg hwy figure is legit.

        Hell, this Equinox gets better mileage than my small hatchback, my car takes Premium as well.

        Excellent job GM. Can't wait until that engine spreads across the lineup. A Malibu with that DI 4cyl will be quite competitive as the non-DI version is already very efficient.
      • 5 Years Ago
      I own one of these..a AWD 4 cylinder. I test drove a 4cyl and a 6 cylinder AWD and let me tell you..unless your going to be towing all the time, you dont need the 6. This 4 cylinder has more horsepower AND torque than my old V6 suv. This is definitely a winner. I test drove a RAV 4 and there is no comparison. The Equinox wins hand down, not just in gas mileage, but in safety also. Onstar..you cant even get that on a toyota. Im very happy with this vehicle..the warranty is superior to Toyotas, and it will outrun a Rav 4 4 cyl also. And,,I like the chrome trim inside, and most people that have looked at mine like it also..they say the inside looks classy and luxurious. My awd 4 cylinder is averaging 27mpg and when I drove it to Indianapolis it averaged 30 on the highway. When i approached steep, long, hills on the freeway at 73mph..I was impressed..very impressed. You can hardly hear the the transmission downshift one notch..it was so smooth and quiet. If this car had a Lexus badge on it no one would even know the difference. This SUV is a winner...hands down. Thankyou GM!
      • 6 Years Ago
      Very well-written review. Keep them coming!
      • 6 Years Ago
      I drove the new Equinox, nice vehicle but will not buy one due to the interior layout. I always have a 20 to 2 ounce drink and ther is no place to put it. The cup holders are way down of the floor, and the only way to reach tem is to bend over holding the top of the cup itself. With a big cup you cannot leave it there or it would slide of either left or to the right. All the vehicles I have had over the years the console was flat coming back from the dash to the shifter to the center console. Not sure who thought of this arrangement but they did not think of what the public wanted just like the big 3 have been doing for years.
      • 6 Years Ago
      Nice looking CUV but I don't see this as a competitor in the compact class. It's bigger and more expensive than anything in "it's class". GM fans talk about how expensive the Taurus SHO is at around $40,000 but this is supposedly a compact, entry level CUV that tops out close to $35,000.

      That seems more like Edge, Venza, and Murano territory to me.

      Again good looking vehicle but just because it's bigger than everything in "it's class" doesn't mean it's better. The current Equinox is bigger than anything in it's class and it's a horrible vehicle.
      • 6 Years Ago
      So the complaints about this vehicle are limited to:

      1. Tailight design
      2. Its larger but more efficient than its competition
      3. The Chevy emblem
      4. Its not really a compact SUV

      Sounds like nitpicking to me.

      I dont agree that the old model was dull looking BTW, it was one of the better looking small SUVs. Anyone remember the last gen RAV4 or Sante Fe? Those were ugly.

      People comparing this to the Pilot need to remember it only seats 5, has far less capacity, gets better mileage and costs less. The pilot starts at $28-$29k vs $23k for the Chevy. The pricing and mileage of the Equinox put it squarely up against the compact utes. The fact that it has more rear seat room is just a bonus.
        • 6 Years Ago
        The tailight design is unacceptable.
        The V6 is too tall geared
        The 19" tire size makes the gearing even taller.
        19" wheels make the turning circle go from bad to worse.
        No redline/orangeline on tachometer.
        • 6 Years Ago
        @Mike W

        Please explain to me how the rim diameter affects the turning radius? Also, typically larger rims are matched with lower profile rubber to keep the overall diameter the same more-or-less.... but one knock you could have mentioned is what the article pointed out, the 19" rims are heavier and adversely impact handling.
    • Load More Comments