By the thousands: Auto ownership around the globe
The Economist ran a piece on vehicle ownership around the globe, and we just had to share. It's a graph of national car ownership rates and it's sure to produce a few "WTHs" from those who view it. Car-lovin' 'Murkins have to be on top, right? No. In fact, we'd bet the house that you wouldn't guess the country in the number one slot even if we spotted you the first letter of its name. It's Luxembourg. Yes, Luxembourg has claimed the top spot with 647 cars for every 1,000 residents. The highest ranked countries tend to be wealthy nations with small populations, so maybe seeing Iceland (#2) and New Zealand (#3) so high on the list makes more sense. And where does America rank? 16th! We can see placing below motor-manic Italy (4th), but we're even below Canada (5th) and Australia (8th). Heck, we're below France (12th). Go figure. At least we place higher than the Brits (19th) or Japanese (21st). The numbers come from the International Road Federation's "Pocket World in Figures 2009", and uses figures from 2005, the latest year available for all countries. Thanks for the tip, Filovirus[Source: The Economist]












Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
rsfourever 5:11PM (1/14/2009)
wow that is some shocking data. as a frenchman, i guess i don't really have any legitimacy claiming that we are all about using public transportation and getting away from cars... i am truly shocked that the US has less cars/1000 people than france, or even germany...
Reply
cm 5:46PM (1/14/2009)
I've seen similar data for Germany, and I muss say that the number of registered cars per 1000 persons varies greatly depending on how densely populated the region is, and how well developed the public transit system is.
Here in Berlin, we only have about 350 cars registered per 1000 persons. There are however counties, especially in rural, small and middle town Germany, which have much higher numbers.
But Italy in 4th place?? No offense, but seriously, the data doesn't tell too much, as we don't know what the average price per car is, so we can't estimate what kind of cars they are driving. Also consider this, Italy and France have a large number of small cars on the roads, then does Germany. This is due to the fact that Italian and French manufacturers tend to traditionally produce smaller cars, and that the have a large share in their respective domestic markets. These cars are also cheaper, so probably more people can afford to buy, and maintain one.
Japan is supposedly going through a post-car era. Japan is also more urbanized then the US, and better served by public transportation, so there is no point of comparing yourselves with them.
What we should take home from this hole chart is that country with more then 400 cars registered per 1000 inhabitants are probably very well motorized! The chart is not really telling anything else, as the differences are too small to be really relevant.
PS: South Korea was a shocker. But I guess it's fair, given that about half the country lives in the metro of Seoul.
Randy 12:24AM (1/15/2009)
Shocking Indeed!
I feel betrayed by my media for making me feel like a gas guzzling, car fanatic for all these years! And to think the Maple Leafs up North actually have more cars per 1000!
I'm writing a strongly worded letter! ;)
Does make me feel less guilty about driving a Hemi though! heh
Dondonel 5:13PM (1/14/2009)
How do they define cars?
Are pick-up trucks counted as cars?
These figures don't come with a credible source attached, who is International Road Federation anyway?.
BTW World Bank figures are completely different from these figures, which quote US as having 874 passenger cars per 1000 person.
Reply
mister nomer 7:12PM (1/14/2009)
Um, where are you getting your numbers from and what are they counting?
The most recent number for the U.S. I've seen is 478 cars per 1000 people.
(source World Bank 2002)
http://www.swivel.com/data_columns/spreadsheet/2045088
Epyx 8:32PM (1/14/2009)
Either he is dyslexic or thought no one would check!
Dondonel 11:12PM (1/14/2009)
@Epyx,
The article takes the numbers from an US DOT report, but obviously misinterprets them, see the report here:
http://www.bts.gov/publications/national_transportation_statistics/html/table_01_11.html
You can see that in US there are 135 million "passenger cars" and another 99 million "2-axle 4-tire vehicles" (trucks and SUVs) registered as highway vehicles.
In other words the article quoted here ignores half of the passenger vehicles registered in US, hence the erroneous ranking.
mister nomer 2:55AM (1/15/2009)
I stand corrected.
Thanks for the link. It's a fascinating chunk of data.
Cheers... = )
Rich 5:16PM (1/14/2009)
It's "merkins", not "'Murkins". Look it up to see why.
Reply
mikemaj82 5:21PM (1/14/2009)
This is because Americans buy cars they can't afford and then the repo-man comes...
Reply
Jeremy 5:23PM (1/14/2009)
I'm fairly sure the reason the U.S. isn't ranked higher on the list is that our population is younger than the populations of most European countries. In other words, a lot more people out of that "per 1000 population" in the U.S. will be under the legal age to obtain a driver's license than in say, Germany.
Reply
RonPauls 6:19PM (1/14/2009)
You have no idea what you are talking about.
Carl 7:14PM (1/14/2009)
While he may not have been hitting on this point exactly, Europe and Italy in particular has very low birth rates. In fact, I remember the Pope at one point a few years ago implored Italians to have kids. So if you've got a family of 2 with 2 cars in Italy and a family of 4 with 2 cars in the US, you've got a big portion of the disparity right there. Combined with all the other factors mentioned, these numbers do make a little sense.
Ty 8:52PM (1/14/2009)
Hahahahaha.
"At least we placed higher than the brits/japanese."
As if this is some kind of contest....
Reply
sunnycyclist 8:19PM (1/14/2009)
Exactly. I can afford a car and I'm a gearhead, but I don't need one. I doubt this survey takes into account people who use Zipcar and other car-shares. Personally, I couldn't imagine settling for just one vehicle to drive, especially since I usually drive for fun.
nardvark 5:29PM (1/14/2009)
I blame Manhattan. And hippies.
Reply
rsfourever 5:31PM (1/14/2009)
agreed!
Mobius_1 8:05PM (1/14/2009)
And Al Gore.
MikeofLA 10:18AM (1/15/2009)
Here in LA we're trying to make up for Manhatten's lack of cars. From the traffic last night, I can tell you we're doing a good job.
rick 6:41PM (1/14/2009)
the reason the usa is so far down the list is because there is such a disparity between the 'haves' and the 'have nots'. remember the images from hurricane katrina? there are tens of millions in this country who can't afford to feed and house themselves and their families properly...let alone run an automobile.
as a nation, we should be ashamed of this...instead we're worried about our ranking in cars per population as opposed to canada and australia?
Reply