Back in June of 2009, Chrysler terminated relationships with 789 dealerships in an effort to cut its dealer network down by 25 percent. A few of those dealerships didn't think too highly of the move, which was orchestrated in part by the federal government. As a result, 64 former Chrysler franchisees have reportedly filed a suit against the United States Treasury and are seeking at least $130 million in damages.

Was the move to terminate these dealerships a violation of the U.S. Constitution? According to the lawsuit, the automotive task force violated the Fifth Amendment, which essentially states that property cannot be taken away and used for public purposes without adequate compensation.

[Source: Automotive News – sub. req. | Image: Drew Phillips/AOL]

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • From Our Partners

    Share This Photo X