• 60
Despite plenty of academic research demonstrating that texting while driving can be just as dangerous as drinking and driving, a new poll shows that most teens simply don't think that's the case. State Farm recently sponsored a poll conducted by Harris Interactive in which 14-to-17 year-olds were asked whether they thought they would die one day if they regularly text and drive. Only 35 percent of those asked strongly agreed with that statement. Compare that figure with the 55 percent of teens who think that drinking and driving could prove deadly, and you begin to see the disparity.

Likewise, those polled believed that their chances of getting into an accident are higher while drinking and driving versus texting and driving. The auto insurance giant says that it's up to parents to underscore the dangers of both activities for their children. We couldn't agree more – especially after seeing that only a little more than half of the teens surveyed appear to adequately understand the potential consequences of drinking and driving. With public safety groups and parents having already spent decades reminding young people of the dangers of driving under the influence, it looks like it's going to take at least that long to reach them about the perils of distracted driving. Hit the jump for the press release.

[Source: State Farm | Image: Getty]

Show full PR text
State Farm® Survey Shows Fewer Teens Believe They Will Have an Accident or be Killed Texting While Driving Versus Drinking While Driving

Findings at Odds with Academic Research Showing Consequences of Texting While Driving as Severe as Drunk Driving; Parents can Play Key Role in Closing Awareness Gap

BLOOMINGTON, Ill., Sept. 20 /PRNewswire/ -- A new State Farm ® survey, conducted by Harris Interactive, shows that despite academic research indicating the consequences of texting while driving can be as severe as drunk driving, some teens still don't see it that way.

In the survey, fewer teens view texting while driving as leading to fatal consequences as compared to drinking while driving. Of 14-17 years-olds who intend to have or already have a driver's license, the survey found that 36 percent strongly agree that if they regularly text and drive they could be killed one day. In contrast, the majority of teens (55 percent) strongly agree that drinking while driving could be fatal.

The survey also showed that teens think the chances of getting into an accident are still higher when drinking while driving versus texting while driving. In the survey, of these same teens, 63 percent strongly agree they could get into an accident if they text and drive. This compares with 78 percent who strongly agree they could get into an accident if they drink and drive. The survey was conducted in July among 697 U.S. teens 14-17 years of age.

The awareness gap becomes more pronounced among teens who admit to texting while driving versus teens who refrain from the practice. Among teens that have never texted while driving, 73 percent strongly agree they will get into an accident if they text and drive. Yet among teens that admit to texting while driving, only 52 percent strongly agree they will get into an accident as a result of the practice.

"Some teens still think the consequences of reaching for a cell phone are less severe than reaching for a beer bottle," said Laurette Stiles, vice president of Strategic Resources at State Farm. "We have a lot of catching up to do when it comes to helping teens understand that texting while driving can be every bit as dangerous as drinking while driving. It's an awareness gap that must be addressed."

Reaction Times

In the survey, aspiring and current teen drivers also think their chances of narrowly avoiding an accident are better texting while driving versus drinking while driving. With texting while driving, 55 percent of these teens agree they will have some situations when they almost get into an accident but will recover just in time. This compares to 36 percent of these teens who agree they can recover just in time in situations where they are drinking and driving.

While many teens may believe their ability to respond during a texting while driving incident is greater than with drinking while driving, research shows that texting may be as dangerous as or more so than drinking. In a 2008 study by TRL, the United Kingdom's Transport Research Laboratory, reaction time of drivers 17-24 years of age was reduced by 35 percent when typing a text message, compared with 12 percent when driving after consuming alcohol to the legal limit. A similar study was released in 2006 by the University of Utah using participants 22-34 years of age. This study found that the impairments associated with talking on a cell phone can be as profound as those associated with driving while intoxicated during those times when drivers are directly engaged in cell phone use. Researchers also pointed out that drinking creates impairment throughout the entire practice of driving. They found that texting while driving only creates impairment while the driver is directly engaged in the practice. Once reengaged in driving, drivers who text do not display the same characteristics as intoxicated drivers during routine operation of a motor vehicle.

The National Safety Council estimates that 200,000 crashes each year are caused by drivers who are texting.

The Role of Parents

The survey also underscores that parental engagement on texting while driving is not fully breaking through when compared to discussions about drinking and driving.

Of teens who talk often with their parents about driving, 82 percent strongly agree that if they regularly drink and drive they will get into an accident. That number falls to 72 percent among teens who rarely or never talk to their parents about driving. A similar pattern was evident around texting while driving but in these cases teens view the consequences of texting as less severe. In the survey, 67 percent of teens who often talk to their parents about driving strongly agree that if they regularly text and drive someday they will get into an accident. This compared with 56 percent of teens who rarely or never talk to their parents about driving.

The Survey

For this State Farm survey, Harris Interactive conducted the survey within the United States on July 22-26, 2010 among 697 U.S. 14-17 year-olds, including 694 who intend to have or already have a driver's license. Figures for age, sex, geographic region, and race/ethnicity were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. The estimated margin of error is +/- 3.7 percentage points for the entire sample and is higher among subgroups.

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 4 Years Ago
      Id say that OLDER people texting while driving are more dangerous than teens/people in their 20's texting. I know people that can text without even looking at the phone, this is less likely to be the case with older folks. Im not condoning the activity, simply stating what Ive seen.

      That said, a lot of the time the people that I know that can text without even looking at the phone are terrible drivers even without the phone in their hands.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Make law to put them in jail when they are catched upon fact, and then they will consider it enough dangerous ? If you think its too much, think that here is about lives and health at risk !
      • 4 Years Ago
      Right off the bat, "teens" and "thinking" should not be used in the same literary work... let alone in the same sentence. There should be a law if you get caught texting (why is this word not in the spell-check dictionary?) while driving, your license will be suspended and you much go through a mandatory 45mph crash into a deformable object to convey the dangers of auto accidents... they should also re-use the same car to save money.
        • 4 Years Ago
        - LOL, spelling fail while trying to be a smart-ass...
      • 4 Years Ago
      Texting while driving is a parent's responsibility to stop. There are solutions to stop this so buy your teen a smart phone and install some software. Better yet buy the bumper stickers on this site so you can hear about what your teen is doing on the road!


      Maybe after a couple of bad driving reports your teen will take driving seriously!
      • 4 Years Ago
      The reason teens don't think texting is dangerous is because most cops text and drive also, and the fines, if any, are minimal. On the other hand, if you blow a .02 as a teenager the cops will rip you out of your car, beat you repeatedly, then steal thousands of dollars from you or your parents at a DUI show-trial.
      • 4 Years Ago
      I'm 18 years old and if I ever see my friends texting while driving I'll slap the frigging phone right out of their hand. None of my friends are gonna put my or their lives in danger cause of some stupid text that can wait. When you are in the car DRIVING COMES FIRST. PERIOD.
      • 4 Years Ago
      Raise the driving age to 17.
      • 4 Years Ago
      This just in, teens are stupid.

      Problem solved.
        • 4 Years Ago
        That's an incredibly naive thing to say.
      • 4 Years Ago
      its funny how they say teens.... when I've seen A LOT of adults texting and driving. . .
      • 4 Years Ago
      Yet another reason why I think the England PSA about texting while driving should be aired here in the states unedited and parents complaining be damned!

      • 4 Years Ago
      Let's back the truck up a little bit...

      When did it ever become SO important to be in constant communcation that people started putting their lives and the lives of people around them at risk just to relay some trivial sentence on a phone? What ever happened to I'll-get-to-it-when-I-get-to-it or it-can-wait? Kids these days.

      /Get off my lawn
        • 4 Years Ago
        About the same time that the marketing department of Cell phone companies convinced everyone that they absolutely "needed" a cellphone to be cool.

        ... these are the same type of people that convinced consumers that even though they probably have the cleanest water in the world and it is available in a limitless form within a few feet of anywhere in their home, they instead should buy it in bottled form from the supermarket.
        • 4 Years Ago
        I have an iPhone, simply because I like to be able to look up restaurants and hotels when traveling, and it's not to be able to send emails from anywhere ... but honestly, I might send an email over a cellular network once a week (although it's generally a great time saver when traveling, to be able to look up things in places I don't know). I never send text messages.

        The only reason it's affordable is because I'm on a family plan with my extended family and we split the bill about 4 ways. I might call someone maybe three times a week, too, and that's usually "Hey, I'll be there in 5 minutes" kind of things. We have 9,999 rollover minutes on a ~500 min/month plan that's split four ways. It's generally pointless. But for some reason, I would feel lost and isolated without it in my pocket.

        I remember the days before cellphones existed. You'd plan ahead, people would expect you at a certain time, and no one would think anything if you were 30 minutes late. Now, if you're five minutes late and haven't checked in, people immediately worry that you've died in a horrible fiery inferno on the interstate.

        I long for the days without cellphones, but am reluctant to be the first to go without one. If I had to pay $100 a month just to have an iPhone on my own plan, though, I know I'd be without it. I'd rather eat Fillet Mignon three or four times a month, or enter in an autocross event three times a year. Cellphones are comparatively dumb. There's nothing I need to say to people over a telephone that's worth $100/month. If someone asked me to name a price, I'd be hard pressed to pay more than $30/month for myself and my wife combined.
      • 4 Years Ago
      LIKE OMG!1!!
    • Load More Comments