• Jul 10th 2007 at 6:28PM
  • 8
There's already been a silent technology explosion in automobiles over the last ten years. Command and control has become largely a computerized affair. With high and low speed data buses throughout the automobile, your car is basically a network. It used to be that you'd press the power window switch and current would flow to a motor, or it would trigger a relay. It was simple to execute in the design and manufacturing stages, and troubleshooting was a matter of time spent with a test light and a meter. Modern cars use protocols like CAN, or Controller Area Network, to facilitate the liberal smattering of increased functionality we all desire in our vehicles. Press that same window switch now, and a message is sent to the central processor that you desire a change in the window status. The central processor then alerts the window motor to energize in the proper direction, and then it's off to the races for the glass. Sounds overly complex at first blush, doesn't it?

The old way had some drawbacks that the new systems hopefully alleviate. Firstly, there were lots of potential failure points with analog control systems. Also, components had to be wired to each other for functionality, and that required lots of wire. Wire is expensive (checked the price of copper lately?), and it adds weight and takes up space. Networking protocols allow automakers to integrate functions as never before – check out the way the MazdaSpeed 3 dials down its power output depending on steering angle – while using less wire and having a system that's more reliable. These changes have gone on virtually unknown to most motorists, but the cool stuff is just around the bend.

[Source: Automotive Design Line]

We're on the cusp of an in-car entertainment bonanza. Navigation systems were just the beginning, and of course now we've got video systems to calm restless back-seat natives. In just the last couple years we've seen Harman International's MyGig system introduce a 20-gigabyte hard drive to the automotive entertainment experience in Chrysler vehicles. Chrysler continues to expand its media offerings with satellite (how appropriate) television in the new minivans, and Ford's got Sync on their minds. As we add music libraries, sophisicated and self-aware navigation systems, telemetry, and whatever else we can dream up to vehicles, the future looks bright for the automotive-grade hard drive.

Hard drives, even those cleared for automotive use and able to withstand shock loads of 200-plus times the force of gravity, are one of the most inexpensive ways to cram lots of information, functionality, and content into a not so large space. The hard disks that are intended for automotive use would smack silly the little $70 Maxtor you get at Staples. Those cheapie drives may win out in bit count, but they'd never stand for the temperature extremes and vibration of an automotive environment. Flash memory is a contender in some applications, but for bulk storage, spinning platters still trump a fistful of solid state gates. Hard drives will be enhanced by advances in flash memory speed and capacity. Caches will grow and take on new functions, and it remains to be seen how hybrid drives will be implemented in embedded systems. Even as solid state memory improves, hard drives have been getting mind-blowingly small, while offering equally mind-blowing data capacity.

Automotive hard drive manufacturers like Toshiba have been at it for a long time, and they've developed hard drives that can laugh off temperatures from -30 to 85 degrees Celsius. Capacity will continue to grow past the current size of approximately 40 gigabytes, and having onboard hard drives will become commonplace. A single hard drive that integrates with the telemetry, navigation, entertainment, and other systems in the car would centralize those systems and stands a good chance of being more reliable than an optical disk transport like a DVD.

Of course, the telemetry angle is what has us worried. Yes, nifty 3-D graphics for the nav system would be marvellous. Storing all our favorite songs and syncing playlists with our home PC is slick. But adding more memory for the "black box" to snitch on you strikes at the heart of the tiny libertarian we harbor inside our souls. Of course, the benefits of having plenty of memory to store performance data might make diagnosing problems easier. Manufacturers could download long-term data sets from cars every time they came in for service, tracking trends and increasing their ability to keep your car happy for many thousands of miles, as well as pointing up areas that need improvement.

We're holding out for a manufacturer to build the ultimate video blogger car. Right now, it'd be something like a Honda Element with an SATA RAID in the glove compartment, and a hotrod multi-core non-linear edit system hiding out. The headrest screens would suffice as a dual monitor rig in a pinch. Now, where to stick that HDCAM SR mastering deck?

I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.

    • 1 Second Ago
      • 8 Years Ago
      You guys raise important concerns, but if implemented properly they can be addressed. Engines are routinely separated from car bodies with rubber mounts to reduce vibration. HDs could be protected from vibration and shocks so they could operate any time short of demolition. (Think bubble wrap.) And 24/7 computer systems are also available--just not from Microsoft.

      The question for the engineers is whether they can implement it right at a low enough cost.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Yeah, using HDD is plain stupid compared to SSD. There's no reason to go with the spinning platter as that WILL fail sooner and faster than SSD, regardless of the marketing BS in the article.
      • 8 Years Ago
      While my current 2001 cars and trucks do have some computers in them, I can say that adding more is a really bad idea. Currently my cars are the most reliable machines in my life. Much more so than the computers and cell phone crap I have to deal with.

      With Ford and maybe others about to add Microsoft garbage into their cars, the days of the reliable car are about to come to an end.
        • 8 Years Ago
        If hospitals can rely on computers for critical functions (I'm talking life support, not Power Point), why can't you? There's a whole lot of computing technology that has nothing to do with Microsoft, Windows, or that ugly beige box probably sitting on your desk.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Keep computers out of my car/truck/motorcycle. I had to spend over $100 on a tool to reprogram the computer on my motorcycle just so I could change the exhaust pipes.

      It cost me $400 to replace an electronic neutral safety switch in my car when that failed.

      Now I have to find a special wiring kit to replace the radio in my truck? Technology is not always a good thing.

      at least my Chevelle fires up every time I turn the key. I can replace the pipes or remove them altogether without a programmer. I can wire up any radio I want.
        • 8 Years Ago
        You didn't NEED to spend that $100 dollars on your what I'm assuming was a dynojet power commander. Most modern motorcycle ecu's and I believe cars too, will account for new equipment through a brief "learning" period. What you did w/ that piggyback was defeat the emmissions guides in the stock ecu to either extract more power, or get rid of a torque/hp dip due to said emmissions requirements. That's why Kawasaki, Suzuki, dealerships, etc. can package an aftermarket exhaust i.e. Arata, Akrapovi, 2 Bros. w/ a new bike. And while you didn't have to reprogram your Chevelle's ecu, or wait while it did it on it's own, you probably did have have to rejet and sync the carbs yourself. Which would you rather do? Deal w/ a laptop and a thumb drive, or pen, paper, calculator, and a bunch of tools, not to mention time. Don't knock technology that you don't know about.
      • 8 Years Ago
      My 1997 Acura RL had a hard drive based navigation system. Only 320mb so you couldn't fit all the states in it at once. Another car just came out with a 10gig drive which is stupid. Why are they so far behind. You can't buy an ipod with a hard drive that small. How about 40-80 gigs for holding music.
    Share This Photo X