![Gran Turismo 5 demo coming to PSN on Dec 17, GT Academy returns [w/VIDEO]](http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/370z-gt-academy_143x85.jpg)
Time for an update of the Automotive Family Tree
In the automotive world, seven degrees of separation does not apply. If you connect all the major players via their joint ventures, licensing agreements and percentage-stakes of ownership, the degrees of separation should be reduced to something more like two. Visualizing these connections is difficult, but thanks to someone with way too much time on his or her hands, we don't have to. The colorful automotive family tree to the right breaks down the large automotive parental groups and their various children. GM takes up the most space on the chart, dwarfing Toyota. The chart also demonstrates that the split of Chrysler from Daimler broke up a once gigantic tree branch that heavily weighed down the industry. While it doesn't delve into too much detail, it does provide a somewhat manageable outline. Click on the image to view the chart in high resolution. Thanks for the tip, Mike!Gallery: Automotive Family Tree 2008
[Source: Too Many Cars]
Get a WordPress.com Blog
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
stang_fan 7:21AM (3/30/2008)
"...GM takes up most of the space on the chart, dwarfing Toyota"
Do you suppose this is the case because:
1.) GM has been building cars for a longer period of time, and building them in more countries, than Toyota?
2.) GM and its subsidiaries/affliates have no qualms about doing joint ventures with other companies...even competitors?
3.) Both 1 and 2 ?
The only things GM and Toyota have (had?) in common? Both often build very conservative cars for the mass market and both are very top heavy with management.
Reply
Frank 8:10AM (3/30/2008)
Actually FIAT takes up almost as much room as GM. The three biggest conglomerates (by number of companies) are GM, FIAT, and Volkswagen.
Now what we need is for someone to put together a time line chart for all the auto companies showing how some were merged into or bought out for others, similar to this one that for computer languages:
http://www.digibarn.com/collections/posters/tongues/ComputerLanguagesChart-med.png
Reply
Frank 8:12AM (3/30/2008)
Sorry, that should be "bought out by others, similar to this one for computer languages:"
When are we going to get an editing feature?
why not the LS2/LS7? 3:20PM (3/30/2008)
There's one for British Leyland. And since British Leyland owned every significant British marque at one time or another, it functions pretty well as a history of the British portion of the auto industry.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Leyland
What?! 10:01AM (3/30/2008)
Wow, GM owns LADA.
Reply
What?! 10:02AM (3/30/2008)
Oops, I mean has a joint venture.
Me 10:35AM (3/30/2008)
If I read this correctly they missed the deal between Lada (Avtovaz) and Renault.
Reply
Nacon 11:16AM (3/30/2008)
Uhh... wait, since when Ford owns Volvo? Should be owned by GM.
Reply
Draaaainage! 2:01PM (3/30/2008)
Uh, no, Volvo is part of Ford's PAG, as were Aston Martin and Land Rover until last week.
The only Swedish brand GM owns is Saab. (AFAIK)
why not the LS2/LS7? 3:24PM (3/30/2008)
GM owned Volvo Heavy Trucks at one time (or perhaps vice-versa).
Lemmiwinks (SSBBFC: 0903-2436-0891) 12:25PM (3/31/2008)
bzzzzt - wrong. Thanks for playing, though. No parting gifts for you.
Joshua 11:22AM (3/30/2008)
I think Soichiro Honda would be proud to see the small footprint his Honda brand leaves on a diagram like this. While budget and knowledge is a large factor, it would also be nice if other brands were more concerned with building on their goals rather than looking for other companies and technologies to buy out. This would help all brands out there.
Reply
Stéphane Dumas 11:50AM (3/30/2008)
Honda had once a stake in British Leyland/MG-Rover to the early 1990s before BMW did its takeover, with models like the Triumph Acclain http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/lc9indexf.htm and the Rover Sterling who was based on some Honda models http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/sterlingf.htm and the sales of the 3.5L V6 to Saturn who used it for the VUE in 2005-2006.
Also, the "last" Isuzu cars was rebadged Hondas like the Isuzu Gemini from 1993 to 2000 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isuzu_Gemini
the_duke 11:28AM (3/30/2008)
This chart is incorrect, it shows that Chrysler owns/has majority share of Mitsubishi, but they sold that off in 2005; Mitsubishi Motors is an independent company inside the Mitsubishi conglomerate and as such should have a separate spot for themselves.
Reply
the_duke 11:30AM (3/30/2008)
I retract that, they show it as a joint venture with Chrysler. I guess Mitsu isn't big enough to warrant their own square.
Esprit bird 11:38AM (3/30/2008)
Ford owns Volvo for now. Chrysler and Mitsu still have some kind of partnership going and have a few ties like the pick-up trucks.
Reply
Joshua 12:00PM (3/30/2008)
I'm well aware of Honda's past as I've been a fan ever since I knew what an automobile was. Overall, compared much of their competition, they have dipped little into partnerships/ventures though, and never straight up bought out a company.
Stéphane Dumas 11:58AM (3/30/2008)
here more family tree trivia like the Rootes/Peugeot-Citroen family tree
http://www.sunbeam.org.au/famtree.htm
and there should be a line connecting GM and Renault since the Opel-Vauxhall Monavo/Vivaro is a joint-venture project with Renault who sold them as the Master/Trafic
Reply
tillmanmatthew 3:57PM (3/30/2008)
I think Lotus licenses the Elise engine from Toyota too.
Reply
Randy 2:05PM (3/31/2008)
The Lotus Elise has a Yamaha engine. Toyota sources them for both their own cars and for Lotus!
Randy