• Feb 27, 2006

 

 "Holy s**t, it's like a f***ing airplane," announced my hockey buddy as she slid into the cockpit. Like it was 'born from jets' or something.

Even given that the above expletives came courtesy of a foul-mouthed Canadian who isn't terribly car-savvy, our friend's first impression of the 9-3 Aero Convertible tester shown above would undoubtedly play like music to GM's ears. Which is just as well, because inserting the funky ignition key and listening to the satisfyingly subtle rumble of Saab's turbocharged 2.8L DOHC V6 as it fired up was music to ours.

 

Consider the addition of the Aero's turbocharged V6 for 2006 a much-needed bump in a segment where Saab has been trailing the pack. With just a high-strung turbocharged 2.0L 4-banger on offer, the Saab was down on cylinders, but worse-- it showed. As it gave chase to the German competition (BMW's 3-Series and Mercedes-Benz's C-class, etc.), the previous model's 210 hp and 221 ft.-lbs. of torque didn't inspire when compared to the BMW 330i's inline-6 (226/214) and the Benz C320's V6 (215/221). While a little lighter than both, the front-wheel drive and 40-60 weight distribution (to say nothing of the turbo lag) caused the previous Aero to come in third in many a comparison test.
 

Even for those who rue the day GM bought into the fair Swede, the new 250 hp Australian-sourced Ecotec aluminum engine in the 9-3 Aero (a version of which also powers the Cadillac CTS) is hard to complain about. The water-cooled twin-scroll turbocharger and variable intake valve timing raises the bar on horsepower, and the 60-degree dual overhead cam is out to get optimal power while netting decent fuel economy... at least according to GM. In reality, our tester has been managing about 20 mpg, despite doing a lot of highway driving (of course, the fact that we've got a heavy throttle foot has nothing everything something to do with it). 

To accommodate the extra power rendered by the improved powerplant, Saab has added stiffer anti-roll bars, tweaked the steering and tightened up the suspension, choosing to add a four-link independent setup in the rear. It's certainly difficult to make a convertible handle as well as a similar hardtop, the prime culprits being weight differences and a loss of rigidity without the hardtop, but GM asserts that its engineers developed the 9-3 convertible alongside the sedan and Sport Combi, ensuring that driving dynamics remain stellar.
 

On paper, at least, the Saab's plenty fast thanks to some of the company's best technology. But let's stop for a moment to examine exactly how fast it looks. Despite its expected role as hauler of golf clubs (a page in the manual is actually devoted to giving instructions on how to fit two sets in the trunk), the Aero's aggressive stance, wedge-like profile, dual exhaust pipes, 17-inch flat-spoke alloy wheels and gaping air dams make it look like a contender. The roofline of the convertible top follows the sedan's, more or less. But with the top down... hoo boy! We've been wondering exactly what to do with a Detroit-bound convertible in February, but the look of it with the top down just might encourage us to put the heated seats, HVAC system and wind isolation to the test.

The specific test model we received boasts Saab's Electronic Stability Program, traction control, front seat head and torso side airbags, automatic roll-over protection, active head restraints in the front, ABS, mechanical brake assist and cornering brake control, an anti-theft system, cruise control, heated outside mirrors and projector beam xenons, among other perks. Of special interest to our directionally-challenged selves is Saab's navigation system, which, fortunately or unfortunately (depending on how you look at it), requires the vehicle to be at a stop in order to program it. All in all, those bennies and the $720 destination fee bring the original $41,900 base MSRP up to a total amount of $47,065.

So how's the sound system? What's it like in the interior? How does the traction control really play out? Is the turbo truly smoother than the previous model's as GM claims? Stay tuned for more when we take the Saab 9-3 Aero out for a spin or 20 later this week.

 

 

 



I'm reporting this comment as:

Reported comments and users are reviewed by Autoblog staff 24 hours a day, seven days a week to determine whether they violate Community Guideline. Accounts are penalized for Community Guidelines violations and serious or repeated violations can lead to account termination.


    • 1 Second Ago
  • 28 Comments
      • 8 Years Ago
      Yeah, the MSRPs on the 9-3 convertibles are high, but if you look at the competition (BMW, Audi), they're not really out of whack. Besides, it's a GM car and you know they never go for close to MSRP.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Some of you guys are NUTZ!!! If you go drive one you would change your mind about the car. the convertible is 40k+ But you can get the 4 door that has the same V6 turbo engine etc..... same car with 4 doors and no convertible for 34K. I just picked up my 2006 AERO and i love it. I was going to buy a AUDI S-Line or a BMW 330 but when i drove the SAAB i was sold !!!! I have owned NSX's BMW's Porshe etc...... And this one is truley a great car coming from a TRUE CAR NUT I love it !!!! In other words instead of talking nonsense go drive the car then post your comment!!
      • 8 Years Ago
      Not a bad car overall, but absolutely ludicrous for close to $50k!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
      • 8 Years Ago
      same as your 80's 9000- sure, minus the solid rear axle and 160hp four banger. almost exactly.

      The price is a bit high, but still less than a comparibly equipped A4 and 330Ci, believe me I'm shopping them all.

      I haven't driven the Saab yet so I'll be interested in seeing how it performs driving.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Yeesh. Can't you guys find your own interior shots? Ever heard of search engine?

      http://saab.jimburke.com/images/edmunds/VEHICLE/2006/Saab/100610534/20027363-E.jpg

      But what's all the fuss about? It's the same basic design they've been using since the mid-1980s. (I remember it from my '88 9000.) Except that with the addition of the nav system, and literally dozens of small rectangular buttons (nav, audio, climate control, etc), it's now an ergonomic mess.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Rather Buy a BMW for that price! wouldn't you?
      • 8 Years Ago
      ESP is _not_ the same thing as traction control.
      • 8 Years Ago
      Electronic Stability Program != Traction control
      • 8 Years Ago
      As a recent purchaser of a 2000 9-3 Conv. I naturally have to root for this car. The 210 hp on my car never leaves me hurting for scoot and its smooth enough (below 5000 rpm at least) not to miss two the two additional cylinders, so I don't know if personally opt for the turbo V6.

      The car isn't always in line with my sports car sensibilities, but it has been growing on me.

      But I agree with everyone's sticker shock. 5 years ago mine stickered for $44K. Hopefully the original owner didn't pay list for it because nice as the car is, it was never worth 44K. $35K would probably have been reasonable.

      For those who want to see the dash on this new model, just think buttons. Lots and lots of buttons.
      • 8 Years Ago
      David wrote:

      >> This 9-3 convertible is very different from the "mid-1980s Saab 9000s." I won't even go on about how crazy that statement is.

      Sigh. I was referring to the interior - specifically, the design of the dashboard.
      • 8 Years Ago
      But dido on the photography comments.
      • 8 Years Ago
      sometimes this blog is born from lameness
    • Load More Comments