Question of the Day: Worst automotive regulatory workaround?

Jacking up the entire car to meet headlight-height laws, adding sketchy plastic seats to a pickup bed to skirt the Chicken Tax… or worse?

Get Autoblog in your Google feed

Governments create regulations of varying strictness for vehicle manufacturers to follow, and those companies follow them – or evade them – with solutions that range from clever to head-clutchingly stupid. Some examples of the latter type include British Leyland raising the entire MGB an inch in order to get the headlights up to new US-market minimum-height standards (because it would have cost too many pence to redesign part of the car’s snout). Or Subaru bolting some extra-dangerous plastic seats in the bed of the BRAT, to convert it from truck to car and avoid the dreaded Chicken Tax (thus making a lot of American personal-injury attorneys quite wealthy). The list goes on and on. What’s the regulatory workaround you think is the most maddening?