Critics say automakers can be greener with better computer programming

Twenty years ago, hot rodders were buying “chips” for the engines to boost power. These E-PROM chips carried the fuel and spark programming codes in the engine-control units (ECU). Instead of manually adjusting the spark advance and rejetting a carburetor, tuners on EFI engines would have to pull the chip and reprogram the fuel and spark maps with a computer. Modern cars have flash memory in the ECUs. Today’s tuners going for more power either replace the entire ECU or reflash the program.

Get Autoblog in your Google feed

Twenty years ago, hot rodders were buying “chips” for the engines to boost power. These E-PROM chips carried the fuel and spark programming codes in the engine-control units (ECU). Instead of manually adjusting the spark advance and rejetting a carburetor, tuners on EFI engines would have to pull the chip and reprogram the fuel and spark maps with a computer. Modern cars have flash memory in the ECUs. Today’s tuners going for more power either replace the entire ECU or reflash the program.

A leading online seller of new cars in England says automakers aren’t getting the most green out of their engine-management computers. Ling Valentine says the same engine is spread over a variety of vehicles and programmed for reliability and reduced service intervals.

Simon Hall, who runs a reprogramming shop for a variety of vehicles, makes the same argument that today’s vehicles can be greener with a few changes in the computer code.

Basically, the two feel that consumers should be allowed to “chip” their cars without fear of losing a warranty.

Related:

[Source: Auto Industry]