The third-generation Camaro was much lighter than its increasingly porcine predecessor, so the use of a two-digit-horsepower four-cylinder engine wasn't quite as disastrous as it might have been. Still, the idea of 92 horsepower in a Camaro seemed like sacrilege during the "Morning In America" era.
It could have been (slightly) worse. The rough-running 2.5-liter Iron Duke engine, made from one bank of the Pontiac 301-cubic-inch V8 to save money, made just 90 horses in the base 1982 and 1983 Camaros. The Iron Duke was available for the 1982 through 1986 model years, finally being replaced by the 135hp 2.8-liter V6 as the base engine for 1987.
At least this car has a five-speed manual transmission. Imagine the misery of a Duked Camaro with an automatic. Yes, it happened.
Because most car shoppers aren't idiots, a quick test drive convinced even the most budget-minded 1982-86 Camaro (and Firebird) shoppers to ante up the $250 for the 2.8-liter V6. Very few of these cars came off the assembly line with the Duke under the hood.
This one has most of the paint burned off its upper surfaces from years of California sunshine, and it's shod with three space-saver spares plus a random van wheel. This suggests that the car spent years or decades sitting unloved and de-wheeled in a field somewhere before being dragged away forever.
If you wanted a very cheap rear-wheel-drive Chevy with an economical four-cylinder engine in 1984, the Chevette Scooter would have been the more sensible choice. Weighing just 1,988 pounds and powered by a 65-horsepower Isuzu engine, the Scooter's power-to-weight ratio was nearly identical to that of the Iron Duke Camaro's, and the price tag was $4,997 versus the Camaro's $7,985.
Take-charge people taking charge!