<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Hybrid drivers are safer from injury in a crash]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a></p><a href="/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/#continued"><img alt="honda civic hybrid crash" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/civic-hybrid-crash-test.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 387px;" /></a><br />
<br />
Hybrid models have the advantage of fuel economy over their gas-only siblings, but it appears that batteries and electric motors make them safer as well. The Highway Loss Data Institute studied 25 2003 to 2011 vehicles that featured both conventional and hybrid powertrains (example: Honda Civic and Honda Civic Hybrid). The <a href="http://autoblog.com/model/prius">Toyota Prius</a> and <a href="http://autoblog.com/model/insight/">Honda Insight</a> were not included in the study since neither vehicle has a conventionally-powered counterpart.<br />
<br />
The data shows that occupants are 27 percent less likely to be injured if they're in the hybrid version of the vehicle. There are several reasons why the hybrid is safer, but the biggest factor is weight. Heavier cars are safer than lighter vehicles, since the added mass means that the heavier vehicle will transfer force to the lighter vehicle. That's good for occupants and insurance companies, as the hybrids need 25 percent less personal injury protection than their conventional counterparts.<br />
<br />
But while hybrids have proven to be safer than their non-hybrid counterparts, the story isn't as good for pedestrian crashes. HDLI finds that hybrid vehicles are 20 percent more likely to be involved in pedestrian crashes with injuries. The study claims that pedestrians might get involved in more accidents with hybrids because they can't hear the cars when they're in electric mode. We'd add that low rolling resistance tires often contribute to longer braking distances, and the heavier hybrids are also slower and less maneuverable than their non-hybrid counterparts.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/#continued">Hit the jump</a> to read over the details of the study.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Hybrid drivers are safer from injury in a crash</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/">Hybrid drivers are safer from injury in a crash</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20110102/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>accord</category><category>civic</category><category>crash</category><category>hldi</category><category>hybrid</category><category>safety</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 16:03:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20110102/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/11/19/hybrid-drivers-are-safer-from-injury-in-a-crash/20110102/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20110102</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/11/civic-hybrid-crash-test_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: The future of the BMW 3 Series]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/coupes/" rel="tag">Coupe</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hybrids/" rel="tag">Hybrid</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.ASpx?AR=242109"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/08/p0025423.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
The next generation BMW 3-series is set to get some major revisions when it arrives in two year's time. The new model is expected to be the first in the range to get a line of turbocharged three-cylinder engines in both gas and diesel variants, and will likely be 1.5-liter units -- essentially halved versions of the latest generation inline-sixes.<br />
<br />
BMW's current six-cylinder diesels use a sequential dual turbo setup with small and large blowers to provide quick response and better top-end power. The new engines may use an electric motor to spin up the turbo more quickly allowing the use of a single turbo for reduced weight and complexity.<br />
<br />
Aerodynamics will also be a major focus of the new 3 with the expected inclusion of front wheel air curtains. Ducts in the lower front bumper will route air out just ahead of the front wheels, creating a virtual wheel skirt. The high velocity over the wheels will prevent air coming around the sides and spilling around the wheels, one of the major sources of drag. <br />
<br />
Other areas of improvement will include weight reductions, the incorporation of hybrid drive technologies, low-power climate control systems and eight-speed automatic transmissions. All that and more could be in showrooms as early as 2012.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.ASpx?AR=242109">AutoCar</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/">REPORT: The future of the BMW 3 Series</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autocar.co.uk/News/NewsArticle.ASpx?AR=242109>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19120299/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>aerodynamics</category><category>autobloggreen</category><category>bmw</category><category>bmw 3 series</category><category>bmw 3-series</category><category>Bmw3-series</category><category>Bmw3Series</category><category>downsizing</category><category>hybrid</category><category>weight</category><category>weight reduction</category><category>WeightReduction</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 16:26:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19120299/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/08/05/report-the-future-of-the-bmw-3-series/19120299/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19120299</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2009/08/p0025423_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Lead wheel weights meet their demise in California]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a></p><p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D92MMI400.htm"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/lead_weight.jpg" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Environmentally-friendly California is putting an end to lead balancing weights on wheels and tires. The heavy metal neurotoxin is polluting the state's ground water supplies, according to the Center for Environmental Health. The group claims that more than 500,000 pounds of lead weights are inadvertently flung off wheels each year, making it the state's leading cause of environmental lead contamination. Under a court settlement approved this week, Chrysler and the three largest lead weight wheel manufacturers will all phase out lead in wheel weights by the end of 2009. While California is taking the initiative in this country, we are still years behind the European Union, which banned lead weights in 2005. With lead on the chopping block, future wheel weights will be made from either steel or zinc alloy. Those metal weights are larger and more expensive to produce than lead, but much safer for Mother Earth.</p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D92MMI400.htm">Business Week</a>]</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D92MMI400.htm"></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/">Lead wheel weights meet their demise in California</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:27:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1291647/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>balancing</category><category>banned</category><category>environmental</category><category>environmentalism</category><category>environmentally friendly</category><category>EnvironmentallyFriendly</category><category>lead</category><category>magnesium</category><category>replaced</category><category>weight</category><category>Wheel weights</category><category>WheelWeights</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2008 18:27:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1291647/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/08/22/lead-wheel-weights-meet-their-demise-in-california/1291647/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1291647</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/08/lead_weight_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[New IRL rule weighs heavy on Danica Patrick]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/motorsports/" rel="tag">Motorsports</a></p><a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=125346#3"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/danica_patrick_opt.jpg" alt="" /></a><br /><br />The new rule at the Indy Racing League (IRL) says the minimum weight for cars will now include the driver. That's good news for <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/08/06/video-franchittis-harrowing-airborne-crash-during-firestone-40/">Ed Carpenter</a>. At 165 pounds, he's the heaviest driver in the series (if anyone can call that "heavy"). On the other hand, it appears to penalize <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/07/25/danica-signs-with-andretti-green-racing-for-2007-no-nascar/">Danica Patrick</a> -- the petite driver, the lightest in the series, can barely tip the scale over 100 pounds. The IRL insists the new rule isn't targeting Danica. Nevertheless, she's not very happy.
<p> </p>
<p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/irl_logo_opt.jpg" alt="" />The weight difference is more significant than many think. In fact, it has been estimated that a 65-pound weight difference could mean as much as a 1-mph advantage during a race. To even the field, the new rule will divide the drivers into three categories. The heavy group get weight cut, while the lightest group will get ballast added - to the vehicle's chassis, not the driver's derri&egrave;re. We don't want to affect <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/02/13/danica-patrick-reaches-another-milestone-sis-swimsuit-issue/">Danica's swimsuit modeling career</a>, do we? </p>
<p>[Source: <a href="http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=125346#3">Inside Line</a>, Photo by Darrell Ingham/Getty]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/">New IRL rule weighs heavy on Danica Patrick</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1150283/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Danica Patrick</category><category>DanicaPatrick</category><category>Ed Carpenter</category><category>EdCarpenter</category><category>Indy Racing League</category><category>IndyRacingLeague</category><category>IRL</category><category>Racing</category><category>Rules</category><category>Weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Harley]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1150283/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/03/27/new-irl-rule-weighs-on-danica-patrick/1150283/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1150283</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/danica_patrick_opt_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[How the new Mazda2 shed the pounds]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mazda/" rel="tag">Mazda</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/image33031_b_mazda2.jpg" /><br /><br />Recently we blogged about vehicles getting heavier and the general consensus was that they were better off with the added safety and improved features of a new car. Now we have Mazda, who has managed to remove 100kg from its new Mazda2 supermini over the previous model. With the weight loss the 1.3L and 1.5L models come in at 955kg and 960kg respectively.<br /><br />Mazda has now released information on how they achieved these savings with better engineering techniques and a smaller overall car. Reducing the size of the new model - another trend bucked - resulted in a 20kg loss, while the removal of some features also contributed another 20kg. The other 60kg was done by reducing the weight of the front seats (2.5kg), suspension (13kg), front speakers (1kg), and the electrical system at 2.9kg. <br /><br />Reducing weight has resulted in the car achieving better than expected MPG ratings (53MPG on the combined cycle) and also helped improve agility. Now if only someone could implement the same types of programs on, say, a Cadillac Escalade...<br /><br />[Source: Mazda]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>How the new Mazda2 shed the pounds</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/">How the new Mazda2 shed the pounds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:34:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/945882/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>vehicle weight</category><category>VehicleWeight</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddharth Raja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:34:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/945882/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/07/22/how-the-new-mazda2-shed-the-pounds/945882/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>945882</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/image33031_b_mazda2_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Vehicles keep piling on the pounds]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/2007_civic_si_sedan_111.jpg" alt="" /><br /><br />With fuel prices ever creeping northwards you'd think the automakers would start slowing down on upping the size of their new models. Unfortunately, the notion of 'less is more' isn't the case when it comes to building and selling new cars. The belief in the auto industry is that consumers view bigger as better, a problem that's increasingly being associated with vehicles not normally regarded as being large. <br /><br />According to data compiled by Edmunds, SUVs have grown on average ten inches in length and gained 474 pounds over the past decade, a trend that's reflected in almost all other segments. The <a href="http://autos.aol.com/honda-accord-2007:8664-overview">Honda Accord</a> and Civic models are a prime example of the practice that's occurring right across the industry. For example, the current '07 Civic sedan (pictured) has nearly the same legroom as a 1990 Accord and they're only around 100 pounds apart.<br /><br />The major problem lies in fact that more weight requires more horsepower, which usually requires higher fuel consumption, a vicious cycle that automakers are now being forced to change. <br />
<p class="MsoNormal">There are still some carmakers using innovative packaging and better technology to make new models lighter. Mazda lopped off a massive 100kg from its already super-small Mazda2 model, and the new <a href="http://autos.aol.com/audi-tt-2008:9138-overview">Audi TT</a> is lighter than the outgoing car thanks to an aluminum spaceframe construction.<br /></p>
[Source: USA Today]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/">Vehicles keep piling on the pounds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2007-07-15-little-big-cars_N.htm>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/941397/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>vehicle weight</category><category>VehicleWeight</category><category>weight</category><category>weight gains</category><category>WeightGains</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Siddharth Raja]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 19:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/941397/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/07/17/vehicles-keep-piling-on-the-pounds/941397/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>941397</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/07/2007_civic_si_sedan_111_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ferrari makes commitment to green performance with FXX Millechili concept]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sports/" rel="tag">Performance</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/supercars/" rel="tag">Supercars</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ferrari/" rel="tag">Ferrari</a></p><a href="http://news.windingroad.com/wp-gallery2.php?g2_itemId=4729"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/fxxgreen.jpg" /></a><br /><span style="font-style: italic;">click above to view more shots of the Ferrari FXX Millechili from Winding Road</span><br /><br />Today Ferrari revealed that it has been forced to face an inconvenient truth, which is that the Italian exotics made in Maranello are no longer immune from environmental concerns. The Prancing Horse revealed today at a press event kicking off its 60th Anniversary celebration in Maranello, Italy, that future Ferraris would be both "leaner and greener" according to Car Magazine, which was on hand. To showcase its intentions, Ferrari unveiled the FXX Millechili Concept. The FXX Millechili looks like a truncated Enzo with much shorter front and rear overhangs, while the car's crowning stat is a curb weight of 1,000 kilograms, or about 2,207 lbs. It measures over ten inches shorter than the Enzo, 93.7 inches compared to the Enzo's length of 104.3 inches. <br /><br />More after the jump.<br /><br />Click <a href="http://news.windingroad.com/wp-gallery2.php?g2_itemId=4729">here</a> to view Winding Road's gallery of the FXX Millechili concept.<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/news.php?sid=801&amp;page=1">CAR</a>, <a href="http://news.windingroad.com/concept-cars/ferrari-quietly-unveils-1000kg-concept/">WR</a>, <a href="http://www.autobloggreen.com/2007/06/21/ohhhh-ahhh-hmmm-ferarri-goes-green-with-their-new-fxx-mill/">AutoblogGreen</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ferrari makes commitment to green performance with FXX Millechili concept</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/">Ferrari makes commitment to green performance with FXX Millechili concept</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:03:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/923335/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>breaking</category><category>concept</category><category>ferrari</category><category>ferrari fxx millechili</category><category>FerrariFxxMillechili</category><category>fxx millechili</category><category>FxxMillechili</category><category>green</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 15:03:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/923335/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/06/21/ferrari-makes-commitment-to-green-performance-with-fxx-millechil/923335/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>923335</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/06/fxxgreen_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Weight watchers: Are heavy trucks and SUVs illegal on some California roads?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/suvs/" rel="tag">SUV</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/classified/automotive/highway1/la-hy-wheels18apr18,0,5143218.story?track=ntottext"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/h2_gross_weight.jpg" /></a></p>
<p>Pop quiz: if you're driving an H2 and you see a sign forbidding vehicles above 6,000 pounds to use a street, do you avoid that street? Neither does anyone else. In a sarcastic, meandering article touching on carbon dioxide, gasoline, SUV-haters, municipal codes, and testosterone, the LA Times looks at the genesis of road weight restrictions and how SUV's trample on them. </p>
<p>The California Motor Vehicle Code has all sorts of byzantine rules applicable to different kinds of trucks and what roads they can use. Certain roads and bridges are explicitly off limits to vehicles weighing more than three tons. But those rules were made when nobody expected the random businessman, housewife, or athlete to be driving a vehicle weighing more than three tons just for the heck of it. (FYI, a half-ton Suburban weighs more than 7,000 pounds before the first soccer mom gets in.)</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>But in spite of the proverbial legal limbo, a city spokesman said the rule applies, in general, to "business and commercial trucks." Even better, he was backed up by a pickup-truck-driving LAPD officer who let everyone off the hook by saying "We are not going to cite somebody for driving an SUV down the street." Roll on, ladies and gentlemen, roll on.</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip, Stedwoo!</p>
<p>[Source: LA Times]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/">Weight watchers: Are heavy trucks and SUVs illegal on some California roads?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:05:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.latimes.com/classified/automotive/highway1/la-hy-wheels18apr18,0,5143218.story?track=ntottext>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/877261/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>gross</category><category>h2</category><category>suburban</category><category>suvs</category><category>vehicle</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 17:05:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/877261/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/04/18/weight-watchers-are-heavy-trucks-and-suvs-illegal-on-some-calif/877261/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>877261</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/h2_gross_weight_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Worth its weight? ShurTrax could keep your pickup planted]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/aftermarket/" rel="tag">Aftermarket</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a></p><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/full-lw-0048.jpg"  alt="" />If you live in a cold-weather climate and own a RWD pickup truck, you know that driving in inclement weather can be a real crap shoot. The rear wheels seem to have a mind of their own, coming out from under you when you least suspect it. To help keep traction, many people combat this problem by adding weight to the pickup bed, using items like sand bags or even packed snow.<br /><br />The big problem with adding weight to your pickup is that the fillers you add typically eliminate the usefulness of your truck by taking up room in the bed. In the case of sand, the bags tend to break, which can make a big mess. We found this product we think provides a clever solution for these minor issues with cold weather traction. <br /><br />A company called  <a href="http://www.shurtrax.com/index.asp">ShurTrax</a> came up with a handy idea to add weight to your truck without rendering the bed entirely  useless. The gadget, which is basically a 400lb. water-filled bladder, spreads the weight evenly over a large portion of the bed. Owners of the ShurTrax can continue to use the truck bed, since the device can withstand a 500lb load. The product is reasonably affordable too, with a sticker price between $120 - $140.<br /><br />While there is no substitution in bad weather for experienced drivers and four-wheel drive, we think this nifty device is a good idea for those who need a little stability in areas that get a lot of the white stuff.<br /><br />[Source: ShurTrax]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/">Worth its weight? ShurTrax could keep your pickup planted</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.shurtrax.com/index.asp>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/875461/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>pickup</category><category>shurtrax</category><category>truck</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Shunk]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2007 19:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/875461/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2007/04/16/worth-its-weight-shurtrax-could-kee-your-pickup-planted/875461/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>875461</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/04/full-lw-0048_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Alfa puts the 159 on Atkins]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/euro/" rel="tag">Europe</a></p><p><a href="http://www.motorauthority.com/news/sedans/alfa-159-going-on-a-diet/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" id="vimage_1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/alfa_159_44-1600.jpg" alt="" /></a>Excess weight is the enemy of every automobile. Extra pounds will make a car slower at the top end, more sluggish off the line, wobblier in the corners, more lethargic under braking, guzzle more gas and expel more toxic fumes...among other problems. It can render an otherwise great car imperfect. Case in point: the US-bound Italian beauty, the Alfa Romeo 159. </p>
<p>The 159 is, as we've said time and time again, one of - if not the - most beautiful sedans on the market. Unfortunately its performance has not been quite up to par with its drop-dead gorgeous looks. And the more powerful V6-powered all-wheel-drive Q4 version only adds another 200kg to the problem. But Alfa's working on it, announcing a two-stage weight-loss program for the 159. The first stage will take some extra pounds off the body, chassis and suspension using lightweight construction materials such as aluminum. The second stage will be marked in 2008 with the introduction of a new lightweight five-cylinder turbodiesel. </p>
<p>Of course the same problems plague the 159's sisters, the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2005/09/15/alfa-brera/">Brera</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/15/bellissima-alfa-spider-launch-photos/">Spider</a>, but while the lightweight diesel is almost certain to find its way into the shapely two-doors, there's no word yet on whether the first stage weight loss will hit them, too. Now, nobody wanted to resort to taking the 159 off of pasta and pizza, so next time, Alfa, just watch the weight from the start, alright?</p>
<p>[Source: Motor Authority]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/">Alfa puts the 159 on Atkins</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:17:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.motorauthority.com/news/sedans/alfa-159-going-on-a-diet/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/707653/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>159</category><category>alfa</category><category>diesel</category><category>diet</category><category>light</category><category>reduction</category><category>romeo</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Noah Joseph]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2006 19:17:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/707653/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/11/26/alfa-puts-the-159-on-atkins/707653/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>707653</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/11/alfa_159_44-1600_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Automakers toil to drop a few pounds]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><p><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060807/FREE/60807004/1041/PHOTOS"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="0" align="right" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/car-on-a-scale.jpg" id="vimage_1" alt="" /></a>Just as Americans continue to get fatter, so do our cars. According to the EPA, the average weight of a new vehicle in 2006 is a whopping 4,142 lbs - that's up a quarter-ton from ten years ago, and is the heaviest yet since the EPA began tracking the statistic in 1975. Not only does weight hurt fuel economy, but it also drags down performance. Adding additional horsepower is easy nowadays, but that of course hits economy a second time. The end result is that fuel economy improvements have stalled in the last decade, despite vastly improved engine technology. </p>
<p>This has prompted automakers to consider a variety of diet plans. The supplier of trim moldings for Buick's Lucerne managed to cut a whopping five pounds out of that vehicle's plastic and rubber trim, while the aluminum hood and deck of Chrysler's LX vehicles are said to shave 15-20 lbs. Such improvements seem minor, but when repeated several times throughout the vehicle, substantial gains can be had. </p>
<p>Of course, like any weight-loss program, it's much easier to put the weight on than it is to take it off, so the situation is unlikely to improve substantially until buyers accept a compromise in power, features, safety, size, or price. The likelihood of that, even at over $3/gallon, seems quite low at this time. </p>
<p>[Source: Autoweek/Automotive News]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/">Automakers toil to drop a few pounds</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:24:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060807/FREE/60807004/1041/PHOTOS>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/651583/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>CAFE</category><category>economy</category><category>emissions</category><category>EPA</category><category>weight</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Eric Bryant]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2006 13:24:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/651583/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/08/07/automakers-toil-to-drop-a-few-pounds/651583/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>651583</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2006/08/car-on-a-scale_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>