<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[CarMD releases entirely objective reliability rankings]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a></p><a href="/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/#continued"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/carmd-reliability-study.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 696px; " /></a><br />
<br />
Reliability ratings for cars are important stats for customers to have when looking at buying a new or used car, but can vary greatly depending on the source. While <em>Consumer Reports</em> uses customer feedback that can be somewhat subjective but encompassing of the entire car (including elements not necessarily involved with reliability), <em>CarMD</em> can more objectively (in theory) measure a car's reliability with its Vehicle Health Index. The index uses data based on problems associated with check engine codes, as well as the average costs to repair these problems.<br />
<br />
In just the second year of its study, <em>CarMD</em> found that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/">Toyota</a> (including <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/scion/">Scion</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/lexus/">Lexus</a>) has once again held its ground as the most reliable automaker having the fewest issues that would set a check engine light. Likewise, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/hyundai/">Hyundai</a> stays at the runner up spot. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/bmw/">BMW</a> sits in the third spot after not being named to the list at all last year. <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/honda/">Honda</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> round out the top five. In terms of cost to repair, it isn't that surprising that BMW has the most expensive repair costs at an average of $502.48, but we were definitely surprised to see Toyota listed in the two spot with average repairs of $490.72. American automakers <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/">General Motors</a> and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> dropped out of the top five to the eight and nine spots, respectively.<br />
<br />
Overall, the most reliable car on the list is the 2010 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/toyota/corolla/">Toyota Corolla</a> just barely ahead of the 2008 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/taurus">Ford Taurus</a> and the 2008 Toyota Yaris. Of the top 100 cars, 16 of them were Toyotas with Ford following close behind with 15 cars on the list. Ford did take the top spot when it in the truck category and <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/subaru/">Subaru</a> was named the best in the wagon and crossover SUV category. The study even breaks down the top five causes for a check engine light by automaker.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2012/11/13/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/#continued">Scroll down</a> for the official press release, and be sure to check out the full <a href="https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&amp;pid=gmail&amp;attid=0.2&amp;thid=13b00b160492ad54&amp;mt=application/pdf&amp;url=https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui%3D2%26ik%3D42845ecb15%26view%3Datt%26th%3D13b00b160492ad54%26attid%3D0.2%26disp%3Dsafe%26zw&amp;sig=AHIEtbR2Z9yMsS2gtf8OwjA5pkkMtPGlwA"><em>CarMD</em> reliability study</a>.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CarMD releases entirely objective reliability rankings</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/">CarMD releases entirely objective reliability rankings</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:33:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20380219/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>carmd</category><category>reliability</category><category>reliability study</category><category>vehicle health index report</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey N. Ross]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2012 08:33:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20380219/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/11/20/carmd-releases-entirely-objective-reliability-rankings/20380219/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20380219</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/11/carmd-reliability-study_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[CarMD's Vehicle Health Index deciphers the 'check engine' light]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a></p><img alt="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/03/carmd-deciphers-the-check-engine-light-with-first-annual-vehic/" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/check-engine-porsche.jpg" style="border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 630px; height: 397px; " /><br />
<br />
Is your Check Engine light staring you in the face? That bright orange warning serves as a beacon that <em>something</em> is wrong. Problem is, it doesn't convey anything more than that. For years, the prime culprit of an illuminated CEL has been a loose gas cap. In fact, according to <a href="http://www.carmd.com/" target="_blank">CarMD.com</a>, the gas cap has ranked as number one on the CEL hit list for the last 12 years. Recently, however, it seems people are either giving their gas caps an extra twist or the Check Engine Light has had enough because the new CEL king is the engine misfire.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/carmd">CarMD</a> has an extensive database of Diagnostic Trouble Codes (DTC), which date back to the 1996 introduction of mandated <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/obd-ii">on-board diagnostic</a> technology. Now, CarMD is using that data to shed some light on the oft-misunderstood Check Engine light, and it's produced its first-ever Annual Vehicle Health Index Report.<br />
<br />
Set to be released each April, the Vehicle Health Index Report examines the most common repairs or fixes required as a result of CEL warnings. The gas cap has fallen to number two on that list, while replacement of the O<sub>2</sub> sensor has risen to the top spot. Taking home third place is the always-expensive DTC that alerts you to replace your catalytic converter.<br />
<br />
<a href="/2011/05/03/carmd-deciphers-the-check-engine-light-with-first-annual-vehic/#continued">Click past the jump</a> to read the full press release from CarMD.com, and to glean more insight into what our Check Engine lights are telling us. Unless, of course, you own a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/volkswagen/">Volkswagen</a> from the mid '90s, in which case you should simply get a piece of black tape and cover up the CEL because it's always on.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>CarMD's Vehicle Health Index deciphers the 'check engine' light</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/">CarMD's Vehicle Health Index deciphers the 'check engine' light</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Sat, 07 May 2011 09:31:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19930463/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>annual vehicle health index report</category><category>carmd</category><category>carmd.com</category><category>cel</category><category>check engine light</category><category>diagnostic trouble code</category><category>dtc</category><category>obd</category><category>obd-ii</category><category>obdii</category><category>on-board diagnostic</category><category>vehicle health index report</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Glucker]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 09:31:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19930463/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/05/07/carmds-vehicle-health-index-deciphers-the-check-engine-light/19930463/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19930463</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/check-engine-porsche_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>