<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Report: V6, V8 engine popularity continued to fade in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/sadflattie.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Turning the past completely upside down, four cylinder engines marched up ten percent to further solidify the market dominance of lower cylinder count powertrains. According to Ward's Automotive, nearly 62 percent of cars produced in 2009 carried four bangers, up ten percent in just a year from 2008's 51.7 percent. Despite the V8 engine's precipitous fall from a high of being fitted to 88 percent of all cars sold in 1969, there's a sweet spot for the smaller powerplants, too. <br />
<br />
Numbers are up for engines below 3.0 liters, while displacements smaller than 2.0 liters actually saw a decline for 2009. While engines between 2.0 and 2.9 liters are perhaps not as exciting as the typically larger V6 and V8 engines, they're less expensive and can still provide satisfying performance thanks to improvements like direct injection and forced induction. It's also worth noting that production numbers for trucks dropped for 2009, as well, skewing numbers further in favor of smaller engines. <br />
<br />
Ward's comprehensive analysis of different engine sizes and types and their market share and volume lays it out for you in the link below. Either way, we suspect that the garages of car nuts are still filled with a majority of high-performance engines, regardless of displacement or cylinder count.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/">Ward's Automotive</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/">Report: V6, V8 engine popularity continued to fade in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19402614/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>engine displacement</category><category>EngineDisplacement</category><category>four cylinder</category><category>four cylinder car</category><category>four cylinder cars</category><category>four cylinder engine</category><category>four cylinder popularity</category><category>FourCylinder</category><category>FourCylinderCar</category><category>FourCylinderCars</category><category>FourCylinderEngine</category><category>FourCylinderPopularity</category><category>v6 engine</category><category>v6 popularity</category><category>V6Engine</category><category>V6Popularity</category><category>v8 engine</category><category>v8 popularity</category><category>V8Engine</category><category>V8Popularity</category><category>WardsAuto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19402614/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/19402614/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19402614</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/sadflattie_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[BMW slashes V8 engine production in favor of fours]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/green/" rel="tag">Green</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/bmw/" rel="tag">BMW</a></p><a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080901/ANA03/809010324"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" align="right" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/bmw_4-cyl_injin.jpg" /></a>The new BMW 7-Series has just stepped out from behind the curtain, and it's taken the stage to a house only half full. Demand for BMW's big engines has dropped so low that the house of the roundel says it can make enough 8-bangers to satisfy the world's demand using just one shift for four days.<br /><br />A member of BMW's supervisory board put it plainly: "We are producing the wrong engines here." Even the sixes, the center of BMW's engine constellation, are being taken out of production in Munich to be replaced by those with two fewer cylinders in 2011. When the phase-out is complete, the company will be able to build 560,000 4-cylinders per annum. Care for a BMW 716i, anyone?<br /><br />[Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080901/ANA03/809010324">Automotive News</a> - sub. req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/">BMW slashes V8 engine production in favor of fours</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:01:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080901/ANA03/809010324>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1301223/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>4-cylinder</category><category>4-cylinder engines</category><category>4-cylinderEngines</category><category>bmw</category><category>bmw 8-cylinder</category><category>bmw engines</category><category>bmw manufacturing</category><category>bmw production</category><category>Bmw8-cylinder</category><category>BmwEngines</category><category>BmwManufacturing</category><category>BmwProduction</category><category>engine manufacturing</category><category>EngineManufacturing</category><category>v10</category><category>v12</category><category>v6</category><category>v8 engine</category><category>V8Engine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:01:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1301223/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2008/09/02/bmw-slashes-v8-engine-production-in-favor-of-fours/1301223/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1301223</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/09/bmw_4-cyl_injin_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
