<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler kicks off production of Pentastar V6 engine, formerly known as "Phoenix"]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/jeep/" rel="tag">Jeep</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production/"><img hspace="0" border="0" vspace="4" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v601.jpg" alt="" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>Chrysler Pentastar V6 engine begins production - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
The <strike>artist</strike> engine formerly known as <strike>Prince</strike> Phoenix has officially hit the assembly lines at the <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/chrysler">Chrysler</a> Group's plant in Trenton, Michigan. The first version of the mill, which <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/04/13/chryslers-flexible-new-pentastar-v6/">now bears the Pentastar moniker</a>, displaces 3.6 liters and will see its first production application in the engine bay of the brand new <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/grand+cherokee">2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee</a>.<br />
<br />
Expect this all aluminum, 60-degree, dual-overhead cam (with variable valve timing) powerplant to see lots of use in the near-term future - Chrysler boasts that the Pentastar V6 will replace seven current V6 engines. In the new Grand Cherokee, the Pentastar will put out 280 horsepower (a 22-percent increase) at 6,400 rpm and 260 pound-feet of torque (an 11-percent improvement) at 4,800 rpm.<br />
<br />
Just as importantly, Chrysler tells us that the new engine will be 11 percent more fuel efficient than the unit it replaces, and it will run on either regular 87-octane gasoline or E85. This family of engines represent a $730 million investment, and the 822,000-square-foot Trenton facility will be able to produce more than 400,000 engines per year. See the complete press release after the break.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production">Chrysler Pentastar V6 enters production</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v618_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v617_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v611_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v602_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/chrysler-pentastar-v6-enters-production/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v603_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Chrysler kicks off production of Pentastar V6 engine, formerly known as "Phoenix"</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/">Chrysler kicks off production of Pentastar V6 engine, formerly known as "Phoenix"</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:26:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19407235/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 jeep grand cherokee</category><category>2011JeepGrandCherokee</category><category>chrysler</category><category>chrysler pentastar</category><category>chrysler pentastar v6</category><category>chrysler v6</category><category>ChryslerPentastar</category><category>ChryslerPentastarV6</category><category>ChryslerV6</category><category>grand cherokee</category><category>GrandCherokee</category><category>jeep grand cherokee</category><category>JeepGrandCherokee</category><category>pentastar</category><category>pentastar v6</category><category>PentastarV6</category><category>trenton michigan</category><category>trenton plant</category><category>TrentonMichigan</category><category>TrentonPlant</category><category>v6</category><category>v6 engine</category><category>V6Engine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:26:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19407235/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/19/chrysler-kicks-off-production-of-pentastar-v6-engine-formerly-k/19407235/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19407235</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/chrysler-pentastar-v601_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Report: V6, V8 engine popularity continued to fade in 2009]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/carbuying/" rel="tag">Car Buying</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/sadflattie.jpg" /></a><br />
<br />
Turning the past completely upside down, four cylinder engines marched up ten percent to further solidify the market dominance of lower cylinder count powertrains. According to Ward's Automotive, nearly 62 percent of cars produced in 2009 carried four bangers, up ten percent in just a year from 2008's 51.7 percent. Despite the V8 engine's precipitous fall from a high of being fitted to 88 percent of all cars sold in 1969, there's a sweet spot for the smaller powerplants, too. <br />
<br />
Numbers are up for engines below 3.0 liters, while displacements smaller than 2.0 liters actually saw a decline for 2009. While engines between 2.0 and 2.9 liters are perhaps not as exciting as the typically larger V6 and V8 engines, they're less expensive and can still provide satisfying performance thanks to improvements like direct injection and forced induction. It's also worth noting that production numbers for trucks dropped for 2009, as well, skewing numbers further in favor of smaller engines. <br />
<br />
Ward's comprehensive analysis of different engine sizes and types and their market share and volume lays it out for you in the link below. Either way, we suspect that the garages of car nuts are still filled with a majority of high-performance engines, regardless of displacement or cylinder count.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/">Ward's Automotive</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/">Report: V6, V8 engine popularity continued to fade in 2009</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://wardsauto.com/ar/engines_lose_ground_100315/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19402614/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>engine displacement</category><category>EngineDisplacement</category><category>four cylinder</category><category>four cylinder car</category><category>four cylinder cars</category><category>four cylinder engine</category><category>four cylinder popularity</category><category>FourCylinder</category><category>FourCylinderCar</category><category>FourCylinderCars</category><category>FourCylinderEngine</category><category>FourCylinderPopularity</category><category>v6 engine</category><category>v6 popularity</category><category>V6Engine</category><category>V6Popularity</category><category>v8 engine</category><category>v8 popularity</category><category>V8Engine</category><category>V8Popularity</category><category>WardsAuto</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19402614/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/03/18/report-v6-v8-engine-popularity-continued-to-fade-in-2009/19402614/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19402614</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/03/sadflattie_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[What to do with the PT Cruiser?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a></p><p><em><a href="http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060612/FREE/60612004/1024/LATESTNEWS"><img id="vimage_1" alt="" hspace="4" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/pt-cruiser.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="0" /></a>Automotive News</em> had a chat with Chrysler execs about the next PT Cruiser, which is causing the company some sleepless nights. What do you do next with such a unique vehicle, so strongly steeped in retro cues? The car, which debuted in 2001 and has only had a small refresh since, may go on the new Dodge Caliber platform (which would probably make the folks in Belvedere, Illinois pretty happy), but if it gets a V6 for the next model year, it may end up on the new Chrysler Sebring platform. At this point, Chrysler is gauging the market to see if the vehicle will find any customers interested in a V6 for the vehicle.</p>
<p>Either way, the redesigned PT won't hit the streets until 2009 or 2010, giving the current model an awfully long lifespan. </p>
<p>[Source: Automotive News via AutoWeek]</p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/">What to do with the PT Cruiser?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.autoweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060612/FREE/60612004/1024/LATESTNEWS>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/632558/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>new car design</category><category>NewCarDesign</category><category>PT cruiser</category><category>PtCruiser</category><category>retro</category><category>v6 engine</category><category>V6Engine</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Erin Mays]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2006 11:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/632558/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/13/what-to-do-with-the-pt-cruiser/632558/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>632558</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/pt-cruiser_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
