<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #321 LIVE!]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/mitsubishi/" rel="tag">Mitsubishi</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/australia/" rel="tag">Australia</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ram/" rel="tag">Ram</a></p><a href="/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/#continued"><img alt="Autoblog Podcast graphic" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp.jpg" style="border-top-style: solid; border-right-style: solid; border-bottom-style: solid; border-left-style: solid; border-top-width: 0px; border-right-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; margin-right: 0px; margin-left: 0px; margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 305px; " /></a><br />
<br />
We're set to record <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast #321 tonight, and you can drop us your questions and comments regarding the rest of the week's news via our Q&amp;A module below. Subscribe to the <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast <a href="http://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/autoblog/id73331469">in iTunes</a> if you haven't already done so, and if you want to take it all in live, tune in to our <a href="http://www.ustream.tv/channel/autoblog-podcast">UStream</a> (audio only) channel at 10:00 PM Eastern tonight.<br />
<br />
<strong><big>Discussion Topics for Autoblog Podcast Episode #321</big></strong><br />
<br />
<ul>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/">Unibody Ford Ranger replacement</a></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/16/2014-chevrolet-ss-makes-its-live-debut/"><span style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 12pt;">2014 Chevrolet SS</span></a></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/14/ram-1500-to-get-v6-turbodiesel-engine-later-this-year/">2013 Ram 1500 getting diesel engine</a></li>
	<li class="p1">
		<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/12/mitsubishi-leaving-us-no-its-doubling-its-marketing-budget/">Mitsubishi doubles down in the US</a></li>
</ul>
<br />
[<a href="http://podcasts.autoblog.com/rss.xml">RSS</a>] Add the <em>Autoblog</em> Podcast feed to your RSS aggregator<br />
<br />
<script type="text/javascript">var vhm_widget_settings = { eventId: 3163201, colorScheme: 'redblack', width: 628, height: 550, sizeClass: 3};</script><script type="text/javascript" src="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/qawidget.js.jsp"></script><noscript><span>Can't see the EventBox? <a href="http://vhmengine.com/widgets/view?eventId=1920456&amp;colorScheme=redblack">Click Here.</a></span><br/><br/><a href='http://www.voicesheardmedia.com'>Voices Heard Media</a></noscript><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/">Submit your questions for Autoblog Podcast #321 LIVE!</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:45:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20467930/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>1500</category><category>2013 ram 1500</category><category>2014 chevrolet ss</category><category>autoblog podcast</category><category>autoblog podcast 321</category><category>autoblog podcast 321 topics</category><category>chevrolet</category><category>ford</category><category>ford ranger</category><category>mitsubishi</category><category>podcast</category><category>podcast 321</category><category>ram</category><category>ram diesel</category><category>ranger</category><category>ss</category><category>unibody pickup</category><category>unibody ranger</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Roth]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:45:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20467930/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/19/submit-your-questions-for-autoblog-podcast-321-live/20467930/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20467930</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/06/podcastlivev2stamp_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford talking unibody Ranger replacement]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2011-ford-ranger/#photo-3467320/"><img alt="Global Ford Ranger tailgate" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/ranger-tail-gate-628.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 424px; " /></a><br />
<br />
Now here's some welcome news. <em>Car and Driver</em> reports <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/">Ford</a> is seriously mulling a replacement for the recently deceased <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/ranger/">Ranger</a>, but the successor to the compact pickup's throne may not look anything like what we've seen from the nameplate in the past.<br />
<br />
While speaking at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/chicago auto show/">2013 Chicago Auto Show</a>, Doug Scott, marketing manager for Ford Trucks, said there's still a market for a smaller pickup, but that buyers expect to see a larger differentiation between the smaller utility vehicles and their full size counterparts in price, capability and fuel economy.<br />
<br />
According to Scott, that means a vehicle with a payload capacity of around 1,000 pounds paired with a towing capacity of 3,000 pounds and "a dramatic reduction in fuel consumption." But the biggest piece of that recipe is the price tag, and Scott says to keep the MSRP far enough away from the already cheap <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/f-150/">F-150</a>, the answer could come in the form of a unibody design. Scott says target customers in this market don't care whether the truck has a traditional frame or not, so long as it's tough enough to do the job and has the capability they need.<br />
<br />
We should be clear here: Ford hasn't approved such a vehicle for production, but the company is working on developing a business case for the model. Even so, it could be years before buyers see another small pickup on dealer lots.<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/">Ford talking unibody Ranger replacement</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:58:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20465381/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2015 ford ranger</category><category>car and driver</category><category>doug scott</category><category>ford</category><category>ranger</category><category>unibody pickup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:58:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20465381/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2013/02/18/ford-talking-unibody-ranger-replacement/20465381/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20465381</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2013/02/ranger-tail-gate-628_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Chrysler developing TR Ram Life Style Truck to compete with Honda Ridgeline]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/plants-manufacturing/" rel="tag">Plants/Manufacturing</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/crossovers-cuvs/" rel="tag">Crossover</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/canada/" rel="tag">Canada</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept/"><img alt="2006 Dodge Rampage concept" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/dodge-rampage-concept.jpg" style="border-width: 0px; border-style: solid; margin: 4px 0px;" /></a><br />
<div class="iphone_hide" style="text-align: center; font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px; font-style: italic;">
	2006 Dodge Rampage Concept - Click above for high-res image gallery</div>
<br />
Does the world need a competitor to the <a href="http://autoblog.com/honda/ridgeline">Honda Ridgeline</a>? While sales figures of Honda's half-truck would lead us to believe consumers aren't clamoring for such a vehicle (<a href="http://autoblog.com/make/honda">Honda</a> only sold <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/01/07/report-honda-says-its-sticking-by-ridgeline/">16,142 Ridgelines in all of 2010</a>, barely more than the 13,047 Dakotas that Dodge moved), recent reports indicate that <a href="http://autoblog.com/make/chrysler">Chrysler</a> seems to think otherwise.<br />
<br />
We've known for some time that Dodge was considering a small urban-style pickup - ever since it showed off the Rampage Concept (shown above) at the 2006 <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chicago-auto-show/">Chicago Auto Show</a> and then mentioned it <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/">again in Chrysler's rambling five-year plan announced in 2009</a> - but talk of the so-called Lifestyle Pickup had cooled off... until now.<br />
<br />
According to <a href="http://www.wheels.ca/article/795719">wheels.ca</a>, Chrysler suppliers were recently briefed on the automaker's future product plans, and a replacement for the unloved <a href="http://autoblog.com/tag/dakota">Dakota</a> is on the docket. It's thought that Chrysler may build the vehicle in Windsor, Ontario atop its minivan platform, which lends credence to the Ridgeline comparison.<br />
<br />
We have to wonder if the crossover platform employed by the latest (and very well-received) <a href="http://autoblog.com/dodge/durango">Durango</a> might be a better bet, but we'll surely reserve judgement until something more concrete than these rumors begin to surface. We're also curious as to whether the small pickup would wear a Dodge or Ram badge. Stay tuned for more...<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/">Chrysler developing TR Ram Life Style Truck to compete with Honda Ridgeline</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 18 May 2011 14:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19944016/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>chrysler</category><category>dakota</category><category>dakota replacement</category><category>dodge</category><category>dodge rampage</category><category>ram</category><category>rampage</category><category>small pickup</category><category>unibody pickup</category><category>unibody truck</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremy Korzeniewski]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 14:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19944016/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2011/05/18/chrysler-developing-tr-ram-life-style-truck-to-compete-with-hond/19944016/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19944016</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2011/05/dodge-rampage-concept_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ram considering new mid-size unibody pickup to replace Dakota]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chrysler/" rel="tag">Chrysler</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/dodge/" rel="tag">Dodge</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota/"><img hspace="0" vspace="4" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2008-dodge-dakota.jpg" /></a><br />
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>2008 Dodge Dakota - Click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br />
In a rambling presentation that presented almost nothing of any value, Fred Diaz, CEO of Chrysler's newly-created Ram brand, did drop at least one little tidbit in passing. Currently the Dodge truck offerings consist of only two vehicles, the full-size Ram and the mid-size Dakota. The long-term fate of the Dakota has been the subject of much speculation but one of Diaz's slides did mention that Ram was considering a replacement. The key word was "considering."<br />
<br />
Interestingly, the possible replacement would be based on a unibody platform which in all likelihood would be derived from the new Grand Cherokee/Durango architecture. That would be a big departure for Chrysler - jumping into a vehicle type that currently consists of only the slow selling Honda Ridgeline. If Chrysler were to build this vehicle, it would make sense to do something to differentiate it from the big Ram, and perhaps with the right styling and powertrain - perhaps something like the Rampage concept from 2006 - it could be more successful than the Honda.<br />
<br />
The current Durango will remain in production until mid-2011 and the new truck, if approved, would not launch until at least then.<br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota">2008 Dodge Dakota</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/08dakota_01_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/08dakota_02_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/08dakota_03_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/08dakota_04_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2008-dodge-dakota/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2007/02/08dakota_06_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />
<div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept">2006 Dodge Rampage Concept</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cn006_029dg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cn006_030dg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cn006_031dg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cn006_032dg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2006-dodge-rampage-concept/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/01/cn006_034dg_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/">Ram considering new mid-size unibody pickup to replace Dakota</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19223251/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2012 dodge dakota</category><category>2012DodgeDakota</category><category>dodge dakota</category><category>dodge rampage</category><category>DodgeDakota</category><category>DodgeRampage</category><category>fred diaz</category><category>FredDiaz</category><category>ram</category><category>ram brand</category><category>RamBrand</category><category>rampage</category><category>unibody</category><category>unibody pickup</category><category>unibody truck</category><category>UnibodyPickup</category><category>UnibodyTruck</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 13:20:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19223251/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/11/04/ram-considering-a-new-mid-size-unibody-pickup-to-replace-dakota/19223251/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19223251</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/green.autoblog.com/media/2009/11/2008-dodge-dakota_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[REPORT: GM kills plans for unibody pickup truck]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/chevrolet/" rel="tag">Chevrolet</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/gmc/" rel="tag">GMC</a></p><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1/full/#7"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/denali-xt-reveal-630.jpg" /></a>
<div style="text-align: center;"><em><strong><small>GMC Denali XT concept - click above for high-res image gallery</small></strong></em></div>
<br /> General Motors has reportedly cancel plans for a new unibody mid-sized pickup truck after finding it wouldn't get much better fuel economy than existing body-on-frame designs. In early 2008, GM showed off the GMC Denali XT concept at the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/Chicago-Auto-Show/">Chicago Auto Show</a>. That truck was actually based on the same Zeta rear wheel drive platform used for the Pontiac G8. And unlike the star-crossed G8 ST that never made it into showrooms, the intended production truck would have been derived front-wheel drive/all-wheel drive Epsilon II architecture like Honda's Ridgeline. <br /> <br /> GM vice-chairman Tom Stephens told <em>Automotive News</em> the unibody design would not give much of an efficiency boost while losing capability that buyers were willing to pay a premium for. That means the trucks would have been less profitable, something GM is obviously trying to avoid. The current four-wheel drive Chevrolet Silverado pickup has an EPA rating of 14/20 mpg while the all-wheel drive Ridgeline only gets 15/20 mpg, so there's clearly something to this. <br /><br />As a mid-sized truck, the unibody would have likely replaced the Chevy Colorado/GMC Canyon, two vehicles that are getting long-in-the-tooth. It's not clear how GM plans to handle those products (or that segment) going forward.<br /><br /><br /> <div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1">Chicago 2008: GMC Denali XT concept reveal</a></strong></p><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2008/02/denali-xt-2-1280-1_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2008/02/denali-xt-2-1280-10_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2008/02/denali-xt-2-1280-11_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2008/02/denali-xt-2-1280-12_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://green.autoblog.com/photos/chicago-2008-gmc-denali-xt-concept-reveal-1/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autobloggreen.com/media/2008/02/denali-xt-2-1280-13_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br /> [Source: <a href="http://www.autonews.com/article/20090921/ANA03/309219928">Automotive News</a> - sub req'd]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/">REPORT: GM kills plans for unibody pickup truck</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19168036/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>camino</category><category>Denali XT</category><category>DenaliXt</category><category>el camino</category><category>ElCamino</category><category>GMC Denali</category><category>GmcDenali</category><category>mid-size</category><category>mid-size truck</category><category>mid-size trucks</category><category>Mid-sizeTruck</category><category>Mid-sizeTrucks</category><category>pickup</category><category>pickup truck</category><category>pickup trucks</category><category>pickups</category><category>pickuptruck</category><category>pickuptrucks</category><category>uni-body</category><category>unibody pickup</category><category>UnibodyPickup</category><category>unit-body pickup</category><category>Unit-bodyPickup</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Sam Abuelsamid]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19168036/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/09/21/report-gm-kills-plans-for-unibody-pickup-truck/19168036/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19168036</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/09/denali-xt-reveal-630_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Tear in my beer: GM reportedly kills off 2010 Pontiac G8 ST]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trucks/" rel="tag">Truck</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gm/" rel="tag">GM</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/pontiac/" rel="tag">Pontiac</a></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck/699988/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/pontiac-g8-st-580.jpg" alt="" /></a><br />
<div align="center"><em><strong><small>Click above for high-res gallery of the Pontiac G8 ST</small></strong></em><br /></div>
<br />Hold on to your Budweiser coozies: Details are scarce at the moment, but Pickuptruck.com is reporting that Pontiac has quietly euthanized plans to introduce the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/08/14/officially-official-pontiac-g8-st-it-is/">2010 Pontiac G8 ST</a>. The muscular <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/04/24/in-the-autoblog-garage-2008-pontiac-g8-gt/">G8-based</a> trucklet was to signal the re-emergence of the unibody pickup in North America, a genre once populated with vehicles like the Chevrolet El Camino and Ford Ranchero, along with smaller front-drive moppets like the Volkswagen Rabbit pickup and Dodge Rampage. <br /><br />The Austrailian-built rear-drive G8 ST was to arrive with V8 power, a 74-inch cargo hold, and a 3500-pound towing capacity, making it less capable than full-size body-on-frame pickups like General Motors' own Silverado/GMC Sierra twins, with the predicted trade-off of markedly better handling and fuel economy.<br /><br />The ST was to launch as a 2010 model later this year, and prices were rumored to start in the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2008/10/29/pontiac-g8-st-expected-to-start-in-low-30k-range/">low $30k range</a>. Although we are unsurprised to learn of the truck's cancellation (as GM is actively slimming down its portfolio and the baby muscle pickup was expected to serve as a small-volume niche model), we can't help but get a little misty-eyed at the loss of what promised to be a truly epic donut-making machine. G8 ST, we hardly knew ye... <br /><br /><div class="postgallery"><p><strong>Gallery: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck">2010 Pontiac G8 ST</a></strong></p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/g8stconcept_1024x768_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/pontiac-g8-st-1280-001_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/pontiac-g8-st-1280-003_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/pontiac-g8-st-1280-004_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/photos/2010-p-o-n-t-ianda-c-gpontiac8-sport-truck/"><img src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2008/03/pontiac-g8-st-1280-005_thumbnail.jpg" alt="" title="" /></a></div><br />[Source: <a href="http://news.pickuptrucks.com/2009/01/2010-pontiac-g8.html">Pickuptruck.com</a>]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/">Tear in my beer: GM reportedly kills off 2010 Pontiac G8 ST</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:29:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/1420236/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Aussie</category><category>Australia</category><category>Australian</category><category>breaking</category><category>El Camino</category><category>ElCamino</category><category>G8</category><category>General Motors</category><category>GeneralMotors</category><category>GM</category><category>Pick Up</category><category>Pickup</category><category>Pontiac</category><category>Trucklet</category><category>unibody pickup</category><category>UnibodyPickup</category><category>Ute</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Paukert]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 12:29:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/1420236/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/01/06/tear-in-my-beer-gm-reportedly-kills-off-2010-pontiac-g8-st/1420236/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>1420236</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/01/pontiac-g8-st-580_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>