<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd">
<channel>
<title>Autoblog</title>
<link>http://www.autoblog.com</link>
<description>Autoblog</description>

<language>en-us</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2012 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright>
<generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[Turn signal neglect results in over twice as many crashes as distracted driving]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/#continued"><img alt="Volvo XC60 taillamp" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/volvo-turning-indicator.jpg" style="margin-top: 4px; margin-bottom: 4px; width: 628px; height: 417px; " /></a><br />
<br />
The <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/national highway traffic safety administration">National Highway Traffic Safety Administration</a> has taken dead aim at stamping out <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/distracted driving">distracted driving</a> and with good reason. Last year, inattentive drivers caused around 950,000 accidents. But according to a new study by the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/tag/society%20of%20automotive%20engineers/">Society of Automotive Engineers</a>, there's another issue causing even more accidents across the country: turn signal neglect. According to their research, drivers neglect their turn signals, either by failing to turn when their signal is activated or not activating the signal at all, an astonishing 750 billion times a year. What's more, neglecting the signals may be responsible for as many as two million accidents per year.<br />
<br />
SAE says the solution lies in the implementation of so-called "Smart Turn Signals," which use sensors to shut off turn signals before they become a safety hazard. What's more, engineers can integrate a "Turn Signal Assist" feature, which uses a vehicle information display to alert the driver if they fail to use turn signals on a regular basis or don't shut them off in a timely manner. The report says that since the system uses sensors already integrated into the stability control module, there would be no cost added to the vehicle's bottom line.<br />
<br />
This is our skeptical face. We're major proponents of proper and consistent turn signal use, but we're bigger fans of creating smarter drivers through education than we are of building smarter cars. <a href="/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/#continued">Hit the jump</a> for the full press release.<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Turn signal neglect results in over twice as many crashes as distracted driving</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/">Turn signal neglect results in over twice as many crashes as distracted driving</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/20227147/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>distracted driving</category><category>national highway traffic safety administration</category><category>nhtsa</category><category>sae</category><category>safety</category><category>signal use</category><category>society of automotive engineers</category><category>turn signal</category><category>turn signals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 14:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/20227147/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2012/04/30/turn-signal-neglect-results-in-over-twice-as-many-crashes-as-dis/20227147/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>20227147</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2012/04/volvo-turning-indicator_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Followup: Toyota bomb scares due to... Nigerian turn signal inventor?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/etc/" rel="tag">Etc.</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/government-legal/" rel="tag">Government/Legal</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/toyota/" rel="tag">Toyota</a></p><a href="http://wvgazette.com/News/Putnam/201005190836?page=1&amp;build=cache"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/toyota-logo-nascar-curl-630-getty.jpg"  alt="" /></a><br />
<br />
Authorities with the Federal Bureau of Investigation have finally determined the origin of the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/19/reuters-fbi-investigating-four-packages-after-toyotas-k/">four suspicious packages</a> that were mailed to various <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/toyota/">Toyota</a> facilities last week. Turns out the boxes were filled with wires, relays and film canisters from a <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/01/10/nigerians-motorcyclists-using-pumpkins-to-dodge-new-helmet-law/">Nigerian</a> engineer.<br />
<br />
All four of the packages were sent without a return address, and bomb sniffing dogs reacted positively to the boxes when they were discovered. According to investigators, that's probably due to the fact that film uses some of the same chemicals as common explosives. From what everyone can tell, the sender was simply trying to get his ideas for a new turn signal to Toyota R&amp;D. He certainly got their attention. <br />
<br />
According to the <em>Charleston Gazette</em>, the FBI has no intention of tracking the engineer down or charging him with anything. The agency said that the whole thing was a simple misunderstanding.<br />
<br />
[Source: <a href="http://wvgazette.com/News/Putnam/201005190836?page=1&amp;build=cache">The Charleston Gazette</a> | Image: Rusty Jarrett/Getty for NASCAR]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/">Followup: Toyota bomb scares due to... Nigerian turn signal inventor?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 20 May 2010 10:28:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19484867/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>Bomb Scare</category><category>BombScare</category><category>FBI</category><category>Nigeria</category><category>nigerian</category><category>Nigerian Engineer</category><category>NigerianEngineer</category><category>Toyota</category><category>Toyota Bomb Scare</category><category>toyota headquarters</category><category>ToyotaBombScare</category><category>ToyotaHeadquarters</category><category>turn signal</category><category>TurnSignal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach Bowman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 10:28:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19484867/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2010/05/20/followup-toyota-bomb-scares-due-to-nigerian-turn-signal-inve/19484867/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19484867</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2010/05/toyota-logo-nascar-curl-630-getty_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Ford adding three-blink function to turn signals]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/economy/" rel="tag">Budget</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/sedans/" rel="tag">Sedan</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/hatchbacks/" rel="tag">Hatchback</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/ford/" rel="tag">Ford</a></p><a href="http://www.at.ford.com/news/cn/Pages/ThreeBlinksandIt%27sOff;NewFordLaneChangeTechnologyHelpsEaseDriverPetPeeves.aspx"><img vspace="4" hspace="0" border="1" alt="" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/ford_turn_signal.jpg" /></a><br /> <br /> It's fitting that <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/make/ford/">Ford</a>'s first European offering to swim over this way will bring with it another feature that The Continent can take credit for: tap-for-three-blinks turn signal operation. It will appear on the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/ford/fiesta">Fiesta</a> this summer, and then migrate to other vehicles in the 2011 line-up, starting with the <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/09/24/2011-ford-super-duty-debuts-at-texas-state-fair-with-two-new-eng/">Super Duty</a> series. <br /> <br /> The three-blink feature is not as polarizing as the placement of paddle shifters, but people are known to have their opinions. This writer likes it, preferring a mistaken tap to someone flashing their turn signal eternally. You can read Ford's release after the jump, and sound off on the new convenience - or not - in the comments.<br /> <br /> [Source: <a href="http://www.at.ford.com/news/cn/Pages/ThreeBlinksandIt%27sOff;NewFordLaneChangeTechnologyHelpsEaseDriverPetPeeves.aspx">Ford</a>]<p><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/" rel="bookmark">Continue reading <em>Ford adding three-blink function to turn signals</em></a></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/">Ford adding three-blink function to turn signals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:32:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.at.ford.com/news/cn/Pages/ThreeBlinksandIt%27sOff;NewFordLaneChangeTechnologyHelpsEaseDriverPetPeeves.aspx>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/19294713/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>2011 Fiesta</category><category>2011 ford fiesta</category><category>2011Fiesta</category><category>2011FordFiesta</category><category>budget</category><category>Fiesta</category><category>ford fiesta</category><category>FordFiesta</category><category>hatchback</category><category>sedan</category><category>Technical Analysis</category><category>TechnicalAnalysis</category><category>technology</category><category>turn signal</category><category>TurnSignal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonathon Ramsey]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 18:32:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/19294713/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2009/12/29/ford-adding-three-blink-function-to-turn-signals/19294713/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>19294713</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.blogcdn.com/www.autoblog.com/media/2009/12/ford_turn_signal_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[LaneFX blind spot exposure system lets you see your sides - UPDATED]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/safety/" rel="tag">Safety</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://www.lanefx.com/"><img width="449" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="349" border="0" alt="" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/LaneFX-Product-Image-4-LO-REZ.jpg" /></a><br /><br />Blind spot detection systems that warn drivers when a vehicle is playing hide-and-seek in your blindspot using visual and audible alerts have already debuted on production vehicles. Volvo's got such a system on the new S80 and Audi on its Q7. Driveaware is a third-party company that took a different approach than the OEMs when developing its new product called <a href="http://www.lanefx.com/">LaneFX</a>. Rather than detecting an oncoming vehicle, LaneFX automatically moves the corresponding power mirror outward to expose a vehicle's blindspot when the turnsignal is activated. The kit can be universally installed on any vehicle with power mirrors and also features ParkFX that tilts the mirrors downward when reverse is engaged. Check out a video of the LaneFX in action <a href="http://www.lanefx.com/mediaLibrary/LANEFX-TV.html">here</a>.<br /><strong><br />UPDATED:</strong> Missed an important qualification that LaneFX does not automatically move a side mirror, but only when the turn signal is activated. Also, LaneFX does not claim exclusivity on the technology that allows up-down movement of the mirrors when the car is put in reverse. Oh yeah, the company's name is Driveaware, not DriveAware. Now we return you to your regularly scheduled reading...<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/">LaneFX blind spot exposure system lets you see your sides - UPDATED</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:02:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.lanefx.com/>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/630584/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blind spot</category><category>BlindSpot</category><category>DriveAware</category><category>LaneFX</category><category>turn signal</category><category>TurnSignal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:02:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/630584/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/06/07/lanefx-blind-spot-exposure-system-debuts/630584/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>630584</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/06/LaneFX-Product-Image-4-LO-REZ_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Custom blinker tones to replace ringtones in popularity?]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/gadgets/" rel="tag">Gadgets</a>, <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/tech/" rel="tag">Technology</a></p><a href="http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6512270.html"><img width="250" vspace="4" hspace="4" height="167"border="0" align="right" src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/2005-Dodge-Charger-RT-Red-Headlight.jpg" alt=""/></a>Could it happen? CNET pundit Rafe Needleman let us know via email he asked this very question after reading aFord press release that reveals turn signals of today emit a digital tone that has been meticulously engineered bydudes in white labcoats. In the past that familiar clicking sound that accompanied those flashing green arrows wascaused by a mechanical relay. With the electronic revolution having banished nearly all mechanical operations in a carbesides the engine itself, it's feasible we could be downloading custom blinker tones for our pimped rides in thevery near future.&nbsp; <br /><br />We don't know about you, but we're planning on replacing our leftblinker click with the <a href="http://www.thx.com/trailers/">THX intro</a> and the right one with the <ahref="http://www.whitwell.ndo.co.uk/musicthing/sounds/macstartup.mp3">startup sound</a> a Mac makes. What about you?<br/><br />[Source: CNET]<p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/">Custom blinker tones to replace ringtones in popularity?</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:25:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://reviews.cnet.com/4531-10921_7-6512270.html>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/612361/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>blinker</category><category>blinkers</category><category>cell</category><category>cell phone</category><category>cell phones</category><category>CellPhone</category><category>CellPhones</category><category>ringtone</category><category>ringtones</category><category>turn signal</category><category>turn signals</category><category>TurnSignal</category><category>TurnSignals</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[John Neff]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 11:25:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/612361/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/04/27/custom-blinker-tones-to-replace-ringtones-in-popularity/612361/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>612361</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/04/2005-Dodge-Charger-RT-Red-Headlight_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><item><title><![CDATA[Survey: lane-changing drivers skipping signals]]></title><link>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/</guid><comments>http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.autoblog.com/category/trends/" rel="tag">Trends</a></p><p><a href="http://www.mercuryarchive.com"><img alt="" hspace="4"src="http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/MercuryTailLight_Woman.jpg" align="right" vspace="4" border="1" /></a>Inwhat can only be described as a piercing glimpse into the obvious, a&nbsp;national survey by <ahref="http://www.responseinsurance.com/">Response Insurance</a> reveals that a remarkable 57-percent of U.S. driversdon't use their turn signals when changing lanes. Even more amazing (frightening?) is that 7-percent of those driversconfess that they don't signal because it "adds excitement to driving"!<br /><br />Signal-challenged driversalso admit to not having enough time (42-percent), being lazy (23-percent), not signalling because they forget to turnit off afterward (17-percent), changing lanes too often to bother signalling (12-percent), thinking that signallingisn't important (11-percent), and not signalling because other drivers don't (8-percent).</p>
<p>Fully 71-percent of drivers ages 18-to-24 admitted they don't signal when changing lanes.</p>
<p>From one group of driving enthusiasts to another: Light 'em up, people!!</p>
<p>[Source: Response Insurance via PRNewswire]</p>
<p><font color="#008000"><font size="-1"><font face="arial,sans-serif"><br /><br /></font></font></font></p><p style="padding:5px;background:#ddd;border:1px solid #ccc;clear:both;"><a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/">Survey: lane-changing drivers skipping signals</a> originally appeared on <a href="http://www.autoblog.com">Autoblog</a> on Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:30:00 EST.  Please see our <a href="http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/">terms for use of feeds</a>.</p><h6 style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"></h6><a href=http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=109&amp;STORY=/www/story/03-15-2006/0004320746&amp;EDATE=>Read</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/forward/599776/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a>&nbsp;|&nbsp;<a href="http://www.autoblog.com/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a>]]></description><category>safety</category><category>turn signal</category><dc:creator><![CDATA[Stuart Waterman]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2006 12:30:00 EST</pubDate>
  <comments-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/599776/article-comments.xml</comments-url>
  <rss-url>http://www.autoblog.com/feed/2006/03/16/survey-lane-changing-drivers-skipping-signals/599776/article-detail.xml</rss-url>
  <postid>599776</postid>
<thumbnail>http://www.autoblog.com/media/2006/03/MercuryTailLight_Woman_thumbnail.jpg</thumbnail>

</item><pages>
  <prev>-1</prev>
  <next>2</next>
</pages></channel></rss>
